Be quiet, cumshitter; you're not a man, except by the most generous biological interpretations, so your opinions on women are worth even less than your Nonce Agenda. Shouldn't you be fluffing your mom's boyfriend or something, to earn Good Boy Points?
People like this should out themselves at every opportunity. So we need to hear about it, no matter how many horrifying ratings it gets.
We actually have a dox with a little more to go on then "We found a twitter account with Boxershorts47 and it was some gay flip who focuses far too much on cock, therefore it is true"
1. I would argue the diametric opposite. Those grifters double down on how dangerous and permanent this is if it isn't fought and try to build a support base a la "we're fighting to save civilization". This is your opinion too.
More cope. I specified subversive and covert, not overt and autistic. There is a time to be overt and a time to be covert.
The fact is that all ultrareactionary positions are ultraretarded, and have absolutely no use other than as a critique of an established system. People who unironically believe these things are hollow demagogues. Its very rare to see someone with a fringe position be of any real value.
Not exactly. I can differentiate between idealism and realism. In my utopia, scum of the earth get hung from streetlamps. I'm a meritocratic elitist, and I will always value an intelligent brown man over a white nigger. Making society more conservative for the benefit of white niggers is a joke to me.
If they're outing themselves, I'd rather they get remembered for it until the very important moment when they get a bullet to the back of the head. Them throwing this information out every opportunity does nothing except reinforce the fact that they're still alive, which is unfortunate and should get resolved as soon as possible.
I'm pretty sure they say, "Haha, the left is eating their own. Go woke; go broke." They don't fight and they lull them into false security.
I don't know what "Neocon, lol" means. Neocon means modern day right-wing Imperialist aka war-hawk.
FDR laid the foundation for American socialism through programs like Social Security. That wasn't simply a great depression policy, it was social engineering and wealth redistribution. These types of economic policies went out of style because of LBJ's great society. The left went full woke and White America didn't want to see their tax money given to black welfare queens. The support didn't end simply because of time but because the Democratic party used these social programs to redistribute money from Whites to Blacks. Likewise once Whites flighted out of the cities because segregation was illegal, the cities became shitholes and White people no longer supported social projects like public transit. These changes were reactions to the left's identity politics.
Democracy was an ultra reactionary position to monarchy. Abolition was an ultra reactionary position to slavery and triggered a massive war. Communism was ultra reactionary too. We've seen massive social changes in the last 240 years (3 human lifetimes) and there is no reason we can't see one again and I think we will given that our society is fundamentally broken.
Strawmans.
Avoiding the question and virtue signaling.
More virtue signaling. You're a real tough guy.
Their quips aren't proof of anything. Their entire online presence is based off the fact that they're exposing and philosophically challenging the left.
Neoconservatism is characterized by interventionist foreign policy, non-interventionist economic policy
You seem to think that everything comes back to the boogeyman of anti-huwiteness. Since you're such a fan of pointing out logical fallacies, this entire paragraph is an example of post hoc ergo propter hoc until you can prove otherwise.
The general idea of progress has existed since forever. There's a reason that the Code of Hammurabi was obsolete by Classical Antiquity. You can call it what you want, but I would call that "moving left", even though you claim a left didn't exist at that point. Even if you want to be a pedant fag, the basic Liberal v. Conservative conflict has always existed in society. Maybe you should read some Greek and Roman history and literature.
These are:
And by the way, please tell me how these are strawmans and not accurate characterizations of the movement. Name one recognizable leader that isn't an example of what I mentioned.
If you read that back carefully, you'll notice that "Not exactly" is actually in response to something. I conceded part of your characterization.
lmao. I have nothing to prove about my IQ. I'm just curious how the brain of a self-aggrandizing NEET works.
You don't need huwite nationalism to see this downfall. I would argue huwite nationalism undermines this downfall, because you encourage people who trend left to ignore the bullshit in the Leftist platform in favor of challenging the huwite nationalists.
This is misleading. Sure, they are complaining about the left but they work equality hard, if not more harder, at gate keeping people who are further right.
Midwit confirmed. Interventionist foreign policy is a fancy way of saying Imperialist. You're complicating Neocon because you're dumb.
It's not a post hoc fallacy if it's actually true. The entire reason the FDR economic left coalition fell apart was because the leftists when woke in the 50s and 60s and by the 80s white people, especially former Southern Dixiecrats, left the Democratic party. Likewise the Reagan coalition fell apart because the left convinced the professional managerial class that they were racist (sinners) for not wanting to help black people.
Was the fall of the Roman Empire considered progress? For 1000s of years Democracy was considered evil, even in the age of the US founding fathers, and no one thought implementing Democracy was progress until the 19th or even 20th century. Whig history is dumb reverse rationalization.
If it's okay to discriminate against trans people and deny them equal rights then why it's it okay to discriminate based on race or sex? Quite a few left wing debate bros have mentioned this as a rational for trans rights.
Who tf asked, fag
The only nudes he can actually get are Chris Chan's, God knows how many times he's masturbated to them.
The greatest debate over creepboy's fixation on other men's penises is whether he's jealous or gay.
It's great but I still think it's funny to keep the Sailor Moon theme. He's probably beating off to Sailor Uranus (if I remember correctly) futanari right now.
