Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

And how would they be hurting the restaurant if whoever sent the pizza already paid for it. If they didn't pay for it, how would Chantal know if she never answers the door? I know...I know...but it always makes me laugh when she lies so badly for someone who does it all the damn time. And for her face to look that huge she either turned off filters for some reason or she is exploding in size.
 
I can't remember which live it was (fuck 2021 and her fucking marathons), but she did indicate that she doesn't part with her money easily - well, unless she's spending it on useless bullshit and food.
*GASP* You mean to tell me that Ms. I-give-homeless-people-20-dollar-bills-only and I'm-giving-ALL-my-money-away-from-now-on-to-poor-minorites (Cuba crying stream, remember?) is stingy with her money? Ms. I-take-care-of-multiple-people...-people-in-my-family? You lie!
It should also be pointed out that Chantal has CHANGED HER MIND about people being deplatformed. She's gone from "no creator deserves to lose being on a platform" to "I'm taking down bishes and openly bragging about it on several platforms because I can do whatever I want, and fuck you, if you want to watch me, do it on MY channel where most cannot chat because Member-only chats, and even then can be blocked because I'm in a gunty mood".
That's right, I forgot she had said she'd never go after anyone's LIVELIHOOD, yannowhatImean?
paging @SwampKitty to the scene


And for her face to look that huge she either turned off filters for some reason or she is exploding in size.
Bolth.
 
*GASP* You mean to tell me that Ms. I-give-homeless-people-20-dollar-bills-only and I'm-giving-ALL-my-money-away-from-now-on-to-poor-minorites (Cuba crying stream, remember?) is stingy with her money? Ms. I-take-care-of-multiple-people...-people-in-my-family? You lie!
Watching this rant is probably one of the few times I've actually gotten mad at a lolcow. Absurd amounts of man-hours and raw resources go into keeping people like her pampered and well-fed and her response is "REEEEE FUCK YOU WHITEY." It wouldn't be so bad if I didn't know women like her are the reason Justin Trudeau has kept his power. Part of me almost wants them to get their wish, because it isn't going to be "I throw some of my excess cash at minorities for asspats but otherwise live the same way teehee." It's going to more akin to Megacity One but with roving minority rape gangs and reparations squads. Don't call it a grave beezers, it's the future you chose.

White people really need to stop LARPing like they're sooooo above tribalism. If you believe we're beyond tribalism after the riots of 2020 you get what you fucking deserve.
 
Well, I found this little tidbit on the internet. This is a snippet from a document from the Canadian Centre of Substance Abuse and Addiction about the safe usage of edibles. I had to laugh since we now have a psych hospital she mentioned in her live today - and I'm even wondering if it's the same hospital or facility she got fired from in 2017.

I've mentioned in a previous post with another snippet where it's indicated that the risk of psychosis increases with 200 mg doses with 500mg doses definitely putting the risk of psychosis being put at play. I am not surprised we've seen Chantal in real-time, decline more and more every day due to a lack of coping skills, stress management, and lack of basic living skills on top of the fuckery from Nader, her obsession with him, the other drugs, adding DeeDee into play - that she didn't fuck her brain up more by literally going from 10 mg gummy bear doses to 1,000 mg pucks in less than a year.

the TL;DR: Chantals brain is about as healthy as the stuff inside the blue dutch oven. Opening that lid was like seeing what is inside Chantal's mind.

7 Things You Need to Know About Edible Cannabis
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ccsa.ca/sites/default/files/2019-06/CCSA-7-Things-About-Edible-Cannabis-2019-en.pdf

1650567086471.png
 
For anyone speculating, Chantal was NOT in Montreal. She was at the Burger King in Vanier, the same one she often escaped to when staying with Nader because French is scary. She was parked in the far corner by the dumpsters. Address: 199 Montréal Rd, Vanier, ON K1L 6E2, Canada

View from her car, featuring Piss Man:
Screenshot_20220421-105321~2.png

Google streetview from across the BK parking lot:
Screenshot_20220421-105431~2.png

View of the parking lot, noting the location of her car and Piss Man:
Screenshot_20220421-120748-253~2.png
 
Last edited:
Chantal doesn't understand fair use. I've been watching Yaba and ffg's streams in particular lately as this Nader saga unfolds, and where exactly is the TOS violation in ffg's stream? They both stop the streams frequently to add commentary, do polls, talk with their chats. That's what's considered tranformative. They are also commenting on the things Chantal is doing and saying...just because their opinions aren't positive, that does not constitute bullying. Again Chantal may be shooting herself in the foot because she might get herself into trouble for false striking channels that are in their right to discuss her.
The real problem is that Chantal cannot wrap her head around the fact that breaking TOS and violating someone's copyright is NOT THE SAME THING. She constantly conflates the two, so she makes these idiotic statements about bullying and fair use. As a reminder to anyone who needs to hear it: TOS and Copyright Striking are 2 FULLY SEPARATE processes when it comes to YouTube as a platform.

