Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

The left hates them.
Lmfao the left hates EVERYTHING.

No, that's a post modern take. It depends entirely on the relationship. The trad goal was to get your daughter married, not to have her go to school and play sports.
What's wrong with waiting until 18 for marriage? What's wrong with sports and a basic education?

So if the biological age is 20 that means some women will get married before that age and it means they need to develop the relationship experience by 20 so they need to date before 20.
Yeah, two years of dating is plenty of time. She'll probably have friends through school, church, sports, clubs, etc and can easily move into dating someone she likes.

In our post modern societies, women don't take relationships seriously until mid to late 20s?
Then it's a societal concern. Work on fixing the culture, not dropping age of consent.

So AoC should be lowered and women should be in serious relationships in their mid teens
No.

rather than casual sex dump and dump relationships like today,
Again, that's a social ill. Pre-marital sex is encouraged, that's the result. Lowering age of consent WON'T fix that, it would merely allow predators to use young girls.

Well other people are changing their minds. Ultimately what you're saying is completely disconnected from the reality and the issues of today.
Elaborate, how is what I'm saying disconnected from reality? If anyone is, it's you. You just want to fuck elderly, obese conmen minors.
 
Lmfao the left hates EVERYTHING.
No.
What's wrong with waiting until 18 for marriage? What's wrong with sports and a basic education?

Yeah, two years of dating is plenty of time. She'll probably have friends through school, church, sports, clubs, etc and can easily move into dating someone she likes.


Then it's a societal concern. Work on fixing the culture, not dropping age of consent.


No.


Again, that's a social ill. Pre-marital sex is encouraged, that's the result. Lowering age of consent WON'T fix that, it would merely allow predators to use young girls.


Elaborate, how is what I'm saying disconnected from reality? If anyone is, it's you. You just want to fuck elderly, obese conmen minors.
What if you're 20 and you meet a girl and she is 15. Shit that's pedophilia.
The idea of "wait until 18" doesn't work IRL because people of different ages meet randomly and that causes the jail-bait problem where people engage in consensual relationships that are biologically fine and were legal in the past but are now considered illegal for no reason.
It also causes a problem because people don't even consider serious relationships until past 18.If a women spent ages 14-18 engaging in causel sex relationships, will see suddenly change and look for a serious relationship at 18? no. She'll continue that behavior into her 20s.
You're being disingenuous. You're avoiding the real life problems of the current system and nitpicking in an attempt to win.
 
No.

What if you're 20 and you meet a girl and she is 15. Shit that's pedophilia.
The idea of "wait until 18" doesn't work IRL because people of different ages meet randomly and that causes the jail-bait problem where people engage in consensual relationships that are biologically fine and were legal in the past but are now considered illegal for no reason.
It also causes a problem because people don't even consider serious relationships until past 18.If a women spent ages 14-18 engaging in causel sex relationships, will see suddenly change and look for a serious relationship at 18? no. She'll continue that behavior into her 20s.
You're being disingenuous. You're avoiding the real life problems of the current system and nitpicking in an attempt to win.
Put a sock shotgun in it, chomo.
 
Not literally, obviously. They just love degeneracy, like lowering age of consent, something NAMBLA wants. You a NAMBLA member?

What if you're 20 and you meet a girl and she is 15.
Don't.

The idea of "wait until 18" doesn't work IRL
It would if it was enforced.

people of different ages meet randomly
Who "randomly" meet minors lmao


relationships that are biologically fine
Even if that was true there's more to a person than mere biology. Mental and emotional development is equally important.

and were legal in the past
So was slavery.

people don't even consider serious relationships until past 18.
Good. They should only form platonic relationships.

If a women spent ages 14-18 engaging in causel sex relationships, will see suddenly change and look for a serious relationship at 18? no. She'll continue that behavior into her 20s.
You're being disingenuous. You're avoiding the real life problems of the current system and nitpicking in an attempt to win.
All that shit is irrelevant. You've not produced one single good reason for your case, so, it's dismissed.
 
What's wrong with waiting until 18 for marriage? What's wrong with sports and a basic education?
This is a rhetorical question.
If it were legal, pubescent girls (10 - 12) would jump on Boxy's dick. The law is the only thing stopping them. Tweens don't want to go to prison for loving Boxy.
 
Last edited:
Is Slavic Gypsy Jew from Romania. Would be deported from his own ethnostate.

This is true genius at work, Kiwis. No retarded counter-productive cucking here!
Owning the libs is always productive no matter the cost. You merely lack convictions you cuck centrist libtards.

inb4 Boxy unironically agrees with this
 
The trad goal was to get your daughter married, not to have her go to school and play sports.
You know what else was trad, Emil? Working with your hands like a man. Or actually working, at minimum. How's the unemployed trad advocate life going? Are you ever going to press for trad values beyond the legality of having sex with teenagers?
 
