Plagued Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

[b0x]

i've seen many hot women with butt ugly men; they just had good personalities.

I think Women are more likely to make a compromise when a Man can support their lifestyle.


Incels are too lazy for that, they just complain.

 

[KoldHardTruth]

I think Women are more likely to make a compromise when a Man can support their lifestyle.
View attachment 3196415

Incels are too lazy for that, they just complain.

Men defiantly have the upper hand when it comes to looks. You'd never see a hot man with an ugly women, but you see plenty examples of the images you're showing above.

 

[DavidS877]

they ju$t had good per$onalitie$.

Any questions?

 

[Chuck McGill]

The same that niggers, fags, troons... well not Jews since they are the masters of victimhood and manipulation.

This right here is the crux of it. The advice given to incels would be fine if we still lived in a society that valued self determination at all. But it doesn't. Go ahead, try telling that tranny that he's part of a vanishingly small portion of the population so he should just fall in line and stop asking for special privileges. Your social media will be all be yeeted within a 15 minute window. Try telling those joggers that they should learn to fucking talk right, stop blaming whitey for everything, stop buying Cadillacs and get a job. Your bank account is removed and your city is now on fire. The point I was making is that there are a contingent of reddit normies that will insist that it's your duty to suffer endless inconveniences for fringe minorities that cause endless problems, yet whenever they're faced with anyone they dislike, be it incels, 'antivaxxers', or generally anyone right of Stalin they morph into rugged individualists right before your very eyes. All of a sudden they remember what personal responsibility is. I'm not against the idea of personal responsibility of course, but it seems like it's a concept that's only deployed by these people when it's time to lay the blame.

 

[AnOminous]

Go ahead, try telling that tranny that he's part of a vanishingly small portion of the population so he should just fall in line and stop asking for special privileges.

You don't tell them. You show them. You show them a brick wall like they were Ceausescu.

 

[Wormy]

Get a job, care for your health, do positive things, and learn to not be a social retard and you'll eventually find someone - cuckpilled

<insert comfy neet and Joo blaming Pepe here>

is nothing in this world based and redpilled

The fact we're identifying by what fucking pills we take based on an overrated sci fi movie is part of the fucking problem in the first place!

 

[EpicGamerMoment]

I really like this thread because it’s a good archive for debates against incels. It’s not just a “Haha point and laugh at the incels” thing, there’s a billion of those on the internet already.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

i don't need a romantic relationship to be happy, even though i can easily get as many as i want. women aren't wired like men though

Bah you whore, of course snailslime is in here tormenting the incels.

Well you have XX chromosomes and are around, let me ask since I think your position would be a better one to make my point; taking vague terms like "girlfriend" "boyfriend" "romantic relationship" etc. off the table, what specifically would a "romantic relationship" entail in this instance?

As I see it the central pillar of what men should focus on bringing to a relationship is safety/security above all else. That's in terms of resources (making sure there's food on the table and a place to live) it's more immediate safety (if there's some physical threat she can trust you to take steps to protect your partner and kids) and even social (you're loyal to each other and can go into public together without embarrassing each other, that applies equally to both men and women), while women bring things like nurturing and emotional comfort towards her partner and their family/children as a whole. That doesn't mean it's acceptable for women to totally abdicate those other responsibilities, but it should be a primary concern for men (no different than how men shouldn't totally abdicate childcare but it's primarily women's concern).

How many of those relationships can you get, exactly? What are these guys you're referring to offering aside from sexual interaction and relationship status? Are they actually offering you anything, or do you just call yourself his girlfriend and get each other off? It's good that you don't want to spread your legs just for shallow approval, there are absolutely plenty of women who will, but still, it's not like you can act like you're really depriving yourself. Please correct me if I'm wrong though, I'm not trying to attack you here.


All this discussion always occurs from a decidedly feminine perspective. Women might believe relationships can exist even if two people have nothing more than mutual passion, but that's because women are more emotional. That's totally fine, women are a little dumb, it's great, but that's also why it's more a man's job to go "Look, I really like you too, but there needs to be some physical groundwork for this to be anything real".

