Business Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Take Twitter Private for $44 Billion - The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at the social-media network

1649933159786.png

The tech billionaire Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $41.4bn.

A regulatory filing showed on Thursday that Musk was offering $54.20 a share – a 38% premium to the closing price of Twitter’s stock on 1 April, the last trading day before the Tesla chief executive’s investment of more than 9% in the company was publicly announced.

More to follow…



1649933831102.png
1649933810146.png






Elon Musk has made a “best and final” offer to buy Twitter Inc., saying the company has extraordinary potential and he is the person to unlock it.

The world’s richest person will offer $54.20 per share in cash, representing a 54% premium over the Jan. 28 closing price and a valuation of about $43 billion. The social media company’s shares soared 18% in pre-market trading.

Musk, 50, announced the offer in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, after turning down a potential board seat at the company. The billionaire, who also controls Tesla Inc., first disclosed a stake of about 9% on April 4. Tesla shares fell about 1.5% in pre-market trading on the news.

Twitter said that its board would review the proposal and any response would be in the best interests of “all Twitter stockholders.”

1649936433325.png

The bid is the latest saga in Musk’s volatile relationship with Twitter. The executive is one of the platform’s most-watched firebrands, often tweeting out memes and taunts to @elonmusk’s more than 80 million followers. He has been outspoken about changes he’d like to consider imposing at the social media platform, and the company offered him a seat on the board following the announcement of his stake, which made him the largest individual shareholder.

After his stake became public, Musk immediately began appealing to fellow users about prospective moves, from turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter and adding an edit button for tweets to granting automatic verification marks to premium users. One tweet suggested Twitter might be dying, given that several celebrities with high numbers of followers rarely tweet.

Unsatisfied with the influence that comes with being Twitter’s largest investor, he has now launched a full takeover, one of the few individuals who can afford it outright. He’s currently worth about $260 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index, compared with Twitter’s market valuation of about $37 billion.

In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk said he believes Twitter “will neither thrive nor serve [its free speech] societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company”

The takeover is unlikely to be a drawn-out process. “If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.

1649936465070.png


Musk informed Twitter’s board over the previous weekend that he thought the company should be taken private, according to today’s statement.

The $54.20 per share offer is “too low” for shareholders or the board to accept, said Vital Knowledge’s Adam Crisafulli in a report, adding that the company’s shares hit $70 less than a year ago.

Although Musk is the world’s richest person, how he will find $43 billion in cash has yet to be revealed.

“This becomes a hostile takeover offer which is going to cost a serious amount of cash,” said Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud Equity Research. “He will have to sell a decent piece of Tesla stock to fund it, or a massive loan against it.”

Musk has hired Morgan Stanley as his adviser for the bid. The offer price also includes the number 420, widely recognized as a coded reference to marijuana. He also picked $420 as the share price for possibly taking Tesla private in 2018, a move that brought him scrutiny from the SEC.

“There will be host of questions around financing, regulatory, balancing Musk’s time (Tesla, SpaceX) in the coming days,” said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush. “But ultimately based on this filing it is a now or never bid for Twitter to accept.”

I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it.
Elon Musk’s full letter to Twitter’s board





EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources​


Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash, the price that he originally offered to the social media company and called his 'best and final', people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $43 billion deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said. It is always possible that the deal collapses at the last minute, the sources added.

Twitter has not been able to secure so far a 'go-shop' provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow it to solicit other bids from potential acquirers once the deal is signed, the sources said. Still, Twitter would be allowed to accept an offer from another party by paying Musk a break-up fee, the sources added.

Twitter and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.




Twitter and Elon Musk Strike Deal for Takeover​

Twitter Inc. TWTR 5.52% on Monday accepted Elon Musk’s bid to take over the company, giving the world’s richest man control over the influential social-media network where he is also among its most powerful users.

The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at Twitter, where many executives and board members initially opposed Mr. Musk’s takeover approach. The deal has polarized Twitter employees, users and regulators over the power tech giants wield in determining the parameters of acceptable discourse on the internet and how those companies enforce their rules.

