Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
A demonstration against the results of the first round broke out in Lyon.


Clashes with the police began. Protesters use fireworks against the police, gendarmes use tear gas in response.
View attachment 3166094
Riots in France devolve into looting and pillaging
as per tradition
View attachment 3166104
Would the French Election fallout deserve a thread of it's own?
 
There really hasn't though. Pretty much everyone in this thread (regardless of their position on this Russia-Ukraine kerfuffle) thinks it's fucking deplorable and the culprit should be gassed into the next dimension. The topic would be settled, were it not for literally one pro-Ukie faggot that keeps bringing it up in every post he makes, for whatever reason.
I’m genuinely surprised that they’ve not tried to justify it by saying that the Russian baby will go on to genocide a billion Ukrainians
 
Cringe? Based? Both? Probably both.
photo_2022-04-11_05-42-07.jpg
 
A demonstration against the results of the first round broke out in Lyon.


Clashes with the police began. Protesters use fireworks against the police, gendarmes use tear gas in response.
View attachment 3166094
Riots in France devolve into looting and pillaging
as per tradition
View attachment 3166104
Is there a way we can blame the looting on black people?
 
Even if Ukraine only had twenty nuclear missiles and sixty warheads each consisting of around a single megaton, say bye to basically every significant Russian city.
Depends on the type of nukes.

Silos - not very useful to Ukraine, easily destroyed in a Russian first strike (that may not have to be nuclear itself due to hypersonic missiles, bunker busters, loitering munitions etc. being real now)

Ground launched cruise or ballistic missiles - they're already familiar with the Tochka platform, which is compatible with atomic warheads up to 100kt. Pretty limited range, may struggle to position these to threaten Moscow but can definitely threaten any future Russian troop/armor concentrations.

Air launched cruise missiles/dumb bombs - this is the old school SAC approach, went out of style in the 60's for good reasons. Could plausibly work against Russia, maybe, if they get the right planes (old European Tornado stock might be available and able to fly low under Russian radar before releasing the bombs/missiles)

Submarine launched nukes - the best all round option for nuclear deterrent. Ukraine has no submarines tho, their last one was stolen by Russia in 2014. They'd also need a good base for repairs and replenishment, and it's doubtful they'll have enough Black Sea coastline to make that work. They don't need expensive SSBNs, a small fleet of SSKs with launch tubes for atomic missiles would work.

Metal Gear - obviously this is the dream.

Trick will be obtaining the nuclear warheads, Ukie engineers are smart enough to cobble together a launch platform that would work but developing their own boom sticks is tricky. I don't think the US is gonna want to help them on that, and everybody else in the atomic weapons club has good reasons to refuse.

They might be better investing in drones. Lots of drones. Networked, autonomous drones that can make life a living hell for any invading force by constantly attacking troops, vehicles, and fixed locations even when Russians take down command centers and jam communications. The Turks are doing great work in drone tech, Ukraine has plenty of good engineers and coders who could take this to the next level.
 
Depends on the type of nukes.

Silos - not very useful to Ukraine, easily destroyed in a Russian first strike (that may not have to be nuclear itself due to hypersonic missiles, bunker busters, loitering munitions etc. being real now)

Ground launched cruise or ballistic missiles - they're already familiar with the Tochka platform, which is compatible with atomic warheads up to 100kt. Pretty limited range, may struggle to position these to threaten Moscow but can definitely threaten any future Russian troop/armor concentrations.

Air launched cruise missiles/dumb bombs - this is the old school SAC approach, went out of style in the 60's for good reasons. Could plausibly work against Russia, maybe, if they get the right planes (old European Tornado stock might be available and able to fly low under Russian radar before releasing the bombs/missiles)

Submarine launched nukes - the best all round option for nuclear deterrent. Ukraine has no submarines tho, their last one was stolen by Russia in 2014. They'd also need a good base for repairs and replenishment, and it's doubtful they'll have enough Black Sea coastline to make that work. They don't need expensive SSBNs, a small fleet of SSKs with launch tubes for atomic missiles would work.

Metal Gear - obviously this is the dream.

Trick will be obtaining the nuclear warheads, Ukie engineers are smart enough to cobble together a launch platform that would work but developing their own boom sticks is tricky. I don't think the US is gonna want to help them on that, and everybody else in the atomic weapons club has good reasons to refuse.

They might be better investing in drones. Lots of drones. Networked, autonomous drones that can make life a living hell for any invading force by constantly attacking troops, vehicles, and fixed locations even when Russians take down command centers and jam communications. The Turks are doing great work in drone tech, Ukraine has plenty of good engineers and coders who could take this to the next level.
Is someone actually arguing Ukraine should get nukes?

"Destroying the world is fine as long as we destroy Russia too!"

This is the most nigger jewish cope I have had the misfortune to see. No scratch that, the heebs are too smart to be this suicidal, this is absolute nigger tier levels of thinking. I hope Russia wipes these nigger slavs off the face of the earth.
 
China is the real long term threat. Russia's economy is barely there and their cultural and government influence doesn't reach nearly as far as China's does.

They literally go from "omg we iz winnerz" to "plz help Russia bad" in about 0.5 nanoseconds whenever they want people to send them more shit.

At least welfare queens help keep the national population from falling too far below replacement levels.
Just because you're making gains doesn't mean you're not in need of ammo.
 
There's really no such thing as a few good hits when it comes to nukes, a single megaton nuclear warhead is enough to turn most of a city into rubble and assuming it's MIRV and most the warheads hit the same city it's safe to say everyone in that city is dead or will be soon from radiation.

Even if Ukraine only had twenty nuclear missiles and sixty warheads each consisting of around a single megaton, say bye to basically every significant Russian city.
Yeah that's true.
But now imagine if that same number of Russian nukes fell on Ukraine.

Nobody wins in a nuclear exchange.
 
Is someone actually arguing Ukraine should get nukes?

"Destroying the world is fine as long as we destroy Russia too!"

This is the most nigger jewish cope I have had the misfortune to see. No scratch that, the heebs are too smart to be this suicidal, this is absolute nigger tier levels of thinking. I hope Russia wipes these nigger slavs off the face of the earth.
No, people here had just brought up the Ukraine used to have nukes shit again. Bit weird that you're the first to cry about anyone going after Russians, yet go full blown genocidal on the ukies just because a random forum person suggested they shouldn't have given up their nukes.
 
Didn't see it posted but everyones favorite slavic mutant posted a video walking around the wreckage in Bucha, Irpin, and Hostomel apparently.
Who is this guy in the video, and where is the sentient homunculus?
I have so many questions
View attachment 3165829
Got the context:

A Russian tank hit Ukrainian militants at point-blank range.

A tank of the Russian army hit a group of Ukrainian militants from the so-called territorial defense at point-blank range.

Apparently, the Ukrainians took the vehicle as their own. The tank crew also identified the enemy at the very last moment, but nevertheless managed to open fire.


From what I've seen, this is a common problem when soldiers approach each other face to-face, ask whose army they belong to, a second of surprise, and then the Mexican duel begins.
 
No, people here had just brought up the Ukraine used to have nukes shit again. Bit weird that you're the first to cry about anyone going after Russians, yet go full blown genocidal on the ukies just because a random forum person suggested they shouldn't have given up their nukes.
Just like your guns, never give up your nukes... especially not for a nation that actually used them before in war.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back