That's where the actual issue arises, because the social ills we're dealing with currently (communal fragmentation among the middle class leading to total inability for collective action and increasing reliance on the system, all leading to critical levels of centralization and overreach among the upper class, increasing strain on the environment, expanding welfare class, decreasing protection against the criminal class, etc) means there is no security for men to offer.
How women feel is irrelevant, if you cannot fulfill your obligations as a man then an actual romantic relationship isn't possible because you cannot responsibly start a family.


So as usual it's no surprise that incels (and by that I don't mean people who don't get laid, I mean people who are fixated on the fact they don't get laid) become trannies so often, because they're useless limp dicked slime puddles with no sense of dignity or firm standards for themselves. Their only job is to find a way to get women to give them what they want, just like it always was with mommy! If only women would be their girlfriend-mother and tend to their pathetic little faggot ego, that'll serve as a temporary narcissistic opiate to help them cope with the fact that they know they're worthless and unable to protect, care for, or provide comfort to literally anyone!

It's absolutely contemptible. The state of people is something else.

 

[Yarp64371234]

Bah you whore, of course snailslime is in here tormenting the incels.

Well you have XX chromosomes and are around, let me ask since I think your position would be a better one to make my point; taking vague terms like "girlfriend" "boyfriend" "romantic relationship" etc. off the table, what specifically would a "romantic relationship" entail in this instance?

As I see it the central pillar of what men should focus on bringing to a relationship is safety/security above all else. That's in terms of resources (making sure there's food on the table and a place to live) it's more immediate safety (if there's some physical threat she can trust you to take steps to protect your partner and kids) and even social (you're loyal to each other and can go into public together without embarrassing each other, that applies equally to both men and women), while women bring things like nurturing and emotional comfort towards her partner and their family/children as a whole. That doesn't mean it's acceptable for women to totally abdicate those other responsibilities, but it should be a primary concern for men.

How many of those relationships can you get, exactly? What are these guys you're referring to offering aside from sexual interaction and relationship status? Are they actually offering you anything, or do you just call yourself his girlfriend and get each other off? It's good that you don't want to spread your legs just for shallow approval, there are absolutely plenty of women who will, but still, it's not like you can act like you're really depriving yourself. Please correct me if I'm wrong though, I'm not trying to attack you here.


All this discussion always occurs from a decidedly feminine perspective. Women might believe relationships can exist even if two people have nothing more than mutual passion, but that's because women are more emotional. That's totally fine, women are a little dumb, it's great, but that's also why it's more a man's job to go "Look, I really like you too, but there needs to be some physical groundwork for this to be anything real".

That's where the actual issue arises, because the social ills we're dealing with currently (communal fragmentation among the middle class leading to total inability for collective action and increasing reliance on the system, all leading to critical levels of centralization and overreach among the upper class, increasing strain on the environment, expanding welfare class, decreasing protection against the criminal class, etc) means there is no security for men to offer.
How women feel is irrelevant, if you cannot fulfill your obligations as a man then an actual romantic relationship isn't possible because you cannot responsibly start a family.


So as usual it's no surprise that incels (and by that I don't mean people who don't get laid, I mean people who are fixated on the fact they don't get laid) become trannies so often, because they're useless limp dicked slime puddles with no sense of dignity or firm standards for themselves. Their only job is to find a way to get women to give them what they want, just like it always was with mommy! If only women would be their girlfriend-mother and tend to their pathetic little faggot ego, that'll serve as a temporary narcissistic opiate to help them cope with the fact that they know they're worthless and unable to protect, care for, or provide comfort to literally anyone!

It's absolutely contemptible. The state of people is something else.

