𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

I'd argue it goes back further than that: Hunter Biden's laptop. That thing has been a slow acting poison within the body politic and Musk has brought up the suppression of that story more than once.
The (other) key point is that twitter is Musk's "fuck around, blow off steam" toy. After a long meeting figuring shit out at Telsa he can do some shitposting to relax while heading over to a SpaceX meeting.

Look how much fun he has been having: he called one of the richest men in the world a fat fuck and trolled a US Rep to her face, all in front of everyone.
 
Why are all those censure cunts pajaeets or poo in the loos?
Because those men tend to be beta males and beta males often can't handle criticism. An alpha male would let you handle your own shit while betas constantly try to police the world.
Odd, for a commie cunt like Vijaya Gadde, she sure doesn't seem to like redistrubuting her own wealth. I hope someone does it for her.
Redistribution of the wealth is a one way street. You give up your wealth and your politicians get richer.
Mombot is unbanned and posting on twitter. https://twitter.com/mombot
This is a bad day for the woke dipshits, the dumpy asian lady that trolled them so hard is back and now shit is on like Donkey Kong.
I hope I get my Twitter account back again.
 
wonder if I will be unbanned for making a joke about killing homosexuals
nvm twitter is still shit
1651327243040.png
 
kinda but not in the trannyjanny way. Moderators here seem to operate under strict code of conduct rules with strict agnosticism towards ideology.. , you can say shit here that would kick up a giant hell storm on social media.. but as long as you are not an a-logging sperg or go out of your way to harass others or 1 sided containment threads; you are okay.
They still make fun of you in the subtitles of some threads like passive aggressive faggots.
It does reinforce the fairness of the site though. We've got mods that like Joe Biden.
 
Wonder how pajeet is taking the news that he is going to be the CEO that lasted the less on Twatter, Lord Muskeke already has a replacement from him, is more ironic when you remember he promised that no one would get layoff
He promised no humans would get laid off. He didn’t say anything about pajeets or other shitskin niggers.
 
is someone named rothschild really expecting ANYONE to care about his hurt feelings?
He's not even just named Rothschild, he's literally one of THE Rothschilds.
The world's richest jannie is at risk of being shit-canned! What is the world coming to when a diversity hire can't make $17 million a year to silence Americans for bad think?

View attachment 3231620
They're literally paying some faggot $17 million just to fuck up the site and drive away business? Their severely mentally ill 41%ers who doit4free can't fuck it up themselves?
 
Full ownership won’t be given until 3-6 months from now. Obviously some of the things there a few days ago will still be there with the new ownership. I will probably judge the actual free speech thing once that is finalized.
You have to love the stupid bastards who are getting banned for pissing off the tranny jannies who are still on the job and have nothing to lose because they probably correctly assume they're getting fired in a couple months. It's also not like being a Twitter tranny being triggered 4free 24/7 is a job with transferable skills either. "Oh you're a guy out of a job because you shit the bed and ruined the last company you freaks were at? Nah, try tumblr, freak! Or a circus sideshow!"
 
It's because they allow social conflicts. When you allow people to bitch at each other you also allow them to resolve social conflict. That is you'll get into an argument with someone, you'll call each other a bunch of names, have a bit of a back and forth, if you go to far people in your vicinity will start to bitch at you, then you'll break up and that's that. Only if it becomes a major disturbance do mods step in.

Meanwhile in other places mods micromanage conversation and especially conflict. If someone says something retarded and you call them a retard, mods immediately step in and break it up. Nothing gets resolved, everything is left to fester. And not only that. People quickly learn that the way to get around that is to become extremely passive aggressive, adopt fake politeness, and get in good with the moderation staff so they take your side (and the mods get involved in every bitchfight, even if it's just to break it up, they inevitable take sides as a consequence).

Oh and if someone is a really awful person it's a lot easier for them to hang around in a place where they can use the mod team as an enabling shield against mockery and humiliation. People who are to anxious and can't handle online conversation will leave places like Kiwi Farms.

All of that combined and places like this become a lot more chill than conflict averse communities (most of the rest of the internet by now).
i see this as a consequence of the internet maturing to some degree. not to say that it's becoming 'more mature' but in the sense that the way the internet operated 15-20 years ago was very different from the way things work now. you can blame social media which obviously has a role in this but i'm speaking specifically to how communities self-moderate, back in the something awful days of the internet you HAD to be extremely hands-on and aggressive as a moderation team because there wasn't really any sort of established collective understanding of how people acted on the internet. most new users were new users because they were new to the internet. it's not that they micromanaged conflict but there was a lot MORE conflict and they had to manage it, and 'internet culture' learned how to manage conflict between individuals better

that was kind of the status quo until the internet got popular with normies and the resulting backlash to that was kind of in lockstep with social media and wokeness. "the internet is too mean and too elitist for normal people" had people cargo culting the same style of strict moderation, but under the guise of an ideology 'fixing opressive things" rather than it being a natural consequence of mods dealing with hundreds of 16 year old newbies. But that was like fifteen years ago and the moderation guidelines on basically every website on the internet are designed like it's still that era, like they're trying to stop people who have never used the internet from falling into a paradigm. but that paradigm doesn't exist anymore and hasn't for almost a decade
 
Back