Business Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Take Twitter Private for $44 Billion - The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at the social-media network

1649933159786.png

The tech billionaire Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $41.4bn.

A regulatory filing showed on Thursday that Musk was offering $54.20 a share – a 38% premium to the closing price of Twitter’s stock on 1 April, the last trading day before the Tesla chief executive’s investment of more than 9% in the company was publicly announced.

More to follow…



1649933831102.png
1649933810146.png






Elon Musk has made a “best and final” offer to buy Twitter Inc., saying the company has extraordinary potential and he is the person to unlock it.

The world’s richest person will offer $54.20 per share in cash, representing a 54% premium over the Jan. 28 closing price and a valuation of about $43 billion. The social media company’s shares soared 18% in pre-market trading.

Musk, 50, announced the offer in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, after turning down a potential board seat at the company. The billionaire, who also controls Tesla Inc., first disclosed a stake of about 9% on April 4. Tesla shares fell about 1.5% in pre-market trading on the news.

Twitter said that its board would review the proposal and any response would be in the best interests of “all Twitter stockholders.”

1649936433325.png

The bid is the latest saga in Musk’s volatile relationship with Twitter. The executive is one of the platform’s most-watched firebrands, often tweeting out memes and taunts to @elonmusk’s more than 80 million followers. He has been outspoken about changes he’d like to consider imposing at the social media platform, and the company offered him a seat on the board following the announcement of his stake, which made him the largest individual shareholder.

After his stake became public, Musk immediately began appealing to fellow users about prospective moves, from turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter and adding an edit button for tweets to granting automatic verification marks to premium users. One tweet suggested Twitter might be dying, given that several celebrities with high numbers of followers rarely tweet.

Unsatisfied with the influence that comes with being Twitter’s largest investor, he has now launched a full takeover, one of the few individuals who can afford it outright. He’s currently worth about $260 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index, compared with Twitter’s market valuation of about $37 billion.

In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk said he believes Twitter “will neither thrive nor serve [its free speech] societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company”

The takeover is unlikely to be a drawn-out process. “If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.

1649936465070.png


Musk informed Twitter’s board over the previous weekend that he thought the company should be taken private, according to today’s statement.

The $54.20 per share offer is “too low” for shareholders or the board to accept, said Vital Knowledge’s Adam Crisafulli in a report, adding that the company’s shares hit $70 less than a year ago.

Although Musk is the world’s richest person, how he will find $43 billion in cash has yet to be revealed.

“This becomes a hostile takeover offer which is going to cost a serious amount of cash,” said Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud Equity Research. “He will have to sell a decent piece of Tesla stock to fund it, or a massive loan against it.”

Musk has hired Morgan Stanley as his adviser for the bid. The offer price also includes the number 420, widely recognized as a coded reference to marijuana. He also picked $420 as the share price for possibly taking Tesla private in 2018, a move that brought him scrutiny from the SEC.

“There will be host of questions around financing, regulatory, balancing Musk’s time (Tesla, SpaceX) in the coming days,” said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush. “But ultimately based on this filing it is a now or never bid for Twitter to accept.”

I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it.
Elon Musk’s full letter to Twitter’s board





EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources​


Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash, the price that he originally offered to the social media company and called his 'best and final', people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $43 billion deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said. It is always possible that the deal collapses at the last minute, the sources added.

Twitter has not been able to secure so far a 'go-shop' provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow it to solicit other bids from potential acquirers once the deal is signed, the sources said. Still, Twitter would be allowed to accept an offer from another party by paying Musk a break-up fee, the sources added.

Twitter and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.




Twitter and Elon Musk Strike Deal for Takeover​

Twitter Inc. TWTR 5.52% on Monday accepted Elon Musk’s bid to take over the company, giving the world’s richest man control over the influential social-media network where he is also among its most powerful users.

The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at Twitter, where many executives and board members initially opposed Mr. Musk’s takeover approach. The deal has polarized Twitter employees, users and regulators over the power tech giants wield in determining the parameters of acceptable discourse on the internet and how those companies enforce their rules.

