𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

So even though he hasn’t taken the reins yet, isn’t there usually a stipulation to such takeovers that nothing at the time of “sale” can be fundamentally changed after the announcement? And if there is the fact that various “problematic” people seem to be able to return all the sudden seems interesting as it certainly looks like someone inside Twitter is trying to clean up what we’ve all known- namely that being outside of their tribe of sycophants, dangerhairs and faggotry means you won’t have a voice.
 
Smart move, but it's probably going to require a full Stalin- style purge to drive all the rats out.
There's going to be no shortage of people who'd gleefully stab Musk in the back at any given opportunity.
He should honestly just fire everyone. He has legions of devoted fanboys and it's a sure bet some of them have the knowhow to run the Twitter shit show.
 
So even though he hasn’t taken the reins yet, isn’t there usually a stipulation to such takeovers that nothing at the time of “sale” can be fundamentally changed after the announcement? And if there is the fact that various “problematic” people seem to be able to return all the sudden seems interesting as it certainly looks like someone inside Twitter is trying to clean up what we’ve all known- namely that being outside of their tribe of sycophants, dangerhairs and faggotry means you won’t have a voice.
I've been thinking about that too.

The sudden unbanning's began happening after the reports of the source code being locked down.

So with contractual stuff being involved, that makes it just weirder.
 
It's kind of funny to me how the DOOM AND GLOOM posters seem as butt hurt about this happening as the purple haired 5 o'clock shadow troon slacktivists are because it messes up their massochistic edge lord accelerationist fantasies . I don't know maybe if you are as upset as they are you should reassess what jumps in logic allowed you to get to that point where you're on the same page as them.
When operatives desire to seed feelings of despair in the public discourse, doomposting is their best option.

A wiseman once told me: Not all fedposts are doomposts, but all doomposts are surely fedposts.
 
Meanwhile I wonder how many of these fart-huffing Blue Checkmarks drive EVs? I can't see many of them driving Teslas anymore, yet somehow I don't think they realise that without Musk, other auto makers probably would've have jumped so hard on the EV bandwagon.

Would overeducated and permanently single catladies and baristas, fatfuck shut-ins, and homo faggots who blew their 100K inheritance on hormones and chopping their peepees off and who all have to pay 2-3K mo. for a shitty carboard box in an alley in or near downtown NY, Philly, Chicago, Boston, SF, Seattle, etc... actually be able to affort a Tesla?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dickens Cider
You have tunnel vision. You've bought into this narrative that things will go in one direction until society is destroyed so badly that anything that contradicts it must be inherently wrong and thus the result of conspiracy.

I'm not saying Musk is some kind of savior or anything other than a shitposting rich guy, no one should be kissing his ass, but the idea that left/establishment/insert whatever boogeyman (like juice) wanted this to happen is absurd or there wouldn't have been nonstop tantrums from people on all levels of leftard society from troon jannies working for Twitter up to the press secretary of the United States and the fucking EU. If I'm to believe in your argument, all of this must have been orchestrated this way in secret, which is a schizoid way of viewing things.

It remains to be seen how the Musk reign of Twitter will go since he hasn't taken over yet, but you're like the people who claim Trump was establishment and allowed by the left to get elected when the opposite was true to anyone paying attention.

It's kind of funny to me how the DOOM AND GLOOM posters seem as butt hurt about this happening as the purple haired 5 o'clock shadow troon slacktivists are because it messes up their massochistic edge lord accelerationist fantasies . I don't know maybe if you are as upset as they are you should reassess what jumps in logic allowed you to get to that point where you're on the same page as them.
People who think like that are just idiots. Take Brexit for example. It was a fuck you moment. Yet people still say "oh it was allowed to happen because it was in their script". They buy in to the propaganda that powerful people sway opinions with a phone call. When they spend 4 years, millions in court cases, paying celebs to denounce it, replacing the BBC staff with far left activists to try to reverse it. The Labour party frustrate votes in the process to so much a degree that Parliament was worthless and the election in 2019 proved that, AND THEY STILL COULD NOT STOP IT!
You are falling in to the trap of thinking people have the power of all knowing godhood and they are political chess masters always 7777777 moves ahead of you.
"Even when you win, you lose goys" is blackpill kike brainwashing.
They got out played by Musk, just like people who voted for Brexit out played the EU and it backers.
 
Last edited:
So even though he hasn’t taken the reins yet, isn’t there usually a stipulation to such takeovers that nothing at the time of “sale” can be fundamentally changed after the announcement? And if there is the fact that various “problematic” people seem to be able to return all the sudden seems interesting as it certainly looks like someone inside Twitter is trying to clean up what we’ve all known- namely that being outside of their tribe of sycophants, dangerhairs and faggotry means you won’t have a voice.

