Trashfire Ethan Ralph vs. Mister Metokur & Gator - It's finally happening

Who did the worse beating?

  • The 14-year-old transgender prostitute in Lisbon.

    Votes: 599 24.8%
  • A Minnesota cancer patient.

    Votes: 1,302 53.8%
  • Mundane "Boulder King" Matt Jarbo.

    Votes: 517 21.4%

  • Total voters
    2,418
I’m curious what would happen if Ralph’s entire subforum was locked down for a couple weeks, what effect that would have on RagePig?
Depends on if the ground was allowed to lie fallow or if he was just unable to access and observe the activity on it. The latter would no doubt be much more entertaining.
 
What’s funny is that, without him hitching his wagon to the Gunt, I never would have known how big of a faggot Nick Fuentes is.

I didn’t know KF existed until I came to find out about Isabella Janke, and had no idea what GG was or who Gunt was.

I thought Fuentes was just a young, well-spoken right wing nut who had some clout and was going to be a Tucker Carlson type personality. I now realize he’s a zoomer faggot who has admitted that he has no standards or ethical compunctions and amends his moral stances depending on whether or not they benefit his current status.

For a man with “political objectives” he spends a ton of time slap fighting on the internet, and his admission of hypocrisy with regards to his value system has proven that it is impossible to debate in good faith with him. A+ move I’m sure you and your 400 followers are going to be very influential moving forward.
 
When Mundane Matt imploded and people were making up a lot of wild shit about him, Ralph would gladly bring those things up and add "allegedly" so he can say that shit, frame Matt as a pedo or serial killer, but give himself a cover of "I'm just a journalist reporting" deniability.
That's one of those bits of "legal knowledge" dumb white trash think, along with other classics like an undercover cop has to admit it if you ask if they're a cop. The test isn't "did he say allegedly" but whether a reasonable person would take it as a factual allegation.

Most of the stuff against Jarbo was so obviously over the top it wouldn't be believed anyway, but "allegedly" isn't some magic word any more than "Minecraft" is.
 
That's one of those bits of "legal knowledge" dumb white trash think, along with other classics like an undercover cop has to admit it if you ask if they're a cop. The test isn't "did he say allegedly" but whether a reasonable person would take it as a factual allegation.

Most of the stuff against Jarbo was so obviously over the top it wouldn't be believed anyway, but "allegedly" isn't some magic word any more than "Minecraft" is.
Doesn't it also come down to how the statement is structured? Like the distinct difference between "Ralph raped Alice, allegedly" and "Alice is alleging that Ralph raped her". One of the two should keep you clear of legal trouble.
 
Doesn't it also come down to how the statement is structured? Like the distinct difference between "Ralph raped Alice, allegedly" and "Alice is alleging that Ralph raped her". One of the two should keep you clear of legal trouble.
It's more complicated than that. If the context made it clear you were actually endorsing it, no amount of chanting "allegedly" would protect you, especially if it was obvious you knew she is an unreliable crazy person, or knew for a fact it was false and presented it as credible anyway.

For instance, I could say "Alice is alleging that Ralph raped her." But I'd also probably include disclaimers more than merely invoking "alleged" or "allegedly" or "alleging," since I have serious doubts about the truth of the statement. By itself, the quoted sentence is just a fact.

Another example, suppose I say "X was arrested under suspicion of child molestation," but I know it was in fact a case of mistaken identity and the actual suspect was someone else with the same name. Omitting that makes the statement a lie, even if it is literally true. That's also another kind of defamatory statement called "false light," in which the defendant presents statements that are literally factually true but intended to convey a defamatory falsehood.
 
He's clinging to highschool Ralph for some reason. Kind of reminds me of this dude.
Rawr_fag.jpg

A retarded redneck who shows off his shitty jewelry, constantly takes the troll bait while making himself look even more stupid when trying to disprove the trolls, obsessed with his shitty creation, and clings to his high school experience... fixed that for you.
 
View attachment 3215376
A retarded redneck who shows off his shitty jewelry, constantly takes the troll bait while making himself look even more stupid when trying to disprove the trolls, obsessed with his shitty creation, and clings to his high school experience... fixed that for you.
Please do not compare pre-tomgirl cwc to Ralph. He has a very special place in my heart.(:_(
 
Back