The ‘Groomer’ Accusation Is Counterproductive - Cuckservatives are too afraid to call groomers out for what they are


“Groomer” has become the fashionable charge to level against anyone who opposes Florida’s parental-rights bill. It’s counterproductive. And not because it isn’t super creepy to see so many liberals invested in ensuring prepubescent kids, trapped in state-run schools, are force-fed post-modern, pseudoscientific ideas about sexuality and transgenderism in direct contradiction of the wishes of their parents.

And it’s not because leftists, who habitually dehumanize and smear their opponents as racists, rapists, bigots, and nihilists, don’t deserve it. Just this week, the head of the DNC called a U.S. senator “a maggot-infested man.” We would be knee-deep in feigned outrage had this been aimed at a Democrat. Professional hysterics would be calling it “pre-genocide talk.” So please spare us the tone-policing.

And it’s not because the political frustration isn’t understandable. The entire “Don’t Say Gay” accusation is based on a lie, perpetuated by virtually every mass-media outlet. Democrats not only get to give their bills misleading names like “The Freedom to Vote Act” or “Build Back Better,” they get to misname Republican bills, too. Which must be nice.

Rather, the accusation is wrong because it isn’t really true. Most opponents of the bill, I’m sure, aren’t “grooming” kids for sexual acts. They simply don’t believe that parents should have a say in their kids’ education. They want to normalize half-baked identitarianism and gender ideology against the will of parents. That’s bad enough.

Though most of this “groomer” debate is very online, I also question its political efficacy. The pugilistic inclination among conservatives these days isn’t a bad one. You can’t bring a knife to gun fight, and so on. But, in this case, it makes little sense. Turning it to eleven on every issue has diminishing returns. It didn’t work for Democrats in Virginia. And it isn’t working in Florida. Why do some conservatives believe it will always work for them? Florida Republicans passed the parental-rights bill — a far more consequential victory, incidentally, than dunking on Twitter accounts — without using hyperbolic language. Every poll quoting the bill verbatim, or even framing it a halfway-honest way, finds overwhelming bipartisan support. “Groomer” is a distraction that allows progressives to stop defending the idea that kindergartners should be taught that there are 72 genders, and instead, make it about how Republicans think every teacher is a would-be pedophile.
 
The words don't mean anything anymore because they apply to anyone who disagrees with the person speaking. Cuck, simp and incel are also pretty much meaningless words. If you just toss around groomer constantly, people are going to start tuning out the moment they hear 'groomer' sooner rather than later.
yeah nah, all of them wanna fuck kids, and by the sounds of it you're one of them.
you're only saying that because you're an incel nazi cuck.
Gj not tuning out the moment you get called a groomer, groomer.
 
They may not want to fuck children themselves, but they are actively preparing children to be sexually exploited and / or mutilated, so the term "groomer", applied to them, is still within its dictionary definition.

Rather, the accusation is wrong because it isn’t really true. Most opponents of the bill, I’m sure, aren’t “grooming” kids for sexual acts. They simply don’t believe that parents should have a say in their kids’ education.
Any person who "simply don’t believe that parents should have a say in their kids’ education" has an evil intention.
 
"Haha but it's working now" completely fails basic reading comprehension of the article. Every buzzword used to actually have effect and make people on all sides take notice. Now they mean nothing and nobody cares. "Groomer" is just going to become another buzzword that means nothing and nobody cares about because like absolute monkeys you see a tactic that appears to be working and think the best possible solution is to start slamming the button over and over again full force until it breaks.

If you want the accusation of groomer to continue to carry weight, stop using it on everyone who you don't like. Or keep doing it. This time next year there'll be a thread with a bunch of people stomping their feet, whining and crying about how degenerate the world has become because nobody cares when you call them a groomer anymore. KF is about pointing and laughing at people who inflict their own troubles upon themselves, so imagine that result will only be a net positive for the site.
 
"Haha but it's working now" completely fails basic reading comprehension of the article. Every buzzword used to actually have effect and make people on all sides take notice. Now they mean nothing and nobody cares. "Groomer" is just going to become another buzzword that means nothing and nobody cares about because like absolute monkeys you see a tactic that appears to be working and think the best possible solution is to start slamming the button over and over again full force until it breaks.

