Preston Poulter et al v. Ali "Dean" Assaf et al (2021)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Good luck. Hope you win again!

@5t3n0g0ph3r will have to give us instructions as to whether he wants this discussed here, or make a separate thread. Technically it's a separate lawsuit but, functionally, it's the same fucking thing he had dismissed in Federal Court refiled in New Jersey Superior Court. Maybe have this thread be for both?

Also, I think we all knew this was coming. He telegraphed it in his Discord from the screencaps I saw months ago.
Much like how Ouzounian v. Kokkinos spun off from the main LOLsuit thread, I think this suit should also be spun off from this one.
Who wants to make the OP? I would but I don't have access to the opening document for it. Maybe @I'm not a Robot can work wonders and provide a copy?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Coon
John T. Lamont and Preston Poulter v. Ethan Van Sciver; John Does and XYZ Corps 1-10 (said names being persons and/or entities which are fictitious and presently unknown)
Superior Court Of New Jersey Law / Division: Burlington County / Docket Number: BURL000689-22

This is where you can access the filings:
https://portal.njcourts.gov/webcivilcj/CIVILCaseJacketWeb/pages/publicAccessDisclaimer.faces
(Change the search to civil, and search by party name preston poulter. The new filing is largely a copy paste of the previous complaint)

01.png02.png03.png04.png05.png06.png07.png08.png09.png10.png11.png12.png13.png14.png15.png16.png17.png18.png19.png20.png21.png22.png23.png24.png
 
Last edited:
John T. Lamont and Preston Poulter v. Ethan Van Sciver; John Does and XYZ Corps 1-10 (said names being persons and/or entities which are fictitious and presently unknown)
Superior Court Of New Jersey Law / Division: Burlington County / Docket Number: BURL000689-22

This is where you can access the filings:
https://portal.njcourts.gov/webcivilcj/CIVILCaseJacketWeb/pages/publicAccessDisclaimer.faces
(Change the search to civil, and search by party name preston poulter. The new filing is largely a copy paste of the previous complaint)

View attachment 3200677View attachment 3200678View attachment 3200679View attachment 3200681View attachment 3200682View attachment 3200683View attachment 3200684View attachment 3200685View attachment 3200686View attachment 3200687View attachment 3200688View attachment 3200689View attachment 3200690View attachment 3200691View attachment 3200692View attachment 3200693View attachment 3200694View attachment 3200695View attachment 3200696View attachment 3200697View attachment 3200698View attachment 3200699View attachment 3200700View attachment 3200701
Thank you!
I was hoping for an easier way to keep an eye out on this case.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Captain Manning
I promise you that everything she said in this clip is a lie. I am her sister. This is all lies.
Which part? That she's dead ass broke and only does volunteer work?

(Mind you, I'm not fully convinced you're Vikki's sister, but I guess I'll roll with this for a little while).

Who wants to make the OP? I would but I don't have access to the opening document for it. Maybe @I'm not a Robot can work wonders and provide a copy?
Well, he did. Guess you're up to bat. You're so good at lawsuit OPs. Make us proud again!

:feels:

I would keep them together here, at least initially.
So would I, considering he's simply refiling the same crap (more or less) in NJ state court, but @5t3n0g0ph3r makes the decisions here, and not I. Either way works, I suppose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Coon
Thanks for coming to the farms Cassandra. I can't imagine what it's like having such a failure as a relative.



Could you go into this a little more? Why has Vikki been unemployed for years and years? I know she worked with you at the Cuttz-4-Muttz, how did she fuck that up?

Also, I'd be remiss if I didn't point you towards the Vikki & Dean thread since this thread is mostly for her lawsuit.

while you are here, can you confirm or deny if @Pokerwhore72 is in fact your sister?
Which part? That she's dead ass broke and only does volunteer work?

(Mind you, I'm not fully convinced you're Vikki's sister, but I guess I'll roll with this for a little while).


Well, he did. Guess you're up to bat. You're so good at lawsuit OPs. Make us proud again!

:feels:


So would I, considering he's simply refiling the same crap (more or less) in NJ state court, but @5t3n0g0ph3r makes the decisions here, and not I. Either way works, I suppose.
I’m not sure why anyone would lie about that, but her being dead ass broke is true. The part about volunteering, looking for a job, and trying to find an attorney. There is a certain tone in her voice when she lies. I listened to the clip, she was lying.
 
