Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

I hate this fucking idiot so much and until this goddamn retard is showered with incessant hatred and none of his critics get banned, I will continue to refuse to believe than Elon Musk the pussified faggot is going to do ANYTHING. BAN THE TRANNIES ELON YOU FUCKIN FAG LOVING HOMO!
 
Brianna Wu just went on Bloomberg TV to discuss the Elon/Twitter situation:

View attachment 3230713
1 minute in and GamerGate is mentioned, plus the lie that people went after him in public. The FBI couldn't prove that there was any danger at all.

People wonder why trust in the media is lower than ever and why Twitter needs fixing. John himself takes credit for why Twitter is as bad as it is.
 
Better do it Frank, he needs to donate this money to the local soup kitchen or homeless pee-oh-cees will starve to death and it will be your fault.

View attachment 3229757
>"I work for a living, unlike those grifters! 100 hours a week!"
>"Oh husbando... I can has money?"
Film Historian John is like every other John. Wrong about everything.

No R-rated film has ever been released under the Disney name. Roger Rabbit was released by Touchstone, a Disney subsidiary.
Tbf WFRR was rated PG.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Homer Simpson
Chang is trash.
Forget the gamergate nonsense. That is John's bread and butter. The rest of it was much worse.
John is brought on as expert to talk about Musk buying twitter. His "bloomberg" point is that Musk's actions will hurt the stock price of a privately held company.
Dumb chinaman broad's response? "Hmm".
John, who has literally done nothing ever, claims that Musk has failed to deliver on promises and again mentions the potential negative effect on twitter stock price.
His response to Jack "faggot" Twitter's point about transparency is that the original MO of twitter's "trust and safety team" was not to publicize anything it did.

This is the expert. This is the person who is supposed to provide more perspective.

I hate "sailor talk", but, Jeepers H. Charlie, this was a donking mess.
 
1651282673619.png

1651282583790.png
 
I know Elon has made some vague notions towards political speech but I can imagine he cares more about shitposters not getting banned for shitposting and is just trying to dress that up as legitimate since political speech is supposed to be the most important form of speech on the planet.

John's such an idiot though, he should be using these platforms the media is giving him to paint Rebellion PAC as this valiant entity daring to stare down Elon's agenda and pull in a bunch of cash from dumb progressives/Democrats like The Lincoln Project. It's not like he actually has to do anything to justify those donations.
 
For the love of God, "journalists," is it really too much to ask to take five seconds to vet John's credentials? Even if all you need is a talking head to spout off whatever bullshit you want the public to hear, you could easily find someone more credible than John. You could drag a hobo off the street and put him in front of the camera, and he'd be more honest than this melty-faced balding man in a dress.
1. They kinda did
2. You think the other talking heads are really that more credible?
 
Chang is trash.
Forget the gamergate nonsense. That is John's bread and butter. The rest of it was much worse.
John is brought on as expert to talk about Musk buying twitter. His "bloomberg" point is that Musk's actions will hurt the stock price of a privately held company.
Dumb chinaman broad's response? "Hmm".
John, who has literally done nothing ever, claims that Musk has failed to deliver on promises and again mentions the potential negative effect on twitter stock price.
His response to Jack "faggot" Twitter's point about transparency is that the original MO of twitter's "trust and safety team" was not to publicize anything it did.

This is the expert. This is the person who is supposed to provide more perspective.

I hate "sailor talk", but, Jeepers H. Charlie, this was a donking mess.
Jesus H. Christ.

This
is why you vet the people you bring on your shows, you fucking idiot "journalists!" Hell, Emily Chang should be sacked for not calling out John's retardation in not understanding that private companies don't have stock! This is the level of stupidity that you willfully put on national TV! This is the "expert" you brought in to discuss this story!

I really hope Robert Stacy McCain wasn't lying about wanting to write up a Spectator article on John. It'd be stuff we all know, of course, but anything exposing John's lies to more people outside our autistic bubble would be great.
Did John lose weight and get plastic surgery or something? He looks so different from how he used to looks it's weird.
Lose weight? Doubtful, that potbelly has been pretty consistent, and I'm sure that hasn't changed even though we haven't seen a full-body pic of John in a while.