Safety and security was generally an activity which all people on gregarian societies did, men just did fighting to eachother because of our physical strength and our capabilities with it (powerful enough to kill other men, not powerful enough to overpower an animal with 10% or more physical strength Animals which use strength>Men>Women>other animals, if you think otherwise you haven't touched an spear or did real hunting in your life, specializations exist on hunting for this reason, even more when no technology societies used resistance running as the main tool). This was an aspect that we had because we have a more polyamory based past before being humans (which is extremely common on apes, we are reassuringly, a reflection of dropping most if not all of the dichotomies of apes) which we destroyed on our evolutive scale, making us monogamous (obviously with some specializations).

This is seen on our reduced aspects of it and our sexual organs which reflect this (by being very complex, big and soft, they aren't for ramming, inseminate rapidly or grabbing, we aren't rape machines, we are love infused species with funny, but unknown attitudes, monogamy makes relationships faster and removes the play game and violent fights which are mortal with our lower strengths and team based mechanisms, we still have it as a way to fend other humans tho and do extreme force oriented tasks which were niche, but useful)

An interesting part where women aid with this is night watching, which is an skill based around safety and security too (with a more important factor thanks to leopards and other big animals which could wreck your shit at night without any warning, killing all of the persons in a tribe in mere seconds), even more when women dominate on this area thanks to their biology which aids them at detecting and helping in general security around correct strategies which are totally needed to evade death, something which disembowels the less smarts argument by the virtue of good leadership and smart behavior (thus mature) on all parts of society, even more when finding refugee and food was a thing everyone did.

The reason of this is that those resources normally were found as a groups thanks to being temporal spots which were used to let a generation thrive and get their minimal care of 6 months, something which has been proven to cause an effect on men and women (women and men, have a child rearing instinct. It even makes sense thanks to having to do a lot of stuff through the day and needing to take care of a 24/7 individual as a single person is next to impossible, even more when we lived on gregarian societies which reflect on this perfectly, women have 2 nipples for a reason), women shouldn't give those responsibilities to men on any manner, they should work with eachother, doing otherwise is accepting retardation and just doing things in bad faith.

Passion can exist only as a focus on a relationship, even more when those factors are already in place in two socially developed, not damaged adults, it should be a requirement on both parts and accepting anything else is gids, saying otherwise makes you a retard which accepts unruly behavior and subpar relationships.

Fragmentation happens when we put value classes around replacement and acceptance and as a inherently broken basis of people start putting people on those categories, it will generate those problems at face value thanks to that separation, increasing those aspects in levels unheard of by an extreme margin, it's a reflection of how modern values warp things, societal ills are a reflection of a sell by aspect (not commie style, consumerist style) related to a lack of a real respect between peers and an atomized, pressure filled culture which inherently will pressure people to not generate relationships, a man should be able to fall back on his close group, female or male because it isn't a replaceable cog, which women and men need to have by the need of a mutual respect, this doesn't happen on this case.

You're an example of a person which lives on an atomized society, a reflection of a person which doesn't understand the hurdles and the ways we had to live thanks to an isolating culture and a lower family grounding based around over-consuming culture and low love as a child, a figment which most likely lost his body autonomy since the start of his childhood, just like most incels.

snailslime has some flaws on his idea around behavior and relationships tho, even if relationships are based around personality, most people are too broken for this, they believe that it is a resource disassembly thanks to not getting the tools needed for an stable live, so they are forced to reflect and try to covert those faults by the medium of flaunting, even more when she believes polygamy around his more isolated lifestyle with a very excruciating society which is judaism, which undervalues mutualism and aids around dichotomies, grabbing the short end of the stick, she doesn't do it (thanks to the way she writes, it says that it can happen, not that it is the norm), but believes in abandonment and that it's her only choice, thus being very stubborn about it.

We are monogamous and we need to work together as equals, if you don't want to read any of this, there it is. Atleast the neg rating made a highlight.

