Even if he had gone to law school (and somehow got admitted), I will lay money on the strong possibility he'd fail the bar exam, sue for "discrimination", and claim he deserves a law license because "he put in effort."
It's conceivable that with more effort than he's put into his life, he could pass marginally based on the written portion. You might be surprised, but you're not necessarily grade on whether you get it "right," but just the ability to generate verbiage describing what applicable legal issues there are.
For instance, you might have a fact pattern and if you notice it has defamation per se in it, the plaintiff might be a public figure and have to prove to an actual malice standard, one of the claims is missing an allegation that the material was ever even "published," what "published means, etc. etc. until you run out of ideas or time.
They don't even check your written answers if you score high enough on the multiple choice, so I'd imagine Russ would not make the cut on that and they'd actually look at it. Even with only some bar exam written question sections looked at, though, the graders are handling an enormous volume of what is generally pretty bad writing, because it's more or less generated voluminously to hit as many issues as possible, but maybe only some in depth.
I could see Russ actually able to generate enough text that correctly at least identifies enough issues to pass. He wouldn't have the specific delusional approaches he does to cases involving himself, where he is always right and will be vindicated, even if his arguments are obviously absolutely retarded.
Even if he had gone to law school (and somehow got admitted), I will lay money on the strong possibility he'd fail the bar exam, sue for "discrimination", and claim he deserves a law license because "he put in effort."
It's conceivable that with more effort than he's put into his life, he could pass marginally based on the written portion. You might be surprised, but you're not necessarily grade on whether you get it "right," but just the ability to generate verbiage describing what applicable legal issues there are.
For instance, you might have a fact pattern and if you notice it has defamation per se in it, the plaintiff might be a public figure and have to prove to an actual malice standard, one of the claims is missing an allegation that the material was ever even "published," what "published means, etc. etc. until you run out of ideas or time.
They don't even check your written answers if you score high enough on the multiple choice, so I'd imagine Russ would not make the cut on that and they'd actually look at it. Even with only some bar exam written question sections looked at, though, the graders are handling an enormous volume of what is generally pretty bad writing, because it's more or less generated voluminously to hit as many issues as possible, but maybe only some in depth.
I could see Russ actually able to generate enough text that correctly at least identifies enough issues to pass. He wouldn't have the specific delusional approaches he does to cases involving himself, where he is always right and will be vindicated, even if his arguments are obviously absolutely retarded.
I know they do, but Russ isn't disabled in a way that would require more time to take the bar (and no matter how much time he had he'd never pass it - especially not in Nevada).
His hands are fucked up. If he were in a situation where he had to use handwriting, he might.
