Exulansic / TT Exulansic / Sierra Weir / Sierra Dullea Weir - TERF detransitioner/desister who has a crusade against the "I Am Jazz" phenomenon and also a massive collection of Party City wigs.

No.

The more notable TERFs are in it because they either have been in the feminist sphere for a long time or have children and are genuinely concerned about the damage caused by “transition on demand” healthcare.

I assume the reason TT started her channel was so that she could call out doctors. Talk about how she understood the harm of SRS/hormones better than doctors. How doctors are failing to diagnose all the issues she sees, etc. If you look at the phallo files it’s all about how doctors are bad and don’t know what they’re doing. Munchie through and through.
But these doctors are the ones doing real harm to children. They belong in jail.
 
36C7D2FC-AF84-4C19-A4F2-FC99BF975C05.jpeg

TT has read Karen’s timeline and got up to date on her thread and is trying to stave off Karen‘a wrath before it is too late!

I think it already is, babe. the only reason she’s held off this long is to prove the haters wrong.
 
Then she could talk about how they belong in jail without diagnosing reality tv characters with developmental disorders and designing fetal tests for CAIS
I don’t disagree with you about the absurdist CAIS rhetoric. But your post referenced the doctors in regards to her phalloplasty philes videos. Those doctors ARE evil because they ARE actually harming people. You don’t have to have munchausens to hate doctors who profit off of the maiming of mentally ill teenagers.
 
View attachment 3200673

TT has read Karen’s timeline and got up to date on her thread and is trying to stave off Karen‘a wrath before it is too late!

I think it already is, babe. the only reason she’s held off this long is to prove the haters wrong.
(archive)

Going from brilliant medical pathologist, to brilliant religious scholar and now brilliant legal expert.

No Sierra, it's debt collectors who are prohibited from publicly shaming debtors into repayment. Third parties can do whatever the fuck they want. And in fact, if we all want to put on our google law degree hats: commenting that Karen's a greasy shithead who should repay the trans widow she exploited is a first amendment protected activity.

And actually, a debt collector collects debts on behalf of someone else. When you're collecting your own debt, the FDCPA doesn't apply.

Ute could probably legally shame Karen herself into paying up. (although maybe other laws apply at that point, but I doubt it, because Ute is not a financial institution and this was just a person-to-person loan. I'm fairly certain they don't hold people in those situations to particularly high standards. But I'm not going to state definitively because unlike Sierra Weir Esq I'm not actually a lawyer)
 
I have no idea what "Podcast woman" Sierra is talking about, but the memory of that woman offering her some benign sounding woo positive touch is the hot new argument that was burning a hole in her brain from last night into this morning.

Note: pardon the repeat of exulansic's "I have met..." post, @bravado replicated it re: karen's response while i was getting this one together.

Here's the ongoing shit with pmberkeley about not wanting to be touched by woo or men or humans in general:

exulansicreiki01.png

exulansicreiki02.png

exulansicreiki03.png

exulansicreiki04.png

exulansicreiki05.png

exulansicreiki06.png
 
I have no idea what "Podcast woman" Sierra is talking about, but the memory of that woman offering her some benign sounding woo positive touch is the hot new argument that was burning a hole in her brain from last night into this morning.

Note: pardon the repeat of exulansic's "I have met..." post, @bravado replicated it re: karen's response while i was getting this one together.


Here's the ongoing shit with pmberkeley about not wanting to be touched by woo or men or humans in general:

View attachment 3202553

View attachment 3202554

View attachment 3202555

View attachment 3202556

View attachment 3202557

View attachment 3202558
Sierra isn't wrong here, if you don't want to be touched, you don't want to be touched. And yeah, there's definitely the point to be made where certain people can feel entitled to touch you, regardless of your feelings about it and that kinda stuff does need to be shot down.

The problem is that Sierra let herself go on for pages of nonsense screeching about it.

Sometimes less is more, Sierra.

If she just said "lol wow rapey much?", or something like that, the person insisting that she should've let weirdos touch her for "healing" purposes would look way worse. The situation is obvious on its face. Adding more outrage to it just looks desperate.

It's that SJW itch in her brain where she has to make everything a big dramatic demonstration about a battle between good and evil, and of course, emphasize that she's on the side of good.

Just chill out Sierra. You're in Cali, smoke a joint.
 
Sometimes less is more, Sierra.

Her early videos were proof of this, she’d cut in with a concise sentence or two of commentary and get her point across. It made her videos really watchable, especially compared to wafflers like Karen. I guess that was a fluke of being new to the platform. Now that she has everyone’s attention and a higher character limit on GETTR and a substack… once you get her going she just keeps going and going and going. It’s not charming or interesting or effective.
 
I have no idea what "Podcast woman" Sierra is talking about
the only popular podcast "terfs" (i use this very loosely) i know of, for future reference in mentions, are katie herzog (of blocked and reported), meghan murphy (of feminist current, the same drugs), dr. debra soh (of wrongthink), meghan daum (of the unspeakable), and isabella malbin (of whose body is it). add 'em if you got 'em. all of these women are actual interviewers or journalists with structured programs, who are way out of exulansic's league professionally when it comes to feminism, and afaik have much lower levels of cow.

edit: oh, the podcaster was also the "touch healer", and probably in the united states. it's probably isabella.
or another crunchy granola midwife. there are quite a few of those in the spiritual side of the movement.
i just noticed that exulansic has had almost no guests on that i can remember, so she can't even be called an interviewer, other than ryan, an ftm, to pretend like she deeply cared about the phalloplasty falling apart.
 
