Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

Well...you did.

acc.jpg
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Humpty hump, Homer Simpson, Dean Pentel and 4 others
Peace and Harmony said:
Well...you did.

View attachment 3221398
Click to expand...
I actually agree, the "death threats" were almost eight years ago and it's hard to absolutely prove that you personally faked them even though you obviously did. So how about we talk about the receipts you claimed to have on Jesse Singal? That was last year and you haven't deleted the tweet, he's requested nicely and his TERF boss raised funds for charity for when you release them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Homer Simpson, Water-T, Smaug's Smokey Hole and 3 others
AirdropShitposts said:
I actually agree, the "death threats" were almost eight years ago and it's hard to absolutely prove that you personally faked them even though you obviously did. So how about we talk about the receipts you claimed to have on Jesse Singal? That was last year and you haven't deleted the tweet, he's requested nicely and his TERF boss raised funds for charity for when you release them.
Click to expand...

We don't know if John faked the death threats, but we know for certain he faked the Steam harassment. It follows he faked other things too.

I was having a conversation with a normie relative tonight where I tried to explain who and what Wu was, and the best I could do was "grifter." He seemed astonished that someone with no credentials and a shady biography with mutable facts could get interviewed by NBC. The struggle continues.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Homer Simpson, Water-T, Dean Pentel and 3 others
AirdropShitposts said:
I actually agree, the "death threats" were almost eight years ago and it's hard to absolutely prove that you personally faked them even though you obviously did. So how about we talk about the receipts you claimed to have on Jesse Singal? That was last year and you haven't deleted the tweet, he's requested nicely and his TERF boss raised funds for charity for when you release them.
Click to expand...
There's things you can prove:

John intentionally inserting himself into Gamergate by making memes insulting them to piss them off and claim harassment when they mocked him back

John mistreated and severely underpaid his employees at giant space kat

John lied about leaving his house

John lied about the threats being real when even the feds say they were nothing
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Humpty hump, Francis York Morgan, Homer Simpson and 5 others
I like the "that's original" crack
Why would it have to be original? they are point out ole Johns personal history

and John bitching about Trump for the last 6 years and gamergate for...sorry not clear on date 8 years? something like that isn't exactly the freshest of takes
but John always has been one for "let the wookie win" rules...wouldn't want him to fly into a rage and unleashes his towering-over-janet-reno wendigo might upon thw twittersphere
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AprilRains and Dr. Merkwurdichliebe
Mola Ram said:
I was having a conversation with a normie relative tonight where I tried to explain who and what Wu was, and the best I could do was "grifter." He seemed astonished that someone with no credentials and a shady biography with mutable facts could get interviewed by NBC. The struggle continues.
Click to expand...
This is one of the most frustrating things about trying to get people to have a critical eye about the media, especially journalism. It seems like it should be obvious with how most everyone acknowledges how it fails when it comes to a topic you're informed about but then just assumes it's perfectly fine on every other topic. Hell, I probably have to be better about this and I know this.

Especially when it comes to someone like Wu where it's so blatant that I, someone who prefers to assume good faith, can't come up with literally any good faith explanation for why he continues to exist and he's now getting interviewed on the nightly news and for "legitimate" entities like NBC/Washington Post where it's not that his credentials don't exist it's that they don't exist so much that the shitty ones they refer to (Rebellion PAC, which nobody has ever heard of, Executive Director) don't even have anything to do with what he's talking about (a major corporate/tech acquisition) and an actual fact about him (he's a Twitter user) is a more relevant credential and seemingly the actual basis for why he's being interviewed.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Homer Simpson, OttoWest and 11 others
AirdropShitposts said:
This is one of the most frustrating things about trying to get people to have a critical eye about the media, especially journalism. It seems like it should be obvious with how most everyone acknowledges how it fails when it comes to a topic you're informed about but then just assumes it's perfectly fine on every other topic. Hell, I probably have to be better about this and I know this.

Especially when it comes to someone like Wu where it's so blatant that I, someone who prefers to assume good faith, can't come up with literally any good faith explanation for why he continues to exist and he's now getting interviewed on the nightly news and for "legitimate" entities like NBC/Washington Post where it's not that his credentials don't exist it's that they don't exist so much that the shitty ones they refer to (Rebellion PAC, which nobody has ever heard of, Executive Director) don't even have anything to do with what he's talking about (a major corporate/tech acquisition) and an actual fact about him (he's a Twitter user) is a more relevant credential and seemingly the actual basis for why he's being interviewed.
Click to expand...

