Business Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Take Twitter Private for $44 Billion - The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at the social-media network

1649933159786.png

The tech billionaire Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $41.4bn.

A regulatory filing showed on Thursday that Musk was offering $54.20 a share – a 38% premium to the closing price of Twitter’s stock on 1 April, the last trading day before the Tesla chief executive’s investment of more than 9% in the company was publicly announced.

More to follow…



1649933831102.png
1649933810146.png






Elon Musk has made a “best and final” offer to buy Twitter Inc., saying the company has extraordinary potential and he is the person to unlock it.

The world’s richest person will offer $54.20 per share in cash, representing a 54% premium over the Jan. 28 closing price and a valuation of about $43 billion. The social media company’s shares soared 18% in pre-market trading.

Musk, 50, announced the offer in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, after turning down a potential board seat at the company. The billionaire, who also controls Tesla Inc., first disclosed a stake of about 9% on April 4. Tesla shares fell about 1.5% in pre-market trading on the news.

Twitter said that its board would review the proposal and any response would be in the best interests of “all Twitter stockholders.”

1649936433325.png

The bid is the latest saga in Musk’s volatile relationship with Twitter. The executive is one of the platform’s most-watched firebrands, often tweeting out memes and taunts to @elonmusk’s more than 80 million followers. He has been outspoken about changes he’d like to consider imposing at the social media platform, and the company offered him a seat on the board following the announcement of his stake, which made him the largest individual shareholder.

After his stake became public, Musk immediately began appealing to fellow users about prospective moves, from turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter and adding an edit button for tweets to granting automatic verification marks to premium users. One tweet suggested Twitter might be dying, given that several celebrities with high numbers of followers rarely tweet.

Unsatisfied with the influence that comes with being Twitter’s largest investor, he has now launched a full takeover, one of the few individuals who can afford it outright. He’s currently worth about $260 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index, compared with Twitter’s market valuation of about $37 billion.

In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk said he believes Twitter “will neither thrive nor serve [its free speech] societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company”

The takeover is unlikely to be a drawn-out process. “If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.

1649936465070.png


Musk informed Twitter’s board over the previous weekend that he thought the company should be taken private, according to today’s statement.

The $54.20 per share offer is “too low” for shareholders or the board to accept, said Vital Knowledge’s Adam Crisafulli in a report, adding that the company’s shares hit $70 less than a year ago.

Although Musk is the world’s richest person, how he will find $43 billion in cash has yet to be revealed.

“This becomes a hostile takeover offer which is going to cost a serious amount of cash,” said Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud Equity Research. “He will have to sell a decent piece of Tesla stock to fund it, or a massive loan against it.”

Musk has hired Morgan Stanley as his adviser for the bid. The offer price also includes the number 420, widely recognized as a coded reference to marijuana. He also picked $420 as the share price for possibly taking Tesla private in 2018, a move that brought him scrutiny from the SEC.

“There will be host of questions around financing, regulatory, balancing Musk’s time (Tesla, SpaceX) in the coming days,” said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush. “But ultimately based on this filing it is a now or never bid for Twitter to accept.”

I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it.
Elon Musk’s full letter to Twitter’s board





EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources​


Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash, the price that he originally offered to the social media company and called his 'best and final', people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $43 billion deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said. It is always possible that the deal collapses at the last minute, the sources added.

Twitter has not been able to secure so far a 'go-shop' provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow it to solicit other bids from potential acquirers once the deal is signed, the sources said. Still, Twitter would be allowed to accept an offer from another party by paying Musk a break-up fee, the sources added.

Twitter and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.




Twitter and Elon Musk Strike Deal for Takeover​

Twitter Inc. TWTR 5.52% on Monday accepted Elon Musk’s bid to take over the company, giving the world’s richest man control over the influential social-media network where he is also among its most powerful users.

The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at Twitter, where many executives and board members initially opposed Mr. Musk’s takeover approach. The deal has polarized Twitter employees, users and regulators over the power tech giants wield in determining the parameters of acceptable discourse on the internet and how those companies enforce their rules.

