Why do people think being physically attracted to 16 and 17 year olds makes you a pedophile?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
BoxerShorts47 said:
Most women will compete puberty by age 15 or 16. Some maybe 17. Others maybe 14 or younger. So be it. If that's their DNA then that is their DNA.
You're no "die hard feminist" but you're still fundamentally a feminist and you agree with all the die hard feminist policies like AoC. Typical normie behavior.
Ultimately you hate biology just like the feminists and you empower them to rewrite the human asexuality rules to fit their social agenda (cucking families and putting women into the workforce).


If they are feeling coercion or the person is bad then maybe but if not then it could fine. You're overly generalizing. Having sex post puberty is fine. It's pre-puberty or even during puberty that is bad.
Click to expand...
not wanting adults to diddle little kids isnt feminism, its being a reasonable person. also non even statutory rape (adult having sex with a minor who says its ok) is traumatising once they have time to process, do you know what grooming is? its to make a minor """consent"" despite them being underage. you have never spoken to a victim before, have you? you have no idea how much it affects these people.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: supremeautismo
Michael Pemulis said:
In general it's not an actual approval of the practice but just a reasoned decision to draw the line a bit lower than you actually want, so people who are basically decent don't get criminalized for tiny and arbitrary violations. That's why I think 16 or 17 is where the unlimited (as in the other party can be any amount older) age of consent should be, with some accommodations for younger relationships between people of the same age range. It's no good for anyone to have a situation where 17 year and 11 month year old college freshmen who just want to fuck can turn willing partners into felons., even if society generally agrees that 18 is the ideal age to start.
Click to expand...
I would put sex at 14 and sexting at 12 and that would fix all current issues while still criminalizing real pedophilia.
If women don't want to have sex or don't want to sext then they still have that choice.

soda soop said:
not wanting adults to diddle little kids isnt feminism, its being a reasonable person. also non even statutory rape (adult having sex with a minor who says its ok) is traumatising once they have time to process, do you know what grooming is? its to make a minor """consent"" despite them being underage. you have never spoken to a victim before, have you? you have no idea how much it affects these people.
Click to expand...
1. Kids are PRE PUBERTTY so under 12 in general and maybe 12-15 depending on the women if she is still in puberty. If the person is POST PUBERTY then that's not a child and it is feminist to view these people as children rather than adults.

2. Teenagers are going around having sex with each other and you support that. None of you reactionary normies want to seriously raise the AoC or repeal the Romeo + Juliet loopholes.

3. Being traumatized depends on the person and the experience and that can happen if a 15 has sex with a 16 or a 26 yr. You're just making motte and bailey fallacies as a last ditch effort to trick normies into thinking you won this debate when you clearly lost.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Law, Pringles Can, Anal Eclipse and 4 others
soda soop said:
not wanting adults to diddle little kids isnt feminism, its being a reasonable person. also non even statutory rape (adult having sex with a minor who says its ok) is traumatising once they have time to process, do you know what grooming is? its to make a minor """consent"" despite them being underage. you have never spoken to a victim before, have you? you have no idea how much it affects these people.
Click to expand...
What age is this minor? 12 and 17 are quite different.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
I would put sex at 14 and sexting at 12 and that would fix all current issues while still criminalizing real pedophilia.
If women don't want to have sex or don't want to sext then they still have that choice.


1. Kids are PRE PUBERTTY so under 12 in general and maybe 12-15 depending on the women if she is still in puberty. If the person is POST PUBERTY then that's not a child and it is feminist to view these people as children rather than adults.

2. Teenagers are going around having sex with each other and you support that. None of you reactionary normies want to seriously raise the AoC or repeal the Romeo + Juliet loopholes.

3. Being traumatized depends on the person and the experience and that can happen if a 15 has sex with a 16 or a 26 yr. You're just making motte and bailey fallacies as a last ditch effort to trick normies into thinking you won this debate when you clearly lost.
Click to expand...
my cousin is like 13, she hit puberty early and is by your definition an "adult" now. but she is a kid. if you met her you would think shes a kid. she acts like a kid and deserves to have her teen years without freaks like you justifying fucking her because "ummm but her dna... and her... and her... hormones and.. mm biology". get therapy and dont go near minors, im ending this convo here since you clearly will not budge on your justification of your mental illness
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Law, Bass, supremeautismo and 2 others
soda soop said:
my cousin is like 13, she hit puberty early and is by your definition an "adult" now. but she is a kid. if you met her you would think shes a kid. she acts like a kid and deserves to have her teen years without freaks like you justifying fucking her because "ummm but her dna... and her... and her... hormones and.. mm biology". get therapy and dont go near minors, im ending this convo here since you clearly will not budge on your justification of your mental illness
Click to expand...
she's going to be having wild sex with random men in a few years anyway, sorry pal
 
