Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I expect at least a trilogy or two about the Ghost of Kyiv
View attachment 3238663
The Ghost of Kyiv is a collective spirit? I wasn't aware that the USSR had even managed to create communist ghosts.I expect at least a trilogy or two about the Ghost of Kyiv
View attachment 3238663
Nato has always been on their doorstep and always will be. Russia could push the line back to Berlin and nato would still be on their doorstep.they just want Nato off their fucking doorstep once and for all. Their wants effectively start and end there in regards to the globohomo entity.
Why are you still pretending to be American?Well then you should be for Putin nuking us and ridding the world of our troublesome country.
Couldn't they just surrender to Ukrainians if they did not wanted to fight? Or were there Russian commissars behind their backs?By using them as cannon fodder for 8 years?
Still does not mean you should not prepare for it as a matter on national security. Russia-friendly Ukraine past 2014 is an oxymoron.This is still based around the first strike plan, which simply isn't feasible. Ukraine offers an advantageous geographical position over the Baltic states and Finland, but a whole Russia-friendly Ukraine would be more valuable. A divided Ukraine is worthless. Especially after the Black Sea fleet got bruised and with limited capabilities for rebuilding.
Weren't there agreements made for a spacial status for Donbass before this war even started? Why did Ukraine not followed them? That would avoid this war in it's entirety. And how much Russia did send, exactly?All the free will in the world will not materialize guns, ammo and heavy equipment, my dude.
If Russia didn't want the war to happen, it wouldn't happen.
It's not a moral issue. It is a political one. Simply leaving Donbass to it's fate would be political suicide in Russia. I don't mind this conflict going until Russia annexes Ukraine or Ukraine annexes Russia. They are virtually the same. Remove extreme nationalists from Ukraine and you will have yourself a smaller Russia.I'm sorry, is this some kind of appeal to morality? If you regret starting a conflict, either push for it to end or look away if you don't want to see it burn.
And Australia not wanting Chines military base in their waters is also infantile? How is not wanting more military bases of hostile power block around you is infantile? Or does the West have monopoly on setting up military bases and everybody should just take it and shut up?They would anyway.
Don't come at me for denying agency to separatist movements when you're the one proposing this line of reasoning. This "don't upset the baby or he throws a tantrum" attitude actually infantilizes Russia's position.
Can you guaranty that they would not be there if it comes down to it? What blocks Americans from stationing them there if Ukraine joins NATO?Again, I think Germany does host American nukes but I don't know if there's any other European country that hosts nukes not part of their own domestic nuclear program. Can you actually justify this fear of nukes in Ukrainian territory?
The only big baby in this i can see is US. While major EU countries tried to solve this problem through diplomacy and not let it go into hot war, US senators found it in themselves to go and give speeches about how they will give Ukraine everything to fight the Russians "over there", whatever it means.This is what the kids would call a "based" take, because at least we can have a good old fashioned sacrifice of the young to satisfy the greed of men in suits. Instead of discussing big babies throwing tantrums.
>single nuclear warhead detonated in seawater turning Britain into a nuclear waste for hundreds of years.we have a guy (on Russian TV?) discussing the option to first plunge Britain into the depths of the sea, followed by turning it into a nuclear desert. Kinda like Chekov's rifle but with Posidon missiles.
View attachment 3238693
View attachment 3238694
I'm fully convinced Russia stopped doing actual weapons development somewhere in the late 1970s and they've just been staffing their weapons RnD departments with fan fiction tier writers and whenever they want to show off a new toy they use some left over designs from the 60s.we have a guy (on Russian TV?) discussing the option to first plunge Britain into the depths of the sea, followed by turning it into a nuclear desert. Kinda like Chekov's rifle but with Posidon missiles.
View attachment 3238693
View attachment 3238694
I think a lot of pro-Russia and Russia-curious opinion is simply a reaction to how the most disgusting people on this planet have gone 100%
Because Donbass just getting a bit too peacefulWhy die for Donbas?
Hey, blyat, I planned to emigrate there. *_*God I wish, but sadly this is just russian cope
At this point I assume you're purposefully misinterpreting what I said.Couldn't they just surrender to Ukrainians if they did not wanted to fight? Or were there Russian commissars behind their backs?
And whose fault was that? Again, Russian leadership is dealing with the consequences of their actions. These are self-fulfilling prophecies of their own creation.Still does not mean you should not prepare for it as a matter on national security. Russia-friendly Ukraine past 2014 is an oxymoron.
Nobody followed them. Yet you single out Ukraine.Weren't there agreements made for a spacial status for Donbass before this war even started? Why did Ukraine not followed them? That would avoid this war in it's entirety. And how much Russia did send, exactly?
Imagine killing tens of thousands and displacing millions of people because you cannot take the L.It's not a moral issue. It is a political one. Simply leaving Donbass to it's fate would be political suicide in Russia.
I did not know that Ukraine resided inside Russian territorial waters.And Australia not wanting Chines military base in their waters is also infantile?
Ukraine and Georgia demanding Russia to remove its own military bases because Russia is an hostile power would be infantile.How is not wanting more military bases of hostile power block around you is infantile?
It pays to have friends.Or does the West have monopoly on setting up military bases and everybody should just take it and shut up?
What blocks Russia from stationing troops near Ukraine?Can you guaranty that they would not be there if it comes down to it? What blocks Americans from stationing them there if Ukraine joins NATO?
Excuse me? What did the EU do? The diplomacy all went to shit when fighting continued and Russia said they didn't have anything to do with Minsk II apart from being a mediator so they could do whatever the fuck they wanted. When Zelensky tried to talk to Russia, they told him to fuck off and talk to the DPR and LPR.The only big baby in this i can see is US. While major EU countries tried to solve this problem through diplomacy and not let it go into hot war, US senators found it in themselves to go and give speeches about how they will give Ukraine everything to fight the Russians "over there", whatever it means.
I expect at least a trilogy or two about the Ghost of Kyiv
View attachment 3238663
Wasn't hard when the rats came out in support for Ukraine day oneI think a lot of pro-Russia and Russia-curious opinion is simply a reaction to how the most disgusting people on this planet have gone 100%Slava
Ugayni
:
View attachment 3238754
Most people are aware on some level that Russia is a depressing shithole run by criminals, which is the opposite of based. Howsoever, when Twitter troons, senile pedophile politicians and - may Allah forgive me - journalists are lined up behind an issue, you wouldn't be spiritually and mentally healthy if you didn't take the opposite stance.
Nice English, faggot. So exactly which part of borschtland are you from?All three of you (@mindlessobserver , @Elbereth and you) are keep being highly delusional manlet gay shills. Gross.