The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal. Earlier on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Twitter and Mr. Musk had reached an agreement to value Twitter at $44 billion.

The takeover, if it goes through, would mark one of the biggest acquisitions in tech history and will likely have global repercussions for years to come related to how billions of people use social media. Mr. Musk, who is also chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA -1.30% and Space Exploration Technologies Inc., must find a way to balance his commitment to less moderation with the business needs of a company that has struggled to reconcile free-wheeling conversation with content that appeals to advertisers.

On Monday, after the Journal reported that a deal was close, Mr. Musk tweeted to indicate that he wants the platform to remain a destination for wide-ranging discourse and disagreement.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” he wrote.

The San Francisco-based social-media company had been expected to rebuff the offer, which Mr. Musk made April 14 without saying how he would pay for it.

Twitter, a day after the unsolicited offer, adopted a so-called poison pill, designed to make it more difficult for Mr. Musk to reach more than a 15% stake in the company.

Twitter changed its posture after Mr. Musk detailed elements of his financing plan for the takeover. On April 21, he said he had $46.5 billion in funding lined up. Twitter shares rose sharply, and company executives opened the door to negotiations.

Twitter shares were ahead more than 5% in afternoon trading on Monday.

The potential turnabout on Twitter’s part comes after Mr. Musk met privately Friday with several shareholders of the company to extol the virtues of his proposal while repeating that the board has a “yes-or-no” decision to make, people familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Musk, with over 82 million Twitter followers, has long used the platform to pronounce his views on everything from space travel to cryptocurrencies. In January, he began buying Twitter stock, becoming the single-largest individual investor with a more than 9% stake by April.

He has previously used Twitter to escalate a conflict with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency opened a probe into some of his recent stock sales, and he often blasts his critics on the social network.

Twitter, at the beginning of the month, invited Mr. Musk to join its board—which would have prevented him from owning more than 14.9% of the company’s stock. Mr. Musk initially agreed and then rejected the offer.

Twitter has already embarked on a turnaround plan after a fight with activist Elliott Management Corp. about two years ago. Twitter said a little over a year ago that it would work to at least double its revenue to $7.5 billion by the end of 2023 and reach at least 315 million so-called monetizable daily active users at that time.

Mr. Musk’s proposed changes for the platform include softening its stance on content moderation, creating an edit feature for tweets, making Twitter’s algorithm open source—which would allow people outside the company to view it and suggest changes—and relying less on advertising, among other ideas.

Mr. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” said in a recent interview at a TED conference that he sees Twitter as the “de facto town square.”

Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts, Mr. Musk said, pointing to temporary suspensions as a better solution.

Mr. Musk said he also wants the platform to be more transparent when it takes action that amplifies or reduces a tweet’s reach. He said he wasn’t certain how some of those ideas would be implemented.

Twitter has spent years advocating for healthier discourse on its platform and adding content moderation, arguing at least in part that it is good for business.

The company also has introduced new features that have been gaining some traction with users, including Twitter Spaces, which allows people to host live audio conversations with each other within the platform.

Mr. Musk has said he wants Twitter to rely less on advertising—which provided roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021—and shift its business model more toward subscriptions. The platform currently offers a subscription-based service called Twitter Blue, which gives customers premium features like “undo tweet” for $2.99 a month. He suggested removing all ads on Twitter as part of the subscription offerings.

Mr. Musk also floated the idea of cutting staff, shuttering the company’s San Francisco headquarters building and not giving the board of directors a salary. The latter could save roughly $3 million a year alone, he said.

His other proposed changes for Twitter include trying to stop spam and scam bots and allowing for longer tweets. The current limit is 280 characters.

On Thursday, Twitter is scheduled to announce its first-quarter earnings.


 

Attachments

Last edited:
They know what's coming for them, in the meeting that happened earlier the pajeet only told them that no nothing will fundamentally changed, the tranny jannies keep pestering about him about muh culture or if they are willing to suicide pill the company just for no mean tweets and the pajeet answered that they can't reveal that information to the plebs

They are totally selling
*ron paul "it's happening".gif*
 
Last edited:
There are about 8,000 Twatter employees. The employees I see screaming about quitting look like diversity hires and are in roles that look good on paper but don't actually contribute much to making sure Twitter is up and running.