soda soop said:
my cousin is like 13, she hit puberty early and is by your definition an "adult" now. but she is a kid. if you met her you would think shes a kid. she acts like a kid and deserves to have her teen years without freaks like you justifying fucking her because "ummm but her dna... and her... and her... hormones and.. mm biology". get therapy and dont go near minors, im ending this convo here since you clearly will not budge on your justification of your mental illness
Click to expand...
Teen years aren't supposed to exist, e.g. body of an adult with the brain child. Children are supposed to be raised into adults and if a 13 yr old is still acting like a 7 year old, that's unhealthy. At this point, the avg 30 yr old has the maturity of the avg 20 yr old from a 100 years ago. That's an issue.

Michael Pemulis said:
she's going to be having wild sex with random men in a few years anyway, sorry pal
Click to expand...
This too.

BigDongWarrior said:
Idk but I think i regret everything in my life leading up to this.
Click to expand...
Be strong. You're on the right side of history.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Law, Pringles Can, supremeautismo and 4 others
She's 17 years, 11 months, 30 days, 23 hours and 59 minutes old YOU SICK FUCK!!!!!!!!

Anyways, have I seen a hot 16 to 17 year old recently? I don't think so, because if I did I probably didn't think she was a teenager because she didn't look like one.

I haven't found myself attracted to a teenager since my early 20's.

Have any of you seen high school girls recently? They're nothing like they are in movies and TV. They have zits, awkward looking postures, lanky arms, etc. And that's just their looks.

I wouldn't date a 17 year old, even if she's hot, and it's legal in the state that I live in. The generation gap would be too vast, and our priorities would be radically different. Imagine being a 30-something year old picking your GF up at her high school, or her parent's house?

"Can't go out, it's a school night."

"Can you help me with my homework?"

"Why should I? I already graduated."

"Ohh, can you take me to the Lil' Xannybar$Prime concert?"

"Who the fuck is that?!"

If you're into jailbait, good for you, I guess. The maturity of a 16/17 year old isn't much different than an 18-22 year old anyways. If you believe or think otherwise, you're fucking delusional.

Personally, I like women around my age (30s) who look like they're in their early-mid 20s.
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Clarence Big Boss, BigDongWarrior, Pissmaster and 1 other person
BoxerShorts47 said:
@soda soop

You're not protecting anyone. All you're doing is cucking relationships that could lead to marriage and making it MORE likely that she will have causal sex with multiple partners. You're the bad guy because you've been brainwashed by feminists.
Click to expand...
listen im sorry you cant find people your age who like you and feel the need to resort to grooming naive girls who want to feel mature. thats all about all i can say to you
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Chi-com Soldier, Digital Thunder, José Mourinho and 4 others
soda soop said:
listen im sorry you cant find people your age who like you and feel the need to resort to grooming naive girls who want to feel mature. thats all about all i can say to you
Click to expand...
I can but that doesn't mean there is anything wrong with dating a 16 yr old if she is my type and mature.
This accusation of groomer is so post modern. It used to be called being a suitor.
 
  • Dumb
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: Chi-com Soldier, Clarence Big Boss, Law and 5 others
Hollywood Hitler said:
She's 17 years, 11 months, 30 days, 23 hours and 59 minutes old YOU SICK FUCK!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

This you?
Hollywood Hitler said:
I just don't understand child-fuckers, there's no way fucking little kids could be that good. Ever fuck a teenager? It's not what you'd call "great sex". I can't understand how one could find pleasure by fucking a child.
Click to expand...
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: cornycat, Chi-com Soldier, Digital Thunder and 5 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
I would put sex at 14 and sexting at 12
Click to expand...

You said upthread that we were all being ignorant normies because you think the age of consent should be 16 and you keep lowering it and lowering it :story: How's that foot in your mouth taste, Dan Schneider?

Also sexting at 12 is child porn, maybe you should chuck your phone into a river before Chris Hansen offers you a seat.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: José Mourinho, Anal Eclipse, Pissmaster and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back