US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Talk about a rock in a hard place.
Trump is the leader of the Republican Party, so when Trump started talking up Parnell for over two years and fully endorsing him last fall, there was nothing the neocons could really do, but once Parnell dropped out the neocons smelled blood and are pushing their neocons for the seat. This is something a lot of conservatives on twitter like Posobiec or Barnes don't seem to grasp, it is one thing to go after Cheney and Romney. These are two neocons in blood red states, you can place MAGA Republicans in these areas rather easily, but it is a whole lot harder to do in a purple state like PA, a state that has gone Republican just once in the last 30 years, yes it is drifting red but it is going to be a lot more like Florida/Ohio 2000-2012 than Florida/Ohio 2016- present.

The seat is a neocon seat, so your two choices are have Trump say and do nothing, potentially giving Democrats a chance to pick up the seat, or Trump endorses a guy he has some personal history with who might play ball even though his baseline views suck and you are potentially stuck with another neocon but at least you hold serve. To me to giving up and not endorsing anyone doesn't solve the problem but only makes it worse, you need Republicans to show up to continue to drift the state more to the right, in the same way Ohio and Florida drifted red. Then you can start putting the pieces you want. Like I said, Florida had to have Crist before they got DeSantis, installing someone in DeSantis in Florida in the early 2000s wouldn't have been doable at all.
 
Dating apps really fucked up the dating scene.
I think it made things worse, but The core problem is how completely fucked the very concept of relationships has become.

The 70s Sexual Revolution, and "Women as EQUALS" has had unforeseen consequences and while The 50s may not have been perfect..throwing everything about them away so that "WOMEN CAN HAVE IT ALL" may have been a mistake.
 
I think it made things worse, but The core problem is how completely fucked the very concept of relationships has become.

The 70s Sexual Revolution, and "Women as EQUALS" has had unforeseen consequences and while The 50s may not have been perfect..throwing everything about them away so that "WOMEN CAN HAVE IT ALL" may have been a mistake.
Romantic/Sexual relationships were seen as one's duty as a human being to propagate your family name and add to society. Now, relationships are a commodity that includes sex, food, and intimacy with the most successful dynamics being take maximum and give minimum.

It is unsustainable, hollow, outright toxic, and will destroy society.

And, yes, it is unironically and depressingly women's fault. In the pursuit of an endless feels train, they wasted away their fertile years, encouraged dangerous behavior in potentially already dangerous men, shamed men that would've made excellent fathers/husbands for their lack of attractiveness (financial and physical) instead of character, and probably gave birth to one or two bastards. Men see this and have started dropping out of society, which they're being shamed for as if that's the problem, because jesus fucking christ no.

We can point the finger at the Jew, but that won't change a very unfortunate truth.

Women seek someone superior in the social and financial strata. Encourage them to work and they'll want someone who makes twice what they earn. Female sexuality is juxtaposed between safety and danger, causing her to seek safety when it's dangerous and danger when it's safe if she's left to her own devices. Due to her physical weakness and specialization towards childbirth, women are more socially-inclined because otherwise is certain death in event of tribe expulsion and are averse to responsibility because that opens up expulsion in event of a colossal fuckup.

Women were encouraged to enter into the workplace, are unreasonably favored for high-paying positions due to quotas, live in the safest period of human history so far with no supervision, are bombarded with constant feel-good propaganda just for existing, and absolved of all fuckups due to the constant messaging that it's bad to make a woman feel bad for any reason.

The coming decades are going to be a social fucking disaster as we feel the extent of the consequences. Worst case scenario: society collapses. Best case: we recorrect with minimal chaos.
 
And either case will cause women to have contractions in their freedoms.
Former, definitely. They'll burn the law themselves in favor of being protected. We don't have to look that far to see women who specifically signed up for combat duty going full helpless damsel when shit actually went down.

Latter, I see it more women just dropping out of work en masse, letting men take those high paying positions and becoming a hundred times more attractive. That sorta happened during the coof.
 
Former, definitely. They'll burn the law themselves in favor of being protected. We don't have to look that far to see women who specifically signed up for combat duty going full helpless damsel when shit actually went down.