 

[Knight of the Rope]

Safety and security was generally an activity which all people on gregarian societies did, men just did fighting to eachother because of our physical strength and our capabilities with it (powerful enough to kill other men, not powerful enough to overpower an animal with 10% or more physical strength Animals which use strength>Men>Women>other animals, if you think otherwise you haven't touched an spear or did real hunting in your life, specializations exist on hunting for this reason, even more when no technology societies used resistance running as the main tool), this was an aspect that we had because we have a more polyamory based past (which is extremely common on apes, we are reassuringly, a reflection of dropping most in not all of the dichotomies of apes) which we reverted on our evolutive scale (obviously with some specializations), which is seen on our reduced aspects of it and our sexual organs which reflect this (by being very complex, big and soft, they aren't for ramming, inseminate rapidly or grabbing, we aren't rape machines, we are love infused species with funny, but unknown attitudes, monogamy makes relationships faster and removes the play game and violent fights which are mortal with our lower strengths and team based mechanisms, we still have it as a way to fend other humans tho and do extreme force oriented tasks which were niche, but useful), night watching is around safety and security too (with a more important factor thanks to leopards and other big animals which could wreck your shit at night without any warning, killing all of the persons in a tribe in mere seconds), even more when women dominate on this area thanks to their biology which aids them at detecting and helping in general security around correct strategies which are totally needed to evade death, something which disembowels the less smarts argument by the virtue of good leadership and smart behavior (thus mature) on all parts of society, even more when finding refugee and food was a thing everyone did, even more when those things needed to be found as a groups thanks to being temporal spots which were used to let a generation thrive and get their minimal care of 6 months, something which has been proven to cause an effect on men and women (women and men, have a child rearing instinct, it even makes sense thanks to having to do a lot of stuff through the day and needing to take care of a 24/7 individual as a single person is next to impossible, even more when we lived on gregarian societies which reflect on this perfectly, women have 2 nipples for a reason), women shouldn't give those responsibilities to men on any manner, they should work with eachother, doing otherwise is accepting retardation and just doing things in bad faith.

Passion can exist only as a focus on a relationship, even more when those factors are already in place in two socially developed, not damaged adults, it should be a requirement on both parts and accepting anything else is aids, saying otherwise makes you a retard which accepts unruly behavior and subpar relationships.

Fragmentation happens when we put value classes around replacement and acceptance and as a inherently broken basis of people start putting people on those categories, it will generate those problems at face value thanks to that separation, increasing those aspects in levels unheard of by an extreme margin, it's a reflection of how modern values warp things, societal ills are a reflection of a sell by aspect (not commie style, consumerist style) related to a lack of a real respect between peers and an atomized, pressure filled culture which inherently will pressure people to not generate relationships, a man should be able to fall back on his close group, female or male because it isn't a replaceable cog, which women and men need to have by the need of a mutual respect, this doesn't happen on this case.

You're an example of a person which lives on an atomized society, a reflection of a person which doesn't understand the hurdles and the ways we had to live thanks to an isolating culture and a lower family grounding based around over-consuming culture and low love as a child, a figment which most likely lost his body autonomy since the start of his childhood, just like most incels.

snailslime has some flaws on his idea around behavior and relationships tho, even if relationships are based around personality, most people are too broken for this, they believe that it is a resource disassembly thanks to not getting the tools needed for an stable live, so they are forced to reflect and try to covert those faults by the medium of flaunting, even more when she believes polygamy around his more isolated lifestyle with a very excruciating society which is judaism, which undervalues mutualism and aids around dichotomies, grabbing the short end of the stick, she doesn't do it (thanks to the way she writes, it says that it can happen, not that it is the norm), but believes in abandonment and that it's her only choice, thus being very stubborn about it.

You know you can have more than one sentence per paragraph, right man? Also you write like a fucking redditor.

 

[Pee Cola]

Safety and security was generally an activity which all people on gregarian societies did, men just did fighting to eachother because of our physical strength and our capabilities with it (powerful enough to kill other men, not powerful enough to overpower an animal with 10% or more physical strength Animals which use strength>Men>Women>other animals, if you think otherwise you haven't touched an spear or did real hunting in your life, specializations exist on hunting for this reason, even more when no technology societies used resistance running as the main tool). This was an aspect that we had because we have a more polyamory based past (which is extremely common on apes, we are reassuringly, a reflection of dropping most in not all of the dichotomies of apes) which we reverted on our evolutive scale (obviously with some specializations).

