Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
Irpin, province of Kiev.
A pair of marauders, father and son got caught after throwing a RGD-5 grenade at women who called the police on them. One woman is in critical condition. They were a part of Тероборона, Territorial guard, which should be infamous for everyone here at this point.
"Where did you get the grenade from? At the (guard)post."
This is what happens when you give untrained civvies access to weapons. Russians did it.



Remember DPR soldiers with Mosin rifles?
Here's a Ukrainian soldier with a Mauser.
16509133667660.jpg
Creepiest telegram tag winner.
 
Last edited:
chad_yes.jpg

I already addressed the Tochka-U situation: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/russi...-2022-thread-2.114104/page-1335#post-11634503
Ukraine fired one missile into the Donetsk region that was just 25 numbers off from one fired by Russia in Syria, 4 years apart.
The missile serial numbers appear to be completely jumbled, so the serial being filmed by cameras doesn't mean it was a false flag.

I still don't understand. Even if we remove any appeals to morality, "escalation" is still based on a gentleman's agreement being breached. There is an offense committed against one of the parties by receiving outside help. Not a "real" offense like actual war crimes, but essentially a moral offense.
Attacking a place where weapons are stored isn't so much an "escalation", but a tactical necessity. If new weapons are being introduced, it makes sense to target them before they're even at play.
I don't think i was accusing russia of escalation for attacking weapon stores, i was more trying to say that it was more a response of russia to the escalation of the weapons.
I don't really feel comfortable with my ability to debate the morality of what happens in a war, i'm not equipped or if i was equipped, i'm not willing to get into that debate. It's a loser's game to try to compare either side to some sort of moral code, outside of "war crimes" I don't think either side could possibly assume a moral high ground with what's going on.
 
Irpin, province of Kiev.
A pair of marauders, father and son got caught after throwing a RGD-5 grenade at women who called the police on them. One woman is in critical condition. They were a part of Тероборона, Territorial guard, which should be infamous for everyone here at this point.
"Where did you get the grenade from? At the (guard)post."
This is what happens when you give untrained civvies access to weapons. Russians did it.

Remember DRP soldiers with Mosin rifles?
Here's a Ukrainian soldier with a Mauser.
View attachment 3215831
Creepiest telegram tag winner.
I swear to God there better be some fucking surplus imports after this war. The supply of vintage milsurp has gone to shit the last few years and I need more damnit. Plus these would have extra history attached, which is cool if you're into that sort of thing.
 
Pro-Russian copeposter compares the war in Ukraine with the Franco-Prussian war


I think his conclusions are wrong and don't take into account that most of the western money and material coming to Ukraine is getting more advanced and numerous almost every week and Russia will struggle in the long term to get the advanced components to produce the smart weapons that are almost indispensable in modern war due to sanctions. (unless China gets involved in the war)

His point about conscripts is total bullshit because Russia has lost a lot of combat potential for it's professional forces and they're scraping the bottom of the barrel by bringing mercenaries and foreign fighters from the Middle East and the Caucasus, in short, they have a manpower crisis.

Russia at this point needs to admit that this is a war and retrain their reservists to bring them to Ukraine because their professional forces will be burned out by the time they win Donbass.

This is not the Franco-Prussian war, the time for maneuvers and brilliant victories at a low cost is over. This is a war of attrition and the Russians must get that fact through their skulls or face the consequences.
 
so anyone got a map that shows the progress of the Russian army over time?


Here's one sourced from all versions of the map on Wikipedia's Russian Invasion of Ukraine page. Map is subject to Wikipedia's Reliable Sources™ rule (i.e. New York Times). Flickering of claimed territory between frames is due to editors have an autistic slapfight over what constitutes a Reliable Source™. I don't necessarily endorse this map but Wikipedia is the easiest source to scrape maps over time from.
 
I don't think i was accusing russia of escalation for attacking weapon stores, i was more trying to say that it was more a response of russia to the escalation of the weapons.
I don't really feel comfortable with my ability to debate the morality of what happens in a war, i'm not equipped or if i was equipped, i'm not willing to get into that debate. It's a loser's game to try to compare either side to some sort of moral code, outside of "war crimes" I don't think either side could possibly assume a moral high ground with what's going on.
Yes, my point being is that describing it like that kind of sounds like "we weren't attacking this region, but now that you're receiving weapons we will attack you there to show you who's boss".
I'm only saying that it's more "oh shit they have weapons they didn't have there yesterday, we should fire our meme missile that zips across a country in 5 minutes!". That's it, it's not a "response" but an actual tactical need to both disable systems before they go online and also create a demoralization effect.
 
