Law Man told job not to celebrate his birthday. He was awarded $450K following unwanted party.


Kevin Berling suffers from an anxiety disorder and told his job that a birthday celebration would trigger a panic attack, according to a lawsuit.

A Kentucky man with an anxiety disorder asked his former employer not to celebrate his birthday because it triggers panic attacks.

When the company, Gravity Diagnostics, ignored Kevin Berling's request and had a surprise lunchtime celebration for him on Aug. 7, 2019, he got upset. Days later Berling was fired, according to a lawsuit he filed in a Kenton County court against the company.

On March 31, a jury awarded him $450,000. The jury found that Berling suffered an "adverse employment action" because of his anxiety disability, court documents show.

The saga began in August 2019 when Berling told his office manager that he did not want to celebrate his birthday because it would trigger a panic attack. The company has a practice of having birthday celebrations at the office for employees, the lawsuit, filed in 2019, says.

However, on the day of his birthday, the company surprised him with a celebration in the lunchroom. Berling had a panic attack, the suit says. He quickly left and finished the rest of his lunch in his car and then texted his manager for failing to accommodate his request.

A day after the celebration, Berling was called into a meeting where he "was confronted and criticized" for his reaction, according to the lawsuit.

"This confrontation triggered another panic attack," the lawsuit says. "At the conclusion of this meeting and because plaintiff had a panic attack, plaintiff was sent home from work for the remainder of August 8 and August 9."

On Aug. 11 of that year, he was sent a letter telling him that he was being terminated "because of the events of the previous week," the lawsuit reads.

Berling sued for disability discrimination and retaliation.

Gravity Diagnostics did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Saturday.

Founder and COO Julie Brazil told Link NKY that Berling was terminated for violating a "workplace violence policy" and they stand by their decision.

She also noted an increase in incidents of workplace violence, telling the station: "My employees deescalated the situation to get the plaintiff out of the building as quickly as possible while removing his access to the building, alerting me and sending out security reminders to ensure he could not access the building, which is exactly what they were supposed to do."

Tony Bucher, an attorney for Berling, said his client posed no threat.

"I think the significance for employers is that they need to understand that they shouldn’t make assumptions about individuals with mental health issues. Kevin was an exceptional employee that went above and beyond for his employer and if they would have taken a step back it would have been clear that he did not present any danger at all," he said in a statement.
 
Wow what an absolutely insufferable situation all around. If somebody asks you to not make a big deal of their birthday then don't be a weirdo about it and just let them be. But on the other hand fuck you for being a fragile faggot that can't handle some shitty cake and a few retards singing happy birthday, just take the L and go have a meltdown in your car or whatever. Like how the fuck are you supposed to do any job that involves being around people if you can't handle even the most boring and predictable social interaction ever.
 
Wow what an absolutely insufferable situation all around. If somebody asks you to not make a big deal of their birthday then don't be a weirdo about it and just let them be. But on the other hand fuck you for being a fragile faggot that can't handle some shitty cake and a few retards singing happy birthday, just take the L and go have a meltdown in your car or whatever. Like how the fuck are you supposed to do any job that involves being around people if you can't handle even the most boring and predictable social interaction ever.
Except he apparently did exactly what you suggested and got fired for it. People ca't control what triggers panic attacks, and they can apparently cause a sense of doom or be mistaken for a heart attack. I think it was reasonable for him to ask to skip it. It's like the mental equivalent of somebody with IBS saying they can't sit through a long meeting without shitting themselves. If anything, it sounds like the company was just looking for a reason to fire somebody who didn't "fit in with company culture," AKA is disabled.
 
Except he apparently did exactly what you suggested and got fired for it. People ca't control what triggers panic attacks, and they can apparently cause a sense of doom or be mistaken for a heart attack. I think it was reasonable for him to ask to skip it. It's like the mental equivalent of somebody with IBS saying they can't sit through a long meeting without shitting themselves. If anything, it sounds like the company was just looking for a reason to fire somebody who didn't "fit in with company culture," AKA is disabled.
I'm not making a moral judgement here I just hate dealing with both fragile muh mentals faggots and corporate turbo cunt karens. The last two years have very much worn my patience for neurotic people thin.
 
