I don't know if there's a time limit on a Rule 60 motion. There really shouldn't be if it meets certain qualifications (i.e. the Defendant wasn't actually served).
Wait. I'm confused. Does she actually live at this charitable organization in exchange for work? Like a homeless shelter?"I'm a fulltime volunteer, Spectree."
View attachment 3170689
View attachment 3170666View attachment 3170693
I would love it if Ethan offered her a job doing fulfillment for his comics.
Not at all. She claims she has never been properly served, thus never properly brought into the lawsuit. There is no formal time frame to file for this. But doing so before the court awards any monetary damages related to the default is probably for the best. Pure speculation on my part, but I'm guessing that while she is filing Pro Se, she likely did consult with some available charity legal aid services for assistance in drafting these filings. They have that look about them. And that would be a much better option than going the Dean route of "Some guy on the Internet".
Giles Tomkin, the secretary of the Sanctuary Project, testified that Vikki has been a resident at their thrift store property since Jan 2019. She testified that he was her landlord. Google street view of the address shows what I guess are living spaces on the second floor. When Vikki last backed Preston's campaign in Aug 2020, she had him send the comics to Cuts 4 Muttz instead of this location.
This probably belongs in the Vikki and Dean thread (and I'm sure it'll be put there), but there's this interesting nugget on Google Reviews.
I'm starting to find that a lot of the "hardcore anti-CG crowd" leads really sad and miserable lives. Trying to get into fights with @FROG and CG personalities all the time should probably be the least of her priorities right now. As she lives rent-free above a thrift store, he lives rent-free in her head. Maybe she should rethink this whole anti-CG crusade?
I agree, but several people, including myself (TBH), thought the filing Spectre worked on wasn't complete garbo. So I'm done making predictions. I wanna wait till a judge puts his signature on something.
That's true. He didn't make a bad argument, he made the wrong argument. There's definitely a distinction to be drawn there. He's good enough to be a paralegal and write official-sounding documents but doesn't have the insight to be someone's legal counsel and represent them competently.
Actually, the argument he made was on point (failure to state a claim, etc.) as a backup to Dean not raising jurisdiction in the initial reply (assuming Spectre had nothing to do with that initial reply). It is one of the arguments you can raise to get a case dismissed early on. Unfortunately, the judge didn't buy it.
I'm assuming here that he was responsible for missing the jurisdiction argument to begin with. It really seemed like they were collaborating on all the legal decisions until Dean and/or Spectre realized it was a gigantic mistake to admit to that and tried to DFE.
I'm not sure you're obligated to respond to service that was void at the outset. Even if service actually was valid, and it's hard to imagine how it could be when it wasn't even made in the right state, there's a doctrine of excusable neglect that lets it slide much of the time, especially if the non-moving party isn't prejudiced by it and there are obviously potentially valid defenses.
Service (or waiver of service) is jurisdictional. Once a court realizes it lacks jurisdiction, the only remaining jurisdiction it has is to dismiss the case. The court also has an obligation itself to take note of an obvious lack of jurisdiction, and a date of service well past the deadline should have been addressed by the court itself.
There's dueling narratives on that. All we know for certain is that he worked in some capacity on the second one. That's the one he himself copped to before trying to backpedal.
Pretty much. He had no business writing legal shit for somebody else. And you certainly don't want to be connected to writing anything in a situation where Preston's lawyers prevail. Which is exactly what happened in Dean's case.
God willing.
Nah man. Vikki is so dumb she deserves to have her hovel turned inside out. When people are left facing homelessness and starvation they tend to smarten up real fast.
I dunno. Her obsession with CG is weird, and grows weirder. Given there's probably better things she can and should be doing with her life.
I gotta ask:
We're about to open the pool for the Spring/Summer, and so my wife and I were out in the back yard yesterday. We had the speakers playing 80s music, and we were getting things ready for the lawncare Spring clean up, just having drinks and since it got up to 70 degrees, we turned on a sprinkler for Ava to play in. It was just a perfect day.
You can still feel pity and compassion for someone that is a despicable person.
Here's what I don't understand. What is keeping her in Wallace?