You know what else was trad, Emil? Working with your hands like a man. Or actually working, at minimum. How's the unemployed trad advocate life going? Are you ever going to press for trad values beyond the legality of having sex with teenagers?
I've done real work with my hands and I learned a quite a bit from that experience. Fun tidbit, my blue collar boss (technically landlord), said I didn't belong doing blue collar work so now I'm here doing political research, which is white collar work, and I'm satisfied with the development of my rhetoric and understanding of the issues over the last few years.
 
I've done real work with my hands and I learned a quite a bit from that experience. Fun tidbit, my blue collar boss (technically landlord), said I didn't belong doing blue collar work so now I'm here doing political research, which is white collar work, and I'm satisfied with the development of my rhetoric and understanding of the issues over the last few years.

What really happened... his boss told him to stop being autistic and flip those burgers, Boxy had a temper tantrum and was fired.

Your rhetoric is retarded and you don't understand why impregnating 12 year olds is dumb. If this is your idea of solid work, I see why your boss fired you.

Also, how will you support your 12 year old wife? Using the Left's welfare? For a guy who raves about his high IQ, you really are an idiot for not seeing why you, a Right Winger, being on welfare, hurts your side and makes the Left look good. So much for owning the Libs, the Libs are owning you, Boxy!
 
I'm satisfied with the development of my rhetoric and understanding of the issues over the last few years.
Says every pseudointellectual who thinks they have the knowledge everyone else needs. You may have knowledge, but as the proverb goes, knowledge without wisdom is still foolishness.
 
I'm just going to go on record and say that pedophiles deserve to be held down and forcibly castrated with a rusty box cutter.

Also it's hard to believe that even after 600 pages this chomo failure puts even an incel like myself to shame with, well, everything.
Those who advocate for sexualizing children are irredeemable and need to be extinguished from society in a mass genocidal purge. Pedophiles and "ephebophiles" are people who put their own sexual gratification above all else, rendering them not only useless to society, but threats to the future development of society. They are perhaps, the single most dangerous threat to civilization.

Sexual gratification is a privilege provided through the societal construct of marriage, meant to encourage the means of pro-creation. It's not a biological necessity, nor a right.
 
Those who advocate for sexualizing children are irredeemable and need to be extinguished from society in a mass genocidal purge. Pedophiles and "ephebophiles" are people who put their own sexual gratification above all else, rendering them not only useless to society, but threats to the future development of society. They are perhaps, the single most dangerous threat to civilization.

Sexual gratification is a privilege provided through the societal construct of marriage, meant to encourage the means of pro-creation. It's not a biological necessity, nor a right.
There was a guy I encountered who believed it was, and encouraged people to write their governments to provide them with girlfriends. Personally I don't care if someone has sex within or outside of marriage, but I do think the "have sex only within marriage" are religious weirdos afraid of going to Hell if they so much as consider masturbating, or at least come off as such.

They're the other side of the shit stained incel coin. Although to be honest, forcing incels to go to church might not be the worst thing ever, although I don't really think you can force a person to truly believe.
 
I'm just going to go on record and say that pedophiles deserve to be held down and forcibly castrated with a rusty box cutter.

Also it's hard to believe that even after 600 pages this chomo failure puts even an incel like myself to shame with, well, everything.
Castration just makes them more depraved and sadistic because they can't get off. Just shoot them in the head.
 
OK, @BoxerShorts47 let's say you get your 11 year old wife. Years down the line, you still prefer 10-14 year olds. Your wife is an ancient 20-21 year old a la Logans Run, do you trade her in for someone who you are actually attracted to?

ETA oh God, I found this picture here of all places. WTF!! Thanks @Wraith

Looks like my hyperbole wasn't extreme after all 😕😐

Low Egg's World -.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've done real work with my hands and I learned a quite a bit from that experience. Fun tidbit, my blue collar boss (technically landlord), said I didn't belong doing blue collar work so now I'm here doing political research, which is white collar work, and I'm satisfied with the development of my rhetoric and understanding of the issues over the last few years.
They usually say that when you suck at your blue collar job lol. Whatever though, I'm not gonna press that fact.

Have you considered actually putting your time to use? Getting a graduate degree instead of jerking off to incel rhetoric on the internet? Conservative universities exist, you know. Being a 30+ year old unemployed tradposting doomer is unproductive and would be frowned upon in the trad society you advocate for.

I'm also curious about your physical fitness. Do you go to the gym? Do you train cardio? There's a pretty funny trend of tradposters being either overweight or underweight lazy incels, so it would be nice if you could provide proof that you don't fall into that category. If you do, you're a hypocrite and need to get your shit together before you spout reactionary takes on the internet.
 
Back