CrispyGonad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2019
Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
jumboseafood
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2022
You know she could simply not want media goons and weirdos on the interent digging into her personal life
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
The number of people who "identify" as gay or bisexual has fluctuated, but the number of men who admit to having sexual contact with another man stays pretty consistently at around 3 - 6%, depending on how you define it (ie, does one encounter 20 years ago make you an "MSM" or not). This is why it's important to understand that even the context of the "gay" or "Bi" identity is itself a social category. There are plenty of men who do not identify as gay who engage in MSM semi-regularly. You can argue that they really are gay, but for the purposes of things like Gallup polls they don't show up, which is why self-id'ing isn't a good measure of the prevalence of behaviors in a population.
So no, the alarming rise in minors experiencing gender dysphoria is really not comparable to "being gay" at all. I mean, this is where the self-id'ing as "trans" or "nb" is also problematic. It's not even super clear right now if all the kids getting lined up for puberty blockers even have GD, or if they just ID as trans and want puberty blockers anyway.
E; I should add that I can't find as good metrics on women who have sex with women, but I think that's because there's less interest due to woman woman sexual contact having the lowest danger for things like STIs.
Last edited:
Punitive Castration
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2018
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2021
Greasy, thinning hair, disgusting fast-food body and an embarrassingly self-referential t-shirt? This “lady” is literally every other male programmer I’ve seen sheepishly lurking in the shadows.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
There must be a word count requirement for grindr profiles now. There's no way this guy is actually dumb enough to think this is possible.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2017
Bra sperg under the spoiler:
Cup sizes are supposed to indicate the projection of breasts relative to the underbust measurement (band size), so an A cup indicates that the circumference of the chest and breasts at their fullest point (over-the-bust measurement) is 1 inch greater than the band size. For each cup size you go up, that is equal to an extra inch on your over-the-bust measurement, so a J cup using US measurements (cup sizes don’t go up the alphabet the same way in every country) would be a 10 inch projection. On an average woman that is a large set of breasts - the underwire is likely to be quite wide and would reach up into the armpits considerably, in order to contain all the tissue. But we’re not talking about a True and Honest woman, we’re looking at a barrel-chested male. He claims to be wearing a J cup and I don’t doubt him, because he would need wide cups to contain his moobs. However, I very much doubt he has the typical projection of a J cup. As for the band size, he is probably wearing one that is too small because his chest circumference is the same or bigger than the average obese woman (you know, bc of his big ass ribcage), and it becomes harder to find large band sizes once you pass 42in.
All that being said, standardised bra sizes are already inadequate for many women (no two sets of breasts are identical, not even your own breasts are) so they are even less suitable for men. The bra will look ridiculous under clothes and it’s probably gaping and squeezing in all the wrong places.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, though.
All that being said, standardised bra sizes are already inadequate for many women (no two sets of breasts are identical, not even your own breasts are) so they are even less suitable for men. The bra will look ridiculous under clothes and it’s probably gaping and squeezing in all the wrong places.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, though.
pursuitsnail
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2021
Look how he's lifting his arms but rather than the moobs lifting with the outer side of the pec and shoulder, they're limply sliding into his armpits. It's just a roll of fat with no support structure hanging off his chest. Corpulent. Like a sack of jello.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
And, of course, if this was flipped on its head and he was the one inconvenienced and made to feel "unsafe" he'd be the first to complain about it. It's almost funny, seeing men like this speak this way only because they've never been met with actual, legitimate consequences.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
Can a lawfag explain what is going on here? This goes back to 2020, but I had not seen it before, here on KF or anywhere else. Seen here on Twitter. Where I seem to be spending far too much time following the whole Musk kerfuffle.
Axios link
View attachment 3222505
The ruling, which I have not fully read.
etc.
As an aside, Varner was convicted of possession of Cheese Pizza, surprise, surprise. The REEEing on Twitter about this case doesn't mention that small point for some reason.
Lawfag here. Not a lawyer, but trained as a paralegal and have a hobby of reading court decisions.
The fifth circuit is widely considered the most conservative federal appeals court in the country. That's just background information. I'm not going to spend time talking about the appeals court system much, because no1curr. Look at Wikipedia if you're curious.