This is seen on our reduced aspects of it and our sexual organs which reflect this (by being very complex, big and soft, they aren't for ramming, inseminate rapidly or grabbing, we aren't rape machines, we are love infused species with funny, but unknown attitudes, monogamy makes relationships faster and removes the play game and violent fights which are mortal with our lower strengths and team based mechanisms, we still have it as a way to fend other humans tho and do extreme force oriented tasks which were niche, but useful)

An interesting part where women aid with this is night watching, which is an skill based around safety and security too (with a more important factor thanks to leopards and other big animals which could wreck your shit at night without any warning, killing all of the persons in a tribe in mere seconds), even more when women dominate on this area thanks to their biology which aids them at detecting and helping in general security around correct strategies which are totally needed to evade death, something which disembowels the less smarts argument by the virtue of good leadership and smart behavior (thus mature) on all parts of society, even more when finding refugee and food was a thing everyone did.

The reason of this is that those resources normally were found as a groups thanks to being temporal spots which were used to let a generation thrive and get their minimal care of 6 months, something which has been proven to cause an effect on men and women (women and men, have a child rearing instinct. It even makes sense thanks to having to do a lot of stuff through the day and needing to take care of a 24/7 individual as a single person is next to impossible, even more when we lived on gregarian societies which reflect on this perfectly, women have 2 nipples for a reason), women shouldn't give those responsibilities to men on any manner, they should work with eachother, doing otherwise is accepting retardation and just doing things in bad faith.

Passion can exist only as a focus on a relationship, even more when those factors are already in place in two socially developed, not damaged adults, it should be a requirement on both parts and accepting anything else is gids, saying otherwise makes you a retard which accepts unruly behavior and subpar relationships.

Fragmentation happens when we put value classes around replacement and acceptance and as a inherently broken basis of people start putting people on those categories, it will generate those problems at face value thanks to that separation, increasing those aspects in levels unheard of by an extreme margin, it's a reflection of how modern values warp things, societal ills are a reflection of a sell by aspect (not commie style, consumerist style) related to a lack of a real respect between peers and an atomized, pressure filled culture which inherently will pressure people to not generate relationships, a man should be able to fall back on his close group, female or male because it isn't a replaceable cog, which women and men need to have by the need of a mutual respect, this doesn't happen on this case.

You're an example of a person which lives on an atomized society, a reflection of a person which doesn't understand the hurdles and the ways we had to live thanks to an isolating culture and a lower family grounding based around over-consuming culture and low love as a child, a figment which most likely lost his body autonomy since the start of his childhood, just like most incels.

snailslime has some flaws on his idea around behavior and relationships tho, even if relationships are based around personality, most people are too broken for this, they believe that it is a resource disassembly thanks to not getting the tools needed for an stable live, so they are forced to reflect and try to covert those faults by the medium of flaunting, even more when she believes polygamy around his more isolated lifestyle with a very excruciating society which is judaism, which undervalues mutualism and aids around dichotomies, grabbing the short end of the stick, she doesn't do it (thanks to the way she writes, it says that it can happen, not that it is the norm), but believes in abandonment and that it's her only choice, thus being very stubborn about it.

tl;dr: @Yarp64371234 sucks cocks

 

[The Last Stand]

@Yarp64371234 STFU I'm not reading all that

 

[R00T]

@Yarp64371234 i will not move into your cave and join your polyamorous cult.

