- Joined
- Jan 13, 2022
Presidents relinquishing power after numbers are out and certain bodies of legislation changing with multiple parties is certainly a low and hollow bar to set. If you want to go that route, we should start calling Mexico a democratic country with “flaws”. Your gross oversimplification of what constitutes “democratic” is exactly why moronic takes like these are so baffling.In the 30 years of its existence, Ukraine has seen six presidents, and one acting president. Of the six people to hold the office previous to the current president, five relinquished power when they lost the election, and the sixth was technically impeached hence why one of those five people held the office in an "acting" capacity.
As far as most westerners are concerned, that's good enough. Power transfers at elections, or when the legislative body impeaches the leader. No one refusing to give up power despite their term being up. No one pushing the legislature into altering term limits to let them keep running for reelection. For that matter the legislature is made up of multiple political parties with the largest controlling little more than half the seats. All in all, it's more or less functioning as a democracy. Is it without things to criticize? Of course not. But that's not exactly unusual for governments, including democratic ones.
It’s the failure to understand the underlying issues that the appeasing veneer of these democratic processes in countries don’t show. The banning of political parties, attack of journalists, suppressing of television networks would suggest its more than merely “flawed” but actively deceitful.
The Dichotomy with democracy and autocracy are ridiculous. You don’t put Ukraine in the same category as Finland, in the same way you don’t put Mexico in the same category as Canada. Ukraine is not a full or even flawed democracy. Its on a spectrum, and classified as a hybrid regime.