View attachment 3216244
Here's one sourced from all versions of the map on Wikipedia's Russian Invasion of Ukraine page. Map is subject to Wikipedia's Reliable Sources™ rule (i.e. New York Times). Flickering of claimed territory between frames is due to editors have an autistic slapfight over what constitutes a Reliable Source™. I don't necessarily endorse this map but Wikipedia is the easiest source to scrape maps over time from.
cheers bruv. Looks like most of the gains in the East happened when the Ruskies withdrew from the north.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Russia have been busy with forced relocation of close to 1 million Ukrainian civllians into Russia.

and yes, i know it is an ukraine source, but Russia have a "nice" history of forced relocation of civilians into their country.
From the link you provided:
"According to him, "over the past 24 hours, without the participation of the Ukrainian authorities, 16,838 people were evacuated to Russia from dangerous regions of Ukraine, certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, including 1,402 children, in total, since the start of the war, there have already been 951,329 people, including 174,689 children."
For reference, that doesn't matter if it is forced relocation.
Ah yes, those forced evacuations from the military conflict. I'm sure Mariupol residents would spit in the face of anyone who would suggest moving them out of there. They have grown to like the sound of artillery strike, amirite?

Referring to the Russian article:
https://translate.yandex.ru/translate?lang=ru-en&url=https://www.interfax.ru/russia/837576
"In the subjects of the Russian Federation, more than 9.5 thousand temporary accommodation facilities continue to operate, which are fully equipped with the necessary equipment and provide places for rest and hot meals. Individual work is carried out with the arriving refugees, they are provided with qualified medical and psychological assistance, " Mizintsev said.
 
I think his conclusions are wrong and don't take into account that most of the western money and material coming to Ukraine is getting more advanced and numerous almost every week and Russia will struggle in the long term to get the advanced components to produce the smart weapons that are almost indispensable in modern war due to sanctions. (unless China gets involved in the war)

His point about conscripts is total bullshit because Russia has lost a lot of combat potential for it's professional forces and they're scraping the bottom of the barrel by bringing mercenaries and foreign fighters from the Middle East and the Caucasus, in short, they have a manpower
Russian sources are just as autistically retarded as Western sources, just in reverse.

Irregardless, I don't expect the gun drops on Ukisrael will change the outcome of the war, and doubt Nato expects them to. This is partly about making the war as damaging and costly for Russia as possible (it also does the same thing to Ukraine but nobody cares about Ukrainians), partly about setting up the successor state of Western Ukraine to become a Nato FOB disguised as a country in preparation for the next war with Russia.

Their economy is now almost exclusively based on Western charity, which comes with unpleasant strings attached (no peace until the US says you can have peace), more than 5 million of their most valuable citizens (women of childbearing age and the kids) have left so far, and they've suffered unknown but probably terrible casualties among their professional fighting men.

Doesn't matter very much at this point if they get 1,000 Abrams tanks with laser cannons, it'll take months to years to train a new army, integrate new weapons systems, update their doctrine. Ukraine doesn't have that kind of time. It's headed toward being a failed state / American Manchukuo / permanent PvP zone.

Russia has probably lost a few thousand men already, but since they have the fifth largest military in the world in terms of active duty manpower, they're very far away from scraping the barrel. Instead, they're determined to do this war as cheaply as possible for a bunch of reasons. Getting Chechens and ME dudes to do Russia's dirty work is partly a response to Nato's attempts to bleed the Russian army dry in Ukraine. Can't bleed Russia dry if you're killing not-Russians
220122-vladimir-putin-jm-1327-24e441.jpg
But it also means Russia expects, or is at least preparing for, the followup to their Ukrainian Bogus Journey. Which, sad to say, is looking pretty likely before 2030 and will be the true sequel to WW2 we've all been waiting for.
 
Numerous Ukrainians lay dead in the fields of Kherson (link)


Now we know whos not been stealing boots from corpses

b.png{/SPOILER]

Chechens caught an Azov fighter on Azovstal and now he's walking with them and telling them everything he knows.


Chechen viking master race
12.png

Edit2:

A serviceman of the armed forces of Ukraine explains how he raped a detained civilian woman in view of her husband and shot him dead for 'expressing discontent' with his actions.


Don't ask me why this retard would admit to that if he really did that
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back