 

[Moses game]

Every society at any given moment in history had its share of male outcasts, and it would be fun for them to have a place to meet and share their thought, but man, chimpout.co sucks.
Keep in mind that it has been a long time since I last lurked that forum and so some things might have changed. What made me lose interest are those things:

a) Fixation on sex alone- sure, the “celibate” in the handle suggests it should be forum mainly about sexual frustrations, but there is more to sex than just the act itself. You may find some nympho in a bar that would have sex with you, but how do you find and attract someone who you’d actually want to start family or even just a long lasting relationship with? People usually meet each other through social circles, what do you do when you have none? It’s tough as social outcast, and people usually get through tough times in life by relying on their friends and groups, what do you do when you have none? Ask or muse about any of these questions and most of the forum will get angry at you and call you fake incel or dismiss you. All that matters is getting poon.

b) Racial sperging- there is a stupid stereotype that white men are sought after in asian countries. This has caused almost all people on forum who aren’t white to claim that unless white forum members fly all the way to Taiwan and not manage to get some one night stands there (this combines with my point above about fixation on just sex) then you aren’t real incel and don’t belong on forum.

Most of those people are “westernized” indians, arabs and blacks, they are living in Europe or America where they moved in as kids or teenagers and they often complain that their “social value” there is low because of their race. When you pull their own logic on them and point out that they can move back to their homeland, which is easier than travelling to fucking Asia as a white person because
1. at least they spent their childhood/early teenage years there
2. they are same race as majority of people in country that they would move to
3. they often still have some family life over in those countries
(hell, they can just move to a district in country that they currently live in that is mostly populated by same race)...so that they have same “social value” as everyone else they just chimp out.
So people whose romantic frustrations mostly boil down to “shieeet, where da white wimmen at!?” have audacity to tell people who can’t find partner in their own ethnic populace that they’re fake incels because they’re white and they don’t want to move continent away to find someone.

All of this is of course laced with typical sperging about how they’re happy that white people are “dying out” etc. This is main thing that has made that forum useless to me, if I wanted to watch racial minorities chimp out about evil white people I’d go to pretty much any big corporate social media platform like twitter or reddit, I don’t need incel flavour to it and I don’t need to do it on forum that’s probably on some sort of watchlist lol

c) No fun, no copes, no solutions- the consensus on that forum is that if you’re social reject then all you should ever do is wallow in misery and waste your time away. Either ask for or suggest some ways to cope, improve or just have fun in life and most users will lash out at you.

 

[snailslime]

Bah you whore, of course snailslime is in here tormenting the incels.

Well you have XX chromosomes and are around, let me ask since I think your position would be a better one to make my point; taking vague terms like "girlfriend" "boyfriend" "romantic relationship" etc. off the table, what specifically would a "romantic relationship" entail in this instance?

As I see it the central pillar of what men should focus on bringing to a relationship is safety/security above all else. That's in terms of resources (making sure there's food on the table and a place to live) it's more immediate safety (if there's some physical threat she can trust you to take steps to protect your partner and kids) and even social (you're loyal to each other and can go into public together without embarrassing each other, that applies equally to both men and women), while women bring things like nurturing and emotional comfort towards her partner and their family/children as a whole. That doesn't mean it's acceptable for women to totally abdicate those other responsibilities, but it should be a primary concern for men (no different than how men shouldn't totally abdicate childcare but it's primarily women's concern).

How many of those relationships can you get, exactly? What are these guys you're referring to offering aside from sexual interaction and relationship status? Are they actually offering you anything, or do you just call yourself his girlfriend and get each other off? It's good that you don't want to spread your legs just for shallow approval, there are absolutely plenty of women who will, but still, it's not like you can act like you're really depriving yourself. Please correct me if I'm wrong though, I'm not trying to attack you here.


All this discussion always occurs from a decidedly feminine perspective. Women might believe relationships can exist even if two people have nothing more than mutual passion, but that's because women are more emotional. That's totally fine, women are a little dumb, it's great, but that's also why it's more a man's job to go "Look, I really like you too, but there needs to be some physical groundwork for this to be anything real".

