Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
DumbDude42 said:
feels exactly like knowing the fact that people like paris hilton or kim kardashian have gained more money than everybody on this whole forum combined ever will in their entire lives: indifferent
Click to expand...
They at least never fell for a catfish of Swiss gay guy that posed as a NazBol
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: DumbDude42
Herty said:
How it feels knowing the fact that the dumb grifter e-thot has made more money than you will ever make in your entire life?
Click to expand...
Pity. A sort of dislocated sadness for her because she never stood a chance. The money doesn't matter. Pretty much every single person with even a moderately fulfilling life will tell you money is at best a tool to get you to a fulfilling life faster.
The perfect storm of her broke ass brain folds, e-celeb bullshit, and attractive looks completely fucked her and there was nothing she could do about it.

You see, she's good looking. She has a nice face, not gorgeous, but good looking enough to attract the right men to start preying on her dipshit retard ass. If she was born a little earlier or later she might have bypassed the rise of e-celeb grift stuff. But she wasn't. She got sucked into this giant revolving bullshit thing that turned her into an old, bald, lonely, emotionally stunted semen bloated clown.
The cavalcade of embarrassing L's she's taken is permanently etched onto the internet. Her nudes are out there, and more embarrassingly, none of us have saved them. All of that and in return she got... some money. How much money? I don't know. Probably not enough.
Would you make that trade? ​

I wouldn't. I'm a fat old bald piece of shit too and I wouldn't trade my life for hers for any amount of money. If things were just a little different she could have been married to some skinny nerd and the biggest worry in her life would be whether to make frozen chicken nuggets for dinner or to beg her 3 kids to eat grown up food like mommy and daddy do, just this once.

But hey, money is okay too, I guess.
 
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: an hero, Snack Cracker, sleepy-jezza and 5 others
Kahr CW9 said:
The cavalcade of embarrassing L's she's taken
Click to expand...
it keeps happening
Screenshot 2022-04-26 at 21-09-21 shoe on Twitter.png
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Coral Apples, Woke Blue Muttlema, Lichen Bark and 7 others
  • Like
Reactions: manlikebigp, Bayard Rustin and Woe-B-Gon (TM)
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Johnny Salami and 20 Mule Team Lorax
Sneeds_Sniggerly said:
I should have predicted this. The guy is such a beta, I wonder how long until she's pegging him. If you let your lefty gf walk over you, shit like this happens.
Click to expand...
I sense that they both have a hidden agenda of "I can fix him/her," but both of them have their identities all tied up in political ideology, her left and him right. They're in an LDR from New York to Ohio. Shoe has a sizeable online following, an insatiable appetite for attention, and no shortage of it. Shoe appears to me like what they call a "quiet borderline" with some nice, big servings of schizoid and maybe some histrionic traits. Euda's probably got his own stuff, too, but I'd be hard pressed to guess at it. He converted to Catholicism in his mid-30s, and he's dating shoe0nhead from 600 miles away.

Now, honestly, I like both of them. I would like to see it work out for them. That said, I do suspect that if he manages to get her on lock and expects that trad Catholic values are going to pave their way to a happily ever after, they could end up bitter about each other's disparity of values. If that happens, she is probably more likely to eat him alive than the other way around.

But if they're both smart enough to not use Twitter and YouTube as a way of living out nearly their whole relationship like June did with Greg, I would think and hope they're both smart enough to make choices that will be viable for them. Shoe is not about to pull a Hannah Minx and drop off the face of the internet, so we'll probably get to see what happens.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: an hero, Flying Whale, MasonicTelevision and 3 others
Sneeds_Sniggerly said:
Why does pol have such low standards? You get ugly spics, mutts, and kikes on there more than actual hot people lol
Click to expand...
There were people in the thread saying that they didn’t want June. Plus with the spics and Brazilians, you have to remember that most of their woman that don’t have a certain percentage of Spanish dna. Will look like goblinas. Then again their standards are low
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sneeds_Sniggerly
JambledUpWords said:
More political takes
View attachment 3224554
View attachment 3224556View attachment 3224555
Click to expand...
Blocking someone isn't a violation of free speech, it's just a bitch move when not done when absolutely necessary.

I remember back in the day everyone used to laugh at Steve Shives for blocking thousands he'd never even interacted with like a massive pussy but now everyone does it.

Speaking of Steve Shives everyone asked how he went from reasonable to an SJW cuck, but it turns out he was just par for the course.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Subhuman Leftist, Lord Xenu, Snack Cracker and 6 others
Jack Awful said:
Blocking someone isn't a violation of free speech, it's just a bitch move when not done when absolutely necessary.
Click to expand...
Blocking per se isn't necessarily a violation of freedom of speech, but blocking as Twitter has implemented it, where it violates Right of Reply, is a violation of free speech.

And, preemptively, yes, I'm aware that Twitter violating freedom of speech is not a violation of the US First Amendment. Just because a NGO is violating human rights doesn't mean it's A-OK and there's no problem to discuss.

It's also not even considered a best practice for user controls to alert a blocked user that they've been blocked.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Disagree
Reactions: Subhuman Leftist, goo'dup, Jacknife and 4 others
Raven of the Burning God said:
Blocking per se isn't necessarily a violation of freedom of speech, but blocking as Twitter has implemented it, where it violates Right of Reply, is a violation of free speech.

And, preemptively, yes, I'm aware that Twitter violating freedom of speech is not a violation of the US First Amendment. Just because a NGO is violating human rights doesn't mean it's A-OK and there's no problem to discuss.

It's also not even considered a best practice for user controls to alert a blocked user that they've been blocked.
Click to expand...
save us elon
 
The main thing with Shoe being a blocking retard is that once again she flip-flopped on an old thing and I doubt she's blocking people that just call her a cunt. I'm sure if you asked her about her wigs she's block you lol.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gamercat and Jack Awful
Raven of the Burning God said:
Blocking per se isn't necessarily a violation of freedom of speech, but blocking as Twitter has implemented it, where it violates Right of Reply, is a violation of free speech.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't. Ignoring the fact that has nothing to do with any law, rule, or anything in general, it's applies to certain types of media and the right to have a response IN THE SAME MEDIA.

Now, ignoring the fact that this was completely overturned in all regards in the US....blocking a user on Twitter doesn't stop them from replying....on Twitter. Nowhere in the history of anything has anything ever said that you have the RIGHT to make ME listen to YOU, lmao. In what world would it be a right to force me to have to listen to you? That's ridiculous. And you can absolutely type whatever angry, whining drivel you wan to until Twitter regardless of which person blocked you. Much like "free speech" doesn't mean "no consequence", "reply" doesn't mean "hold my ears open and scream at me".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: whathefuck, Flying Whale, Gay Mouth and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back