The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal. Earlier on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Twitter and Mr. Musk had reached an agreement to value Twitter at $44 billion.

The takeover, if it goes through, would mark one of the biggest acquisitions in tech history and will likely have global repercussions for years to come related to how billions of people use social media. Mr. Musk, who is also chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA -1.30% and Space Exploration Technologies Inc., must find a way to balance his commitment to less moderation with the business needs of a company that has struggled to reconcile free-wheeling conversation with content that appeals to advertisers.

On Monday, after the Journal reported that a deal was close, Mr. Musk tweeted to indicate that he wants the platform to remain a destination for wide-ranging discourse and disagreement.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” he wrote.

The San Francisco-based social-media company had been expected to rebuff the offer, which Mr. Musk made April 14 without saying how he would pay for it.

Twitter, a day after the unsolicited offer, adopted a so-called poison pill, designed to make it more difficult for Mr. Musk to reach more than a 15% stake in the company.

Twitter changed its posture after Mr. Musk detailed elements of his financing plan for the takeover. On April 21, he said he had $46.5 billion in funding lined up. Twitter shares rose sharply, and company executives opened the door to negotiations.

Twitter shares were ahead more than 5% in afternoon trading on Monday.

The potential turnabout on Twitter’s part comes after Mr. Musk met privately Friday with several shareholders of the company to extol the virtues of his proposal while repeating that the board has a “yes-or-no” decision to make, people familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Musk, with over 82 million Twitter followers, has long used the platform to pronounce his views on everything from space travel to cryptocurrencies. In January, he began buying Twitter stock, becoming the single-largest individual investor with a more than 9% stake by April.

He has previously used Twitter to escalate a conflict with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency opened a probe into some of his recent stock sales, and he often blasts his critics on the social network.

Twitter, at the beginning of the month, invited Mr. Musk to join its board—which would have prevented him from owning more than 14.9% of the company’s stock. Mr. Musk initially agreed and then rejected the offer.

Twitter has already embarked on a turnaround plan after a fight with activist Elliott Management Corp. about two years ago. Twitter said a little over a year ago that it would work to at least double its revenue to $7.5 billion by the end of 2023 and reach at least 315 million so-called monetizable daily active users at that time.

Mr. Musk’s proposed changes for the platform include softening its stance on content moderation, creating an edit feature for tweets, making Twitter’s algorithm open source—which would allow people outside the company to view it and suggest changes—and relying less on advertising, among other ideas.

Mr. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” said in a recent interview at a TED conference that he sees Twitter as the “de facto town square.”

Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts, Mr. Musk said, pointing to temporary suspensions as a better solution.

Mr. Musk said he also wants the platform to be more transparent when it takes action that amplifies or reduces a tweet’s reach. He said he wasn’t certain how some of those ideas would be implemented.

Twitter has spent years advocating for healthier discourse on its platform and adding content moderation, arguing at least in part that it is good for business.

The company also has introduced new features that have been gaining some traction with users, including Twitter Spaces, which allows people to host live audio conversations with each other within the platform.

Mr. Musk has said he wants Twitter to rely less on advertising—which provided roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021—and shift its business model more toward subscriptions. The platform currently offers a subscription-based service called Twitter Blue, which gives customers premium features like “undo tweet” for $2.99 a month. He suggested removing all ads on Twitter as part of the subscription offerings.

Mr. Musk also floated the idea of cutting staff, shuttering the company’s San Francisco headquarters building and not giving the board of directors a salary. The latter could save roughly $3 million a year alone, he said.

His other proposed changes for Twitter include trying to stop spam and scam bots and allowing for longer tweets. The current limit is 280 characters.

On Thursday, Twitter is scheduled to announce its first-quarter earnings.


 

Attachments

Last edited:
We don't know the agreement...the stock being down could be a good thing for him. Also Twitter has never made money, so I'm guessing there are motives other than money for the buy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Yamma Damma
We don't know the agreement...the stock being down could be a good thing for him. Also Twitter has never made money, so I'm guessing there are motives other than money for the buy.
The 4% drop cope is the same thing as when leftoids brag about gas going from $4 to $3.60. Look at this.
1651023850705.png
It's just normal fluctuations at the moment, but the commies have no understanding of markets in the first place.
 
