Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

after reading jim's tweets about this, I think that nick is simply taking ethan's word about "swatting" and dox happening because of jim. On firday, Jim is going to predictably say "name one time I did that", and once again no one will have an example of it ever happening, and nick may just be the next bridge burned by ethan ralph. looking forward to friday!
 
View attachment 3192615
Would be hard pressed to find someone who endorses swatting. Nick saying guilt by proxy is insane with people like Ralph, wishing death upon former co-hosts and saying he would shoot people without remorse if he could get away with it, in the same call. If stuff like this gets Nick so upset he becomes delusional then maybe politics isn't the career path for him.
EDIT: Clip of Nick saying he does not believe in free speech.
View attachment 3192635
"You want an ethical code? Get a real job."
You could start, Nick if you didn't torpedo your whole life to get to this point.
 
1650313537620.pngasddasddsads.pngasdasdasdsadsadadsasdafff.png
 
Last edited:
Catboy grifter is just eternally infighting, and failing to get along with anyone. Bottom faggots such as he, have so low self-esteems that they can't allow any slight dissent. They have no other choice than to surround themselves with nick sucking sycophants, who are ultimately going to be liabilities. The end result is real time imploding movement with no means to ever seize power. All Nick had to do was choose not to be gay twink and go lift to purge those overwhelming feelings of inferiority.
 
after reading jim's tweets about this, I think that nick is simply taking ethan's word about "swatting" and dox happening because of jim. On firday, Jim is going to predictably say "name one time I did that", and once again no one will have an example of it ever happening, and nick may just be the next bridge burned by ethan ralph. looking forward to friday!
Nah Nick wont abandon the gunt. They are brothers in Christ. They also both got a thing for sniffing ass and eating shit, except that Nick prefers gay catboy ass over barely legal teens and horses.
 
nick may just be the next bridge burned by ethan ralph.
This would be epic. These two always keep dirt on everyone close to them, whilst denouncing "gossip". Fuentes openly admits he just pretends to like people like BAP and Metokur for clout. Can't wait for the Ralph and Nick to open up the Milo hard drive and shit on each other.
 
Nah Nick wont abandon the gunt. They are brothers in Christ. They also both got a thing for sniffing ass and eating shit, except that Nick prefers gay catboy ass over barely legal teens and horses.
i guess friday will be a test of if shit fetishism and catholocism is enough to keep a friendship together. informative
 
Nick has denounced Patrick Casey, CWC, Tucker, Metokur, etc... While surrounding himself with Ethan Ralph and Beardson. He can't stand potentially being challenged, so he's only comfortable being around "Trailer trash whose life is falling apart", in his own words.
I was writing this as a post but it goes well with your observation.

PPP and warski ask on kino casino “what does nick and america first actually believe?”

Nick is a bunch of impulses and reactions leftover from the post 2016 era of right wing twitter. You can see this whenever he reminiscences with beardson and talks about paul town. Nick thinks the height of the internet was complaining about e-girl feuds on the weekly sweat. Why does nick use catholicism as a political shield? Traditionalist catholics were a major faction on twitter at that time. Why does nick dislike certain section of the right wing? It is definitely because beardson made fun of them on the weekly sweat years ago. Why does nick focus on the incel stuff so much? Being incel was a term that showed you were in the known with dissident culture back in 2016. People shouldn't overlook beardson and the weekly sweat's influence on america first. Nick's entire personality is based off obscure twitter feuds and characters who were not relevant even at their highest. That era is the entire world to fuentes.

Cozy tv represents it. It is nick trying to recreate the ecosystem of right wing twitter of the 2016 era to his own ideals. Nick let beardson and paul town on because they're his favorite characters. Nick let ralph on because the killstream was a place that connected the twitter ecosystem to the IBS universe. Why is destiny allowed? Destiny was part of IBS and represents the leftist personalities of that era. You can find random channels on cozy that exist only because they're twitter people nick remembers. The people like haz aren't that unique either. They're all downstream from jokes and political personalities that started on twitter in 2015 or 2016. Nick's belief system is twitter jokes and diluted /pol/ talking points mixed with his own cult of personality. Nick is still living in the era of gossiping on the weekly sweat about richard spencer.

Cozy tv is the movie Synecdoche, New York and nick's is philip seymour hoffman's character.

