BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Tranimal Farm said:
none of them are ever one of the super weird but more interesting section of the far right that's even farther to the right of fascism. I'm of course talking about the monarchists/nrx crowd. When can we get a shit tier breadtuber who used to be a Mencius Moldbug fanboy?
Click to expand...
Yep you don't see former Bowl Patrol people doing the how I left the far right grift.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Brain Problems and Shaka Brah
DirtyHegel said:
Duncan hasnt responded to me at all, and I dont think he will. If you listening Duncan, you are a massive pussy and Anarchism will win.
Click to expand...
He's probably not going to actually debate simply because like most BreadTubers, they don't debate well. I'd say cut the losses and move on in my opinion.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Oh piss off!, Erwin Rotten, Brain Problems and 1 other person
1651096846207.png

Does triggering a bunch of left wing retards into screeching like retards count?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Oh piss off!, Da Capo, Woke Blue Muttlema and 5 others
Chuck Gruden said:
He's probably not going to actually debate simply because like most BreadTubers, they don't debate well. I'd say cut the losses and move on in my opinion.
Click to expand...

I see it as two types of debates: cater to the radicalization of their fans OR aim to find a truth. You can't do both at the same time, it's either one or the other. Breadtubers don't want truth, they want their fans radicalized and addicted to the drug.

Every time I see any breadtuber say anything, I never think "oh, what will I learn today from them". It's always "okay... What's their plan to lie this time..." But what's great about their lies is that they strengthen truth and make it that much more valuable.

Really do move on, because at this point it's dealing with a person who is looking for any drug to sell to their intentionally young and easily manipulated audience. If you're able to offer the cure, don't do it through the drug dealer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, KokoroKoroki, mrpatapon and 8 others
Erwin Rotten said:
I see it as two types of debates: cater to the radicalization of their fans OR aim to find a truth. You can't do both at the same time, it's either one or the other. Breadtubers don't want truth, they want their fans radicalized and addicted to the drug.

Every time I see any breadtuber say anything, I never think "oh, what will I learn today from them". It's always "okay... What's their plan to lie this time..." But what's great about their lies is that they strengthen truth and make it that much more valuable.

Really do move on, because at this point it's dealing with a person who is looking for any drug to sell to their intentionally young and easily manipulated audience. If you're able to offer the cure, don't do it through the drug dealer.
Click to expand...
All dozen of them are really taking the drug well it seems. I think half of them are retarded furries
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Lobster Cult High Priest, Erwin Rotten, Brain Problems and 1 other person
Question for Emilie: how on earth can YOU of all people read this article knowing how you displayed Faun and Doe on your Livestreams, covered in bruises all over? Asking them to take pride in being beaten up by you, while openly plying them with drugs to dull the pain and stuff their true feelings? (How many times have I seen you three openly pass around that bong on your streams?) How can YOU read something like this, knowing 1000nds of people online are witnesses to what you are doing to these two men, and insist that this article about someone other than someone like you?


No, this article is not about some other man, Emilie. It's about you. You too know the pretzel that these two men are forcing themselves into to protect you, and you happily exploit that through the strategic use of drugs. That's what I witnessed over and over on your Livestreams and I know you will never admit to this.
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: berenstain, Brain Problems, DSP's Tax Lawyer and 1 other person
Erwin Rotten said:
I see it as two types of debates: cater to the radicalization of their fans OR aim to find a truth. You can't do both at the same time, it's either one or the other. Breadtubers don't want truth, they want their fans radicalized and addicted to the drug.

Every time I see any breadtuber say anything, I never think "oh, what will I learn today from them". It's always "okay... What's their plan to lie this time..." But what's great about their lies is that they strengthen truth and make it that much more valuable.

Really do move on, because at this point it's dealing with a person who is looking for any drug to sell to their intentionally young and easily manipulated audience. If you're able to offer the cure, don't do it through the drug dealer.
Click to expand...
BreadTubers got good propaganda, that's a certainty. Good thing we are blessed they and their followers are incompetent when it comes to actually running things. They're like that one kid back in school where he acted like he was the internet but when it came time to actually do the work he was clueless as Joe Biden without his handlers.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Oh piss off!, Just A College Boy, Lobster Cult High Priest and 2 others
DirtyHegel said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oci0AMBUa4Y. dude really criticizing one of the best recent films in a while cause his favorite boogeyman likes Vikings, like tons of other people do, if you reading this Kavernacle, you are soy as hell and an actual consoomer and statist cuck.
Click to expand...
I feel like the vikings are a bit overrated in history but that's just me.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: A Welsh Cake, Bayard Rustin, winderson_silva and 4 others
DSP's Tax Lawyer said:
As opposed to what? Vikings have a cool history depending on the age you look at imo
Click to expand...
The Christianized Vikings especially have a much cooler time period than the Pagan ones. Parts of their settlement of the British Isles and discovering the Americas are really not focused on enough compared with monastery raiding and Odin.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Rome's rightful successor, Bayard Rustin, z0mb0 and 4 others
DirtyHegel said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oci0AMBUa4Y. dude really criticizing one of the best recent films in a while cause his favorite boogeyman likes Vikings, like tons of other people do, if you reading this Kavernacle, you are soy as hell and an actual consoomer and statist cuck.
Click to expand...
Kavernacle is just a leftist Quarterpounder except somehow even more annoying, his thumbnails make me want to gouge my eyes out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rome's rightful successor, Bayard Rustin and Lobster Cult High Priest
DSP's Tax Lawyer said:
As opposed to what? Vikings have a cool history depending on the age you look at imo
Click to expand...
In a military sense, they are a bit overrated when you consider their performance against armies that aren't made up entirely of poorly armed peasants. The exception would be the Great Heathen Army under Ivar the Boneless and to an extent King Harald Hardrada of Norway. Mostly because Vikings were more raiders than true fighters.
DirtyHegel said:
agreed, Mercenaries are the most underrated and interesting group imo.
Click to expand...
Technically speaking, some Vikings did serve as mercenaries. The most notable of these were the Varangian Guard that served the Byzantine Empire.

In unrelated news, reports have come out saying Roe v. Wade has been overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 6-3 decision.

Let's see how BreadTubers react to this news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Da Capo and Lobster Cult High Priest
Chuck Gruden said:
In a military sense, they are a bit overrated when you consider their performance against armies that aren't made up entirely of poorly armed peasants. The exception would be the Great Heathen Army under Ivar the Boneless and to an extent King Harald Hardrada of Norway. Mostly because Vikings were more raiders than true fighters.
Click to expand...
True but they also were a product of their time and environment. They didn't have massive armies wandering around that required them to fight. They basically sailed around and found a town. Then they attacked, took what they wanted, and left
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lobster Cult High Priest
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back