I just wonder if there is compensation involved which would make it all the more confounding as Wu doesn't even hold up to the most modest of scrutiny.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Homer Simpson, AprilRains and Mola Ram
AirdropShitposts said:
Maybe there's a bet involved to see who can get Wu into a story in the most absurd way.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing if you hit the media circuit once, you are in a database of subject matter experts.. I guess it was smart play to cast as wide of a net with the made up bonafides. It would be really interesting to see Wu's jacket. And even if someone wanted to handwave the research found online as a smear campaign, Wu's twitter activity should turn anyone off just based on the combination of being a massive asshole and the Peter Pan Syndrome.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Homer Simpson, Tragi-Chan, The Littlest Shitlord and 2 others
AirdropShitposts said:
This is one of the most frustrating things about trying to get people to have a critical eye about the media, especially journalism. It seems like it should be obvious with how most everyone acknowledges how it fails when it comes to a topic you're informed about but then just assumes it's perfectly fine on every other topic.
Click to expand...

Over the past two decades, the media has become exponentially worse about getting simple facts right. But even in the good old days you would notice that if a reporter was writing about something you were very familiar with, the reporter never got everything right. A single game of chess or tennis would be called a match. Opening statements in a trial would be called opening arguments. A firearm's magazine would be called a clip. A fair number of police reporters never learned the difference between being arrested and being indicted. The list is, of course, endless.

But, back in the day, an absolute fraud like John would have been exposed long before now. He's the equivalent of the war-hero sheriff who turns out to be an Army deserter. Nowadays, people like John Flynt are apparently untouchable because everyone is terrified of the consequences of exposing a Dark Triad tranny con artist. Maybe that will start to change under Twitter's new ownership.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Yamamura, Francis York Morgan, Sicko Hunter and 10 others
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Over the past two decades the media has become exponentially worse about getting simple facts right. But even in the good old days you would notice that if a reporter was writing about something you were very familiar with, the reporter never got everything right. A single game of chess or tennis would be called a match. Opening statements in a trial would be called opening arguments. A firearm's magazine would be called a clip. A fair number of police reporters never learned the difference between being arrested and being indicted. The list is, of course, endless.

But back in the day an absolute fraud like John would have been exposed long before now. He's the equivalent of the war-hero sheriff who turns out to be an Army deserter. Nowadays, people like John Flynt are apparently untouchable because everyone is terrified of the consequences of exposing a Dark Triad tranny con artist. Maybe that will start to change under Twitter's new ownership.
Click to expand...
I've speculated on the reasons before, and my best answer is a combination of various factors. Namely, the laziness of most journalists preventing them from doing basic fact checking, the reluctance to dig into the past of a troon for fear of accusations of "deadnaming," and John's general small-fry status making him not a big target to scrutinize. Any or all of these play a part in how he continues to keep his con going all these years later.

The craziest thing is that we've pretty much done all the legwork for them. Our dedicated autists have been cataloging John's lies ever since he jumped headfirst into GG, and we have all the receipts to back up our findings. A journalist with half a brain could do the same and reach the same conclusions; hell, they could just rip off our work if they wanted to. But again, whether it's due to laziness, fear, or indifference, they simply don't.

Honestly, as much as I'd like a full-on exposé showing the world that Brianna Wu is John Walker Flynt, I know I'll likely never see it, and I've come to terms with that. Still, is it too much to ask that these shitrags just stop giving him any sort of media exposure? You don't have to deadname him and call him a tranny faggot, just look for literally anyone else if you need a soundbite.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Francis York Morgan, Homer Simpson and 4 others
King Dead said:
I've speculated on the reasons before, and my best answer is a combination of various factors. Namely, the laziness of most journalists preventing them from doing basic fact checking, the reluctance to dig into the past of a troon for fear of accusations of "deadnaming," and John's general small-fry status making him not a big target to scrutinize. Any or all of these play a part in how he continues to keep his con going all these years later.
Click to expand...

Another major factor is the disappearance of copy editors from the newsroom. Twenty years ago, they were the gatekeepers who prevented people like John from being quoted in news stories, much less being the subject of a story about himself in which all of the details are provided by John with no corroboration at all. The story about the beloved neighborhood grandpa who gives kids rides on his backyard railroad, for example, would be spiked when the copy desk Googled him and discovered that he was a convicted child molester.

