𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

Actually? Yeah, we should be worried... since Brad Chapman of NBC Universal can be seen over here on the Outages-discussion mailing list asking network admins the legal/technical barriers to de-peering a certain Autonomous System, AS13414 (read: Twitter), from the rest of the Internet.

I'm sure @Null would be happy to explain to him how trying to de-peer Elon Musk from the Internet is not quite the same as de-peering KiwiFarms... Elon has money and lawyers.
Good lord that guy is a moron. That's hardly even the place to bring it up, as one reply mentions this has long been (half jokingly) bandied about on the NANOG list at various times for various reasons.

Of course an AS could 'be isolated'. You just drop peering with them. If someone else doesn't want to talk with them, just blackhole their routes. Left out of that discussion is 'be fucking careful if you do that, you don't want one or both political parties classing you as a common carrier even harder than the Obama FCC did'.
 
so overdramatic
View attachment 3220261

antifa organizing WiSpa gayops to beat on women and the entirety of Summer 2020 doesn't exist I guess
Antifa couldn'tt organize a picnic. The only reason they were even able to get involved is because the niggers did all the work for them.
 
words cannot express how unintimidated I am by checkmarks
Is he threatening to make his own twitter with blackjack and hookers just like all the other people did who were already exiled years ago, or is it going to be physical violence?


Because that fat fuck is incapable of both.
Big talk from a guy who's too short to ride a roller coaster by himself.
When shit-talkers with a Napoleon Complex like Tim start talking about violence, they that mean other people made of sterner stuff will do their violence for them.

He'd go crying to the cops he loves to denounce the moment Meal Team Six LARPerators came out to play.
 
It is so discouraging that so many people are OPENLY hostile to free speech. A few years ago they would have atleast tried to soften it up somewhat
"there is no slippery slope that's just a far right conspiracy"
they are openly anti free speech while constantly blabbering about "open democracy".
Just like how they are anti establishment rebels while acting as liberal foot soldiers supporting increased government power. Just like how they are anti capitalist anarchists while purchasing Funkopops and Disney merch by the ton. Just like how only a few weeks ago they told us to buy electric if we don't like the gas price increase, but now hate Musk and Tesla.

They are literal NPCs. Religiously hypocritical fanatics. Societal sycophants.

Half the comments on Elon Musk's twitter right now are pseudo-intellectual nonsense desperately reaching for "gotcha!" moment, coming from full grown adults who believe they are the pinnacle of enlightenment yet haven't had an original thought since the Obama years.
 
three open close parenthesis on either sides.png

Archive

Oh gee whizz I wonder why they started to "review section 230" now that Elon owns twitter. Watch as the Drumpfstein worshippers who previously supported his anti-section 230 rhetoric lash out at the other side for doing the same thing
 
Last edited:
Good lord that guy is a moron. That's hardly even the place to bring it up, as one reply mentions this has long been (half jokingly) bandied about on the NANOG list at various times for various reasons.

Of course an AS could 'be isolated'. You just drop peering with them. If someone else doesn't want to talk with them, just blackhole their routes. Left out of that discussion is 'be fucking careful if you do that, you don't want one or both political parties classing you as a common carrier even harder than the Obama FCC did'.
What gets me is that this guy is supposedly a Systems Engineer w/ a *nix background, so he should already have a vague idea of what this would take, and that this was entirely the wrong mailing list to pitch this to... unless he's a lying sack of shit and his *nix background consists of "I logged into an Ubuntu box once". Yeah, pitching it to NANOG would've been better, and also lulzier since they would've told him exactly where and how to fuck off.
 
Antifa couldn'tt organize a picnic. The only reason they were even able to get involved is because the niggers did all the work for them.
I can't find it again but I remember a video where some BLM dude, who was not rioting but distributing literature and actually organizing peaceful shit, went berserk on a bunch of antifa, I think in Seattle, and if not, Portland. These six skinny white dudes started giving him shit and he started flipping over their tables and shit they had set up in his space. Someone might remember this.

Also BLM, not the looters but the actual people engaging in free speech and not rioting and fucking shit up, often got the flak from the antifa idiots going around nihilistically smashing shit for no reason. Yeah there was a certain feral cloud surrounding BLM. . .peaceful demonstrations but that sort of activity usually stopped after all the HDTVs and shit were gone.

Antifa would just nihilistically burn things down for no reason, even shit like small family-owned bookstores.

And not to defend stealing shit because you don't have it, you want it, and you can get away with it, but it's a much less reprehensible motive than being some trust fund kid and smashing shit up just out of hatred of pretty much everything.

Antifa ruins EVERYTHING it touches, even stuff that was already ruined before they got to it (like BLM)!
 
View attachment 3220483

Oh gee whizz I wonder why they started to "review section 230" now that Elon owns twitter. Watch as the Drumpfstein worshippers who previously supported his anti-section 230 rhetoric lash out at the other side for doing the same thing
I have no problem flip-flopping on that, now that circumstances have changed. Whatever helps me attain my agenda is acceptable.

Turnabout is fair play.
 
View attachment 3220483

Oh gee whizz I wonder why they started to "review section 230" now that Elon owns twitter. Watch as the Drumpfstein worshippers who previously supported his anti-section 230 rhetoric lash out at the other side for doing the same thing
What a surprise. NOW they want to "reform" section 230. Except it won't be a reform it will be an out right removal then replacement. Psaki is using Covid "misinformation" as an excuse. People who think Covid is a major issue are at fault for it to still be used as a cudgel by the government.
 
Because @Null told them it was important and anything he says to the hugbox is believed by the hugbox.

What I want to know is if Twitter's algorithm (that has been dismantled somewhat in the last few hours to cover their asses) will be recoverable so that we really know what shit they were doing.

I do find the whole situation weird, where a guy who runs a website that catalogs the retards of the internet, who lives in another country, who runs offshore servers, who was forced to use crypto by banks, is worried about 230. It just goes to show you 230 doesn't exist until they say it does.
 
I do find the whole situation weird, where a guy who runs a website that catalogs the retards of the internet, who lives in another country, who runs offshore servers, who was forced to use crypto by banks, is worried about 230. It just goes to show you 230 doesn't exist until they say it does.
Last time I checked, he said the problem was not 230 but payment processors. In fact he was talking about it on Raket stream yesterday.
 
Back