I’m not sure why anyone would lie about that, but her being dead ass broke is true. The part about volunteering, looking for a job, and trying to find an attorney. There is a certain tone in her voice when she lies. I listened to the clip, she was lying.
Is there anything in her past that would prevent her from getting a job at Piggly Wiggly, CVS, Dollar Tree? Can you elaborate on Vikki working at two separate dog grooming operations, but not doing any dog grooming?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Coon
What else has he been lying about?!

View attachment 3200960
Oh SHI- He misgendered Vikki!

1650514473317.png


>Negligent Hiring/Supervision/Training

Why is that there? Every allegation in the complaint is about @FROG calling them pedos who make child porn, nothing about hiring, supervision, training or employees. Did I miss something?
I think he's trying to depict CG as some sort of cartel with FROG as the boss. Certainly, he hold a lot of sway over his CG acolytes, but it's not a corporation. It's all an informal association.

But who knows... it's Preston...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant
Is there anything in her past that would prevent her from getting a job at Piggly Wiggly, CVS, Dollar Tree? Can you elaborate on Vikki working at two separate dog grooming operations, but not doing any dog grooming?
There is nothing to prevent her from working, I can not for the life of me understand why she doesn’t. She worked for me, I am a groomer she was my receptionist and bathed dogs when needed. She continued to work at my shop after I sold it for a few months. 2 shops same location.
 
Poulter got his mom to fund an ambulance chaser in New Jersey, who is filing in the Superior Court of New Jersey against @FROG on Poulter's behalf, and you retards are so obsessed with my personal life none of you even noticed.
So the turboautist decided to re-file in the proper jurisdiction. For yourself that probably means that he will eventually re-sue you and serve you properly this time.

When this happens, remember that you are judgement proof. You have no assets and never will have. No salary to be garnished and never will have and you have no possessions of any meaningful value.
Nothing Poulter does can affect you in any meaningful way.
So, If/When he does, could I ask that you would then just keep filing random motions to the court as pro se. Just cut-n-paste random shit from the internet if you have to. Make wild claims and add references to random other cases. It doesn't have to make sense. Just file and file and file.
Try to file at least one new motion every week, preferably more.

This will serve two purposes:
1, it will waste Poulters money since his lawyer will have to respond to them.
2, it will be very funny for us on kiwifarms to watch.

If he want's a lolsuit give him a lolsuit.
 
Last edited:
So the turboautist decided to re-file in the proper jurisdiction. For yourself that probably means that he will eventually re-sue you and serve you properly this time.

When this happens, remember that you are judgement proof. You have no assets and never will have. No salary to be garnished and never will have and you have no possessions of any meaningful value.
Nothing Poulter does can affect you in any meaningful way.
So, If/When he does, could I ask that you would then just keep filing random motions to the court as pro se. Just cut-n-paste random shit from the internet if you have to. Make wild claims and add references to random other cases. It doesn't have to make sense. Just file and file and file.
Try to file at least one new motion every week, preferably more.

This will serve two purposes:
1, it will waste Poulters money since his lawyer will have to respond to them.
2, it will be very funny for us on kiwifarms to watch.

If he want's a lolsuit give him a lolsuit.
Might as well just let you know, now. Vikki delayed responding to the lawsuit until the statute of limitations was up on Preston's complaint.

Preston cannot re-file on Vikki. If the judgement is vacated, she's free.
 
Much like how Ouzounian v. Kokkinos spun off from the main LOLsuit thread, I think this suit should also be spun off from this one.
Who wants to make the OP? I would but I don't have access to the opening document for it. Maybe @I'm not a Robot can work wonders and provide a copy?
I disagree. I don't think that this will be entertaining enough to sustain two separate threads, because EVS isn't a retard. Just keep them both here. It's only a separate case on the most technical level anyway. They're still all being sued over the same stuff by the same guy.
 
I disagree. I don't think that this will be entertaining enough to sustain two separate threads, because EVS isn't a retard. Just keep them both here. It's only a separate case on the most technical level anyway. They're still all being sued over the same stuff by the same guy.
EVS just gives it to his lawyer to sort out, and follows instructions to shut the fuck up. It would be a dead thread.
 
Back