If Chantal wants to claim that FFG or Yaba has targeted her specifically for bullying and harassment, she would need to claim a Terms of Service violation. In other words, she would use the report button on the particular video or the whole channel. Then that report is supposedly reviewed by a YouTube employee and the appropriate action is determined. That could be suspension of live capabilities, it might be a week ban, it might be a full termination. More than likely, it will be jack shit nothing that happens. If Chantal believes that FFG or Yaba's content is not transformative, then she would file a copyright strike. Then the video is removed, and FFG or Yaba would have the opportunity to respond by providing their information to both YouTube and Chantal so Chantal could file a civil suit for breaching copyright laws. But, the Gorls never follow through with this second step. Mostly because of their supreme laziness, but also because commentary and reaction channels have already been deemed fair use, as much as these cows wanna moo about how unfair it is. If they don't pursue the lawsuit, the copyright strike is dropped and the videos can be republished.

The reason that you hear about copyright striking getting videos or channels removed WAY MORE than successful reports of TOS violations imposing any such consequences is because YouTube's approach in copyright cases is to immediately remove the video in question to cover themselves, and then wait for the response of the accused creator. If Chantal were to copyright strike 3 videos in a row of either FFG or Yaba's (or any creator, just using them as an example) the entire channel would be removed. Hence why the fats that hate reaction channels use this approach instead of what they are actually pissed about, the supposed 'bullying and harassment.' Of course, the more seasoned reaction channels have wised up to this and will simply privatize all their videos about whoever struck them and file the counterclaim right away to protect the rest of their videos and their channel. Actually getting a channel removed for bullying and harassment is very difficult because YouTube is purposely extremely vague about what will or will not constitute bullying and what the penalties will be if you violate that TOS. They want to be able to make whatever determination they feel best benefits YouTube, and their vague language allows for that.

edited - bad at spelling
 
Uber eats door dash whatever food delivery service is used in Canada never knocks on her door, they usually just leave it at her door while she's checking the app to see where it is, we'd hear knocking constantly during her lives if they did. But somehow two separate deliveries both knocked rather loudly on the same day🤔.
She was raging and if it was pizza being sent she would have ranted about that too. I don't think it was nader because she sent peetz to answer the door and as much as peetz is a spineless little simp I think even he'd refuse to open the door to him, he would just hide in his room.


Re the no talking about nads I wonder if he's said I'll let you pay me to fuck you again when I demand IF you shut the fuck up.
As usual, has no intellectual curiosity about anything outside of herself. Before spouting off, Chins, maybe you should educate yourself about the trial. It's a defamation case against Amber, its not a DV case idiot
View attachment 3202377
Anyone else remember when she said she'd been abusive to nader too... she should keep her mouth shut about the Amber v Johnny Depp situation type deal before people remind her of what she's said in the past.

She's already on thin ice with youtube she might want to make sure she's rightfully striking people. They don't like people false striking channels.
 
Chantal doesn't understand fair use. I've been watching Yaba and ffg's streams in particular lately as this Nader saga unfolds, and where exactly is the TOS violation in ffg's stream? They both stop the streams frequently to add commentary, do polls, talk with their chats. That's what's considered tranformative. They are also commenting on the things Chantal is doing and saying...just because their opinions aren't positive, that does not constitute bullying. Again Chantal may be shooting herself in the foot because she might get herself into trouble for false striking channels that are in their right to discuss her.
Very few of the Chantal reaction videos I've seen are just straight re-uploads of her. 9 times out of 10 it is someone (or a group of people) commenting on whatever she's done. As you said...doing fair use and making shit transformative.

That's why YT hasn't taken them down even when chantal strikes them. She, of course, views it as YT letting people bully her while she gets banned...I fear the fat in her body has completely invaded her brain.
 
Of course she would hate it. She wouldn't be able to stuff her face every night. At least with Bibi he gave so little fucks he just ignored her when she ate her mounds of food on camera...and even then, she still hid pizza boxes from him in the closet.

If she lived with Nader, there's no way he'd remain quiet about her eating habits. He'd mock her relentlessly and she'd be boxed in since there would be nowhere to go when she inevitably had another falling out with him.

Which is why I was rooting hard for the “Cabin arc” to happen.
Not only would they be stuck together, but they’d be in a very small confined place, and even if the Cunt wanted to sneak food while (if) Nader slept, it seems that specific cabin was far enough removed from civilization that there were no Burger Kings within a 200-mile radius.

If she wanted to sneak food she’d have to get a shotgun with a silencer and go snag herself a moose.
 
View attachment 3202370
Gunt reporting Charlie & FFGs twitter for bullying, gonna do Youtube next. Gunt MAD.

View attachment 3202374
The lack of awareness is hilarious. By her showing her reporting an individual for "targeted harrassment and bullying" to her rabid fan base, she is targeting them for harassment and bullying! You cant stand in the middle of a crowd of your "fans" and go "hey look that guy sucks". They will get mobbed. This is asking for a mob. Silly Chantal.
 
Rate me late if this was already debunked, but I found this video and I think it's the first clear proof we have that DD was just a viewer from the beginning and her and Nader do NOT go back way back.

Archive of Foodie Beauty Viewer Deedee was so THIRSTY for Nader PROOF:
 
Rate me late if this was already debunked, but I found this video and I think it's the first clear proof we have that DD was just a viewer from the beginning and her and Nader do NOT go back way back.

It’s crazy that out of the three of them, our gunt is the least desperate. This video is a nice bit of proof that ties all their lies together.

The phone call from d2 was so cringe
 
Back