Plastic surgery? Possible. Again, it's hard to tell given how camera-shy John has been over the years, but the various miscellaneous surgeries he keeps going in for (like "vocal cord issues" and "knee injuries") could be cover for a good ol' fashioned nip/tuck.

Given all those ring lights, it could also be a case of his features being blown out by having that much light on him. Maybe throw in some caked-on makeup and/or a face filter too. Just doing everything he can to avoid showing his true wendigo self.
1. They kinda did
2. You think the other talking heads are really that more credible?
I mean, it is the media we're talking about, so not much more. But I'd imagine that at least some of the "tech experts" these shows bring on have had more experience in the field than John, whose sole experience is claiming his team's work on his masturbatory fantasy game as his own. It really doesn't take much to be more credible than John, and yet they keep hauling him out for some reason. I guess everyone else is too busy actually working to talk about how Elon is going to tank the shares of his privately-held company jesus christ why do they keep doing this.
 
I mean, it is the media we're talking about, so not much more. But I'd imagine that at least some of the "tech experts" these shows bring on have had more experience in the field than John, whose sole experience is claiming his team's work on his masturbatory fantasy game as his own. It really doesn't take much to be more credible than John, and yet they keep hauling him out for some reason. I guess everyone else is too busy actually working to talk about how Elon is going to tank the shares of his privately-held company jesus christ why do they keep doing this.
I get the sentiment, but I think you imagine wrong. It's the old classic of reading a newspaper article about something you know something about and read how they get everything ass backwards, and then you turn the page and expect to be informed about something you know nothing about.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Homer Simpson
Everyone who watched that segment has just scratched their head and gone, "Was that a man?".
To suggest it's even a question I'd say this is the highest praise ever written for BriWoo on Kiwifarms.
I hate this fucking idiot so much and until this goddamn retard is showered with incessant hatred and none of his critics get banned, I will continue to refuse to believe than Elon Musk the pussified faggot is going to do ANYTHING. BAN THE TRANNIES ELON YOU FUCKIN FAG LOVING HOMO!
This was very fun imagining this shouted out by Walter Sobchak
 
I get the sentiment, but I think you imagine wrong. It's the old classic of reading a newspaper article about something you know something about and read how they get everything ass backwards, and then you turn the page and expect to be informed about something you know nothing about.
Michael Crichton called it the Gell-Mann effect.
 
Danged white men! Why cannot they be BIPOC women like John Walker Flynt.
1651336029742.png

And this is coming from the white man who did not understand that Musk taking twitter private means he buys all the stock so there are no investors to worry about share price.

"I do not know what a 'cohort' is, but I have heard other people use it so I will too."
1651348679166.png
 
Last edited:
Good, Twitter is better off dead
It is privately owned now or, well, soon anyway. He could literally just douse the whole place in kerosene, order everyone out, and burn it the fuck down. I mean, subject to zoning regulations about the burning of property. He might have to just use bulldozers.
And this is coming from the white man who did not understand that Musk taking twitter private means he buys all the stock so there are no investors to worry about share price.
John is literally having a "Twitter meltdown" about the fact that Elon Musk now OWNS the shithole he exists on, and his days are numbered.
 
I mean, it is the media we're talking about, so not much more. But I'd imagine that at least some of the "tech experts" these shows bring on have had more experience in the field than John, whose sole experience is claiming his team's work on his masturbatory fantasy game as his own. It really doesn't take much to be more credible than John, and yet they keep hauling him out for some reason. I guess everyone else is too busy actually working to talk about how Elon is going to tank the shares of his privately-held company jesus christ why do they keep doing this.
Part of it is probably that they have Wu in their rolodex and he is an easy lay, the town bicycle, so to say. Don't need no notice, unlike actual professionals, Wu the media slut will roll out of bed and do whatever you want for free if it means exposure that can lead to more media appearances. He's like mainstream media groupie.
 
Back