What would truly FELT nick would be if shawn/prince_hubris, beardson's old co-host, resurfaced openly speaking against america first. A few people in this and beardson's thread have brought up he seems to have turned on beardson and america first. The movement has degenerated into the same as the wignats beardson and hubris screamed at on the weekly sweat. A return from hubris would be like your dad coming back from buying cigarette to give you a beating. I can only see him coming back if someone like nuke_telly is able to contact him. I've seen nuke in the kino casino chat. Nuke was one of the twitter guys nick purged for fun posting and has contacts to all these people. He knows most of the deep lore on these old personalities.

So what does america first believe? Old jokes and shitposts nick read on twitter years ago. Fuentes hates jim, the casino, and farms because it forces him to interact with the world outside his lore sphere. Nick fuentes believes he and a group of acc ounts on twitter got donald trump elected in 2016. He is thin skin covering a social media obsession.
 
Im fucking baffled by the fact you don't recognize in what people are good at, he is gay he wants to fuck catboys, but at least let's have an honest conversation and accept the fact the fag didn't get popular by a reason this fag even debated Barnes and from what I've seen won and he's a lawyer compared to metokur, a weeb that has not the best taste in anime to say the least
Yeah but see none of that matters. The truth is Nick Fuentes has never won a debate in his life on the merits of his actual argument. Nobody who watched the debate between him and Styx walked away thinking supporting the totalitarian Chinese government is really an "America First" thing to do, or for that matter America was ever a historically Catholic nation. But try to hold this lot to facts and arguments like Louis Theroux did and they'll just squirm away and deny even having a position whatsoever. Because they intuitively understand that arguments don't matter. Facts don't matter. What does matter is image presentation and slinging rhetoric to offset one's opponents while comporting oneself like the winner to a brainlet impressionable groyper audience that is both unable and uninterested in evaluating the actual arguments presented. To Fuentes's followers, the winner is the person who looks like how a winner should look. This is what he means when he talks about "aesthetics".

Unfortunately for the America First leader, Nick's "aesthetics" are fading fast with the unavoidable march of time. Yesterday's enfant terrible and impudent youthful provacateur is quickly transforming into today's arrested development manchild in full public display, entering his mid-twenties ranting through a clenched, increasingly unhinged looking smile and bulging eyes about the virtues of never having sex and retreating into an infantile NEET echo chamber. Like Beardson, his "young leader of the dissident right" image is gone the second he's no longer able to disguise his receding hairline. And since Nick is by design all image, that's pretty much it for him. Live by the aesthetic, die by the aesthetic.

I'm not sure Metokur has any substantial arguments on anything, but I definitely believe him and PPP are capable of tilting Fuentes in a contest of rhetoric/IBS as well as delivering enormous damage to Fuentes' all-important public image. Nick knows that too, which is why he's avoiding the Kino Casino like death itself.
 
Last edited:
Yeah but see none of that matters. The truth is Nick Fuentes has never won a debate in his life on the merits of his actual argument. Nobody who watched the debate between him and Styx came away thinking supporting the totalitarian Chinese government is really an "America First" thing to do, or that America was ever a historically Catholic nation. Try to hold this lot to facts and arguments like Louis Theroux did though and they'll just squirm away and deny even having a position whatsoever. Arguments don't matter. Facts don't matter. What does matter is image presentation and slinging rhetoric to offset one's opponents opponent while comporting himself like the winner to a brainlet groyper audience that is both unable and uninterested in evaluating the actual arguments presented. To Fuentes's followers, the winner is the person who looks like how a winner should look. This is what he means when he talks about "aesthetics".

Unfortunately for the America First leader, Nick's "aesthetics" are fading fast with the unavoidable march of time. Yesterday's enfant terrible and impudent youthful provacateur is quickly transforming into today's arrested development manchild in full public display, entering his mid-twenties ranting through a clenched, increasingly unhinged looking smile and bulging eyes about the virtues of never having sex and retreating into an infantile NEET echo chamber. Like Beardson, his "young leader of the dissident right" image is gone the second he's no longer able to disguise his receding hairline. And since Nick is by design all image, that's pretty much it for him. Live by the aesthetic, die by the aesthetic.

I'm not sure Metokur has any substantial arguments on anything, but I definitely believe him and PPP are capable of tilting Fuentes in a contest of rhetoric/IBS as well as delivering enormous damage to Fuentes' all-important pubic image. Nick knows that too, which is why he's avoiding the Kino Casino like death itself.
No one watches these debates without being hopelessly obsessed with one side, I highly doubt they change minds beyond the influence of soundbites that get posted elsewhere.
 
