I can't stomach ~300 pages of zoosadism, so sorry if this has come up before. Has anyone tried to pit the zoophiles against the vegans? It seems like all the arguments you could make as to why fucking a pig is okay could also apply to killing it. Both groups tend to be the same psycho-libtard brain smoothie, and it really feels to me like they just need a small spark to light the fuse. There are probably a few people on twitter right now who claim to be both.
The normal conversation goes like this:
Zoophile: "I'm not raping my dog, she consents!"
Normal Person: "Dogs can't consent at all!"
Zoophile: "She nuzzles up to me and gives me a certain look, she's actually asking me for it!"
Normal Person: "That's not what it looks like at all to me"
Zoophile: "You don't know her! She's not your dog! I alone understand the signs because I know my dog so well!"
At that point the normal person generally comes to understand that the zoophile is operating on a different plane of existence.
Now, if someone is a LGBTQPZSHA512 supporter, you could try the same argument:
Meat Eater: "I'm not murdering my pig, it consents!"
Vegan: "Pigs can't consent at all!"
Meat Eater: "It nuzzles up to the gun and gives me a certain look, it's actually asking me for it!"
Vegan: "That's not what it looks like at all to me"
Meat Eater: "You don't know it! It's not your dog! I alone understand the signs because I know my pig so well!"
Then the vegan is forced to accept your argument, since consent is some strange magical beast to these people. Maybe you could pull a superstraight for meat with this kind of argument?
Of course, they wouldn't actually accept this argument, since their real ideology is "do anything to win", and it also requires you to pretend to be aligned with people who find dogs sexy, but maybe someone can turn this into an epic psyop to totally own the libs.
