Orbiter Isabella Loretta Janke / Maxine Sidero / Bella / Kelly Osborn / @10anon - "The Final Troll of Christory", Animal Abuser, Discord Wannabe Cult Leader, Crusty Suicide Goblin, Estrogen Dispenser

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure the cops out here couldn't care less. She's not some sort of criminal mastermind or gang member and doesn't have any real legal issues apart from a couple minor fuck ups.
Word. And if she ever did get popped for it, she’d probably make bond very quick (or released on recognizance) and they’d just reschedule arraignments and she’d either counsel up and/or pay the damn fines.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Santa Fe Swag
I'm sure the cops out here couldn't care less. She's not some sort of criminal mastermind or gang member and doesn't have any real legal issues apart from a couple minor fuck ups.
If she gets pulled over, they'll run her info and pop her. She'll be back out as soon as daddy bails her out and pays her fines again, unless they have some real hardass judge decide to make an example by adding on failure to appear charges (which they probably will not).
Word. And if she ever did get popped for it, she’d probably make bond very quick (or released on recognizance) and they’d just reschedule arraignments and she’d either counsel up and/or pay the damn fines.
If you make them have to come drag you in, they're usually going to want the money up front, especially if it's obvious you can swing it.
 
Idk if this is a thing but why are the children of feds fking bat shit crazy?
"MK Ultra and/or Monarch Programming."

my theory is that her mom had her when she was like 40 years old. also her dad was in the middle east running wet work operations. who knows what kind of nasty chemicals entered his body. she's lucky she wasn't born with webbed feet and a tail.
 
Idk if this is a thing but why are the children of feds fking bat shit crazy?
"MK Ultra and/or Monarch Programming."

I have wondered if she was molested or severely neglected as a child. That's usually what psychologists tell you about people who have tortured small animals. It could be that she was left alone a lot growing up with very little parenting, and was exposed at a young age to extreme (illegal) fetish sites like crush porn. We never had access to that kind of stuff online when I was growing up. It could also have something to do with microplastics.
 
I have wondered if she was molested or severely neglected as a child. That's usually what psychologists tell you about people who have tortured small animals. It could be that she was left alone a lot growing up with very little parenting, and was exposed at a young age to extreme (illegal) fetish sites like crush porn. We never had access to that kind of stuff online when I was growing up. It could also have something to do with microplastics.
Somewhere she said "my dad is showing me Native American porn". Given her tendency to lie it could've just been some shit she made up but if dude actually shows his daughter porn like that then major red flag. Either way I'm sure she's been through some traumatic shit.
 
Somewhere she said "my dad is showing me Native American porn". Given her tendency to lie it could've just been some shit she made up but if dude actually shows his daughter porn like that then major red flag. Either way I'm sure she's been through some traumatic shit.
I would discount anything isabella janke said about mike janke in those discord leaks as she was purposefully trying to make him look bad to her friends. I don't know if it's some kind of glowie kid thing or her pathological nature. My dad is not a top tier operator who assassinated people for the US government, no. He's a homeless crazy dude who is always high on mushrooms and peyote in mexico.
 
I would discount anything isabella janke said about mike janke in those discord leaks as she was purposefully trying to make him look bad to her friends. I don't know if it's some kind of glowie kid thing or her pathological nature. My dad is not a top tier operator who assassinated people for the US government, no. He's a homeless crazy dude who is always high on mushrooms and peyote in mexico.
Mike Janke is more or less on par with Steven Seagal.
 
Crush videos are not illegal in the United States. In 2010, ruling on United States v. Stevens, the US Supreme Court by an 8-1 majority ruled that they were protected under the First Amendment.
The creator would likely get animal cruelty charges if caught.

Animal porn wasn't illegal in Washington until Mr. Hands got fucked to death by a horse on video. The friends who filmed it were only charged with trespassing in the stable. The state changed the laws after that.
 
It could be that she was left alone a lot growing up with very little parenting, and was exposed at a young age to extreme (illegal) fetish sites like crush porn.
Basically this. She's been terminally online at least since middle school. This is nothing new, you'd be shocked at how many new parents just give their child a tablet to get it to shut up instead of actual parenting.

Having said that, I shudder at the thought of the generation of kids who grew up watching "Pregnant minnie mouse commits suicide" and elsagate shit like that. I think Bella is one of the first horrorcows to rise from extreme internet exposure and this will be the new paradigm for zoomer horrorcows.
 
The creator would likely get animal cruelty charges if caught.

Animal porn wasn't illegal in Washington until Mr. Hands got fucked to death by a horse on video. The friends who filmed it were only charged with trespassing in the stable. The state changed the laws after that.

Crush videos are only illegal to produce, not to possess, view, distribute, or sell. It's not the video part that's illegal, it's the crushing act itself. Thus crush video sites are not illegal in the US. Since this has been affirmed by SCOTUS (and by a large margin), it's pretty much ironclad now and no state law can ban it.

Let me make this clear. Crush videos are not only not illegal, they have been confirmed as a constitutional right, nationally.

While it's generally illegal for the most heinous ones to be produced anywhere in the US, at least to certain species, they can easily be produced overseas and then distributed in the US.

Bestiality porn is legal in 49 states. The only state it is banned in is Oregon. Since it hasn't really been litigated much, it's never gone to SCOTUS so there is no national consensus on it.

