US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
It not old people. Their are plenty of young people including myself who are outspokenly pro-life. You got stop watching CNN. I take that very offensive. I know plenty of young pro-life people. Hell pro-life people tend to have alot of young people at rallies.

Abortion bans are not going to hurt the GOP.

Good lord I'm tired of getting into these debates with you people. The pro-abortion people tend to be the retards on Twitter they were already going to vote Democrat.

Your average citizen are probably fine with it and will still vote GOP.
hardly any young people have any experience with or much book knowledge of electoral politics

babykilling for the left is like gungrabs for the right. it is the one thing that will get everyone out to vote.

you can be antibabykilling and also anti retarded laws.
 
It not old people. Their are plenty of young people including myself who are outspokenly pro-life. You got stop watching CNN. I take that very offensive. I know plenty of young pro-life people. Hell pro-life people tend to have alot of young people at rallies.

Abortion bans are not going to hurt the GOP.

Good lord I'm tired of getting into these debates with you people. The pro-abortion people tend to be the retards on Twitter they were already going to vote Democrat.

Your average citizen are probably fine with it and will still vote GOP.
Idk, I'm pro life myself, but I have to also concur that this isn't the right time. The GOP risks fucking up by making the classic mistake of moving before they consolidate their power. If the GOP pushes forward with this shit, it will galvanize the left again. We'll end up with a repeat of Obama, where the gop Congress faggots will retake Congress, but the Dems will retake the presidency because the GOP will immediately set to fucking this all up.

The smart play would be run on real, tangible issues that a broader range of people care about, without giving the enemy strength or a rallying cry. Win Congress, then win the presidency. Then pass a slew of legislation to improve things across the board, safeguard it to best ability, and then and only then start doing shit like abortion legislation. In that case, it'll still piss people off, but you'll have accomplished enough in the other arenas that a lot of those people could probably overlook their pissed off feelings as well as they have a good standard of living in most other aspects.

But they can't do this if they can't get in power. Congress can't just override a presidential veto without a larger majority than they will have, and a president with an opposing Congress is a lame duck.
 
Idk, I'm pro life myself, but I have to also concur that this isn't the right time. The GOP risks fucking up by making the classic mistake of moving before they consolidate their power. If the GOP pushes forward with this shit, it will galvanize the left again. We'll end up with a repeat of Obama, where the gop Congress faggots will retake Congress, but the Dems will retake the presidency because the GOP will immediately set to fucking this all up.

The smart play would be run on real, tangible issues that a broader range of people care about, without giving the enemy strength or a rallying cry. Win Congress, then win the presidency. Then pass a slew of legislation to improve things across the board, safeguard it to best ability, and then and only then start doing shit like abortion legislation. In that case, it'll still piss people off, but you'll have accomplished enough in the other arenas than a lot of those people could probably overlook their pissed off feelings as well as they have a good standard of living in most other aspects.

But they can't do this if they can't get in power. Congress can't just override a presidential veto without a larger majority than they will have, and a president with an opposing Congress is a lame duck.
Fair point. Which more people had said this
 
Article: https://longisland.news12.com/biden-waiving-ethanol-rule-in-bid-to-lower-gasoline-prices
Archive: https://archive.ph/ZQbaB
---------------------------------------------------
Biden waiving ethanol rule in bid to lower gasoline prices

President Joe Biden is visiting corn-rich Iowa on Tuesday to announce he'll suspend a federal rule preventing the sale of higher ethanol blend gasoline this summer as his administration tries to tamp down prices at the pump that have spiked during Russia’s war with Ukraine.

Most gasoline sold in the U.S. is blended with 10% ethanol. The Environmental Protection Agency will issue an emergency waiver to allow widespread sale of 15% ethanol blend that is usually prohibited between June 1 and Sept. 15 because of concerns that it adds to smog in high temperatures.

Senior Biden administration officials said the move will save drivers an average of 10 cents per gallon at 2,300 gas stations. Industry groups say most of those stations are in the Midwest and the South, including Texas.

