Business Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Take Twitter Private for $44 Billion - The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at the social-media network

1649933159786.png

The tech billionaire Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $41.4bn.

A regulatory filing showed on Thursday that Musk was offering $54.20 a share – a 38% premium to the closing price of Twitter’s stock on 1 April, the last trading day before the Tesla chief executive’s investment of more than 9% in the company was publicly announced.

More to follow…



1649933831102.png
1649933810146.png






Elon Musk has made a “best and final” offer to buy Twitter Inc., saying the company has extraordinary potential and he is the person to unlock it.

The world’s richest person will offer $54.20 per share in cash, representing a 54% premium over the Jan. 28 closing price and a valuation of about $43 billion. The social media company’s shares soared 18% in pre-market trading.

Musk, 50, announced the offer in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, after turning down a potential board seat at the company. The billionaire, who also controls Tesla Inc., first disclosed a stake of about 9% on April 4. Tesla shares fell about 1.5% in pre-market trading on the news.

Twitter said that its board would review the proposal and any response would be in the best interests of “all Twitter stockholders.”

1649936433325.png

The bid is the latest saga in Musk’s volatile relationship with Twitter. The executive is one of the platform’s most-watched firebrands, often tweeting out memes and taunts to @elonmusk’s more than 80 million followers. He has been outspoken about changes he’d like to consider imposing at the social media platform, and the company offered him a seat on the board following the announcement of his stake, which made him the largest individual shareholder.

After his stake became public, Musk immediately began appealing to fellow users about prospective moves, from turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter and adding an edit button for tweets to granting automatic verification marks to premium users. One tweet suggested Twitter might be dying, given that several celebrities with high numbers of followers rarely tweet.

Unsatisfied with the influence that comes with being Twitter’s largest investor, he has now launched a full takeover, one of the few individuals who can afford it outright. He’s currently worth about $260 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index, compared with Twitter’s market valuation of about $37 billion.

In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk said he believes Twitter “will neither thrive nor serve [its free speech] societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company”

The takeover is unlikely to be a drawn-out process. “If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.

1649936465070.png


Musk informed Twitter’s board over the previous weekend that he thought the company should be taken private, according to today’s statement.

The $54.20 per share offer is “too low” for shareholders or the board to accept, said Vital Knowledge’s Adam Crisafulli in a report, adding that the company’s shares hit $70 less than a year ago.

Although Musk is the world’s richest person, how he will find $43 billion in cash has yet to be revealed.

“This becomes a hostile takeover offer which is going to cost a serious amount of cash,” said Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud Equity Research. “He will have to sell a decent piece of Tesla stock to fund it, or a massive loan against it.”

Musk has hired Morgan Stanley as his adviser for the bid. The offer price also includes the number 420, widely recognized as a coded reference to marijuana. He also picked $420 as the share price for possibly taking Tesla private in 2018, a move that brought him scrutiny from the SEC.

“There will be host of questions around financing, regulatory, balancing Musk’s time (Tesla, SpaceX) in the coming days,” said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush. “But ultimately based on this filing it is a now or never bid for Twitter to accept.”

I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it.
Elon Musk’s full letter to Twitter’s board





EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources​


Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash, the price that he originally offered to the social media company and called his 'best and final', people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $43 billion deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said. It is always possible that the deal collapses at the last minute, the sources added.

Twitter has not been able to secure so far a 'go-shop' provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow it to solicit other bids from potential acquirers once the deal is signed, the sources said. Still, Twitter would be allowed to accept an offer from another party by paying Musk a break-up fee, the sources added.

Twitter and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.




Twitter and Elon Musk Strike Deal for Takeover​

Twitter Inc. TWTR 5.52% on Monday accepted Elon Musk’s bid to take over the company, giving the world’s richest man control over the influential social-media network where he is also among its most powerful users.

The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at Twitter, where many executives and board members initially opposed Mr. Musk’s takeover approach. The deal has polarized Twitter employees, users and regulators over the power tech giants wield in determining the parameters of acceptable discourse on the internet and how those companies enforce their rules.

The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal. Earlier on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Twitter and Mr. Musk had reached an agreement to value Twitter at $44 billion.

The takeover, if it goes through, would mark one of the biggest acquisitions in tech history and will likely have global repercussions for years to come related to how billions of people use social media. Mr. Musk, who is also chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA -1.30% and Space Exploration Technologies Inc., must find a way to balance his commitment to less moderation with the business needs of a company that has struggled to reconcile free-wheeling conversation with content that appeals to advertisers.

On Monday, after the Journal reported that a deal was close, Mr. Musk tweeted to indicate that he wants the platform to remain a destination for wide-ranging discourse and disagreement.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” he wrote.