One metro paper that I'm familiar with had 35 news copy editors 20 years ago, with more copy editors working in the sports, features, and opinions departments. Today, that paper has zero copy editors anywhere in the building, and whatever ludicrous bullshit the proudly woke and serenely biased reporters write goes straight to publication online and in print.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Yamamura, Humpty hump and 15 others
King Dead said:
I've speculated on the reasons before, and my best answer is a combination of various factors. Namely, the laziness of most journalists preventing them from doing basic fact checking, the reluctance to dig into the past of a troon for fear of accusations of "deadnaming," and John's general small-fry status making him not a big target to scrutinize. Any or all of these play a part in how he continues to keep his con going all these years later.

The craziest thing is that we've pretty much done all the legwork for them. Our dedicated autists have been cataloging John's lies ever since he jumped headfirst into GG, and we have all the receipts to back up our findings. A journalist with half a brain could do the same and reach the same conclusions; hell, they could just rip off our work if they wanted to. But again, whether it's due to laziness, fear, or indifference, they simply don't.

Honestly, as much as I'd like a full-on exposé showing the world that Brianna Wu is John Walker Flynt, I know I'll likely never see it, and I've come to terms with that. Still, is it too much to ask that these shitrags just stop giving him any sort of media exposure? You don't have to deadname him and call him a tranny faggot, just look for literally anyone else if you need a soundbite.
Click to expand...
Laziness and a fear of consulting "bad" sources for background has to be the best explanation for the reporters behavior doesn't it? Like you don't need to deep dive on someone to just find out about them and go "oh" and drop them from your list of people to get quotes from without ever having to actually explain why they're a bad source. To think about Jesse Singal again, I imagine that he's probably at least looked at the Kiwi Farms threads of a few of the people constantly accusing him of raping troons to judge how seriously to take them outside of whether or not they have a Blue Check. But I imagine there are tons of journalists and writers who would never even dare to do that and assume something like the Kiwi Farms is full of lies because why would anyone say that if it wasn't true and plus you probably get a virus and get doxxed if you even start to type kiwifarms on any device. Not to mention that anyone who is bigoted and hateful is clearly untrustworthy unlike the bigots who work for media companies who are currently hiding their bigotry behind the correct views until they're exposed like that Pulitzer winning COVID reporter for the NYT was. (Although I suppose it's also plausible that they don't even know how to critically evaluate a source.)

I guess the other aspect is the networking which must be the only possible explanation for how ErinInTheMorn has suddenly overnight after declaring the start of the Trans Genocide become a "transgender advocate" being quoted in news stories despite having no qualifications (other than a Twitter account) and being objectively bad at this "job" by any standard while also having none of the stories mention that his actual real employment is for a partisan political organization.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Homer Simpson, AprilRains, Water-T and 3 others
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Agree
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Lizard Pope, Yamamura and 14 others
idosometimes said:
Why did no one listen to wise oracle John Flynt?
Had his enemies been prosecuted, none of this would have happened!
View attachment 3222981
GAMERGATE!!!!
View attachment 3222984
Who is the "we" and who is the "they"? Gosh darn it, John is a fool.
Click to expand...
"Oh, Wise Troon of Twitter, what is your wisdom?"

"GAAAAAAAAMMMMEEERRRRRGAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTEEEEEEE RRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Dean Pentel, Homer Simpson, Troon Anthropologist and 1 other person
idosometimes said:
Why did no one listen to wise oracle John Flynt?
Had his enemies been prosecuted, none of this would have happened!
View attachment 3222981
GAMERGATE!!!!
View attachment 3222984
Who is the "we" and who is the "they"? Gosh darn it, John is a fool.
Click to expand...
Hang on a second. John was claiming that Trump would deny election results in 2019? That's an awfully long time before the 2020 elections, long before Trump made any notion of finding things fishy. The Ambien must be kicking in again.

This whole self-congratulating Cassandra act is absolutely moronic. Prosecute GG for what, calling you mean names on Twitter? We already know you faked your own harassment, and law enforcement specifically told you to stop reporting shit and stop antagonizing GG so they could do their jobs, but you wouldn't. Same thing with the FBI, who were probably fed up with hearing about an imageboard run by a cripple. You were also one of many who didn't think Trump had a snowball's chance in hell, so don't even pretend like you thought Queen Hillary wasn't inevitable. And let's not forget how much disinformation and botting have been used to promote leftist ideas on social media, which have pretty much been run by dangerhairs with zero accountability for years now.

I still have doubts that Elon will be able to turn Twitter around in any meaningful way, but getting rid of the "Trust and Safety" department can only be a positive benefit. Get a thicker skin, John, and learn how to fucking deal with people calling you out. It looks like you need one too, considering how your face keeps sliding off your skull.
 
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Vastly Amused, Homer Simpson and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back