I mean... I'd need to talk with Elon about how much he's paying me, but if the price is right I'd do it.
I would love to see these guys squrim Once they get nuked since they mocked the right for getting censored now it’s on the other foot and the money talks594F3F1E-1C99-4550-8F53-E0999E5954F3.jpeg
 
Can you post the article's text? I can't get the cache version to pop up when I google it (as I've used up my free Medium articles this month).
Twitter died yesterday.

That’s a joke. (Not really.)

The first three words of Camus’ The Stranger are “Mother died yesterday.” Twitter — unfortunately — shaped our world as much as that great book did. And now — well, it’s no more. As flawed as it was — and it was flawed — Twitter held out some hope, some chance, that society could have some kind of collective space. After all the badness, It was getting better.

And now?

Twitter’s death is an object lesson in how democracies die. If you don’t quite get it yet, let me explain. The future of Musk’s Twitter — and its impact on democracy — is so, so much worse than you probably think.

Now it’s owned by the world’s richest man. For political purposes. He’s a far right ideologue. Twitter’s a terrible business. He bought it even though he’s going to lose money. Why? To shift the Overton Window even harder right.

All of this is happening in a certain context. That context? The far right is seizing control of society’s institutionsall of them. That is why the loss of Twitter to a far right ideologue who’s the world’s richest man, no less, is frightening, upsetting, and disturbing.

Are you going to use Twitter much? I’m not. I cut back a while ago. But now? It doesn’t just feel gross. Wrong. Like stepping into a sewer. It’s going to be bad for all of us. Bad for democracy. For civilization. In an absolute way. That is what Twitter just died really means. There’s no going back from this. Now Twitter is something that the far right owns — and will use against the rest of us, in increasingly violent, vicious, and disturbing ways.

You haven’t lived through fascist collapse. I have. Let me teach you how this goes — what happens when the far right seizes one institution after another, and they begin to work in concert.

Hold on, let me both-sides this. There are those who say: “Elon Musk just wants free speech!! What’s your problem?” The problem is very simple. He’s already announced his logic — “A social media platform’s policies are good if the most extreme 10% on left and right are equally unhappy.”

That, coincidentally, was the logic of the Weimar Republic. It’s how the Nazis actually came to power. They too made this false equivalence. And it is still a false one today. The 10% of the left wants wokeness. Gender pronouns and whatnot. Yes, it’s annoying. Yes, it’s often childish. But the 10% of the far right wants to violently overthrow democracy. In case you haven’t noticed, they already tried, at a bloody coup attempt at the Capitol, in Russia’s war on Ukraine, and so on.

The equivalence is false. The 10% of the left is annoying, but it’s not violent or dangerous. It’s just irritating. The 10% of the far right wants to end democracy as we know it, by any means necessary, including killing people it doesn’t like, at the Capitol.

This is why the Weimar Republic fell. It too equated gender warriors — Berlin was full of gender-bending performers in cabarets— with Nazis. But they are not remotely the same thing.

What happens when this false equivalence is made? Well, the far right wins — because it’s the far right who wants this false equivalent to be made.

We all know what “free speech” means these days. What it really means. It doesn’t mean free speech at all — it means hate speech. “Free speech” is, at this very moment, the justification for everything from smearing gay people as “groomers” to accusing teachers of pedophilia to banning books to setting up tip lines to inform on your neighbours. This is in America. It’s not in Stalin’s Russia. Or is it? Is it heading that way?

Free speech these days has been perverted by the far right to mean hate speech. Examples? Mallory McMorrow and Ketanji Brown Jackson being smeared as pedophiles — a tactic invented by one of the GOP’s rising stars. Marjorie Taylor Greene and her ilk sending death threats to fellow members of Congress.