The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal. Earlier on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Twitter and Mr. Musk had reached an agreement to value Twitter at $44 billion.

The takeover, if it goes through, would mark one of the biggest acquisitions in tech history and will likely have global repercussions for years to come related to how billions of people use social media. Mr. Musk, who is also chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA -1.30% and Space Exploration Technologies Inc., must find a way to balance his commitment to less moderation with the business needs of a company that has struggled to reconcile free-wheeling conversation with content that appeals to advertisers.

On Monday, after the Journal reported that a deal was close, Mr. Musk tweeted to indicate that he wants the platform to remain a destination for wide-ranging discourse and disagreement.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” he wrote.

The San Francisco-based social-media company had been expected to rebuff the offer, which Mr. Musk made April 14 without saying how he would pay for it.

Twitter, a day after the unsolicited offer, adopted a so-called poison pill, designed to make it more difficult for Mr. Musk to reach more than a 15% stake in the company.

Twitter changed its posture after Mr. Musk detailed elements of his financing plan for the takeover. On April 21, he said he had $46.5 billion in funding lined up. Twitter shares rose sharply, and company executives opened the door to negotiations.

Twitter shares were ahead more than 5% in afternoon trading on Monday.

The potential turnabout on Twitter’s part comes after Mr. Musk met privately Friday with several shareholders of the company to extol the virtues of his proposal while repeating that the board has a “yes-or-no” decision to make, people familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Musk, with over 82 million Twitter followers, has long used the platform to pronounce his views on everything from space travel to cryptocurrencies. In January, he began buying Twitter stock, becoming the single-largest individual investor with a more than 9% stake by April.

He has previously used Twitter to escalate a conflict with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency opened a probe into some of his recent stock sales, and he often blasts his critics on the social network.

Twitter, at the beginning of the month, invited Mr. Musk to join its board—which would have prevented him from owning more than 14.9% of the company’s stock. Mr. Musk initially agreed and then rejected the offer.

Twitter has already embarked on a turnaround plan after a fight with activist Elliott Management Corp. about two years ago. Twitter said a little over a year ago that it would work to at least double its revenue to $7.5 billion by the end of 2023 and reach at least 315 million so-called monetizable daily active users at that time.

Mr. Musk’s proposed changes for the platform include softening its stance on content moderation, creating an edit feature for tweets, making Twitter’s algorithm open source—which would allow people outside the company to view it and suggest changes—and relying less on advertising, among other ideas.

Mr. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” said in a recent interview at a TED conference that he sees Twitter as the “de facto town square.”

Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts, Mr. Musk said, pointing to temporary suspensions as a better solution.

Mr. Musk said he also wants the platform to be more transparent when it takes action that amplifies or reduces a tweet’s reach. He said he wasn’t certain how some of those ideas would be implemented.

Twitter has spent years advocating for healthier discourse on its platform and adding content moderation, arguing at least in part that it is good for business.

The company also has introduced new features that have been gaining some traction with users, including Twitter Spaces, which allows people to host live audio conversations with each other within the platform.

Mr. Musk has said he wants Twitter to rely less on advertising—which provided roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021—and shift its business model more toward subscriptions. The platform currently offers a subscription-based service called Twitter Blue, which gives customers premium features like “undo tweet” for $2.99 a month. He suggested removing all ads on Twitter as part of the subscription offerings.

Mr. Musk also floated the idea of cutting staff, shuttering the company’s San Francisco headquarters building and not giving the board of directors a salary. The latter could save roughly $3 million a year alone, he said.

His other proposed changes for Twitter include trying to stop spam and scam bots and allowing for longer tweets. The current limit is 280 characters.

On Thursday, Twitter is scheduled to announce its first-quarter earnings.


 

Attachments

Last edited:
I want hashtags to become organic again. Not only was that what made the site fun, but watching the anger over loss of control of that will be amazing
I have to wonder if certain elements of the government are worried. We know Twitter has been coopted to control the narrative, but the question is by who. Most people think it's danger haired activists. IMO though it's probably 3 letter agencies using danger hairs at cats paws. If Musk buys Twitter he gets access to all their internal memos.

