US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Didn’t Eric Swalwell get called a traitor for bedding a woman who turned out to be Chinese agent for the CCP stealing private data from American politicians?
He also threatened to nuke his fellow citizens in the event they got uppity and demanded a new government.

So y'know, typical Commiefornian.
 
And they can post bullshit like this with their tweet being ratioed the only repercussion.
View attachment 3236839
The disgusting part is the replies.

They boil down to "Listen, MAGAts, Biden is better for you and you're just too fucking stupid, ignorant, and backwards to know the Republicans get rich off you while you just fuck your kids and relatives. Vote Blue, you fucking CHUD fucks."
 
Every time someone says the A-10 Warthog would be useless against a near peer power should have this picture rubbed in their face until it's sandpapering their fucking skull away.

The last picture should read "Happy A-10 Noises!"
The Taliban's huge convoys of unarmored trucks and motorcycles heading unopposed to Kabul last summer would've been the perfect "Happy A-10 noises!" scenario, but alas we have a walking corpse being puppeteered as the commander in chief and no one wanted to lift a finger to support the government we spent two decades setting up.
 
The disgusting part is the replies.

They boil down to "Listen, MAGAts, Biden is better for you and you're just too fucking stupid, ignorant, and backwards to know the Republicans get rich off you while you just fuck your kids and relatives. Vote Blue, you fucking CHUD fucks."
Thankfully not all of them are like that when you read the responses
 
Not gonna lie. I'm a leftist, and I actually agree with Chomsky here. From my point of view, NATO during Biden's regime has been instigating shit with Russia, so Russia had to retaliate. They're just getting what they asked for.

Take note that this is from the Canadian Military Journal's conclusion: http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/cmj-article-en-page35.html
From the evidence observed, the Russian military elite, as well as civilian leadership, were always opposed to NATO territorial enlargement; however, the prospect was not taken seriously in the initial days after the Soviet collapse, and was considered implausible even during the early years of the Yeltsin administration. Each of the subsequent instances of NATO enlargement resulted in a Russian reaction, even when the reaction was varied, but the evidence that any and every NATO enlargement, per se, resulted in Russian revanchism is sparse. In reality, Moscow is quite agnostic, and pragmatic about NATO’s relative power superiority. The Kremlin is also aware of Russia’s lack of sway in the European balance. The only instances one can expect Moscow to lash out, are when “direct” strategic interests are threatened, as has been observed in Georgia and Ukraine.

The traditional balancers of Europe, the Anglo-Americans, can therefore debate on whether, the European integration would eventually come at a stop, given that there will be logically a limit to enlargement. Second, if Europe will be ever ready to take the security burden, and to balance Moscow as an independent actor. Third, how to eventually find a place of co-existence with Moscow in the European security architecture, or if that is even possible. At the end of the day, whether to compromise with Moscow and let Russia have her own small sphere of influence in parts of Europe where there are already Russian established bases and interests, or to push Moscow out and risk a localized proxy war of attrition, is a policy question beyond the scope of this article.
The Two Big Questions of the Article:
To compromise with Moscow and let Russia have her own small sphere of influence in parts of Europe where there are already Russian established bases and interests?
To push Moscow out and risk a localized proxy war of attrition?

... and what did happen?! The Western Elite with "Pro-Peace" Biden chose the second option.
 
At the very least, Swalwell should've lost his security clearance and been kicked off his subcommittees.

The disgusting part is the replies.

They boil down to "Listen, MAGAts, Biden is better for you and you're just too fucking stupid, ignorant, and backwards to know the Republicans get rich off you while you just fuck your kids and relatives. Vote Blue, you fucking CHUD fucks."
It's Al Gore all over again. 'You just don't understand Gore's super amazing genius!' Despite the fact he's always been second string at best.
 
I don't see a solution besides what we're doing though. So long as Putin is convinced he can take Ukraine through military might, diplomacy is of no real use. And the alternative is what... let Putin make whatever demands of Ukraine he thinks he can get away with? There's an old quote from Classical times that I feel is appropriate to the situation:

Ukraine did nothing to deserve the invasion, yet it has happened, and the world can either support their right to self-defense and self-determination, or let Putin become emboldened as he bites chunks off of Europe.
Biden (and Friends) kept shitting in Putin's back yard for the past 15 years. And now Putin hits back and everyone is aghast at the horror.

Ukraine had a quasi-NATO status. Not a full member but had the wink and a nod from the US that their security was guaranteed. Putin won't go beyond Ukraine as every where else is a NATO member.
It makes sense when you consider that this is what the Uniparty and the military-industrial complex want. Conflict drives war spending, which fuels the need for bigger military budgets, which means more kickbacks for the Uniparty and defense contractors. Peace is good for the people, but bad for those who have to justify their need for billions of dollars to buy more fighter jets.