But the biggest examples? The Big Lies themselves. “The election was stolen!” “That wasn’t a coup attempt, it was a peaceful protest!” “They’re coming for our kids and our wives — the gays and the minorities and the liberals!!” “Immigrants are to blame for all our woes!!” “This nation belongs to the true of faith and pure of blood!!” All of that is hate speech. Yes, really. It is hate speech because it incites, promotes, legitimises, encourages violence. Very, very real violence. America has become an increasingly violent place.

Let me connect those dots for you. The far right wants the false equivalence to be made — hey, we’re not so bad, we’re just like you. It’s those guys — way over there — and we’re not like them!! Our free speech matters, too! This is a way to shift the Overton Window perpetually right, forever. Because it relies on a perversion of free speech — all that happens when we allow intimidation, violence, hate, threats to spread, to be legitimised and normalized, is that not just speech itself, but al the values of democracy — freedom, equality, justice, truth, goodness — are reduced, minimised, shrunken, chilled. That is why we don’t want hate, hate speech, hate acts, hateful intentions, in a democracy — it’s the opposite of what democracy truly is, intents, means. Hate reduces freedom for all of us.

Now let’s come back to Musk’s vision for Twitter.

In town squares, you can do many things. Socialize, gather, talk, observe. But if someone came up to you and threatened to kill or rape you, called you a slur— that wouldn’t be OK. If a giant group of people surrounded you, yelling at you — that wouldn’t be OK. This is where Musk’s vision for Twitter only begins, though. Musk’s vision for Twitter is a town square patrolled by far right vigilantes, enforcing conformity to a nascent fascist state, in which being, thinking, saying, wanting anything more civilized for you or your kids is criminalized, punished, grounds to hurt someone.

So it’s about licensing and permitting hate. Yes, really. I’ve just shown you how — a false equivalence, leading to the fatal misunderstanding that, LOL, the Weimar Republic literally made. The gender-benders are as bad as the Nazis. Actually…no. The gender benders were dancing in cabarets. The Nazis wanted to kill the Jews and start a World War.

Getting my drift a little?

So what’s going to happen on Musk’s Twitter is painfully obvious. The far right will be allowed to intimidate, hate, threaten, bully — all in the name of free speech. The left will be banned, if it responds, because, of course, it’s the one against this perverse notion of “free speech.” Let me remind you — I’m not a fan of pronouns or what have you. But it pales in comparison to the very real violence the far right wants. They are not equivalent.

Freedom means that you get to be you without being viciously attacked for it.

What’s happening out there? Well, the far right is smearing anyone it doesn’t like as a pedophile — it began with Hillary, and now it’s Mallory McMorrow. It’s busy sending death threats to local officials. It’s reporting, vigilante-informant style, on minorities and women and gays.

Twitter will now be a place where all that happens. It’ll be a place where the average is smeared. Dragged through the mud. Informed on. Reported, not to Twitter, but to the authorities, in Red States which now have tip line laws and so forth. A place where death threats and rape threats are just business as usual.

And speech will be chilled. Freedom will be lost.

The far right is already crowing because it knows this.

Let me crystallise the point I’m making in the example above. The far right is taking over our social institutions. All of them. And that takeover has synergistic effects. One captured institution works with another. Against democracy. Imagine you live in a Red State where abortion has become a crime — even discussing it is forbidden, and you can be “turned in.” The far right can now weaponise that, and begin turning random people in to the authorities in Red States. For what? For the new emerging crimes of…being a woman. Being gay. Being liberal. Reading banned books. Having a kid of a certain kind.

Imagine that. That is what’s about to unfold on Twitter. It’s about to become a kind of decentralised hyper-Stasi, where far right wing vigilantes are on patrol, just waiting for you cross a line set by their far right compatriots in political institutions — and then, when you do, bang!! — your life is over. You have a trans kid? You’re gay? You’re a teacher and you don’t like Trump? You make your kids read these kinds of books? Time to report you. Time to intimidate you. Time to hurt you. You broke the law. Now the state’s after you.

This isn’t even where it ends. It’s where it begins.

