𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

You're famous for following a script, not for your retarded opinions. You play hundreds of characters, but you have none yourself.

True freedom of speech is you getting called a "nigger kike", you running to teacher, and the teacher telling you to stop being a whiny little gay baby, or ignore it. Online bullying isn't real, online 'stalking' (let's be real, the bitch means 'archiving') only exists if your stupid ass can't stop doing stupid shit on the Internet.

Oh and of course "racism and antisemitism". The fact I don't like someone or have preconceived notions due to negative experiences is not a crime, and you probably already hate me and want me dead because I'm not a kool-aid swilling liberal, but double standards are a-okay, right? It would be nice if society would tell celebrities to shut the fuck up and get back to work instead of letting them continue to pretend they have some profound insight us plebs can't comprehend.
 
Last edited:
This is LITERALLY just like voldemort killing all the mudbloods.
The most interesting part of this is elon's statement that he'll make the algorithm open source. One can only hope that it sparks discussion on why companies like jewgle and faceberg keep theirs closed, and what they might be hiding within.
/politisperging

It will be fun at going through it with a fine comb and see which conspiracy theories have more legs than I expected.

Elon Musk is the Henry Ford of our time, singlehandedly moving to take out the tranny botnet when they are at their most vulnerable point and doing a hostile takeover of their headquarters
He's more of a howard hughes. Not someone married to one woman his whole life, but someone who has a large stable of women he fucked. And a far less linear professional career, and more of a guy who says, fuckit lets do this shit now.

I'm surprised there aren't more woke folk celebrating free speech thinking it means they can be more open with their fetishes for children, like Jacob Blaustein or that other Synthia Dragon retard who made front page yesterday. They've been trying to push that the right are the true and honest enablers of cancel culture and censorship (Florida mathbooks etc) so they should be happy about getting more free speech.

Yeah I know, rules for thee but not for me etc
Free speech is terrible for molesters. That's why they warn kids its their little secret and if they squeel mom and dad will hate them for it.
 
Last edited:
Because he demonstrated that he didn't intend the tweet to be taken seriously and harm the man's reputation (which it didn't).
That's an incredibly weak defence if that's how he got off. He called him a pedophile because he's a white man living in Southeast Asia, the "joke" doesn't work without insinuating he's a sexpat by extension. It's like making a "joke" about a male elementary school teacher or football coach being a pedophile, in context it's an incredibly damaging accusation.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Matt Damon
That's an incredibly weak defence if that's how he got off. He called him a pedophile because he's a white man living in Southeast Asia, the "joke" doesn't work without insinuating he's a sexpat by extension. It's like making a "joke" about a male elementary school teacher or football coach being a pedophile, in context it's an incredibly damaging accusation.
The defence wasnt that it was a joke. The defence was that he got into a heated online argument and he used an insult. He also later deleted the tweet and apologized for it and also did so in court.

Finally, defamation cases are really hard to win in the first place.
 
The defence wasnt that it was a joke. The defence was that he got into a heated online argument and he used an insult. He also later deleted the tweet and apologized for it and also did so in court.

Finally, defamation cases are really hard to win in the first place.
Didn’t know the “heated gaming moment” argument was a valid legal defense, though it’s pretty funny that it is, lol.
 
I have my own schizo theory (that sounds pretty believable to me but your mileage may vary) regarding Musk purchasing twitter and it is based on the very convenient timing of Tucker Carlson being unsuspended from twitter. But to lay out this theory I have to sperg about something entirely unrelated (on the surface) first.

Since this post is going to be involving a lot of politisperging allow me to preface that to many I would be considered a Right Wing Extremist and said categorization is not all that inaccurate.

1. The sperging that is on the surface unrelated to Elon buying twitter
I will state this bluntly, There is a concerted effort by Republicans at all levels of society to seize power and implement their will, permanently. This involves the capture or suppression/neutering of all Institutions, Elected Offices, Churches, Financial Markets, Courts etc etc. This effort is being lead by Religious zealots, Extremist Ideologues and right wing/general business interests and is finding massive success on both the State and Federal level. This movement's most powerful weapon besides their reserves of cash, political influence and literal weapons is their ability to influence and propagandize their followers and supporters through media both legacy and social. Look at Christopher Rufo, he has admitted in still public tweets that he was stirring up the CRT panic as part of the culture war and despite these tweets being public Media institutions are STILL parroting the narrative he inserted. This media is obviously has the power to make or break people, this is where Tucker Carlson, Musk and Twitter come in.

2. Musk, Twitter and Tucker
The day that the big announcement came Tucker was unsuspended from Twitter and posted two simple words "We're Back". Now according to what I have heard this was because Tucker voluntarily deleted a tweet calling Richard Levine a man, while I cannot confirm this seeing as how Musk does not officially have control yet it seems likely. That tweet (with the implication that Musk is the reason that the suspension was lifted) in addition to prominent RW figures showering praise on Musk, in my opinion this looks like an effort to endear Musk to right wingers, to make him a member of the team regardless of his actual political stances.

3. The potential reasons for this
Either Musk is onboard with the Movement potentially after being paid off with future guarantees behind the scenes or this is just The Movement piggy backing on a golden opportunity. You also have to remember that Musk is a Billionaire, and the Youth (which make up the resurgent American Left) are everyday more and more Anti-Billionaire, The Movement is extremely Pro=Billionaire.
 
View attachment 3216037
"It's totally gonna be a cool free speech platform you guise! But you gotta authenticate your human identity by giving me your ID or drivers license so your totally free speech posts can be better linked to your identity."

