🐱 Gendered products promote exclusivity of nonbinary and trans individuals

CatParty


The production of strictly gendered products is incredibly harmful to the existence of nonbinary and/or gender non-conforming individuals. Having grown up playing with Barbies and Monster High Dolls and being made to believe that those were the toys only girls were allowed to play with, it was hard for me to break those deeply ingrained habits.

Unfortunately, society and its obsessive love for unnecessarily gendered products are suffering from the same fate. We must make a conscious effort to mitigate this trend and be more inclusive toward those who feel uncomfortable with the expectation to use products that correspond with what society anticipates their gender identity to be.

It is entirely unreasonable to presume that all humans will always conform to one specific gender: male or female. This is not, has never and will never be the case.

Nonbinary and gender-fluid people existing at all is reason enough to be inclusive toward their gender identity. The deliberate production of products “just for men,” or “just for women” erases their existence, at least within the material world.

It is also ridiculous to expect individuals who identify as cisgender to use a product that corresponds with their gender assigned at birth. Why do girls have to use things that are colored pink or purple and labeled with frilly fonts and covered in sparkles? Why do boys have to use things that are scratched up and dirty and labeled with aggressive and blocky fonts?

People, regardless of gender identity or lack thereof, should be able to use products with whatever coloring, decoration, font or style they would like, without fear of judgment from those who are not accepting of gender neutrality or ambiguity.

Research done by two individuals who were intrigued by the impacts of such gendered products actually proves that the gendering of products itself creates an unequal and toxic environment between males and females. This tension created between cisgender males and females drove some to call for a “de-gendering movement.” So imagine how people who don’t identify as cisgender male or female feel. The need for the erasure of gendered products is immense.

BIC Pens For Her and Dude Wipes are some of the needlessly gendered products that still sit on shelves today. My question is: why do you have to identify as a woman to use those pens, or why do you have to identify as a man to use those hygiene wipes?

The only possible exceptions to this issue would be creating things such as shampoo, vitamins or other hygiene products that feature certain ingredients catered specifically to a male or female body. Paying attention to your body’s natural needs is incredibly important, but with this comes the need for companies to do a better job at marketing these products to be more inclusive of individuals who are transgender.

Creating such stereotypically gendered packaging for products like that shows a complete disregard for trans individuals and their gender identity. Selling products such as these should be focused on the anatomical and/or medicinal benefits to the consumer, rather than their gender.

Overall, the blatant and extreme gendering of products that don’t even have any sort of gender is pointless. Doing so does nothing except make people within the LGBTQ+ community feel uncomfortable and invalid, specifically trans and gender non-conforming individuals.

The need for more gender neutrality within marketing tactics is pressing, and we must make more significant strides toward inclusivity as other aspects of society do the same. It is imperative that the acceptance of those specific members of the LGBTQ+ community be normalized, and this is one of the biggest steps that can be made to do so.

I must clarify that as a queer, yet cisgender individual, I do not entirely share any of the struggles or exclusiveness that is placed upon the nonbinary, transgender and/or gender non-conforming community.

The purpose of this article is to bring light to an issue I believe deserves more recognition than it is given. I have no intention to speak on behalf of this community because that is not my place. I simply wish to begin to highlight this issue and raise awareness in a supportive capacity.
 
TFW you need a sociology minor to understand a headline.

That word salad is laid on so thick I doubt a machete would get through it.
I am usually able to interpret these word salads despite not having a humanities or arts degree. It still reads like nonsense. Nonsense with some structure. In simple terms, it reads like the chat in Runescape.
 
IIRC a lot of the normie gays also foresaw where this would lead and they were right. I feel really bad for the normie gays. Even if I don't agree with their lifestyle they're so leaps and bounds apart from today's degeneracy watching Modern Family today seems positively quaint.
How so? I haven’t really taken a dive into the doss about gays and infighting in the LGB community other than what the Farms drip feeds me
 
Bitch, get over yourself. The 90s and early 2000s were all about "there's no such thing as girl/boy toys". If you played with dolls it's cause you WANTED to play with dolls.

Touch grass faggot
I miss that time. I played with building blocks, legos, barbies, dinosaurs, horse, etc. One of the reasons I liked Toy Story so much was the miscellaneous toys that Andy used to play- totally normal for kids in my age range.
 
Why do girls have to use things that are colored pink or purple and labeled with frilly fonts and covered in sparkles? Why do boys have to use things that are scratched up and dirty and labeled with aggressive and blocky fonts?

They don't, and anyone who thinks they do has shit for brains.

It's not like alarms go off in the store when a woman buys the "wrong" product.

People, regardless of gender identity or lack thereof, should be able to use products with whatever coloring, decoration, font or style they would like, without fear of judgment from those who are not accepting of gender neutrality or ambiguity.

You can already do this. If a lady wants to buy and use products labelled for men, she can.