What is important to this case is the concept of jurisdiction. Every lawsuit has to be filed in the court system that the bad thing "took place" in. There's a lot of fairly complex rules that determine which court to file in. To simplify this case is a federal case, due to the original offense being cheese pizza.
Side note: this is this chomo's second cheese pizza conviction. He also failed to register as a sex offender after the first time. Tsk Tsk.
Back to the case at hand. The appeals court said the name change he got was not a legal name change, because he misrepresented where he lived when he got it. Oops.
Secondly, the appeal should have been denied at the lower level, if not for that, for lack of jurisdiction in general.
Also, it did not meet certain criteria required to achieve the desired goal. The reasons are kinda technical. If you want to know, read the ruling. It doesn't matter for our purposes. He couldn't get there from here, basically.
Also, also, there's no need for the things he was requesting. The prison system already has a mechanism for adding an assumed name/alias/preferred name. He could have told the prison "call me Henrietta" and they would.
So, that's why his original request was denied. All perfectly reasonable and logical to me. He didn't meet jurisdiction or the rules required to make a change, so the court was right to say no.
As for the pronouns, that came down to our personal favorite issue : compelled speech and slippery slope. The judge had a lot to say on the issue, but that's what it boiled down to. Compelling speech is bad, mmkay, and once you start saying "her" and "him" you open the doors for all kinds of alternative pronouns.
I can't remember if this was touched on, but appeals are based on errors happening at the lower level - not disagreeing with a verdict. It's possible that if a lawyer was compelled to call a defendant her, and didn't that the defendant would be able to successfully appeal their sentence based on that. That's obviously a dangerous precedent.
I didn't read the dissent. Those are not binding, nor do they create precedent. They are just pretenceous (I know that isn't spelled right) opinions. You can't really even use them in legal briefs to argue for a case in front of a judge, because they don't really count!
Edit: rulings at the appeals court level do set precedent. That means that this ruling is more or less binding on all proceedings that come after it. No one can force a court, at least in the fifth circuit - it's been a long time since school, I can't remember if this now applies to the whole us or that's only Supreme Court rulings, my apologies Frens - to compel pronouns. A court can still use preferred pronouns as a courtesy, judges basically having the final say in their courtroom.
But, where this comes in is let's say there's a nasty rape case. By the time it comes to trial, because it's one of the rare ones that does, the Defendant is now a ~woman~. His lawyer asks the court to call him a her. The victims' lawyer can submit a motion to the judge citing this case as precedent and say this victim is traumatized enough, blah blah, mental health, plznob00ly. The judge can now rule no without the defendant being able to REEEEEEEEEEEE about it.
That concludes my sperg on precedent.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
Troons conspiring to deplatform/sabotage Kevin Hsu's upcoming study on transfem and crossdresser sexuality because of his association with Bailey and being a proponent of AGP. Good luck with that, lol:
Update: Please let "woman brain" here be a troll:
Update: Please let "woman brain" here be a troll:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2018
He has more stubble in the second picture. It's like he's transing in reverse.
Hormones are magic if you consider magic to be illusory bullshit used to trick children and drunk Las Vegas tourists.
Probably snagged em on his giant crusty man feet.
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
When the medical bods conspire against your life-saving surgery.
I always wondered why some people capitalize words at random. I used to think these were just confused and wayward Krauts, or remnants of the OmGsoQuirKYaNdRanDoMxD fad of the early 2000s. Now, I see "Sentences Written like This one Here" and can only think of mental problems.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2022
As a woman with endometriosis this has crossed my mind several times.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2021
Some people will lock/deactivate their accounts out of fear if they’re posted in a KF thread. Even if no one is going to do anything, That’s how it is.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
It was literally a matter of minutes, he must have been clocking this thread if so.
A Dark Day Indeed
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2021
I always assume we have voluntroons and handmaidens monitoring this thread in order to immediately alert the ones who catch our eye.
That's why we archive ♡
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
No, you disgusting piece of shit. Women cannot be AGP because they don't have to imagine themselves turning into "women" in order to get turned on. That is legit the only condition of AGP. Everything else is just a presentation of a symptom.
For real though, I think it's super disgusting that AGPs think that just because they view women as objects of sexual desire and as a result view themselves as that, that all female women are ok with being objectified, or that women even objectify themselves in the same way that men objectify "woman."
Last edited: