Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
“We need to expand the Supreme Court by another two seats to defend democracy“.
You know it’s coming.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Manchin already hard said no to that. And he is against abortion expansion.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
The dems have a majority. They could pass a law federally legalizing abortion at any time.
They won't though. Dangling it in front of their voters is far more imprtant.
They won't though. Dangling it in front of their voters is far more imprtant.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
All the more reason for the dial-a-riot people to make folks scared that the projected annihilation of the Dems at the midterms might hurt them. The Dems (Pelosi and Schumer, TPTB) might happily sacrifice Manchin to stave off being gutted wholesale in the midterms. Look for headlines about Manchin being linked to Epstein, or being caught with his dick in a goat or something.
We’ve seen crazier shit over the last ten years, for sure.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
Speaking of which, when do we get our first big politician deepfake? It really should have happened last go round.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
It is annoying to have to repeat this, but... if they -could- do that, they would have -already done so-. Round abouts when Machin destroyed their -first- main legislation.
Or when he did it to their second. Or when he absolutely nuked their ability to get around the filibuster.
There are so many times I think you specifically but the doomers in general have now popped up with "AH HA! Now they will destroy Manchin!" it is almost comical in how it never comes true, because if it could they'd have already done so.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Twitter is saying the leaked docs contained PII that outed the leaker, and it was a hard left justice's clerk. Seemingly confirmed on Rekieta's stream just now. Trying to find the name.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
Manchin and Trump are finished once the New York Attorney General finishes picking through their kitchen garbage can!
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
What's the likelyhood this causes Barret and Kavanaugh to change their vote?
If anything, it may actually make them dig their heels at the slight of leaking the ruling early.
If anything, it may actually make them dig their heels at the slight of leaking the ruling early.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
AOC deepfakes are pretty common, Pelosi ones… not so much.
I’ve don’t think I’ve mentioned Manchin before on this website, ever. And I’m just spitballing possibilities, not making predictions. Deep breaths bro, we’re all gonna make it.
EDIT: yup, just site-searched for my name + Manchin and only got two hits, both on this thread today.
Please be true. Nothing chops the legs out from under ’at least we respect the law’ like a blatant violation of legal trust.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Highly unlikely. If they were putting their ruling down they -knew- what it meant. That it occurred early is tragic, but they knew it was coming. Hell, they might even have suspected it would be leaked given other core stuff has been.
Then I apologize. Must have misremembered the whos. Still, it pops up every time something like this occurs. If they could have removed Manchin, they'd have well and truly done so already.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
I meant good ones being touted as real for an attack. Or possibly claiming a real photo is a deepfake.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
What are the odds the Justices are being assured their safety now when they specifically were not assured safety if they voted for the State challenge to the rigging?
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
LOL at possibility that he has copies of frazzled.rip in multiple safe deposit boxes and set on a dead man’s switch… the only thing that can protect someone from the dreaded ‘suicide by two to the occipital’.
No I’m not a conspiracy nut or a Q-boomer, I just amuse myself by imagining how badly things can go wrong and then seeing how closely life tees up.
The one with her, the (REDACTED), the frankfurters and the peanut butter was pretty convincing.
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I saw speculation of an "Amit Jain", flunky of Sotomayor but that was more dot-connecting to previous direct connections to politico rather than something in the docs
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
Can't wait for people who spent the last year crying about 1/6 to storm the SCOTUS.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2017
That will be fucking glorious.
Join me, brother and sister Kiwis, in enjoying this delicious salted corn while we watch the fire burn.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Of course. There's militant baby murderers on the steps of the court. Which is allowed, cause they're leftists. No doubt the SCOTUS had a police escort off property and are being protected by several battalions of police. And will be, for the foreseeable future.
As someone pointed out, it's primary season in many states:
Again, reeks of op.
- Status