Biden is to announce the move at a biofuel company in Menlo, west of Des Moines. Iowa is the country's largest producer of corn, key to producing ethanol.

The waiver is another effort to help ease global energy markets that have been rocked since Russia invaded Ukraine. Last month, the president announced the U.S. will release 1 million barrels of oil per day from the nation’s strategic petroleum reserve over the next six months. His administration said that has helped to slightly reduce gas prices lately, after they climbed to an average of about $4.23 a gallon by the end of March, compared with $2.87 at the same time a year ago, according to AAA.

Members of Congress from both parties, as well as industry groups, had urged Biden to grant the E15 waiver.

“Homegrown Iowa biofuels provide a quick and clean solution for lowering prices at the pump and bolstering production would help us become energy independent once again,″ said Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley. He was among nine Republican and seven Democratic senators from Midwestern states who sent Biden a letter last month urging him to allow year-round E15 sales.

The trip will be Biden's first as president to Iowa, where his 2020 presidential campaign limped to a fourth-place finish in the state's technologically glitchy caucus.

After bouncing back to win the Democratic nomination, Biden returned for a rally at the Iowa state fairgrounds four days before Election Day 2020, only to see Donald Trump win the state by 8 percentage points.

Biden heads back to the state at a moment when he's facing yet more political peril. He's saddled with sagging approval ratings and inflation at a 40-year high while his party faces the prospect of big midterm election losses that could cost it control of Congress.

The president also planned to promote his economic plans to help rural families struggling with higher costs, while highlighting the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law enacted last fall. The law includes money to improve internet access, as well as for modernizing wastewater systems, reducing flooding threats and improving roads and bridges, drinking water and electric grids in sparsely populated areas.

“Part of it is showing up in communities of all sizes, regardless of the results of the last election,” said Jesse Harris, who was a senior adviser to Biden’s 2020 campaign in Iowa and directed get out the vote and early voting efforts for Barack Obama’s presidential campaign in 2008.

Harris said most presidents who visit Iowa typically go to the state’s largest cities. Hitting an area like Menlo, part of Guthrie County, which backed Trump over Biden by 35 percentage points in 2020, “does speak to the importance the administration places on infrastructure broadly but also infrastructure in rural and smaller communities.”

The Biden administration plans to spend the coming weeks pushing billions of dollars in funding for rural areas. Cabinet members and other senior officials will travel the country to help communities get access to money available as part of the infrastructure package.

“The president is not making this trip through a political prism," White House press secretary Jen Psaki said. "He's making this trip because Iowa is a rural state in the country that would benefit greatly from the president's policies.”

Still, administration officials have long suggested that Biden travel more to promote an economy that is rebounding from the setbacks of the coronavirus pandemic. The number of Americans collecting unemployment has fallen to the lowest levels since 1970, for example.

But much of the positive jobs news nationally has been overshadowed by surging gas, food and housing prices that have pushed consumer inflation to 7.9% over the past year ending in February. That's the sharpest spike since 1982. Inflation figures for March, due out Tuesday, are likely to bring more bad news for the Biden administration.

“Maybe a trip back to Iowa will be just what Joe Biden needs to understand what his reckless spending, big government policies are doing to our country,” Iowa Republican Party Chairman Jeff Kaufmann said in a statement.

After Iowa, Biden will visit Greensboro, North Carolina, on Thursday.

Psaki blamed Russia's war in Ukraine for helping to drive up gas prices and said the administration expects the consumer price index for March to be “extremely elevated” in large part because of it.

The EPA has lifted seasonal restrictions on E15 in the past, including after Hurricane Harvey in 2017. The Trump administration allowed for selling E15 in the summer months two years later but had the rule struck down by a federal appeals court.
---------------------------------------------------
 
Lil late, but I had to share.

View attachment 3171788

CBS poll came out 2 days ago about Biden's approval. Now, while nothing special about the graph, who they polled to get those numbers is the real interesting part.