The issue is that they miscalculated in how it was going to play out. They figured they could swing their dick around with sanctions on Russia and sending tons of hardware to Ukraine, then Russia would have to play ball and the glorious West would be seen as the brilliant saviors. Instead, Russia started selling oil in rubles, weakening the petrodollar; the EU is being forced into paying for the gas they need because of their own green lunacy in building wind farms instead of nuclear plants; and while Ukraine's not rolling over and dying without a fight, it's not the slam dunk the administration needs. But since they don't know what else to do and can't back down without looking weak, they just double down and keep antagonizing instead of looking for a more peaceful solution.

Look, I'm no fan of Russia, this invasion was wrong from the start and there are too many innocents that have been killed over this. But there's got to be a way to end this without escalating into a more serious conflict.

Or we could just throw billions more dollars of guns and ammo at the problem, surely it'll work this time.
It is the idea that a vote for Biden was a "vote for peace." Everyone seemed to forget that Biden was easily one of the most corrupt fuckers in government and are now surprised the military industrial complex is in charge.
Aside from Chinese nationals, does anyone really feel that they are doing better now than under Trump?
Nope. Feels like the sand is washing out from beneath my feet.
 
Nerd Prom was last night, utter bourgeoisie with Joepedo thinking he's the most clever person who reads a tranny "comedian's" jokes. You're suffering but take heart that they're doing this dinner for you.

View attachment 3236078

View attachment 3236076


View attachment 3236077


View attachment 3236079


View attachment 3236080

> "Fox News, I'm really sorry that your preferred candidate lost the last election!"

YOU were their preferred candidate, you absolute pants-shitting retard.
 

Trump in Nebraska, supposed to go on at 5 (so maybe 5-5:30). I hope he shits on nerd prom and manjaw MiniTrue.
Oh cool, lemme tune into this...

♪♫I can feel it coming in the air tonight, oh lord
And I've been waiting for this moment, for all my life, oh lord♪♫

:story: Real Subtle, Trump
 
This isn't new, but it's new to me. One of the Powerline guys posted an email from a Biden lawyer with a list of Hunter's bills, which Joe was supposed to cover while Hunter transitioned into a new career (whatever that means for him). There's also a lengthy text exchange with lawyer George Mesires in which Hunter calls him a "nigga" twice (second occurrence is lightly censored) and kind of acts like a much stupider version of Patrick Bateman. He complains about getting "fucked" by bills including the Porsche payment, Maisy's wisdom teeth, and "soda." (Soda? Pop? ... Coke?) He begs for money, sends a PornHub link, and starts describing his penis's unconditional love. He and George then express their unconditional love for each other and say it all goes back to the Greeks. I haven't read the whole thing because it's spoiled overgrown rich kid addict whining and grifting lawyer ego stroking. I can only handle so much of that in one sitting.

Powerline
Archive

And of course he owed over $400,000 in taxes and is delinquent on one of his payment plans. It's not enough to rip off the American people through his family's backroom dealing, he has to not pay his taxes, too.
 
It's like how Clarence Thomas believes that our 14th Amendment protections enforcement against private actors should've arisen out of the Privileges and Immunities Clause instead of the Commerce Clause is probably the correct interpretation, but you can't really do that because that would require redeciding the last 150 years of Constitutional law to do that
How would someone begin the process to do that, if SCOTUS was willing to do it? I ask because I hate the concept of "it's too hard so we won't do it" from a bench of lifetime appointees.

Like, if it takes a lifetime, then it's probably worth one in this case.
 
I don't see a solution besides what we're doing though. So long as Putin is convinced he can take Ukraine through military might, diplomacy is of no real use. And the alternative is what... let Putin make whatever demands of Ukraine he thinks he can get away with? There's an old quote from Classical times that I feel is appropriate to the situation:
Let The faggot have Ukraine, it is a corrupt shithole and always has been the only question was "Who gets to launder money through it"

If the West didn't want Putin to be in power then we shouldn't have knee capped American Energy production and get the EU off Russian Energy.

The EU funded this shit.
 
"We have a President that's shaking hands with the air" - Trump

Also "I hate talking about the 'N' word" meaning nuclear. Now shitposters have ammo for using "N"

"no no, I wasn't saying nigger, i was saying nuclear. Clearly YOU'RE the racist!"
>Nuclear is now a fucking no no word
I give up. A FUCKING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCE HAS BECOME A BAD WORD BECAUSE IT'S TOO SCARY. I'm officially giving up on these things being human- human beings have multiple layers to their skin, not this membrane that gets microtears from certain words vibrating through the air over the IDEA that we don't go full windmill/solar rolling brownout retard. I'm betting these fucking idiots think we put Fatmans in every nuclear power plant and unironically use Chernobyl as an example of modern western society's nuclear fission capabilities because Ukraine is kind of a western nation now, thus making Chernobyl's meltdown a retroactive western folly.

Fucking Nuclears man...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back