The San Francisco-based social-media company had been expected to rebuff the offer, which Mr. Musk made April 14 without saying how he would pay for it.

Twitter, a day after the unsolicited offer, adopted a so-called poison pill, designed to make it more difficult for Mr. Musk to reach more than a 15% stake in the company.

Twitter changed its posture after Mr. Musk detailed elements of his financing plan for the takeover. On April 21, he said he had $46.5 billion in funding lined up. Twitter shares rose sharply, and company executives opened the door to negotiations.

Twitter shares were ahead more than 5% in afternoon trading on Monday.

The potential turnabout on Twitter’s part comes after Mr. Musk met privately Friday with several shareholders of the company to extol the virtues of his proposal while repeating that the board has a “yes-or-no” decision to make, people familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Musk, with over 82 million Twitter followers, has long used the platform to pronounce his views on everything from space travel to cryptocurrencies. In January, he began buying Twitter stock, becoming the single-largest individual investor with a more than 9% stake by April.

He has previously used Twitter to escalate a conflict with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency opened a probe into some of his recent stock sales, and he often blasts his critics on the social network.

Twitter, at the beginning of the month, invited Mr. Musk to join its board—which would have prevented him from owning more than 14.9% of the company’s stock. Mr. Musk initially agreed and then rejected the offer.

Twitter has already embarked on a turnaround plan after a fight with activist Elliott Management Corp. about two years ago. Twitter said a little over a year ago that it would work to at least double its revenue to $7.5 billion by the end of 2023 and reach at least 315 million so-called monetizable daily active users at that time.

Mr. Musk’s proposed changes for the platform include softening its stance on content moderation, creating an edit feature for tweets, making Twitter’s algorithm open source—which would allow people outside the company to view it and suggest changes—and relying less on advertising, among other ideas.

Mr. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” said in a recent interview at a TED conference that he sees Twitter as the “de facto town square.”

Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts, Mr. Musk said, pointing to temporary suspensions as a better solution.

Mr. Musk said he also wants the platform to be more transparent when it takes action that amplifies or reduces a tweet’s reach. He said he wasn’t certain how some of those ideas would be implemented.

Twitter has spent years advocating for healthier discourse on its platform and adding content moderation, arguing at least in part that it is good for business.

The company also has introduced new features that have been gaining some traction with users, including Twitter Spaces, which allows people to host live audio conversations with each other within the platform.

Mr. Musk has said he wants Twitter to rely less on advertising—which provided roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021—and shift its business model more toward subscriptions. The platform currently offers a subscription-based service called Twitter Blue, which gives customers premium features like “undo tweet” for $2.99 a month. He suggested removing all ads on Twitter as part of the subscription offerings.

Mr. Musk also floated the idea of cutting staff, shuttering the company’s San Francisco headquarters building and not giving the board of directors a salary. The latter could save roughly $3 million a year alone, he said.

His other proposed changes for Twitter include trying to stop spam and scam bots and allowing for longer tweets. The current limit is 280 characters.

On Thursday, Twitter is scheduled to announce its first-quarter earnings.


 

Attachments

Last edited:
Semi off topic but how in the FUCK did Twitter ban a sitting president because of "unprecedented and ongoing violent situation in Washington DC" which he didn't incite and wasn't even a real thing let alone a big deal, but people were actively rooting on whole cities who burned, looted and in some cases murdered people for nearly an entire summer.

What in the fuck. happened there? I hope this all really ends up sucking for these demons.
They were trying to find an albatross to hang from Trump's neck the entire time he was in office. They tried over and over again to fabricate stuff (taxes, "sexual assault," muh Russia), and eventually they were handed a sad, low-energy Boomer riot courtesy of lockdown anxiety and extreme distrust of a system that was openly slanted against a duly elected president for his full term (plus pre-stacking of the deck against him). They will never let it go because it's all they have after almost 4 years of investigation into a 100% fabricated narrative by the DNC and Hillary Clinton's people. (And did it affect their faith in any of these institutions that are clearly illegally colluding with each other in a fascistic manner?)

Your mistake is in assuming these people are ashamed of being inconsistent or irrational. They don't care. All they do is lie to "win."
 
In regards to the deep state theory.

Remember Elon has a security clearance because of spaceX. SpaceX does do launches for the US military.

The russians are out of the game, The SLS (replacement for the shuttle) is fucked, Blue origin, and other competing launch groups are years away from sorting shit.

And Star Link. There is no way the Military or Intelligence services dont have their hooks in that service. So lets say the normal spook playbook is to have the DOJ or SEC start looking into someone causes problems.