That's where the actual issue arises, because the social ills we're dealing with currently (communal fragmentation among the middle class leading to total inability for collective action and increasing reliance on the system, all leading to critical levels of centralization and overreach among the upper class, increasing strain on the environment, expanding welfare class, decreasing protection against the criminal class, etc) means there is no security for men to offer.
How women feel is irrelevant, if you cannot fulfill your obligations as a man then an actual romantic relationship isn't possible because you cannot responsibly start a family.


So as usual it's no surprise that incels (and by that I don't mean people who don't get laid, I mean people who are fixated on the fact they don't get laid) become trannies so often, because they're useless limp dicked slime puddles with no sense of dignity or firm standards for themselves. Their only job is to find a way to get women to give them what they want, just like it always was with mommy! If only women would be their girlfriend-mother and tend to their pathetic little faggot ego, that'll serve as a temporary narcissistic opiate to help them cope with the fact that they know they're worthless and unable to protect, care for, or provide comfort to literally anyone!

It's absolutely contemptible. The state of people is something else.

it's not that deep you literal autists. this is quite literally why no woman wants to touch you with a 10 foot pole.

 

[The Last Stand]

Incels on this thread, what are your thought on older women? Particularly those from the 20th century?

 

[jenstark101]

I thought this was a thread to discuss and criticize a particular forum

not to debate the forum's subject. Topic relevant posts are like 1/100 posts rn

 

[Moses game]

(cont.)
Anyway, that is not the reason why I’m posting here, instead I’d like to show you a few people that maybe you’ll find worthy of their own OP.
Pretty much anyone who lurked incel forums long enough is aware of r/incelTears, the anti-incel subreddit. That place also has very fundamental problem 1. It’s on reddit 2. It is populated with redditors. (To be fair I was wondering if it wouldn’t be more fitting to post that in reddit general)
They are to incels what A-Log was to CWC- when you look through post histories you realise that all their campaigning against incels is just a way to hide their own skeletons in the closet and eccentricities, esentially trollshielding (is anyone even using that word?) in purest form.
As such it was inevitable that this subreddit produced a few weirdos over the years:

a)

Least interesting but most infamous one so I have to mention him, DrPizza, guy posted once or twice on IT and sperged about incels on twitter. You know what he was also vocal about on twitter?

How jailbait is tempting and how he's totally not a pedo tehee wink wink Type "DrPizza" in google images and you'll find plenty of his even more “lovely” and retarded quotes.
Needless to say, he got outed as a pedo during some police sting where he got baited into writing that he wants to meet up and pee on toddlers or some shit . Now he's trying to appeal for gorilionth time and running grift that he is getting prosecuted only because judge is homophobic.

Shieeeeet

As for IT- first they went into total silence about the guy deleting ANY mention of him no matter the context, then about a year after the whole thing died down they went into conspiracy theory coping- mention him and they'll tell you that he was a "secret incel" and that incels secretly admire him (nevermind that most incel forums made fun of him for years) and/or flat out deny that he ever posted on IT.

b) Brazilian sigma, not much is known about the guy other than one thing- he was posting on IT dozen times a day, EVERYDAY, for year, without a break. And that is counting just his posts, not comments. People soon took notice that he is spending more time lurking incel forums than even the most basement-dwelling of cells and people from various subreddits started making fun of him.

Someone did a graph of how much he is posting a day and his record was twenty-something posts during a single day. To make it even more funny, the amount of his posts would drastically go up during various holidays- you know, the time when even incel forums had less traffic because some people were busy spending time with their families (which always caused a mini spergout on .co forum where most users were accused of being normies btw.), that guy would spend good portion of these days posting about evil incels on reddit.

He was coping in various ways with criticism- aside from repeating that incels are obsessed with him (oh the irony) he claimed that the process of screen-capping posts, posting them or reddit and writing titles was automated and he wrote program for it, other time he was saying that there are several people managing one reddit account, and once he was saying that he is working a high paying job and just posting during breaks and it takes him 15 seconds to make a post.

- what, you guys don’t post about incels on tranny infested subreddit during breaks in your prestigious job?