If you want the accusation of groomer to continue to carry weight, stop using it on everyone who you don't like. Or keep doing it. This time next year there'll be a thread with a bunch of people stomping their feet, whining and crying about how degenerate the world has become because nobody cares when you call them a groomer anymore. KF is about pointing and laughing at people who inflict their own troubles upon themselves, so imagine that result will only be a net positive for the site.

Two senteces

Too Long Didnt Read

And

Okay Groomer.
 
Why does this shit never happen for libs and leftist. Like when they're winning politics using underhanded means there's no "As libs we might be going too far here". Almost makes you think that these articles are controlled opposition
 
you're only saying that because you're an incel nazi cuck.

"Haha but it's working now" completely fails basic reading comprehension of the article. Every buzzword used to actually have effect and make people on all sides take notice. Now they mean nothing and nobody cares. "Groomer" is just going to become another buzzword that means nothing and nobody cares about because like absolute monkeys you see a tactic that appears to be working and think the best possible solution is to start slamming the button over and over again full force until it breaks.

If you want the accusation of groomer to continue to carry weight, stop using it on everyone who you don't like. Or keep doing it. This time next year there'll be a thread with a bunch of people stomping their feet, whining and crying about how degenerate the world has become because nobody cares when you call them a groomer anymore. KF is about pointing and laughing at people who inflict their own troubles upon themselves, so imagine that result will only be a net positive for the site.
Full offense but these mucho texto essays are not gonna be read by anyone but yourself
 
Most of the teachers pushing LGBT shit on kids are just so over-eager to make sure every potential LGBT child is totally heckin' valid and supported that they push anyone mildly deviating from traditionalist gender stereotypes into GSM categories. You call those people as a group pedo groomers and you're just gonna water down the term the same way lefties calling everything under the sun racist has.
 
Interesting point. I don't think that's entirely fair to Buckley because that was back in the 1960s. The Democrats and Republicans were not the absurd diametrically opposed enemies as they both stand today. John Birch was out there by accusing Eisenhower of being communist sympathizer. It was straight up political suicide to attack Eisenhower.

There's only one brand of Republicanism that needs to be kept in the gutter, and that's Neo-Cons.
The Birchers may have gone a bit far, but Buckley is a large part of why the Neo-Con dominated the discourse of the Republican party. And hell, most of the foundational Neo-Con were Trotskyites who replace eternal communist revolution for eternal liberal democratic revolution, so I don't know if the Birchers were that far off. Either way, it made real nationalism or populism verboten in the GOP, and they've been the Washington Generals ever since.
 
The LGBTs reaction shows that calling them groomers is not only super productive, but affirming what we always thought but couldn't say out loud.
> Be me. White, tall, and big.
> Southern.
> Redneck
> Buzz cuts are one of the few decent haircuts for me.
I think I'll consider their points or slow down once I've called them "groomer" the same number of times I've been falsely labelled a Nazi skinhead. At least I can point to behavior and not just appearance. This is the world you demanded and forced on everyone groomer. "Everyone" includes yourself.
 
"Haha but it's working now" completely fails basic reading comprehension of the article. Every buzzword used to actually have effect and make people on all sides take notice. Now they mean nothing and nobody cares. "Groomer" is just going to become another buzzword that means nothing and nobody cares about because like absolute monkeys you see a tactic that appears to be working and think the best possible solution is to start slamming the button over and over again full force until it breaks.

If you want the accusation of groomer to continue to carry weight, stop using it on everyone who you don't like. Or keep doing it. This time next year there'll be a thread with a bunch of people stomping their feet, whining and crying about how degenerate the world has become because nobody cares when you call them a groomer anymore. KF is about pointing and laughing at people who inflict their own troubles upon themselves, so imagine that result will only be a net positive for the site.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
 
Full offense but these mucho texto essays are not gonna be read by anyone but yourself
I read it, it just seems like it could be summed up with "stopping using terms that are effective." Like when all the National Review types went to their fainting couches over being called cucks. They had to get their wives two bulls that night to recover.

Term may lose effectiveness, sure, but it's working now. Stop being McClellan to the base's Grant.
 
“Groomer” is a distraction that allows progressives to stop defending the idea that kindergartners should be taught that there are 72 genders, and instead, make it about how Republicans think every teacher is a would-be pedophile.
cucks really love the backfoot approach to everything. "don't call them groomers becuase then they won't focus on the parental rights issue". meanwhile, internet retards are shouting Groomer at the top of theirand demand to know how teaching 72 genders to toddlers isn't grooming.
 
Back