Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone who has even a whiff of disloyalty about them will go in the next six months.It won't be a purge. It was one person and good luck proving anyone else. The bigger problem is that this destroys any trust among the judges.
Fucking wow. I thought he would never do anything to besmirch the name of the court. Also if he's talking about this, nobody is changing their vote. It hurts their credibility too much.On Rackets stream CNN is reporting a 5-4 decision and claims that Roberts is the one who leaked the numbers to CNN.
Wait, is this literally the first SCOTUS leak ever?
There are a lot of people on Twitter, including SCOTUSblog, saying this is a huge fucking deal because of THAT, not because of RvW.
Anyone who has even a whiff of disloyalty about them will go in the next six months.
Fucking wow. I thought he would never do anything to besmirch the name of the court. Also if he's talking about this, nobody is changing their vote. It hurts their credibility too much.
I don't believe for a second that Roberts is the one to leak it. one of his clerks possibly, but not Roberts himself.Anyone who has even a whiff of disloyalty about them will go in the next six months.
Fucking wow. I thought he would never do anything to besmirch the name of the court. Also if he's talking about this, nobody is changing their vote. It hurts their credibility too much.
Just to make it clear, the claim was he or someone related to him was the one who leaked the vote number.I don't believe for a second that Roberts is the one to leak it. one of his clerks possibly, but not Roberts himself.
There's no way it's a justice. If it is a justice, it's hidden by handing it to a clerk first anyway.I don't believe for a second that Roberts is the one to leak it. one of his clerks possibly, but not Roberts himself.
I'm hearing there was a minor leak in the 70's that got some people some money on the stock market, but nothing political like this.Wait, is this literally the first SCOTUS leak ever?
There are a lot of people on Twitter, including SCOTUSblog, saying this is a huge fucking deal because of THAT, not because of RvW.
The number... possibly. A clerk there could have done it. But the leaked decision? No way in hell.Just to make it clear, the claim was he or someone related to him was the one who leaked the vote number.
Would you concede the possibility that a lightning-fast reaction to the leak is still possible evidence of the usual gang of idiots being pre-primed and ready to go?No op necessary, all I am seeing is things prepped months ago getting the start button pushed. And all this would have occurred within the same timefame had the decision not been leaked. The only thing that's changed is it being leaked early.
Considering my entire premise was everything being pre-primed, and the only reason it looks kinda like an op is that speed... yes, I'd concede it because it is my point.Would you concede the possibility that a lightning-fast reaction to the leak is still possible evidence of the usual gang of idiots being pre-primed and ready to go?
I can’t speak for anyone else but I’m a little stunned by how quickly the militants have started the shitshow. This is ‘unjustifiable police shooting of unarmed black man recorded on 18 obamaphones in a black area with 90% unemployment’ level of speedy response.
Imagine killing your career so women can keep killing kids LOLNot just politico, I wouldn't be surprised if one of the more liberal judges had been making phone calls long before this warning people that it wasn't going well.
I can respect it if there's no CNN job or book deal. More people need to stand up and stop taking it in the ass for a paycheck.... but we all know she (definitely a she) is gonna make bank off this.Imagine killing your career so women can keep killing kids LOL
Where's a rainbow when you need it?Imagine killing your career so women can keep killing kids LOL
I know she’s not sworn in yet but I’d laugh until my spleen ruptured if it was Ketanji Brown Jackson.my personal guess is either Sotomayor or Kagan
Sorry, it appears I misinterpreted your position.it is my point.
Well sorry hohols and Z-man, the right to abort nigger babies uber alles, as far as liberals go.So I see the latest Current Thing is out?
View attachment 3242094
I wish. But I doubt Justice Brown here has access to the SCOTUS internal systems yet.I know she’s not sworn in yet but I’d laugh until my spleen ruptured if it was Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Sorry, it appears I misinterpreted your position.
Roberts is Romney on the Court. The best he would do is abstain. He would never vote for anything difficult.Gonna laugh if the leak pisses Roberts off enough that he tells the liberal justices to clean their shit up or he votes hard right for the next election cycle.
I'd rather the US not interfere in the Ukraine-Russian war to begin with.Well sorry hohols and Z-man, the right to abort nigger babies uber alles, as far as liberals go.
I doubt they can concentrate on both at the same time.
Or start a civil war in Ukraine in the first place..I'd rather the US not interfere in the Ukraine-Russian war to begin with.