The other part of Musk’s plan is “authentication.” That means that Twitter has your name, address, identifying numbers of various kinds, and so on. Now it can identify you. So now imagine the above — far right wing vigilantes patrolling you, hey, do you have a gay kid, are you gay, do you read banned books, are you a teacher who leans liberal or left, time to get you — but now nobody’s anonymous.

All those Red State laws criminalising everything from saying gay to being a woman suddenly look even more sinister, don’t they? Now you can’t even talk about who you really are on Twitter, because, well, the far right can turn you in, and then Twitter turns you in, and it knows who you are exactly, and so does the increasingly authoritarian-fascist state, which has now outlawed everything from having a certain kind of kid to reading a certain kind of book.

See what I mean by digital hyper-Stasi?

I’m not kidding around. I have seen many, many societies collapse into fascism. And this is how it happens. The far right seizes control of institutions. The seizure accelerates. And then those institutions begin to work together, in synergistic ways. To what? To erode freedoms, suddenly, in shocking ways. Now you can’t say what you think, meet this kind of person, read this book, be this way. All of that is already happening in America — and Musk’s vision for Twitter will radically accelerate the process of social implosion, because now Twitter becomes a digital hyper-Stasi controlled by the far right, to surveil, intimidate, and knock people into line.

Sorry, you can’t say that. Think that. Teach your kid that. Be that. We will get you. This is how a democracy dies. You are watching it happen.

Twitter’s epitaph says this. And it says a little more, yet.

The next obvious thing that’s likely to happen is that Trump will be reinstated. Hey — just free speech, right? Everybody gets to have it!! But of course Trump is not exactly to free speech what Aristotle was to philosophy. He’s a peddler of hate speech. And reinstating him on Twitter is what all this is really about. Connect the dots — his own dumb alternative to Twitter is failing so badly he’s only posted on it once. that’s because nobody’s there, because networks obey the law of critical mass. If you needed confirmation, Trump himself yesterday denied he’d rejoin Twitter, which, from the world’s biggest liar, is about as sure a sign as there ever was.

It hardly takes a genius to speculate the following. As even Twitter itself widely believes — LOL — Musk is buying Twitter in very large part to reinstate Trump, and there will be a payoff, too. Musk’s businesses all depend heavily on subsidies, and are wildly overvalued as a result. No subsidies, no business. Biden’s set to lose. It’s a deal. A corrosive one, inimical to democracy — I help install you, the demagogue, and you help me, nudge nudge, wink wink. Twitter figured this out before Musk took it over. The irony is that Twitter will no longer be a place where you can express those kinds of ideas.

That’s how democracy dies.

So imagine all the following together. Elon Musk’s Twitter has your personal details. The far right goes on criminalising anything but essentially fascists beliefs, opinions, associations, expressions, speech, existence. Trump gets reinstated. And the far right’s foot soldiers use Twitter as a digital hyper-Stasi, to enforce all that. Worried yet? You should be.

In case you still doubt me, let me give you one final point, that will really chill you.

Now, everything you say on Twitter is the property of the world’s richest man. Is that…free speech? LOL. It’s the exact opposite. The world’s richest man doesn’t need to own anything else, and certainly not your speech. But now he will. And he’ll use it to advance his far right ideology — against you, because now that he owns your speech, well, you can see how little democracy matters, and just how the seizure of it by the far right really works together. He owns your speech — it’s not really yours. Anyone he likes can abuse you for it, his buddies in the far right politically can punish you for it. Your speech is owned by the world’s richest man, under the guise of “free speech.” How ridiculous is that, how absurd?

This is what happens when far right wing billionaires own everything. First it was money itself, then healthcare, then education, now it’s the nation’s housing, and finally, it’s speech itself.

Concentrations of wealth and power like this are inimical to democracy. Concentrations of far rightness like this are even more dangerous.

Twitter’s epitaph. What does it say? It’s inscribed with Niemoller’s famous poem. First, they came for them. Then, they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me. Neimoller was describing how a society implodes into fascism. Through denial — and even applause — all the way down, until, at last, they come for the gullible ones, too.

That is what’s happening now in America. Go ahead and tell me you don’t feel it.