It wasn't likely voters. It wasn't registered voters. Hell, it wasn't even adults. It was residents.

No verification on if these people can vote, or if they are the age to vote, or if they're just vacationing from somewhere else for the summer. It must be fucking brutal to fudge the numbers and still come up so low.
And the margin of error is still around 3%.
 
And IIRC, many of the abortion restrictions being passed in Red states are similar to those of abortion laws in many EU countries, where it's prohibited after like the first trimester.
except that in no European countries is there the remotest of possibilities of being prosecuted for *murder* because you did a DIY

in the EU abortion is much more restricted than in the US. The restrictions vary by country. Performing an abortions outside of those parameters is a criminal act but the primary punishment is loss of medical license. I dont' even know if anything happens to the woman.

but in the US dipshits want to deal with the evil of babykilling by creating a situation where a woman who is one month pregnant is, by their own legal reasoning, guilty of manslaughter if she drinks too much coffee, runs a marathon, or knowingly eats potentially contaminated food, and subsequently miscarries.

people who yammer about this online don't fucking understand criminal law and they don't understand the implications of giving a zygote legal personhood.
 
The problem with that becomes who gets to determine when that's the case? I understand that the left's idea of 9 month abortions, and in some cases post-birth abortions like what the old VA governor wanted are absolutely insane. However I also think the right's most extreme position of no abortions for any reason except rape, incest, or the mother's life is in danger is also insane as well.

I know we were told "safe, legal, and rare", and the left keeps pushing it more and more. Both extremes suck. The left's idea is basically infanticide, and the right's idea would lead to more dead women through butchered back alley abortions with a clothes hanger.

I would rather we keep what we have now, a 9 week acceptable period from the conception to allow woman to get abortions. I don't like the idea of the state saying you aren't allowed to get an abortion at all because some christfag has a moral objection to it.
The idea of “committing murder is dangerous “is a feature not a bug.
 
I was going to say aren't Etha Ralph (I don't know much about him because I don't go on his thread) and Nick Cannon both liberals? Aren't those the men the pro-life movement call out for their reklenles and for surpporting abortion simply because they don't want to face their consequences?


I think Nick Cannon should be force to pay for all his children. You did the crime so now you have to pay for the consequences. This is the veiw many pro-lifers have
People like Ralph are too stupid and inconsistent to be tagged as liberal, conservative, or whatever political label you want to give them.
 
Idk, I'm pro life myself, but I have to also concur that this isn't the right time. The GOP risks fucking up by making the classic mistake of moving before they consolidate their power. If the GOP pushes forward with this shit, it will galvanize the left again. We'll end up with a repeat of Obama, where the gop Congress faggots will retake Congress, but the Dems will retake the presidency because the GOP will immediately set to fucking this all up.

The smart play would be run on real, tangible issues that a broader range of people care about, without giving the enemy strength or a rallying cry. Win Congress, then win the presidency. Then pass a slew of legislation to improve things across the board, safeguard it to best ability, and then and only then start doing shit like abortion legislation. In that case, it'll still piss people off, but you'll have accomplished enough in the other arenas that a lot of those people could probably overlook their pissed off feelings as well as they have a good standard of living in most other aspects.

But they can't do this if they can't get in power. Congress can't just override a presidential veto without a larger majority than they will have, and a president with an opposing Congress is a lame duck.

This is a defeatist mindset leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy of nothing ever changing. "If we try to change anything, that will motivate the enemy too much, so it's better to do nothing." The left just does shit with no regard for how conservatives will react. Imagine if SCOTUS made abortion blanket illegal across the entire country through one of their rulings. That would be far more extreme than what you're proposing, yet that's what the left did, and they got away with it. I have never once seen a leftie saying that some leftist policy or another, no matter how extreme or insane, shouldn't be implemented because it might rile up conservatives too much. And, unsurprisingly, this leads to them getting their way over the timid conservatives who are too skittish to actually dare shaking the boat a little bit, too terrified of what fresh labels the left might hurl their way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back