Start fucking with elon too much spills over into fucking with his clients that include branches of the US government.

Also spinning up smoke over a private social media platform that just happens to have connects to (deep state) isnt gonna fly. Twitter cant explain how they censor or promote regime change or influence at the request of the government.

So basically they had to take his offer.
More than this, I don't think people realize exactly how badly throwing everything at stopping Trump in 2020 crippled the apparatus at a fundamental level. The economic capital they lost was devastating enough, but they lack severely in political capital far more now. It's why Biden couldn't get Build Back Better off the ground, even though it was critical to repaying the enormous amount of debt they had in that regard. One big reason this administration keeps losing every fight it picks, even with its constituent components willing to go knives-out, is because of this debt. Their financial backers are still strapped from 2016, let alone 2020, and their political capital is long since spent.

Musk couldn't have dropped this at a worse time for them. Election Season's in 7 months and you have vast numbers of the establishment Dems seeing the writing on the wall and retiring this year. The RINOs are out in force, but the Republican party as it stands is no longer the old RNC types and people content to settle for shitheads like McCain and Romney, nor are the newly-arriving former Dems who are on the Repubs' side due to the populist upswell being something they can get on-board with.

They're fucked, and while you're gonna see Biden and Obama shrieking about a need to Regulate, they can't do shit without Musk shredding them and they don't have the political capital to leverage a counter. The RINOs aren't going to help them unfuck themselves because they'll want to save their own ass. It's fucking hilarious.
 
It appears Elon's policy is going to be "Don't commit crimes"
Than how are Antifa post let their feelings known online?
The only Sara tweet that is censored:

View attachment 3221240

I hope Elon gets rid of that fucking gay Covid disclaimer which is funded and implemented by shareblue/correct the record cocksuckers none of whom are scientists.
Yeah I'm still disappointed that pops up. But granted it's only been like two days. So I'll wait and see
View attachment 3221313
>leave twitter for the alternative that bills itself as "a brand new social media platform founded on the principles of free speech, independent thought and rejecting political censorship and “cancel culture""


View attachment 3221340

how long until they're sneeded off Gettr by constant harassment?
Is this true. Holy shit the irony.

Rather you trust Elon or not. I really don't care at the moment. Since I'm just here for the salt. I have my personally theory Elon brought Twitter to un- sepend Babylon Bee the timing is just too good for it to be a coincidence.
 
"Here's how Hillary can still win."

They're the genuine champions of free speech at the moment. And eventually they'll be corrupted by power and become censors in some "holy" cause. It's an inevitable cycle.

This is pretty much a spot-on assessment.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: frozenrunner
Christian speech is healthier for a society than free speech even if it forbids you from saying "I want to FUCK that loli!"
Problem being that cutting that out normally comes with other offensive speech. "The loli fuckers should die" is close to being banned.

Eliminate the banning of speech is the best solution.
 
This is pretty much a spot-on assessment.
If Palmer didn’t latch to the DNC, he would be screaming at people on the street about the wrath of God and demanding people make human sacrifices to keep the sun rising.

In fact, 99% of these die-hard neolibals and democrats would either be insane religious zealots or some kind of mega-Hitler in any other country besides America.
 
Christian speech is healthier for a society than free speech even if it forbids you from saying "I want to FUCK that loli!"
Mandated “Christian speech” is directly responsible for the left’s rise to power, christfag. The Christians being the no-fun police was NOT that long ago, and if it really worked so well for society, the Religious Right would not have lost their near-total social and political dominance. They lost for exactly the same reason the shitlibs are losing today - they simply could not deal with the idea that people dare oppose their religious doctrine.
 
Last edited:
Mandated “Christian speech” is directly responsible for the left’s rise to power, christfag.
Listen up shit for brains, I know your childhood was hard when you wanted to make edgy jokes but adults told you it wasn't funny, but the Religious Right hasn't had "near-total social and political dominance" since the 1950s. If picking up a Bible offends you too much (wow, sensitive much?) try picking up a history book.
 
Listen up shit for brains, I know your childhood was hard when you wanted to make edgy jokes but adults told you it wasn't funny, but the Religious Right hasn't had "near-total social and political dominance" since the 1950s. If picking up a Bible offends you too much (wow, sensitive much?) try picking up a history book.
lmao, seethe some more, won’t change the fact that your team had all the power and lost. You can’t even go “but muh true Christian society has never been attempted! It’ll totally work THIS time!” because it has, and it failed due to its own hubris.
 