Having sex with animals *did* become illegal in Washington because of Mr. Hands, but the video itself is still legal.
 
Last edited:
Crush videos are only illegal to produce, not to possess, view, distribute, or sell. It's not the video part that's illegal, it's the crushing act itself. Thus crush video sites are not illegal in the US. Since this has been affirmed by SCOTUS (and by a large margin), it's pretty much ironclad now and no state law can ban it.

Let me make this clear. Crush videos are not only not illegal, they have been confirmed as a constitutional right, nationally.

While it's generally illegal for the most heinous ones to be produced anywhere in the US, at least to certain species, they can easily be produced overseas and then distributed in the US.

Bestiality porn is legal in 49 states. The only state it is banned in is Oregon. Since it hasn't really been litigated much, it's never gone to SCOTUS so there is no national consensus on it.

Having sex with animals *did* become illegal in Washington because of Mr. Hands, but the video itself is still legal.
I imagine even if it were illegal, it'd rarely see enforcement as the US has pretty slow/nonexistent response to cases of animal abuse unless there is significant pressure from the public, through means like the abuse being blasted into public consciousness by rights groups like PETA– Although such groups only push these videos continually into spotlight for agendas, but that's an entirely separate issue. I think the general attitude of US law enforcement is that there's bigger fish to fry when it comes to criminal activity, and they're only just starting to take more specific categories of abuse (such as zoosadism) seriously as they've noticed more often than not, those involved in such abuse are also involved in the exploitation/abuse of children.

Tl;dr Bella (or pretty much anyone in the US) will very likely never get in trouble for animal abuse unless it is extreme and shared publicly, with her being unquestionably identifiable in the shared media. But even then, investigation may be as fast as a crawl, in which time she'd DFE. Same goes for consuming videos of abuse, if for whatever reason it became illegal.
 
I imagine even if it were illegal, it'd rarely see enforcement as the US has pretty slow/nonexistent response to cases of animal abuse unless there is significant pressure from the public, through means like the abuse being blasted into public consciousness by rights groups like PETA– Although such groups only push these videos continually into spotlight for agendas, but that's an entirely separate issue. I think the general attitude of US law enforcement is that there's bigger fish to fry when it comes to criminal activity, and they're only just starting to take more specific categories of abuse (such as zoosadism) seriously as they've noticed more often than not, those involved in such abuse are also involved in the exploitation/abuse of children.

Tl;dr Bella (or pretty much anyone in the US) will very likely never get in trouble for animal abuse unless it is extreme and shared publicly, with her being unquestionably identifiable in the shared media. But even then, investigation may be as fast as a crawl, in which time she'd DFE. Same goes for consuming videos of abuse, if for whatever reason it became illegal.

I'm very much glad that it's legal. It allows folks to hunt down and destroy the zoosadists who committed the crimes. If the video were illegal, far fewer people would be able to analyze the video and find the culprits.

Don't fuck with cats. The internet will find you and make you pay. Zoosadists are at the bottom of the totem pole, socially. Even furfags will hunt them down. Nazis will hunt them down. Pedos will hunt them down. Chris Chan will hunt them down.
 
I'm very much glad that it's legal. It allows folks to hunt down and destroy the zoosadists who committed the crimes. If the video were illegal, far fewer people would be able to analyze the video and find the culprits.

Don't fuck with cats. The internet will find you and make you pay.
I can generally agree on that for the same basis, but just wish the US took reports more seriously, there's plenty of well known abusers who post online running free as we speak. Tides do seem to be shifting, so.. :optimistic: Luckily though, right now other countries seem to be on top of it even when you're reporting from online. :heart-full:
 
I can generally agree on that for the same basis, but just wish the US took reports more seriously, there's plenty of well known abusers who post online running free as we speak. Tides do seem to be shifting, so.. :optimistic: Luckily though, right now other countries seem to be on top of it even when you're reporting from online. :heart-full:

My current peeve is the fake "animal rescue" videos from southeast Asia where they run over puppies or feed them to snakes and then pretend to rescue them.

EDIT: Even if the country of origin doesn't do anything about it, I would not be above turning a blind eye if someone did horrible things to the perpetrators, thanks to them being identified from their videos.
 
My current peeve is the fake "animal rescue" videos from southeast Asia where they run over puppies or feed them to snakes and then pretend to rescue them.

EDIT: Even if the country of origin doesn't do anything about it, I would not be above turning a blind eye if someone did horrible things to the perpetrators, thanks to them being identified from their videos.
that whole trend started from monkey tortutre videos on youtube. weird as fuck.
the comment sections to those videos are something. a group of people hate monkeys with a passion and they are very vocal about it.
 
I think it's weird that irl animals have more rights than people do. But find it in a crush video and that's a constitutional right.

Meanwhile child abuse can not be distributed. Like is what is it about animal abuse that is a human right? I'm so confused.
 
I think it's weird that irl animals have more rights than people do. But find it in a crush video and that's a constitutional right.

Meanwhile child abuse can not be distributed. Like is what is it about animal abuse that is a human right? I'm so confused.
I assume thats because there's much more of a grey area when it comes to animals. We eat animals so it's acceptable to kill them. We also kill them for other reasons like population control. Meanwhile pretty much everyone who is even halfway decent can agree that killing children is wrong and immoral.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back