No guarantee he does anything about it though. He's still reliant on Government contracts for what he's doing. People assuming he will suddenly change everything at Twitter are being painfully naive. If it was just fat tranny jannies being the problem it would be easy. But it's not. It's the CIA, FBI, State Department and Justice Department controlling things behind the scenes.
 
Questionable. Always assume someone has an ulterior motive. The motherfucker may be the biggest stoner in the world, I dont think hes burning money just to own the libs or whatever. Hes selling you something, too.
Well.. his ulterior motive is fairly obvious: a profitable social media platform with nearly 200 million active users that he can run as he see fits. Owning the libs is just a convenient side effect.
 
Its gonna be a pump&dump, his biggest yet and the feds might pay him a visit over it

I have to wonder if certain elements of the government are worried. We know Twitter has been coopted to control the narrative, but the question is by who. Most people think it's danger haired activists. IMO though it's probably 3 letter agencies using danger hairs at cats paws. If Musk buys Twitter he gets access to all their internal memos.

No guarantee he does anything about it though. He's still reliant on Government contracts for what he's doing. People assuming he will suddenly change everything at Twitter are being painfully naive. If it was just fat tranny jannies being the problem it would be easy. But it's not. It's the CIA, FBI, State Department and Justice Department controlling things behind the scenes.
Twitter was influential, key word: WAS.

Nowadays if you want to run COINTELPRO you use instagram or better yet tiktok. Both have way more metadata on their users and allow for more trickery to happen, no surprise that most cryptoscams happen there now.

If you ask me twitter peaked long ago, nowadays its well known that the twitter user base only represents the opinions of around 1.5% to 2% of the population. I'm old enough to remember when it was the new hot thing because of all the celebs there, but those have already moved to the aforementioned networks and the only ones still in the bird cesspit are B-listers and has-beens.

The only people I know who still use twitter as a social network and aren't mentally ill are using it for porn, like they used to do with tumblr.

Wouldn't be surprised if data comes out that most of twitter's current traffic is porn-related.
 
As if Tumblr went down because of Leftists and not because Yahoo banned porn lol

I doubt anyone here has ever used Tumblr, but every teenage genderbender's page had some perverse sexualized post on it, usually reposting some softcore black and white gif with "choke me daddy" on it. It pretty much ruined it for all of the perverts on that website.
It only got to the point where porn was the only thing keeping it afloat because the staff were so incompetent/lazy that the product actively degraded over the course of the 2010's. There was a point around the time Yahoo first bought them that the entire community were all using the same enhancement mod to have the post customization/timing/UI features actually work instead of constantly breaking. Once the author of the mod got harassed off the site for being a huwhite man, the mod inevitably broke and users began to leave the site well before the porn ban came in.

This is the same platform that didn't have a built-in reporting tool for illegal/harassing posts until the late 2010's, and the only way to report illegal content was to screenshot it and literally email the admins. Their attempt at automating stuff to ban nsfw content was so horribly written that it basically killed all images posted to the website and that accelerated the mass exodus of non-coomers as well.

Tumblr didn't die because they banned porn. It died because it was so terminally shitty that niche/probably illegal porn was the only reason to put up with the site's bullshit. That tweet is absolutely correct that the staff slowly sabotaged the platform, but I expect it was incompetence, rather than malice, because it started well before Yahoo bought them.
 
Well.. his ulterior motive is fairly obvious: a profitable social media platform with nearly 200 million active users that he can run as he see fits. Owning the libs is just a convenient side effect.
Twitter is not profitable, it is probably gonna get slotted into meme stock with all of the happenings.
 
Its gonna be a pump&dump, his biggest yet and the feds might pay him a visit over it


Twitter was influential, key word: WAS.

Nowadays if you want to run COINTELPRO you use instagram or better yet tiktok. Both have way more metadata on their users and allow for more trickery to happen, no surprise that most cryptoscams happen there now.

If you ask me twitter peaked long ago, nowadays its well known that the twitter user base only represents the opinions of around 1.5% to 2% of the population. I'm old enough to remember when it was the new hot thing because of all the celebs there, but those have already moved to the aforementioned networks and the only ones still in the bird cesspit are B-listers and has-beens.

