Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Plenty of women have voices like that. Some women are just simply more naturally masculine and masculine traits tend to come together (like voice, jaw width, being more robustly built or tall). Just like some men are naturally petite and feminine but they've got all the functioning equipment down there.

Back in my college days I knew a 5'10 woman with similar build and she's got a fairly deep voice.

Although your point about the archived posts about her dad's school seem so strange too and that might mean something more. But it's not strange for someone to not have any online information before 18-19. There are plenty reasons of hiding them other than being trans, such as being a cringy idiot and you ashamed to talk about anything you did as a teenagers. Or some inexplicit trauma
You know she could simply not want media goons and weirdos on the interent digging into her personal life
 
The amount of actual gay and lesbian people is tiny. Like, single digits tiny. I haven't seen an increase in legit gay or lesbian people, even with all of the social progress and legalized marriage, and even really shitty LGBT surveys indicate that their numbers have barely gone up.

Meanwhile, I keep running into gender specials, and almost all of them are high school/college aged women. It's a fad. Sadly, it's a very destructive fad that has institutional financial backing and media support.
The number of people who "identify" as gay or bisexual has fluctuated, but the number of men who admit to having sexual contact with another man stays pretty consistently at around 3 - 6%, depending on how you define it (ie, does one encounter 20 years ago make you an "MSM" or not). This is why it's important to understand that even the context of the "gay" or "Bi" identity is itself a social category. There are plenty of men who do not identify as gay who engage in MSM semi-regularly. You can argue that they really are gay, but for the purposes of things like Gallup polls they don't show up, which is why self-id'ing isn't a good measure of the prevalence of behaviors in a population.

So no, the alarming rise in minors experiencing gender dysphoria is really not comparable to "being gay" at all. I mean, this is where the self-id'ing as "trans" or "nb" is also problematic. It's not even super clear right now if all the kids getting lined up for puberty blockers even have GD, or if they just ID as trans and want puberty blockers anyway.

E; I should add that I can't find as good metrics on women who have sex with women, but I think that's because there's less interest due to woman woman sexual contact having the lowest danger for things like STIs.
 
Last edited:
Obligatory dotted AGP smirk to reveal the stare in all its glory
View attachment 3222542
download (3).jpeg


I'm glad that boob tweet has led to the discovery of such a fine specimen.
 
Good of Alex Jones to stop by.

View attachment 3222318
Bra sperg under the spoiler:
Cup sizes are supposed to indicate the projection of breasts relative to the underbust measurement (band size), so an A cup indicates that the circumference of the chest and breasts at their fullest point (over-the-bust measurement) is 1 inch greater than the band size. For each cup size you go up, that is equal to an extra inch on your over-the-bust measurement, so a J cup using US measurements (cup sizes don’t go up the alphabet the same way in every country) would be a 10 inch projection. On an average woman that is a large set of breasts - the underwire is likely to be quite wide and would reach up into the armpits considerably, in order to contain all the tissue. But we’re not talking about a True and Honest woman, we’re looking at a barrel-chested male. He claims to be wearing a J cup and I don’t doubt him, because he would need wide cups to contain his moobs. However, I very much doubt he has the typical projection of a J cup. As for the band size, he is probably wearing one that is too small because his chest circumference is the same or bigger than the average obese woman (you know, bc of his big ass ribcage), and it becomes harder to find large band sizes once you pass 42in.
All that being said, standardised bra sizes are already inadequate for many women (no two sets of breasts are identical, not even your own breasts are) so they are even less suitable for men. The bra will look ridiculous under clothes and it’s probably gaping and squeezing in all the wrong places.

Please correct me if I’m wrong, though.
 
View attachment 3222337

Go to his feed if you want to actually see that shit including some nasty fucked up big ass scars (more like weird holes) in his "breasts" but there's not enough Islamic Content ratings for me to actually post them here for you nor for me to continue looking at them to figure out how they work considering he claims to have had no augmentation at all.

No seriously do not go look at his Twitter to see these until you have prayed to Allah enough or unless you love the kind of things in the SRS surgeries thread.
Look how he's lifting his arms but rather than the moobs lifting with the outer side of the pec and shoulder, they're limply sliding into his armpits. It's just a roll of fat with no support structure hanging off his chest. Corpulent. Like a sack of jello.
 
"IRL I'm a pathetic faggot with social anxiety and autism so in my Twitter safe space I tell my power fantasies and LARP about killing/harassing whoever oposes me"
View attachment 3222525
And, of course, if this was flipped on its head and he was the one inconvenienced and made to feel "unsafe" he'd be the first to complain about it. It's almost funny, seeing men like this speak this way only because they've never been met with actual, legitimate consequences.
 
Can a lawfag explain what is going on here? This goes back to 2020, but I had not seen it before, here on KF or anywhere else. Seen here on Twitter. Where I seem to be spending far too much time following the whole Musk kerfuffle.

Axios link
View attachment 3222505

The ruling, which I have not fully read.


etc.