If you’re upset about Twitter dying at the hands of fascism — because that’s basically what just happened — there’s an alternative. Come join us here, at Medium. It’s kind, civilized, thoughtful, and sane. It’s the only place of it’s kind, really. A community for people like us. Who still believe in democracy and civilization — and aren’t out to destroy each other. Go ahead, readers. Tell them.

Umair
April 2022
 
I would love to see these guys squrim Once they get nuked since they mocked the right for getting censored now it’s on the other foot and the money talksView attachment 3221449
I don’t WANT them to get censored, though. Persecution should be performed by the masses, not by institutions. Let them choose to leave of their own accord when they can’t take the heat.
 
So for the people saying that Twitter was a glowie psyop too valuable to tptb to ever let be sold, what's your take on this?

Were you wrong and Twitter just another pozzed tech company that was insufferably liberal and censurious all by itself?

Or did Elon do some business magic where it would have been impossible to save the luminescent operation without it being exposed?

If that's the case, how long do you give til our favorite African American is found dead of a suicide via gunshot to the back of the head? Or is he too financially powerful for even the glowies to fuck with?
 
Last edited:
Didn't see it posted, but Project Veritas just posted the audio from a Twitter all-hands meeting.

I'd archive, but I'm mobile currently.
The board pretending not to hate Elon and the passive aggressively screened questions is pretty great.

So for the people saying that Twitter was a glowie psyop to valuable to tptb to ever let be sold, what's your take on this?

Was Twitter just another pozzed tech company that was insufferably liberal and censurious all by itself?

Or did Elon do some business magic where it would have been impossible to save the luminescent operation without it being exposed?

If that's the case, how long do you give til our favorite African American is found dead of a suicide via gunshot to the back of the head? Or is he to financially powerful for even the glowies to fuck with?
The magic is owning a large portion of shares and making an offer to buy that is GREAT in a jurisdiction where a board of directors can be sued for making bad financial decisions.
 
The equivalence is false. The 10% of the left is annoying, but it’s not violent or dangerous.
Right, they’re…. Mostly peaceful.

If a giant group of people surrounded you, yelling at you — that wouldn’t be OK.
Tell that to all the college kids who keep trying to shut down speakers.

The fact that these are the same lies they keep telling, and that they seem to believe them, is getting so tiresome.
 
So for the people saying that Twitter was a glowie psyop too valuable to tptb to ever let be sold, what's your take on this?

Were you wrong and Twitter just another pozzed tech company that was insufferably liberal and censurious all by itself?

Or did Elon do some business magic where it would have been impossible to save the luminescent operation without it being exposed?

If that's the case, how long do you give til our favorite African American is found dead of a suicide via gunshot to the back of the head? Or is he too financially powerful for even the glowies to fuck with?
Elon slapped his metaphorical dick on the table and it was simply TOO big to be ignored.

Probably the only way it could’ve been stopped is if there was an offer from a third party that even exceeded Elon’s, but you have to realize just how mindbogglingly huge 44 billion dollars is. That’s about 5 times George Soros’ official net worth. What Elon’s done is quite a few levels above what the Democrat’s top financiers are capable of countering directly, in an arena where political fuckery is hard to pull off because money (specifically, billions of dollars of it) is the only common language between the hundreds if not thousands of competing interests in the pond. And oh my, is it a big, big pond.
 
Elon slapped his metaphorical dick on the table and it was simply TOO big to be ignored.

Probably the only way it could’ve been stopped is if there was an offer from a third party that even exceeded Elon’s, but you have to realize just how mindbogglingly huge 44 billion dollars is. That’s about 5 times George Soros’ official net worth. What Elon’s done is quite a few levels above what the Democrat’s top financiers are capable of countering directly, in an arena where political fuckery is hard to pull off because money (specifically, billions of dollars of it) is the only common language between the hundreds if not thousands of competing interests in the pond. And oh my, is it a big, big pond.
So it was a glowie op, but when he mushroom stamped the aforementioned table they just had to take the L?

That's pretty amusing if so.
 
Back