hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

Elescondio20 said:
I'd love have a place to talk about it.... but it would be only speculation right ?
Unless one in their friendgroup cracks which i doubt they will cause that will cause problems on everyone.

The fact that Ed (aka Punk Duck) and Mandalore unfollowed him on twitter says a lot since they were his closest friends so wnatever he did had to be really bad

But at the same time the fact that they imply that he fucked up and they had to kick him out tells me that they know it could come out..
Maybe he was being innapropiate with a minor and the parents found out and pressed charges?
Since he isnt doxxed that could remain a secret but if someone connects the dots maybe it could come out?

but again is all speculation
Click to expand...
Here's a thread for discussing Shammy
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: G0DofGrief, Nod Flenders and 820㎌Cap
Quintex96 said:
Youtube recommends videos based on shit you already watched, a quick glance at your recent activity shows that you are active in the Nexpo/horror yt thread so you must watch those kind of videos. Youtube sees that you like spooky longform content and recommends you similar videos watched by the largest demographic that watched the video you saw. It's no secret that reddit bugmen love 2spoopy shit and Hbomber is reddit incarnate. Youtube assumes you are also a reddit bugman that hasn't watched Hbomber and his videos end up in your recommended. There are a few other quirks such as Hbomber being an infrequent uploader causing him to have large view spikes which does some algorithm fuckery but that is the general gist of it.

tl:dr the horror to leftist pipeline is real.
Click to expand...
Jesus Christ, do I have to subscribe to actual far-right loonies to negate the association with the balding soy cucks?
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: KingFriko, Toolbox, Woke Blue Muttlema and 8 others
Auntie Fester said:
Once you notice how disingenuous he is politically, you notice how disingenuous he is on other topics also.

A good example in his Fallout 3 review, in which he lists a mod that allows you to skip the intro as thereby meaning the intro is bad. In the same breath, he draws favourably to Fallout 2's intro, which is one of the only parts of that game most people hate. He's similar to Razorfist in that he might sound knowledgeable if you don't know enough about the subject, but if you do, you realise how much he's talking out of his ass. It's a smokescreen to compensate for the fact that he's not as intelligent as he thinks he is.
Click to expand...

I never finished that but didn't he specifically talk about the guy at the end being good?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 820㎌Cap
Kosher Snake said:
the breadtubers themselves or the mindless cultists they call "subscribers"
Click to expand...
Why not both?

I started reading this thread because I watched his Fallout New Vegas video and noticed he was praising the gay companions a lot, more than I’d expect. Plus when someone likes the NCR that much it’s a little suspicious. Turns out he’s like (but hasn’t fully become) any other sexpest leftoid lmao
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: KingFriko, Steinercard, 820㎌Cap and 1 other person
Instant_Pot_User said:
Why not both?

I started reading this thread because I watched his Fallout New Vegas video and noticed he was praising the gay companions a lot, more than I’d expect. Plus when someone likes the NCR that much it’s a little suspicious. Turns out he’s like (but hasn’t fully become) any other sexpest leftoid lmao
Click to expand...
lmlao the reason i asked is because theres barely any difference between a breadtuber and their culties, other than subscriber count

Also hes purposely keeping himself halfbaked when it comes to leftoid moronitude so he can play the "I'm one of the logical ones" card
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chiribisco, 820㎌Cap, Neo-Holstien and 1 other person
skykiii said:
Here I thought I was gonna be necroing this topic for a stupid observation, but anyway...

Earlier, I re-watched Guru Larry's video "5 Pissed Off Hidden Programmer Rants: Japan Edition." Near the end, covering a game called Super Monkey Daiboken, he has Hbomb read the relevant hidden rant... which is just a horny programmer saying things like "I like vagina and clitoris" and other such things.

Guru Larry points out that this programmer is still in the industry and worked on games such as Smash Bros, and makes a crack about how being a creep can help you get ahead.

The way it parsed to me just now is... it made me wonder if Guru Larry wasn't trying to subtly throw shade on Hbomberguy.

And the very last rant in that video was read off by Jim Sterling, and gave me similar undertones.

Is Guru Larry really such a genius that he would insult his allies in such a roundabout way, or am I reading too much into it?
Click to expand...
You're reading too much into it. I know people who know Larry and I've talked to him on Facebook a couple of times. He's a very nice bloke. Not at all like these breadtuber cunts and he is definitely closer to right wing than left. But he's an awful judge of character and surrounds himself with some really shitty people who would hate knowing some of Larry's political beliefs. If you know the "UK Retro gaming scene" then you'll probably know what I mean. No idea why he hangs about with those troons and degenerates. He's not as open (on facebook at least) as he used to be about his politics. If they knew what the Larry of 2016 was saying on his public facebook profile those louts would turn against him in an instant.
Tranimal Farm said:
I'll take brainwashing from Sam Hyde over Philosophy Troon any day, at the very least it will be more entertaining
Click to expand...
I'll paraphrase the actual version of the mangaled quote attributed to Tolkien