This person is really digging to find a problem to whine about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
So your parents were close minded sexists. Got it. I was playing with action figures, fake weapons, and toy dinosaurs. My parents didn't try telling me I should only play with baby dolls and Barbies. They let me enjoy my toys.
i question the truthfulness behind all these "my terrible bigot parents forced me to play with dolls agains my will!" stories tbh
seems more likely that she played with whatever and didn't think much of it either way, until years later she swallowed the feminist narrative about girl toys being terrible things rooted in deeply heteronormative trans exclusive cissexism which is highly problematic, so she retroactively decided to hate on her parents for it
 
Having grown up playing with Barbies and Monster High Dolls and being made to believe that those were the toys only girls were allowed to play with, it was hard for me to break those deeply ingrained habits.
Even if this is true and "made to believe" isn't some weasel wording to imply that society forced her to be retarded by not spelling it out for her, so what? This is like saying "when I was growing up my parents used to hit me with hockey sticks (we are Canadian) therefore we must abolish all hockey sticks". It's completely irrelevant to the bad point the author is trying to make. In fact, it might actually make the opposite point, because if the existence of gendered products brainwashes children into being gendered, then by definition the existence of nonbinary or trans products would brainwash children into being nonbinary or trans. If children's brains are so malleable that learning that something exists means they become that thing, then it's true along the entire spectrum. And by spectrum I mean autistic spectrum, because the author is clearly on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
i question the truthfulness behind all these "my terrible bigot parents forced me to play with dolls agains my will!" stories tbh
seems more likely that she played with whatever and didn't think much of it either way, until years later she swallowed the feminist narrative about girl toys being terrible things rooted in deeply heteronormative trans exclusive cissexism which is highly problematic, so she retroactively decided to hate on her parents for it
This is how I look at anyone saying they knew their sexuality or "gender" when they were like 6. Bitch no you didn't, your brain was still developing, you weren't thinking about shit like that at all.
 
Mild PL: when I was a kid I knew a kid who played with dolls. I warned him he would turn gay if he did, but all the adults around me said it was no big deal. Fast forward 10 years, and turns out the dude says he's gay. Once again proving that everyone but me is a drooling retarded moron.

They don't, and anyone who thinks they do has shit for brains.

It's not like alarms go off in the store when a woman buys the "wrong" product.



You can already do this. If a lady wants to buy and use products labelled for men, she can.

This person is really digging to find a problem to whine about.
You wouldn't know that from the way these idiots go on about the "pink tax." They act like there's a dude putting a gun to their heads forcing them to buy the more expensive girl shit with all the moisturizers and exfoliating whatevers that guys don't give a shit about even though according to them the products are exactly the same.
 
Honestly dude hygiene products are the worst. Old spice gets a pass, but only the original flavor. The soaps, lotions and body washes are all so aggressively scented with the worst smelling garbage scents. Just get the unbranded white generic brands like a real man.
 
BIC Pens For Her and Dude Wipes are some of the needlessly gendered products that still sit on shelves today. My question is: why do you have to identify as a woman to use those pens, or why do you have to identify as a man to use those hygiene wipes?

Bic For Her was a laughing stock right out of the gate. The entire internet made fun of Bic. No one took it seriously. :roll:

This makes trannies shit and piss their pants. Not the soap, the word Men on the soap. Well, probably the soap too.

View attachment 3158626

Wonder when they'll rebrand it to stop triggering troons. Always took the female symbol off of their packaging a few years ago because "people who menstruate" got upset. These are the same menstruating persons who get buttmad about pink maxi pad wrappers when they actually are color coded by size most of the time with various differences between brands. And Always has used a lot of mint green, blue and white packaging for many many years anyway.
Bitch, get over yourself. The 90s and early 2000s were all about "there's no such thing as girl/boy toys". If you played with dolls it's cause you WANTED to play with dolls.

Touch grass faggot

Even in the 80s. I played with cars and Transformers and Voltron. I had girly toys too. But it was pretty varied.

I don't think packaging needs to change just to appease a few trannies and enby attention whores. These people expect the whole of humanity to bend to their every whim like a bunch of cranky toddlers.
 
That could possibly explain the recent years of pushing to normalize polyamory
I can never see that legally viable, since marriage is not a religious ceremony, but a legal and political one. Anyone else who claims any bit that marriage is otherwise is a fucking chirstcuck.
 
This makes trannies shit and piss their pants. Not the soap, the word Men on the soap. Well, probably the soap too.

View attachment 3158626
Only a slack-jawed faggot uses the 1/4 moisturizing cream soap. A real man like me uses the charcoal soap.
(NGL, that shit is still butter smooth even with the grit in it. Plus all that charcoal really scrapes off and sucks up even the worst stuff. Dove makes some damn good soap.)
 
I always thought it was funny to find out that the gay community itself was divided on gay marriage.
Wait, really? I never heard about this
Yep, some gays and lesbians thought one of the advantages of being gay was never having to be committed in that way simply because it wasn't possible and they liked it that way.
Of course, there's also the matter of the state marriage being a three way between you, your spouse, and the state where you have an increased risk of being put in the cuck closet.

Imagine thinking a state marriage is about "love" that can't be expressed in a private ceremony.

Old spice gets a pass, but only the original flavor.
Hey, hold on a second...
 
Last edited:
Having grown up playing with Barbies and Monster High Dolls and being made to believe that those were the toys only girls were allowed to play with, i
This is bollocks though, I was a kid in the seventies and eighties and even then there was ‘just let kids play with toys.’ What era are monster high? Early 2000? Late 1990? The author is clearly engaging in a spot of revisionism to suit her agenda. If her parents told her that, that’s on them, not society.
 
Everyone is now mandated to wear genderless grey jumpsuits. It's too much of a hassle trying to sort clothes otherwise.
The mental institution that is "millennials" is already headed that way. Try to find something on Target or Old Navy's website these days and you will see they have deliberately sabotaged all sense and normalcy with this bullshit:

targetgen.pngongen.png

Now is a S in "adult general" a women's small and men's extra small? A men's small and women's medium? Something else? Who knows!
 
Back