The only people I know who still use twitter as a social network and aren't mentally ill are using it for porn, like they used to do with tumblr.

Wouldn't be surprised if data comes out that most of twitter's current traffic is porn-related.
Twitter has elite capture though. Of those 1.5% a huge percentage are politicians, government mouthpieces, Corporate executives and journalists.
 
He's an absolute madman and Twitter is a cesspool of human scum, but this probably isn't a terrible investment if he can link it somehow with other shit (namely openai)... Which yeah, is terrifying by I wouldn't be surprised if that's where his mind is heading....

Edit: reminder, this is the cunt that wants to plant chips in our brains ☺... I still like him tho.
 
Imagine the Twitter board meeting with Musk waltzing in slapping his dick on the table proclaiming "I own you!" and then showing where he bought all his shares
actually, bruce wayne bought more than 50%, allowing himself back on the board, but the company is still public. though part of that could involve kicking the last guy.
elon is buying the whole thing outright, meaning he can kick the entire board of directors and replace them if he feels like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Derka Derka
Twitter has elite capture though. Of those 1.5% a huge percentage are politicians, government mouthpieces, Corporate executives and journalists.
The vast majority of them don't even use it, they got a lackey to manage their account and its only used for bland corporatespeak announcements and the like, again not as a social network. And they speak to that 2% that's increasingly a bunch of unemployed nobodies because they're the only ones who can be on twitter all day, and many are mentally deranged so anything you say can be turned into a shitstorm for no gain.

In terms of riling people up to vote you I argue facebook is far more powerful, which is why neolibs hate it because that's where the majority of trump voters came from, not 4chan and twitter.
 
Do these retards not understand that "VANGUARD" means the various mutual funds that Vanguard manages, including such funds as the index funds that are required to proportionally buy into every company? Even if Twitter isn't on the S&P 500 (and so not in the index funds that mirror that), it still is part of https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/profile/VSMPX which buys every listed company.
 
I have to wonder if certain elements of the government are worried. We know Twitter has been coopted to control the narrative, but the question is by who. Most people think it's danger haired activists. IMO though it's probably 3 letter agencies using danger hairs at cats paws. If Musk buys Twitter he gets access to all their internal memos.

No guarantee he does anything about it though. He's still reliant on Government contracts for what he's doing. People assuming he will suddenly change everything at Twitter are being painfully naive. If it was just fat tranny jannies being the problem it would be easy. But it's not. It's the CIA, FBI, State Department and Justice Department controlling things behind the scenes.
This is FUD and deserves a trashcan if we had it. Glowfags still have to play by the rules and if they don't then they are no better than any other illegal street gang and deserve to be treated as such.

Moreover the kind of corruption you seem to be talking about comes from the corporations and lobbies. The swamp would be doing the bidding of the danger hairs if this nonsense were true, not the other way around.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what Elon has up his sleeve for Plan B because you know he anticipated this shrieking faggot reaction from Twitter's Board.

The flailing of the establishment, including the DOJ saying they are going to investigate Musk, is because they plan on pulling the same shit for the midterms as they did in 2020 with selectively banning information and probably even candidates themselves, along with who controls the narrative of global economies tanking as well as supply shortages.
This is big stakes. Nothing to do with the ability to freely say nigger.
 
Twitter's Board has gone ahead with the poison pill.
Fags.

poison pill1.jpgpoison pill 2.jpg

The New York Times reports that, according to two people with knowledge of the situation, that Twitter’s board is considering a defensive move known as a poison pill that would severely limit Elon Musk’s ability to acquire the social media giant.

The directors are weighing whether to move ahead with the poison pill — formally called a shareholder rights plan — that would limit the ability of a single shareholder, like Mr. Musk, to acquire a critical mass of shares in the open market and force the company into a sale.
The poison pill defense is a common tactic used by companies that want to fend off unwelcome takeover offers. It essentially lets the company flood the market with new shares or allow existing shareholders other than the potential acquirer to buy shares at a discount.
This dilutes the bidder’s stake and makes buying shares more expensive.
 
Back