These REEEEing employees show how out of touch they are. They are crazy if they think the average Twatter employee is going to walk off a job that is highly sought after and pays better than other places and comes with cool perks other places don't offer. The only people that will quit are rich diversity hires that can fall back on Mommy and Daddy's money.

It reminds me of how the media tried to spin Netflix employees walking off the job to protest that Dave Chappelle series. The media made it sound like most of Neflix walked off, when really it was only a hand full of SJW employees.
 
The one thing I love is when the leftists show just how child-like they really are.

One thing about Democrats and liberals, if you read their OWN FUCKING WRITING, is how a thing, if it is THEIR thing now, it is their thing forever, and because it is there thing, it is a GOOD THING.

Bad people (other people) are not allowed to enjoy, consume, use, or take part in THEIR THING or that could make it bad.

If someone threatens to alter or take away THEIR THING they throw absolute shit-fits and scream and yell and call names and throw tantrums.

I've read it in article after article during the Obama Years.

"When I saw the jets flying overhead I breathed a sigh of relief. Finally those jets were OUR jets, and not in the hands of war mongers and fascists." - Proceeds to drone strike kids

I mean, look at this.

They can't even REALLY tell you what is wrong with some South African autist gaining control of Twitter. It's bad because it's THEIR THING and nobody else is allowed to play with THEIR THING. Nobody is allowed to make another version of THEIR THING because that means THEIR THING won't be special.

Replace it with a fucking action figure and you have a 4 year old spoiled brat screaming that someone else gets to play with the action figure.
 
There are about 8,000 Twatter employees. The employees I see screaming about quitting look like diversity hires and are in roles that look good on paper but don't actually contribute much to making sure Twitter is up and running.

These REEEEing employees show how out of touch they are. They are crazy if they think the average Twatter employee is going to walk off a job that is highly sought after and pays better than other places and comes with cool perks other places don't offer. The only people that will quit are rich diversity hires that can fall back on Mommy and Daddy's money.

It reminds me of how the media tried to spin Netflix employees walking off the job to protest that Dave Chappelle series. The media made it sound like most of Neflix walked off, when really it was only a hand full of SJW employees.
I mean these people feel themselves to be more important then they really are. Most of these people I wish actually had to work a job at McDonald's or do electrical work themselves then bitch about how why we need people to moderate Twitter.
Leave en masse I want to see Elon musk move Twitter to Texas and hire a bunch of white/Mexican working class people there instead to see how the shitshow would work.
 
These REEEEing employees show how out of touch they are. They are crazy if they think the average Twatter employee is going to walk off a job that is highly sought after and pays better than other places and comes with cool perks other places don't offer. The only people that will quit are rich diversity hires that can fall back on Mommy and Daddy's money.
It does make me wonder if there are clauses in their contracts about the fits they're pitching. I know if I had a massive online tantrum about a deal my company was involved it that came with threats about how I can derail it I would expect to be having a discussion with HR quite soon after. It also raises questions about how much influence employees of publicly listed companies can have over the share price before it becomes some sort of manipulation.

You absolutely have the right to have an opinion on a companies acquisition but as soon as you identify yourself as having an interest either way your reeing becomes more than just having an opinion.
 
It does make me wonder if there are clauses in their contracts about the fits they're pitching. I know if I had a massive online tantrum about a deal my company was involved it that came with threats about how I can derail it I would expect to be having a discussion with HR quite soon after. It also raises questions about how much influence employees of publicly listed companies can have over the share price before it becomes some sort of manipulation.

You absolutely have the right to have an opinion on a companies acquisition but as soon as you identify yourself as having an interest either way your reeing becomes more than just having an opinion.
If you identify yourself as an employee of some company, its good faith to assume you're representing that company. Though people online usually put something like "my views are not reflective of my employer". But the left wrote the rules of engagement that any view held by an employee is automatically a view of the company. That's what they did to deplatform people they didn't like in the mid-late 2010s.
 