"No, they eat and drink, Sam. The Globohomo that bred them can only mock, it cannot make: not real new things of its own. I don't think it gave life to the leftists, it only ruined them and twisted them; and if they are to live at all, they have to live like other living creatures. (and not cut their own dicks off out of a misplaced desire for acceptance that will never come)"

Leftists make fuck all of value. They aren't funny, they aren't smart, they are inherently unedgy. When all you care about is the superficial appearance of feelings, the superficial appearance of being "good" to hide your own degeneracy. You can't create anything. Because there's nothing human in you anymore. You're just a bugman. Hollowed out, consuming, being told what to like, being given prescription meds that dull your mind to deal with emotional problems instead of therapy and companionship. You are just a tool of evil. Just like the Orcs in LotR. If a Doctor tells you you are actually a woman and need to cut off your dick, and you do that with no critical analysis. Because in your head doctors are always right and trust the science. You are incapable of creativity. If you don't do that but uncritically accept the people who do do this and even encourage others to do this you are incapable of creativity. Because creativity starts with thought. Which these idiots don't have. Do you think Tolkien was asleep at the typewriter when he wrote what he did? No. Whilst Tolkien himself hated allegories, here he was warning us about the useful idiots. Thoughtless, feckless, They will eat you with a smile on their face because someone told them it was the right thing to do and they just accepted it. They existed in the 40s as they do now. There were just less of them. Now we'd call them breadtubers or SJWs. Nasty, evil people who desperately want you to see them as good. Will put up a persona of good. Whilst being a fucking kiddy fiddler. And doing what they are told.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, Pobblebonk, Toolbox and 11 others
Steinercard said:
They aren't funny, they aren't smart, they are inherently unedgy.
Click to expand...
They can be edgy when they represent an actual countercurrent to power, currently though it's impossible because they have to pretend like they aren't supported by those in the uppermost echelons of society and are still the downtrodden underdog, because the second you realize that their leftism isn't grassroots their entire reason for existing falls apart.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: KingFriko, Toolbox, Woke Blue Muttlema and 3 others
scathefire said:
They can be edgy when they represent an actual countercurrent to power, currently though it's impossible because they have to pretend like they aren't supported by those in the uppermost echelons of society and are still the downtrodden underdog, because the second you realize that their leftism isn't grassroots their entire reason for existing falls apart.
Click to expand...
Their entire reason for being is following existing power structures whilst pretending doing so is a novel and rebellious act. And penalizing others for not following those power structures. These people are incapable of edge.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Jabba2988, Oh piss off! and 820㎌Cap
I'm surprised I didn't realise this sooner, but remember when he made that response video to Paul Joseph Watson by adopting an all-soy diet for a month to try and disprove him, and ended up going from halfway presentable into the very definition of a bald soylord?

Funny how he went quiet on that front.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, Notbok, Da Capo and 16 others
Auntie Fester said:
I'm surprised I didn't realise this sooner, but remember when he made that response video to Paul Joseph Watson by adopting an all-soy diet for a month to try and disprove him, and ended up going from halfway presentable into the very definition of a bald soylord?

Funny how he went quiet on that front.
Click to expand...
Its funnier when you realize that one is 29 and the other is 39
1650049949755.png
1650049990129.png
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, Notbok, Cosmug and 11 others
Manah said:
I never finished that but didn't he specifically talk about the guy at the end being good?
Click to expand...
Yeah but it's still a moot point.
Every fallout game has faceless hostile only enemies.
The fallout fanbases as a whole is fine, most reviewers and critics are pretentious twats tho.
You can point out how little his points matter with the "I have options are good" shit because 2 has a better villain than 3 by alot, but 3 has you able to negotiate with him and in 2 you can't, but no one will say frank horrigan is worse than autumn.
But yeah that fallout 3 vid is mostly wrong or stupid points compared to cherry picked examples from other games where typically something mediocre in fallout 3 is compared to something really good in another game (like the master, which is still arguable the best in all catagories for a fallout antagonist, be it concept, interaction, dialogue, look, motives and goals)
It's not like (and I say this as a fan of the series) fallout games are a mixed bag of highs and lows where quality is constantly dipping and rising, and the modern ones are alright saved by the vanilla experience being replaced by far superior modded versions so you can make a very clunky game run smoother, and play slightly less janky, or not look like total garbage.
Edit: I also had a brain fart, where the end tutorial guy is actually the overseer which has options to peacefully resolve leaving the vault. The guard he compares the tribal in 2 to is just the first human you see. So less then an hour into the game he fabricates a tale how it's missing the same feature he would get to in like 5 mins from seeing that guy at the end of the tutorial. It's dumb as both games have human mooks you can't reason with, so it be like me bitching every mutant, enclave, legion, raider etc isn't negotiable to be peaceful in the game.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: 820㎌Cap
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back