Last edited:
i just noticed that exulansic has had almost no guests on that i can remember, so she can't even be called an interviewer, other than ryan, an ftm, to pretend like she deeply cared about the phalloplasty falling apart.
Given that she followed up that interview by bitching about how hard she had to work to avoid pronouns for Ryan and how delusional he was still... I wouldn't go on there and I'm not even a trannie. God only knows what she'd choose to bitch about after I talked to her, but obviously she would.

For fuck's sake, if your guest is vegetarian, you make a vegetarian meal even if you don't really like it. You don't bitch about what a chore it was to not use meat for one fucking meal if you want other people to consider visiting.

It's pretty bold for someone to bitch so much about avoiding pronouns when she's so particular about her own labels. She identifies as a medical pathologist! You can't refer to her as a speech therapist! It's triggering!
 
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if TT spurning the healer's magic touch did invoke a bit of butthurt on the healer's part. these hippy dippy woo woo types have a tendency to get real in their feelings if you spurn what they see as the gift of their enlightenment. it's emblematic of their own egos and insecurities. I loathe phony intimacy with a passion and all of these communities ooze with it, with this fake as fuck we're all instant besties let's hug and kiss and say we love each other based on nothing except this touchy feely concept it's "good" for us to force an illusion of connection with people we've just met. I find the touch of strangers to be quite violating and exhausting and I prefer to reserve physical connection for those I am truly bonded with. but in these fringe queer lefty hippy spiritual feministy communities, people will stare at you aghast if you actually say no to the hug they try to give you. they take it really personally; the fact of your autonomy to say no really affronts them. yet in the same breath they will talk about the importance of consent and no one owing you any part of their body. I have literally been in a group of these dipshits talking about consent and respect and then them all acting shocked and astonished when I declined to be hugged by them when I was leaving. I was only casually acquainted with them, some of them I had only just met. I wasn't rude or anything, I just politely said I really don't feel like hugging today because I'm pretty overwhelmed and need to hold onto my energy (sometimes you gotta codeswitch) but they were all really taken aback. one of the things that prompted me to say no and hold my ground in the face of their open astonishment was the most obnoxious female in the group talking openly about how she manipulates "consent" out of people to hug them with the language and gestures she uses, and laughing about how she doesn't give people a choice. she's one of those uncomfortably long huggers too. she needs the connection and tells herself everyone needs it and she's doing a good thing by forcing them into it. like if you're close with someone, fine. but when you need to coerce strangers into hugging you for a full twenty seconds while you sway dreamily against them and stroke their hair because you have to convince yourself you're having authentic connections with every damn soul you ever meet because you are such an open hearted, enlightened person who gifts people with mindful touch... get the fuck away from me. it's narcissistic and it creeps me out. no surprise, the woman I'm referencing is a fucking train wreck of a person. her hippy dippy crap is how she tries to fix her own bad feelings about herself, and the consent of others be damned if she thinks they 'need' a hug from her. when peope force hugs on me I don't want, I feel stifled, trapped and violated. because it's about them, not us and any authentic connection we might be able to form if they hadn't forced a hug on me. there is so much NEEDINESS from these types of people when it comes to physical interaction and it is part of what makes it so uncomfortable and offputting to others.
and frankly, it sounds exactly like where this woman was coming from (even the woman defending her saying that TT 'missed out' on human touch - you're not missing out on anything if you don't want THAT person in particular touching you and I'm so sick of woo woo hippies insisting you need to just shut up and learn to enjoy it for your own good) and it just wouldn't surprise me at all if there is a little sour grapes about TT's rejection of her wise healing gift mixed in there amongst it all. doesn't mean that TT isn't being ridiculous in how she addresses it, or delusional about why she's lost the majority of the support she previously had... but given what I've seen and experienced amongst people like this... I really wouldn't be surprised at all if it did stir up a little animosity in the healer. it's just more evidence of how utterly toxic and broken the people who populate these spaces are; how they are bereft of any self-awareness about their own behaviour or true respect and insight into the experience of others. which of course, is why they all find each other and then inevitably invoke narc injuries in each other. and as anti-religion as they all claim to be, those fucking woo woo feminists/queers/hippes/all of the above are determined to convert everyone they meet into becoming true believers in healing touch and "openly receiving love" through never ever denying them access to your body (because they only want to heal you! don't you WANT to be healed?) and very much will consider you suspect if you don't buy in. they're trying to give you a GIFT and you reject it? well how very dare you.

tl;dr you're obviously a few sandwiches short of a picnic if you try and convince an atheist sperg that your magical healing touch is just the special gift they need to recover from all their troubles and it's just more evidence all these people are totally whack and deserve each other. stop trying to touch people who don't want you to touch them. it's not a gift just because your fragile ego needs to believe there's something special in your fingertips.
 
the only popular podcast "terfs" (i use this very loosely) i know of, for future reference in mentions, are katie herzog (of blocked and reported), meghan murphy (of feminist current, the same drugs), dr. debra soh (of wrongthink), meghan daum (of the unspeakable), and isabella malbin (of whose body is it). add 'em if you got 'em. all of these women are actual interviewers or journalists with structured programs, who are way out of exulansic's league professionally when it comes to feminism, and afaik have much lower levels of cow.

edit: oh, the podcaster was also the "touch healer", and probably in the united states. it's probably isabella.
or another crunchy granola midwife. there are quite a few of those in the spiritual side of the movement.
i just noticed that exulansic has had almost no guests on that i can remember, so she can't even be called an interviewer, other than ryan, an ftm, to pretend like she deeply cared about the phalloplasty falling apart.
Thanks for unpacking that. That’s very interesting if it was indeed Isabella, now that you mention it it does sound like her. I don’t recall ever hearing that she and Sierra had met. Isabella is fucking kooky but she is competent at running an interview podcast and a personal brand, I’ll give her that.
 
Back