It's either that or the tranny jannies think they are letting the inmates out of the asylum to fuck up things before Musk takes over, but that will just make it worse for their own people. Either way, we win. This is one of the things I love about this whole shitshow. Musk set up a Xanatos Gambit in which the Twitter leftoids lose no matter what happens. Wait until the shitposters can actually trend their own hashtags again and target the retards that ruined the internet for everyone.
 
the idea that left/establishment/insert whatever boogeyman (like juice) wanted this to happen is absurd or there wouldn't have been nonstop tantrums from people on all levels of leftard society from troon jannies working for Twitter up to the press secretary of the United States and the fucking EU. If I'm to believe in your argument, all of this must have been orchestrated this way in secret, which is a schizoid way of viewing things.
That's exactly what's happening. I get why you think it sounds schizoid, but again, all you have to do is look up who owns the outlets on both sides that are covering this. The people tearing their dangerhair out are being paid and employed by the same bosses that pay and employee the people championing Musk as a free speech guy. Our society's fucked well beyond any semblance of physical salvation, and even if Musk had good intentions at some point, he's towing the line investors want him to. Twitter isn't an independent social media site, it's a direct media arm of numerous governments and corporations.

Same as the shit going on in Florida with people thinking there's an actual conflict between de Santis and Disney when Disney investors were the ones who lobbied for and helped get him into office in the first place. Politics are a moneychanging circus and everyone is friends behind closed doors, because that's the narrative. That doesn't mean mope around about things being shit and doompost, it just means that you should absolutely trust no one who's that high up, because to get where they are they had to play or at least act the part of it. They are not your friends and they are not on your side.

img_1835.jpg
 
That's exactly what's happening. I get why you think it sounds schizoid, but again, all you have to do is look up who owns the outlets on both sides that are covering this. The people tearing their dangerhair out are being paid and employed by the same bosses that pay and employee the people championing Musk as a free speech guy. Our society's fucked well beyond any semblance of physical salvation, and even if Musk had good intentions at some point, he's towing the line investors want him to. Twitter isn't an independent social media site, it's a direct media arm of numerous governments and corporations.

Same as the shit going on in Florida with people thinking there's an actual conflict between de Santis and Disney when Disney investors were the ones who lobbied for and helped get him into office in the first place. Politics are a moneychanging circus and everyone is friends behind closed doors, because that's the narrative. That doesn't mean mope around about things being shit and doompost, it just means that you should absolutely trust no one who's that high up, because to get where they are they had to play or at least act the part of it. They are not your friends and they are not on your side.

View attachment 3233957
You have proof of your claims right? I want to see the email chain, hell i would take a napkin of Musk agreeing to this batshit plan that makes 0 sense and would go against everything he stands for and has done up till now. Keep the pretentious out of context Huxley images to a minimum please.
 
by the same bosses that pay and employee the people championing Musk as a free speech guy.

The fact Fox News thought it was a good thing after Twitter went full retard and banned Tucker Carlson is not evidence that Elon Musk is controlled opposition. Jesus, just let it go, dude. It's fine to be happy for once. Go outside and eat an ice cream cone or something.

Twitter isn't an independent social media site

It is now. It's a private company owned by Elon Musk period via his tender offer.

Same as the shit going on in Florida with people thinking there's an actual conflict between de Santis and Disney when Disney investors were the ones who lobbied for and helped get him into office in the first place.

And the concept of turning against who you were once aligned with out of convenience is completely foreign to you? Jesus, have you ever read a history book? I mean you don't even have to go back to the Roman Empire, you can just go to World War II, the era the doomposters fantasize about.

There is no fucking way the conflict between DeSantis and Disney wasn't genuine. There's no planet in which the scenario you suggest, Disney willingly giving up it's own legal kingdom of land that gives it a complete and total competitive advantage to satiate the right would ever happen. Your mind is broken and you can no longer properly contextualize news developments, realpolitik or anything else.
 
Last edited:
As much as I visibly cringe when people devolve conversation into "da jooz", I unironically agree that you should be able to make ANY factual statement (such as x is y religion) without being sent to the shadow realm
the problem is that a significant portion of the issues that pop culture has isolated as being problems with society that need to be fixed are a direct consequence of events in the 20th century that were specifically done by jews for a jewish motive. so it's like... it's not exactly correct to say that "the jews did it" but you aren't even allowed to say a bunch of jews did something for other jews

the Jewish Labor Bund was instrumental in the formation of the soviet union and the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism and Critical Theory were created by zionist jews. neither statement is anything more than historical fact, and both of those things are hot button issues in the current social and political climate, so it's kind of like trying to have a discussion about the American Civil War while refusing to talk about slavery
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
The fact Fox News thought it was a good thing after Twitter went full retard and banned Tucker Carlson is not evidence that Elon Musk is controlled opposition. Jesus, just let it go, dude. It's fine to be happy for once. Go outside and eat an ice cream cone or something.

It is now. It's a private company owned by Elon Musk period via his tender offer.

And the concept of turning against who you were once aligned with out of convenience is completely foreign to you? Jesus, have you ever read a history book? I mean you don't even have to go back to the Roman Empire, you can just go to World War II, the era the doomposters fantasize about.

