It was a 40 year old ship that most likely malfunctioned,
We have destroyers and cruisers that are 40 years old in service still, its not old for a post WW2 ship. Nothing stops you from putting newer systems on an old ship.
lol "malfunctioned". That's
cope code word for "A shitty Russian AA system has once again failed at its only job"
but even if the Ukrainians had actually attacked it,
Because warships operating in the vicinity of a hostile power your at war with tend to just sink for no reason at all, happens all the time.
Are you seriously entertaining the notion that the Ukrainians didn't hit the ship ? Even with them saying they did before the Russians said anything at all ?
it means almost nothing in terms of the actual conflict,
So what is the long term plan for dealing with the fact that Ukraine has a credible anti-ship capability that potentially extends all the way to Sevastopol ?
I doubt precision strikes are going to be able to neutralize the threat. There's going to have to be a lot more "de-militarization" outside the boundaries of Donbass for a long term solution to be worked out by force.
it hadn't been used in combat and this event isn't going to harm the Russian's ability to wage the war.
I'm fairly certain its radar and AA systems were being used, or at least they were trying to use them.
There weren't even any casualties, all of the sailors were evacuated.
I understand there's ample misinformation coming from every angle in this war, but you are practically deep throating the Russian side if you believe this ship took an anti-ship missile equivalent to a Harpoon and suffered zero casualties.
Why in the fuck would you just accept that claim at face value ?
What's actually embarrassing is having thousands of your soldiers surrender which is what is happening to the holols.
Thousands surrendered after holding off for weeks and many times that number continue to hold elsewhere.
This war will last a long time.