As far as I know he might be the reason why subreddit is called r/inceltear rather than r/inceltears- he was known to be a typical power-tripping janny and some squabble between moderators caused the old subreddit to close down.

c) The general troon rabble -this one isn't that interesting but it's worth at least a mention and is a key to understanding why does IT looks like it does- 99% of the time when someone on IT says something like “as a woman” or writes a post that would imply that they’re a woman with its contents, its a tranny (or they’re 15, more on that later). And what a prime example of trannies they are- since average tranny loves to terrorize internet denizens with its mugshots, almost all of them had (these days IT users are mostly using throwaway reddit accounts because they realized that they’re being made fun of) their selfies burred somewhere in their reddit histories. Someone did a compilation of their mugshots that I sadly don’t have and these “women” all looked uglier than average incel forum poster. Why are ugly men in wigs angry on such massive scale about ugly men that can't get laid, I'll never know

Same goes for straight (a relative term when talking about redditors) males that post there- the soy infused gentleman who frequent reddit also love to post their mugshots publicly and someone did a compilation about them too. Worst man-beasts you’d ever see, diet-induced pimples on foreheads, greasy hair covering necks, you get the idea, plenty of them also had posts in their history where they were claiming to be “chads” (I guess using the thrice-cursed incel lingo is acceptable when you’re trying to stroke your own ego).

Now, for the 1% on IT that are women- these are mostly dumb as brick teenage girls. One of the more infamous ones was 15 and drawing some cringe comics inspired by other user (more on him later). Oh, and IT had/has a few discords too- the implication that there might be teenagers lurking on private discords surrounded by trannies and “male feminist” neckbeards is troubling to say the least but I guess grooming is what you deserve for posting on reddit

d) I’m saving best for last- Advocate Doggo. I won’t go into detail about him, instead take a look at this piece of high art, the classic CWC style doodles.

Then look at the amount of words and walls of text in it (this is one of the least "wordy" of his productions anyway) where he is having some hypothetical incel insult him in weirdest ways possible ("advocuck" lmao). Then at the fucking episode number (he has far surpassed that number since then, it’s probably over 200 right now). And then at the amount of likes on it. He has written a couple hundred essays where he has discussions with himself, or rather with his incel jojo stand, all for 8-11 likes he gets per post. And he keeps going- brazilian sigma has nothing on this guy

Those are just a few examples of people or groups that stood out in this sea of freaks, the general population of that place is either laughable or downright baleful at times (they were for example making fun of incels for NOT shooting up places/murdering people). Reddit isn’t a very respectable platform, but subreddits like this attract the worst of it.

And that’s all, sorry for lack of references and archives but most of that stuff are just anecdotes off the top of my head, I hope that you found at least some of that information interesting or entertaining.

 

[Never Scored]

a)
bruh.png
Least interesting but most infamous one so I have to mention him, DrPizza, guy posted once or twice on IT and sperged about incels on twitter. You know what he was also vocal about on twitter?
bruh2.jpg

How jailbait is tempting and how he's totally not a pedo tehee wink wink Type "DrPizza" in google images and you'll find plenty of his even more “lovely” and retarded quotes.
Needless to say, he got outed as a pedo during some police sting where he got baited into writing that he wants to meet up and pee on toddlers or some shit . Now he's trying to appeal for gorilionth time and running grift that he is getting prosecuted only because judge is homophobic.

drpizza-bright.jpg
Shieeeeet

As for IT- first they went into total silence about the guy deleting ANY mention of him no matter the context, then about a year after the whole thing died down they went into conspiracy theory coping- mention him and they'll tell you that he was a "secret incel" and that incels secretly admire him (nevermind that most incel forums made fun of him for years) and/or flat out deny that he ever posted on IT.

Is this the dude who used to write the Windows articles for Ars Technica?

 

[Almighty MoeBro Nation]

Imagine if incels put the same amount of effort into getting a girlfriend that they do writing all their autistic excuses