What's up with all the hate for Nick? I think he's a real human bean who has sacrificed a lot to try to do the right thing, and he's getting more influence every day. I know the cat boy thing was cringe but who cares? It was years ago and he learned his lesson. Only other thing is a lot of his orbiters are cringe too to a degree but what should he do, be conniving and just toss them aside? Also I've never seen a guy more based, I feel like most of the haters are atheist nihirony bros mad Nick tells them to stop watching porn.
 
What's up with all the hate for Nick?
you can read the highlights of the past ~900 pages, that should get you up to speed.

I think he's a real human bean who has sacrificed a lot to try to do the right thing,
sacrificed or had taken away from him because of personal retardation?

and he's getting more influence every day.
questionable, at best

I know the cat boy thing was cringe but who cares?
There is a lot more than just the catboy thing. People care about that specifically because a lot of us feel it has not been sufficiently addressed, especially in light of other actions. It isn't one singular isolated incident, nor is it just that he is a homosexual, he is a disingenuous lying grifter. Plenty of things point to this.

It was years ago and he learned his lesson.
Again, it isn't an isolated incident, nor is it the main reason people dislike him. He also has demonstrably not learned any lesson, as the other 900+ pages of this thread can attest to.

Only other thing is a lot of his orbiters are cringe too to a degree
which ones? I would say all of them, but I would be interested to hear you further undermine your sodomite leader's flawless judgement in terms of who he associates with.

but what should he do, be conniving and just toss them aside?
That seems to be the nick fuentes MO, so I would say it's certainly on the table in terms of options.

Also I've never seen a guy more based
please please PLEASE leave your echochamber/hugbox more often.

, I feel like most of the haters are atheist
can't speak for everyone here but I personally am a Christian. I don't think I've seen anyone here attack nick for supporting Christianity, only that he is insincere in his faith. Ultimately that is between him and God, but nothing about how he acts suggests that he is a sincere, faithful servant of Christ. Do you ever think it's weird how a guy who divulges all sorts of other info about his personal life of his own accord never once on his show (certainly not recently) has ever talked about actually going to church? Not even an aside comment like, "You know, today I was attending mass and..." or "After church today..."? The guy will post a picture of whatever greasy slop he just picked up at mcdonalds on any given day, can't consistently start his own show on time because his sleep schedule is so fucked he wouldn't even get up for Sunday mass, talks about interactions with family, but never once has talked about speaking with his priest. Nothing about his behavior suggests him living the life of the devout "Christ First" Catholic he claims to be.

nihirony bros
I'm going to assume that's a clunky attempt to make a portmanteau of "irony bro" and "nihilist", which are very funny accusations to levy against people who criticize nick fuentes, as he himself will tell you he is an ironybro (interesting note on that- the definitional opposite of irony is sincerity. Nick tells you he is an ironybro, that he loves irony, that all of his humor is rooted in irony, etc. Nick tells you he is insincere.)
The "nihilist" accusation is also funny, because you are defending a man who went into an existential crisis because he lost his twitter account. There are countless posts he's made and recordings of him on his show just going full "doom and gloom" and crying about how it's all over and everything's fucked. There is nothing "life-affirming" about that, there is no "life-affirming" message to nick's America First. Converesly, if someone criticizes nick for being insincere, it is because they actually value sincerety, meaning they place actual values in what they believe, which doesn't strike me as particularly nihilistic.

mad Nick tells them to stop watching porn.
ranting and raving for hours on end about how much you hate women is a far cry from telling people to stop jacking off, as is telling your audience that liking women is gay and wanting to have a loving relationship with a woman makes you some sort of homosexual manchild. There are hundreds, if not thousands of other online right wing figures who also have a very anti-porn message, several of whom are far more outspoken than nick on the topic, and the overwhelming majority of them do not have threads here. The idea that people are somehow specifically resentful of nick for telling them to not watch porn (something that to my knowledge he rarely actually brings up or divulges on) is laughable on it's face.
If this was bait though, great job, I absolutely fell for it and will continue to do so. If it isn't, I would encourage you to develop some introspection and critical thinking skills, they will help you out greatly in life.

edit: I also think it's funny you think nick should be given a pass on things that happened "years ago" as the only circumstances your manlet messiah ever gives people a pass on past mistakes is if they go out of their way to pledge allegiance to him. If you think his mistakes should be excused and you also think that his approach to these sort of things is correct, you should find some way to encourage him to grovel to all of the people he's wronged.
 
Last edited:
Back