If you identify yourself as an employee of some company, its good faith to assume you're representing that company. Though people online usually put something like "my views are not reflective of my employer". But the left wrote the rules of engagement that any view held by an employee is automatically a view of the company. That's what they did to deplatform people they didn't like in the mid-late 2010s.
Slight PL but my employer’s policy regarding social media is basically “If you identify yourself as an employee of ours on social media we can hold you responsible for what you say”

I sure hope those Twitter employees have cleared this with their HR and Legal departments.
 
Don't mind me, I'm just trying to use copium and autism to manifest a reality where Elon successfully buys Twitter and then dumps the contents of Hunters laptop onto it (If Posobiec actually sent him the copy) just as an added "fuck you" to the establishment.
 
Reddit with competent management would be as valuable as Facebook. They have the lowest revenue per user out of any social network, and this is entirely due to mismanagement. Reddit has the enormous advantage that it’s users tell it exactly what they are interested in by subscribing to interest groups, something Facebook had to invest billions in machine learning models to guess. Yet, they’ve been completely unable to monetize.
Look at this:
View attachment 3179026
$0.49 per user per year. This site likely has higher average revenue per user!

If Musk bought Reddit, fired all the tranny jannies, and hired some competent people to design a good ad product, he could 100 times his money.
Pinterest and WhatsApp are higher than I would've guessed, pretty interesting infographic
 
I don't think Vanguard would be buying up stock unless they thought there was money to be made from it. They're not exactly an activist investment firm.
Agree.
Them increasing their share looks to me they are gambling on that the buyout will eventually be accepted and they want to make a quick buck.
They possibly also expect Elon to eventually sweeten the offer a bit and rise the offered price which would make them a nice tidy profit.
(of course it is not "the final offer" it is never the final offer until the buyout is completely off the table)

EDIT: Also regarding whether Elon has enough cash on hand or not. IF it starts looking that the buyout will eventually happen you will have investment banks queueing up to meet with Elon and get in on the buyout. There is money to make. If he doesn't have the cash then the banks that will approach him definitely will provide it for a piece of the action.
 
Last edited:
Probably already been mentioned, but since I'm not trawling through the last 20 pages, I don't see how Twitter can refuse Musk's offer, since the company Board have a fiduciary duty to the shareholders and with Musk's premium deal the shareholders will never have a deal bigger and better than this and thus if the company turns down Musk's offer the company will probably have a shareholders revolt and I imagine the stock will then take a huge dive... of course if that then happens Musk could then buy the company at... say for arguments sake... 1/3 of what he's currently offering. A bargain. And the Company Board Members would have tens of thousands of FURIOUS shareholders out for their blood.

I know I'd be furious if I had many shares of Twitter that could make me wealth with this deal, and the Company Board tanks the deal and the shares plummet.
 
For the people threatening to leave twitter: How is that a threat? Do you have a subscription? Do you pay to post? Will anyone anywhere care or even notice that you're no longer there? All you're doing is making room for people who aren't self-important, triggered assholes.
 
I would wager that a good 45 percent of outstanding shares are onboard with Elon's plan at the moment, at the end of the day the big institutional investors are heartless and care about making a profit, I am sure he can find enough loose shares in day trading accounts and small funds to get that last five percent. The board would be smart to surrender and make this a friendly take over, but I game for some eighties style corporate raiding.
 
Replace it with a fucking action figure and you have a 4 year old spoiled brat screaming that someone else gets to play with the action figure.
Mr Johnny....fuck you.

You have reminded me of my shitty childhood "friend" who did just that. He didnt want me to buy the same ninja turtle has him because he wanted to be special and have the only one....I tried to explain how the shelves at target were full of them.

I also remember how I "loaned" him my snes cart of sim city and he built a city in it. Then he would just whine and hint how he worked so hard on that city which was on my cart.

So I told him "hey if you get your own cart we can just trade" He then threw a shit fit and ran to his mom and ree'd about how unfair that was because then I would have a new cart and he would have the old.
 
Back