As an aside, Varner was convicted of possession of Cheese Pizza, surprise, surprise. The REEEing on Twitter about this case doesn't mention that small point for some reason. 🙄

Lawfag here. Not a lawyer, but trained as a paralegal and have a hobby of reading court decisions.

The fifth circuit is widely considered the most conservative federal appeals court in the country. That's just background information. I'm not going to spend time talking about the appeals court system much, because no1curr. Look at Wikipedia if you're curious.

What is important to this case is the concept of jurisdiction. Every lawsuit has to be filed in the court system that the bad thing "took place" in. There's a lot of fairly complex rules that determine which court to file in. To simplify this case is a federal case, due to the original offense being cheese pizza.

Side note: this is this chomo's second cheese pizza conviction. He also failed to register as a sex offender after the first time. Tsk Tsk.

Back to the case at hand. The appeals court said the name change he got was not a legal name change, because he misrepresented where he lived when he got it. Oops.

Secondly, the appeal should have been denied at the lower level, if not for that, for lack of jurisdiction in general.

Also, it did not meet certain criteria required to achieve the desired goal. The reasons are kinda technical. If you want to know, read the ruling. It doesn't matter for our purposes. He couldn't get there from here, basically.

Also, also, there's no need for the things he was requesting. The prison system already has a mechanism for adding an assumed name/alias/preferred name. He could have told the prison "call me Henrietta" and they would.

So, that's why his original request was denied. All perfectly reasonable and logical to me. He didn't meet jurisdiction or the rules required to make a change, so the court was right to say no.

As for the pronouns, that came down to our personal favorite issue : compelled speech and slippery slope. The judge had a lot to say on the issue, but that's what it boiled down to. Compelling speech is bad, mmkay, and once you start saying "her" and "him" you open the doors for all kinds of alternative pronouns.

I can't remember if this was touched on, but appeals are based on errors happening at the lower level - not disagreeing with a verdict. It's possible that if a lawyer was compelled to call a defendant her, and didn't that the defendant would be able to successfully appeal their sentence based on that. That's obviously a dangerous precedent.

I didn't read the dissent. Those are not binding, nor do they create precedent. They are just pretenceous (I know that isn't spelled right) opinions. You can't really even use them in legal briefs to argue for a case in front of a judge, because they don't really count!

Edit: rulings at the appeals court level do set precedent. That means that this ruling is more or less binding on all proceedings that come after it. No one can force a court, at least in the fifth circuit - it's been a long time since school, I can't remember if this now applies to the whole us or that's only Supreme Court rulings, my apologies Frens - to compel pronouns. A court can still use preferred pronouns as a courtesy, judges basically having the final say in their courtroom.

But, where this comes in is let's say there's a nasty rape case. By the time it comes to trial, because it's one of the rare ones that does, the Defendant is now a ~woman~. His lawyer asks the court to call him a her. The victims' lawyer can submit a motion to the judge citing this case as precedent and say this victim is traumatized enough, blah blah, mental health, plznob00ly. The judge can now rule no without the defendant being able to REEEEEEEEEEEE about it.

That concludes my sperg on precedent.
 
Last edited:
From Manlet to Tranlet
He has more stubble in the second picture. It's like he's transing in reverse.
Hormones are magic if you consider magic to be illusory bullshit used to trick children and drunk Las Vegas tourists.
When trying to hide your gut takes priority over hiding the holes in your tights.
Probably snagged em on his giant crusty man feet.
 
1651073909307.png1651073764786.png
When the medical bods conspire against your life-saving surgery.

I always wondered why some people capitalize words at random. I used to think these were just confused and wayward Krauts, or remnants of the OmGsoQuirKYaNdRanDoMxD fad of the early 2000s. Now, I see "Sentences Written like This one Here" and can only think of mental problems.
 
God I hate when doctors pull that "oh you may change your mind and want kids someday" bullshit but then go "oh you're trans? Well let's set up an appointment!" to any TIF they come across. It'd probably be easier to get your tubes tied or a hysterectomy if you just lied and said you're just discovering you're a transman and want to get that surgery done first.
As a woman with endometriosis this has crossed my mind several times.
 
Look how he's lifting his arms but rather than the moobs lifting with the outer side of the pec and shoulder, they're limply sliding into his armpits. It's just a roll of fat with no support structure hanging off his chest. Corpulent. Like a sack of jello.

It was literally a matter of minutes, he must have been clocking this thread if so.
I always assume we have voluntroons and handmaidens monitoring this thread in order to immediately alert the ones who catch our eye.

That's why we archive ♡
 
Screenshot_20220427-092524_Chrome.jpg
No, you disgusting piece of shit. Women cannot be AGP because they don't have to imagine themselves turning into "women" in order to get turned on. That is legit the only condition of AGP. Everything else is just a presentation of a symptom.

For real though, I think it's super disgusting that AGPs think that just because they view women as objects of sexual desire and as a result view themselves as that, that all female women are ok with being objectified, or that women even objectify themselves in the same way that men objectify "woman."
 
Last edited:
Back