Possible the guy was a grifter and engineered a situation where he would be discriminated for having “panic attacks” and could turn around and sue them. Either way not sure why you deserve more than four years worth of middle class salary over this
 
On one hand; I hate most anxiety/panic attack people, as it gets used more as a weapon by a lot of people. On the other hand; dude acted appropriately by asking for them not to do something, cited why, and yet they did it anyway.

Getting canned over workplace violence though can go one of two ways. One, he had a massive chimp out and scared people. Two, he sperged/vented and some nosey Nancy reported him; despite him trying to keep it low key. Still looks like a retaliation firing from here, hope this story gets a follow up.
 
Well, if he got violent and actually assaulted someone I’m pretty sure there would be some mention, cops called, separate assault case being pursued, which well, he’d lose, you don’t get to actually hurt someone.

So that must not have happened, he just chimped out verbally. He warned them, give him his $$.
THIS.

If he'd actually done anything actually violent or threatening he wouldn't have won the case. Most likely whatever cunt he spoke with about the incident was such a massive narcissist they were offended he didn't love the special surprise they setup for him. That COO is a dumb cunt too and ought to be pistol whipped.
 
Possible the guy was a grifter and engineered a situation where he would be discriminated for having “panic attacks” and could turn around and sue them. Either way not sure why you deserve more than four years worth of middle class salary over this
there's no doubt the court looked into his medical history and found that he is indeed prone to panic attacks.
i imagine if he was making it up, it wouldn't have gone this far.
 
Did he start screaming and throwing stuff and punching people in the face? What would have happened if they had held him down and recorded his screams? I think this is one of those situations where you try to be nice to a guy but then he freaks out on you so now your pissed off at him. They were so pissed he didn’t like the party that they fired him. But it’s hard to know whose side to be on because I am not sure how badly he actually freaked out or what he actually did.
 
But it’s hard to know whose side to be on because I am not sure how badly he actually freaked out or what he actually did.
Just do what all the other "big brain" spergs here do and pick a "side" based on ignorant self-projection and start sperging out and fighting and champion total strangers you know nothing about in a situation where you dont actually know what happened. Get so angry over the mostly imaginary situation that you start mouthfoaming and spam posting angrily over it too. Dont be a fencesitting faggot.
 
Seems like a real effort to replace the family so you feel more obligated to let things slide.
I tell my staff that we aren't a family; we're a team. Being on a team means that you have to perform, or else you get cut from the team. But it also means that they should support one another in times of need and they can always come to me if something is preventing them from reaching their potential and we'll figure out how to fix it.

I stole this from the lady who made Netflix what they are, except they took it to a whole new extreme where as soon as someone was no longer useful, they'd be let go. The lady who came up with it was actually teriminated under the rules she came up with.

You can read the basic model here. We're not quite so heartless in reality, but it is effective management to make people think we are.
 
Just do what all the other "big brain" spergs here do and pick a "side" based on ignorant self-projection and start sperging out and fighting and champion total strangers you know nothing about in a situation where you dont actually know what happened. Get so angry over the mostly imaginary situation that you start mouthfoaming and spam posting angrily over it too. Dont be a fencesitting faggot.
Okay, I'll take a simplified approach.

Asking an employer to not do "A" for you, when "A" is not part of your described work duties, and they do "A" anyway? And then Fire you due to the fallout of doing "A", whatever it was?

That sounds like textbook "hostile workplace" conditions.
 
I'm not making a moral judgement here I just hate dealing with both fragile muh mentals faggots and corporate turbo cunt karens. The last two years have very much worn my patience for neurotic people thin.
Buddy you're on this site already I don't think autismos have room to talk about neurosis
 
Back