Wow so based. Totally not a fucking joke .
I hate making comparisons to 1984, but i have a feeling in the future we will have 5 minutes of yelling out nigger on twitter instead of the 5 minutes of hate. Only difference is that you’ll have to pay a subscription fee to say/type nigger.
 
Dare I ask why they think Musk is transphobic?
Because being severely mentally ill, they immediately attribute any trait they dislike to anyone who disagrees with them ever, in any way, in even the most mildly inoffensive terms.

In short, because they're a bunch of cocksucking niggerfaggots who need to commit suicide immediately, not in Minecraft, not in Second Life, but by literally trying to headbutt an oncoming train, causing their cocksucking niggerfaggot brains to become blood pudding and kill them immediately.

But in a kind and collegial way.
 
Look at Christopher Rufo, he has admitted in still public tweets that he was stirring up the CRT panic as part of the culture war and despite these tweets being public Media institutions are STILL parroting the narrative he inserted.
A simple google search that took 3.5 seconds reveals that this is a fabricated quote (and one that he is very vocal about correcting), one that pieces together two entirely different quotes to get a false narrative (in his actual speech he was blaming teachers unions for sowing distrust of public schools).

You live in an entirely fabricated reality, one that is the exact polar opposite society finds itself in today. You are literally the exact reason why freedom of speech needs to be reinvigorated not just on Twitter, but all online spaces and places of discourse in general: tv, news, msm, journalism, editorials, corporate board rooms, DEI support groups, safe spaces, colleges, etc. You have been reduced to an empty husk of a human, a walking talking automon spewing talking points you don’t fully understand but believe will get you accolades from your peers due to years, if not decades of intense brainwashing.
 
Late as hell but why are people complaining about a billionaire owning a social media website?
Do these chronically online fucks not use Facebook, WhatsApp, or Instagram? Or GIPHY or Oculus?
DO THEY NOT KNOW ABOUT MARK ZUCKERBERG?!?
You can’t complain that he’s a rich dude when the other guy literally owns the top two social media sites on earth AND the most popular texting app on the planet.
I’m gonna be so mad if it comes down to “Musk has the wrong politics!” Even though I know that’s exactly what it comes down to smh.
 
A simple google search that took 3.5 seconds reveals that this is a fabricated quote (and one that he is very vocal about correcting), one that pieces together two entirely different quotes to get a false narrative (in his actual speech he was blaming teachers unions for sowing distrust of public schools).

You live in an entirely fabricated reality, one that is the exact polar opposite society finds itself in today. You are literally the exact reason why freedom of speech needs to be reinvigorated not just on Twitter, but all online spaces and places of discourse in general: tv, news, msm, journalism, editorials, corporate board rooms, DEI support groups, safe spaces, colleges, etc. You have been reduced to an empty husk of a human, a walking talking automon spewing talking points you don’t fully understand but believe will get you accolades from your peers due to years, if not decades of intense brainwashing.
I don't know what fake quote you are talking about, I am talking about the "We will make their talking points toxic" post. Frankly I think Rufo is a genius, turning something literally nobody knew about into this hotbutton culture war issue that has payed dividends.
 
First, why are you even asking these questions because the answers are obvious?
Late as hell but why are people complaining about a billionaire owning a social media website?
Because they're fags.
Do these chronically online fucks not use Facebook, WhatsApp, or Instagram? Or GIPHY or Oculus?
Because they're fags. I mean the answer is no, but it's no because they're fags!
DO THEY NOT KNOW ABOUT MARK ZUCKERBERG?!?
NO! BECAUSE THEY'RE FAGS!
You can’t complain that he’s a rich dude when the other guy literally owns the top two social media sites on earth AND the most popular texting app on the planet.
Oh come on. You know the response by now.
 
You can’t complain that he’s a rich dude when the other guy literally owns the top two social media sites on earth AND the most popular texting app on the planet.
Yes you can retard, find me one idiot that complain musk owning a social that then says it's absolutely fine that zuck owns other socials
 
You're famous for following a script, not for your retarded opinions. You play hundreds of characters, but you have none yourself.

True freedom of speech is you getting called a "nigger kike", you running to teacher, and the teacher telling you to stop being a whiny little gay baby, or ignore it. Online bullying isn't real, online 'stalking' (let's be real, the bitch means 'archiving') only exists if your stupid ass can't stop doing stupid shit on the Internet.

Oh and of course "racism and antisemitism". The fact I don't like someone or have preconceived notions due to negative experiences is not a crime, and you probably already hate me and want me dead because I'm not a kool-aid swilling liberal, but double standards are a-okay, right? It would be nice if society would tell celebrities to shut the fuck up and get back to work instead of letting them continue to pretend they have some profound insight us plebs can't comprehend.
I've said this before and I'll say it again. The first amendment prevents the government from interfering with your free expression. That doesn't apply to private entities like businesses.

For instance, if you went into a Starbucks and called the barista a "nigger kike," you'll get kicked out, and there's nothing illegal about it. You're on their property, at their business, and if you want to be in the space they own, you have to follow their rules. A website is similar-- when you sign up for Twitter, you agree to their terms of use. They're a business and you're using the webspace they pay to maintain, so they can ban you for whatever reason they like. It's a natural consequence of private businesses now being the main vehicle for public discourse. They want money, and if they decide certain patron behavior is bad for their brand or public image, they're legally entitled to remove those patrons.

Notice that a lot of large protests regardless of political affiliation are held on public property; there's a reason for that. They know that the government has less control over what they say than a private business would.

I definitely don't agree with Twitter's moderation policies, which is why I don't use it. The lesson here is not to patronize businesses whose practices you disagree with.
 
Back