There is no fucking way the conflict between DeSantis and Disney wasn't genuine. There's no planet in which the scenario you suggest, Disney willingly giving up it's own legal kingdom of land that gives it a complete and total competitive advantage to satiate the right would ever happen. Your mind is broken and you can no longer porperly contextualize news developments, realpolitik or anything else.
I'm happy, I'm just not putting trust in any politicians or businessmen who're each as corrupt as the last. As for turning on friends for convenience and bringing up World War II, that's another very similar story of two sides working together behind the scenes for a larger narrative. The Cultural Marxist roots run very, very deep in just about everything today. And the conflict between DeSantis and Disney isn't genuine, no. It's meant to distract people while groomers continue to push their agenda into schools and spread it further, an agenda both DeSantis and Disney support.
You have proof of your claims right? I want to see the email chain, hell i would take a napkin of Musk agreeing to this batshit plan that makes 0 sense and would go against everything he stands for and has done up till now. Keep the pretentious out of context Huxley images to a minimum please.
I don't have leaked email chains or some shit, but some of the strongest evidence is the fact that if any of it was genuine, it wouldn't be happening. It's the same evidence of guys like Alex Jones being frauds. If anything he said was true, he'd be dead and you'd never hear about it anyway. If Musk was genuine, he wouldn't have been allowed to buy Twitter in the first place.
 
Disagree entirely. The SA model was shit, and the first aberrant and cancerous example of how moderation at all was a bad idea. The best of the Internet was when it was nearly entirely text and the best forum of all time was Usenet, which was literally impossible to moderate, although moderated newsgroups did exist, and the rare surviving newsgroup is generally moderated.

You could use regex to filter anything you saw and sort it by as many different categories as you cared about, with killfiles, scorefiles, and other indexing tools. You didn't need any fucking jannies because such creatures were useless. Anyone who professed themselves as a ruler of a newsgroup (unless they actually were a mod on newsgroups that deliberately started that way) would be endlessly called a faggot, told to shut the fuck up, and killfiled.

Look what happened after SA started turning into the gay cat lady tranny forum it is now. Everyone was literally escaping SA to go be somewhere else like 4chan. Or taking their successful model elsewhere, like the LPers. Who were the people coming in at that time? Absolutely useless faggots who generated nothing of merit.

Despite this, they always maintained this air of superiority, even though they fagged up every other thing they got involved with in any way with their leaderfaggotry.

And look at them now.
i have nothing to disagree with about usenet but i would like to point out that im almost 30 and its a relic of an era i am multiple generations past understanding. I barely dealt with dialup let alone dos. i got on the internet in the SA era so that's where my perspective begins.

i have grown to hate something awful too but we're talking about a good twenty year span of time here. something awful in 2003 was not the same website it was in 2008, nor was the internet the same, and it sure as shit wasn't the same as it was in 2015. what i was saying is that the retards in charge of something awful acted like woke retards in 2008 because they were just cargo culting the fragmaster way of doing things except as righteous and woke leaders. before it was cool. what i described applies to pretty much any forum i can think about that was operating in the early 2000's that was still around by the time facebook caught on

woke assholes acted like assholes because they inherited the job from assholes, but never stopped acting like assholes even when the entire crux of their community revolves around 'being inclusive.' nothing has changed, it's just now there are politicians who speak their language
 
And the conflict between DeSantis and Disney isn't genuine, no.

It is, you total and complete sperg. You don't even try to prove your bullshit true because it's logically impossible to explain why Disney would purposely attack and hurt its one true cash cow, the WDW park complex.

but some of the strongest evidence is the fact that if any of it was genuine, it wouldn't be happening.

What a bunch of fallacious bullshit. "This event happening, even though it just happened, is impossible because it doesn't conform to my previous biases, thus it must have not actually happened." Calling you a midwit would be a stretch imo. Even animals have more learning and rational thinking ability than this, even small ones like squirrels and mice.

Guess what, when your world view is a square peg that can never change despite the circumstance, the fact you can't shove it into a round hole is not a conspiracy. Imagine being an adult and thinking you look smart for telling other adults that yes the world works exactly like a formulaic Scooby Doo episode and variation from that formula is impossible.
 
I don't have leaked email chains or some shit, but some of the strongest evidence is the fact that if any of it was genuine, it wouldn't be happening. It's the same evidence of guys like Alex Jones being frauds. If anything he said was true, he'd be dead and you'd never hear about it anyway. If Musk was genuine, he wouldn't have been allowed to buy Twitter in the first place.
So you have nothing and are pulling it out of your ass? Your "BUT ALEX JONES" none sequitur is childish. You conspiritards need to fuck off sometimes. You ruin a lot of things with your incessant spergary. You got 1 thing right about Nixon and spend the last 40 years being wrong.
"He would not have been allowed" Bitch this is not a Tom Clancy novel. How about the more grounded reason is that he has fuck you money and disagreed with the US gov on its use of a private company to silence it critics and took it away from them?
You do know that the other side can win things right? Explain Brexit. Why did they screech and scream for 4 fucking years waste millions of Euro/dollars/Pounds and still fail?
Lets use your logic on something like football. Lot of money in that and has very powerful people connected to it.
Your team only won because it was in our script to let you win. Never mind the loss's, financial or support on our side for losing. We still win because we may play your team next year. At the end of the day, they lost. Same thing here.
 
Last edited:
Back