Latter, I see it more women just dropping out of work en masse, letting men take those high paying positions and becoming a hundred times more attractive. That sorta happened during the coof.
You don't really correct course while still letting women hold their same place. All that does is kick the can down the road a generation.
 
And either case will cause women to have contractions in their freedoms.
And it will ironically be women who will at least maintain that new order. Nobody will police women like other women just like nobody will police men like other men. The next generation of mothers will likely be some of the most hard-core thot patrollers imaginable and all the leftover onlyfans thots will be the most bitter and fussy spinsters you could ask for.
 
You don't really correct course while still letting women hold their same place. All that does is kick the can down the road a generation.
not really the same place as i imagine social pressure and actual pressure (stress) to keep women from getting jobs
and i did say it was best case scenario

If we kick the can down the road, it goes on forever up and down. All we can do is the save the now and immediate future.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
View attachment 3165428

Ban colleges, work in the fields, touch grass.
I wonder how these numbers would look if you separated the women by college degree and "college degree". Cause I'd be willing to take a guess a woman with an engineering degree working in her field and a woman with a "degree" in grievance studies working at Starbucks might have drastically different opinions.
 
I wonder how these numbers would look if you separated the women by college degree and "college degree". Cause I'd be willing to take a guess a woman with an engineering degree working in her field and a woman with a "degree" in grievance studies working at Starbucks might have drastically different opinions.
Woman in Gender Studies still wants a millionaire, not date someone at her income bracket.
 
It was the new reboot of Law & Order and now that I think about it the previous 2 episodes were ripping off Gabby Petito and Britney Spears :story:

View attachment 3160261
the joy of L&O is that the backlog is so dense and people just use it as background noise that chances are you won't be able to figure it out. i know my favorite episodes i don't know what they're based on, meanwhile the stern episode is nauseating.
View attachment 3165428

Ban colleges, work in the fields, touch grass.
its not the colleges you dumb piece of shit, look how quickly the men redpilled. its the axewound causing this
 
Agree with a lot of what you're saying but ultimately strong disagree here.

Women are only able to wreak this level of havoc because men allow them to.
I find this viewpoint to deflect all blame away from women and take the focus away from the actual issue. I do understand where you're coming from as it may seem like that a lot. Physical force isn't the ultimate power when it comes to humanity, society or nature, though it is the most efficient.
 
I find this viewpoint to deflect all blame away from women and take the focus away from the actual issue. I do understand where you're coming from as it may seem like that a lot. Physical force isn't the ultimate power when it comes to humanity, society or nature, though it is the most efficient.
appointing blame is a female trait.

Men need to step up and handle shit and stop being such weak pussies, creating some power vacuum that women abandon their natural duties to do a piss-poor job of filling.
 
Regarding the dating apps.

There was always an industry finding mates. From personal ads, that video dating site that got spoofed by mad tv

see here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atfDg4fLcks

those party line phone numbers


also a fun parody here


match makers, marriage brokers.

So dating apps are an evolution of systems that already existed.

Now one issue I read about regarding dating apps is that when you meet people that are totally outside of your social circle, its alot easier to be rude. If you are introduced through mutual friends there social pressure to be polite in rejection.

Now I will meet people half away and I agree with null that when you can jack off to any porn you can imagine that will lower fertility rates.

fuck give young mean vidya, vr porn and moterized fleshlite and see if they ever leave their room.
 
I think it made things worse, but The core problem is how completely fucked the very concept of relationships has become.

The 70s Sexual Revolution, and "Women as EQUALS" has had unforeseen consequences and while The 50s may not have been perfect..throwing everything about them away so that "WOMEN CAN HAVE IT ALL" may have been a mistake.
The only thing that would of made the 1950's more closer to perfect is if the 1950s was religiously conservative instead of just "secular conservative " ( While church attendance was high back then almost everyone mainline denominations believe that the bible was fallibly and not the perfect word of God this would later cause a fundamentalist' reaction in the 70s and 80s) While the 50s was more then (and better) conservative now, the forces that will become woke, where already gaining ground although very slowly since the 1920s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back