They were trying to find an albatross to hang from Trump's neck the entire time he was in office. They tried over and over again to fabricate stuff (taxes, "sexual assault," muh Russia), and eventually they were handed a sad, low-energy Boomer riot courtesy of lockdown anxiety and extreme distrust of a system that was openly slanted against a duly elected president for his full term (plus pre-stacking of the deck against him). They will never let it go because it's all they have after almost 4 years of investigation into a 100% fabricated narrative by the DNC and Hillary Clinton's people. (And did it affect their faith in any of these institutions that are clearly illegally colluding with each other in a fascistic manner?)

Your mistake is in assuming these people are ashamed of being inconsistent or irrational. They don't care. All they do is lie to "win."
no I was mostly being rhetorical and restating the insanity. I am pretty aware of what we're dealing with I just wanted to point it out again because I think it's important we don't get desensitized to it.

You already see people saying "'muh laptop!'" and that's def a tactic.. perpetuate a lie so long that by the time the truth comes out you can pretend it's old news and therefore irrelevant.

On another note, one interesting thing i'm seeing already is people apparently on the right getting tricked by satirical posts and mobbing up. There's the one guy that said something about Elon not having some kind of degree and people mobbed up. It's interesting how quickly that swung.
 
lmao, seethe some more, won’t change the fact that your team had all the power and lost. You can’t even go “but muh true Christian society has never been attempted! It’ll totally work THIS time!” because it has, and it failed due to its own hubris.
I was on your side, but now the fedora is starting to tip.
Anyway, we have the constitution to prevent a statist oligarchy and to prevent a theocracy. Both of them.
 
Mandated “Christian speech” is directly responsible for the left’s rise to power, christfag. The Christians being the no-fun police was NOT that long ago, and if it really worked so well for society, the Religious Right would not have lost their near-total social and political dominance. They lost for exactly the same reason the shitlibs are losing today - they simply could not deal with the idea that people dare oppose their religious doctrine.
IMO blaming Christians for that is like blaming Jews for the actions of the Black Hebrew Israelites. As if Paul was scheming to take muh vidya games away from the children 2000 years later.
 
I was on your side, but now the fedora is starting to tip.
Anyway, we have the constitution to prevent a statist oligarchy and to prevent a theocracy. Both of them.
I got nothing against Christians who use their religion as a basis for their personal beliefs, just the retards who legitimately think that a return to religious fundamentalism is what will fix society, or that such a return is even possible at this point.

I’m sure the pendulum will swing far right again - the slip is happening already, and the leftists are powerless to stop it. When it happens though, I doubt the next iteration of the no-fun police will come in the form of religious fundamentalists, Christian or otherwise.
 
How? What did they even manage to accomplish that compares to the outright domination of the internet as we see it today?
Yeah, nobody listened when Pat Buchanan told you to boycott Teletubbies.

But modern lefty social media can and has made their boycotts mandatory by threatening to end careers.

Both are insufferably smug, but only one ever had actual cancel power over the daily ins and outs of pop culture.

When Jack Thompson said vidya was the Devil, people laughed at him.

When modern "girl gamers" said vidya was sexist, they got invited to speak at the UN.

When the Pastor said D&D taught kids to worship demons, everyone rolled their eyes

When the SJWs said it was racist in it's depiction of Orcs, they hurriedly rewrote all the books.
 
Last edited:
I was on your side, but now the fedora is starting to tip.
Anyway, we have the constitution to prevent a statist oligarchy and to prevent a theocracy. Both of them.
To add on to this, despite not being religious myself I do think that the death of religion in the modern age has had a net negative impact on societal stability, because as we can observe, in the absence of true religion people have just replaced old gods with new false idols of trannydom, consumerism and blind worship of a perverted image of “science”.

The problem is, that cat’s already out of the bag. Each new generation becomes less and less invested in the religions of their parents. Religious acts have become more akin to cultural customs than true acts of faith. True religion as a major cultural institution is dead in the West. One could argue that this is an inevitability in any society that reaches our level of scientific advancement. One of the main reasons religions arose in the first place was to explain or rationalize events outside of human control and understanding. As human control and understanding in the world increases, it is only natural for the power of religion to wane.

The backlash against progressivism run wild isn’t going to come from existing religious institutions, there just isn’t the widespread organic grassroots support needed for it to succeed. Religion isn’t something that can be dictated from top down, it NEEDS the mandate of the people; speech can be compelled, but belief cannot. For example, forcing someone to say TWAW on threat of social ostracization is only going to harden their hearts against the troon menace. This current right-wing resurgence is the kind that will eventually produce a secular strongman authoritarian that will likely run with their own brand of science-as-a-religion, not a fundamentalist theocracy based on traditional faith.
 
Last edited:
Back