DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell: General Discussion #2

Where is DSP?

  • He is in Connecticut visiting family/funeral

    Votes: 213 47.9%
  • He and Khet are on a honeymoon style trip

    Votes: 12 2.7%
  • He has an issue (s) with the HOA requiring immediate fixes

    Votes: 27 6.1%
  • Comcast/ISP/Internet Issues

    Votes: 16 3.6%
  • He is taking a Kino Casino style break by not announcing when he comes back

    Votes: 30 6.7%
  • Phil and/or Khet Health Issue

    Votes: 48 10.8%
  • This is a social experiment from DSP

    Votes: 99 22.2%

  • Total voters
    445
  • Poll closed .
So here are the results of my viewbot hypothesis testing from earlier today. Similar to my previous post, green dot represents my stream being online and red dot represents buffering. My methodology was that I explicitly asked my viewers to remain in my stream for the 5 minute downtime period. Unfortunately, it took longer than expected for my OBS to re-establish connection with YouTube for some reason.

My stream:
RUN 2_ View count over time (05-02-22 PM), PoP stream.png

DSP's stream from earlier today:
DSP view count.jpg

We see a similar dip in our streams, obviously he has over double the initial viewership but the overall shape seems to be mostly the same. My conclusion is that I would hesitate to use the fact that he drops "x viewers over a very short period" as evidence on it's own that he is botting.

The real question I suppose would be, "is there any possibility that the initial 800+ viewers consists of view bots?" I don't think it can be answered utilizing this one thing. Again, the only question I wanted answered was if under ideal conditions (i.e. viewers were told ahead of time NOT to leave) we could show some kind of major difference (i.e. the viewer count is able to hold steady) and that clearly was not the case here.

Questions like, "How does he have 800+ viewers and a dead chat" are probably more indicative of botting at the end of the day, although I don't think we can definitively prove if he doesn't just have a significantly higher percentage of lurkers compared to an average streamer (I suspect this is a true statement).
 
Well well well.... What is this and how'd you get it? Did wings leak it? I kinda respect wings talking like a human versus Phil attempting to cast pignosis on him. In any case, interesting to see Phil talked to him way ahead of time and acting like a needy gf who wants his approval. What a little bitch.

Regarding the viewbot thing, all the evidence against Phil using viewbots stems from people attempting to predict his behaviour. Not a hard thing to do, but consider how Phil is a lot more shrewd than most people give him credit. As stupid as he is, I do believe that he is willing to invest whatever the price of viewbots is in order to keep his corpse of a Youtube channel afloat.
As for evidence in favor of Phil using bots, things get a bit more solid: big number of views but there's only 20 people talking in chat, Phil has a few internet issues lately, and when he does his views numbers drop like crazy. When it comes to his numbers on Youtube, there is OBVIOUS foul play involved. The man doesn't have nearly 200K active subs. Hell, he probably barely has 20K. 400 members? More like 400-ish socks. I could keep going. Inflated likes, nonsensical comments, etcetera. Wether or not it is Phil using the viewbots and being the one behind it all is a bit of a 50/50 but I lean more into believing he did do it.
His socks have already been talked about in length and is a bad augment. They are dead subs for the most part. This has been talked about ad nauseam for some time.

Phil would not buy bots. It's always been his wheelchair viewers who have kept his channel afloat in the past. They have sub bombed on Twitch. Why is it so hard to believe that the retards on Twitch that spent money for gifted subs would buy Phil bots?
 
So here are the results of my viewbot hypothesis testing from earlier today. Similar to my previous post, green dot represents my stream being online and red dot represents buffering. My methodology was that I explicitly asked my viewers to remain in my stream for the 5 minute downtime period. Unfortunately, it took longer than expected for my OBS to re-establish connection with YouTube for some reason.

My stream:
View attachment 3242240

DSP's stream from earlier today:
View attachment 3242247

We see a similar dip in our streams, obviously he has over double the initial viewership but the overall shape seems to be mostly the same. My conclusion is that I would hesitate to use the fact that he drops "x viewers over a very short period" as evidence on it's own that he is botting.

The real question I suppose would be, "is there any possibility that the initial 800+ viewers consists of view bots?" I don't think it can be answered utilizing this one thing. Again, the only question I wanted answered was if under ideal conditions (i.e. viewers were told ahead of time NOT to leave) we could show some kind of major difference (i.e. the viewer count is able to hold steady) and that clearly was not the case here.

Questions like, "How does he have 800+ viewers and a dead chat" are probably more indicative of botting at the end of the day, although I don't think we can definitively prove if he doesn't just have a significantly higher percentage of lurkers compared to an average streamer (I suspect this is a true statement).
Stop stealing PoPcoin.
 
I spat out my drink reading this, first he sends Wingo an abbreviated prestream segment talking about da trollz and their lies, they're a mentally ill cult who only do this for money and he could win every lawsuit but he doesn't have the time or money + he is a nice guy. Then he hits him with the business correspondence LARP phrase that is "Hello sir"
 
I spat out my drink reading this, first he sends Wingo an abbreviated prestream segment talking about da trollz and their lies, they're a mentally ill cult who only do this for money and he could win every lawsuit but he doesn't have the time or money + he is a nice guy. Then he hits him with the business correspondence LARP phrase that is "Hello sir"
Also I liked how Wings ignored his PENULTIMATE message and he hits him with another "hello sir, everything ok? please babe I hope you are not mad, I saw you didn't reply to last message haha, please respond when you can haha"

He also said at the end that wings and him should talk if wings is upset, for what reason? If wings says that Phil reaction was shit then Phillipo Burnellio is gonna call him a mentally ill moron and deflect until he decides to block wings.
 
Last edited:
Also I liked how Wings was ignored his PENULTIMATE message and he hits him with another "hello sir, everything ok? please babe I hope you are not mad, I saw you didn't reply to last message haha, please respond when you can haha"

He also said at the end that wings and him should talk if wings is upset, for what reason? If wings says that Phil reaction was shit then Phillipo Burnellio is gonna call him a mentally ill moron and deflect until he decides to block wings.
Let me get this straight. Games journalists are not to be trusted because get paid to paint games in a good light.

DSP is trustworthy because he gives his honest opinion about everything. Yet here he is admitting that he watched the Wings DTRH and he tried his best to paint Wings in a good light.

Sounds a little bit hypocritical to me.
 
This is for the fans:
"Fuck you! No!" *retard laugh*
View attachment 3239851View attachment 3239844

Also: former King of Hate needs 52 more members.
"Are you fucking deaf? I guess so!"
"Why yes I am. I'm actually one of the viewers who suffered because you decreased the latency, THUS (and I'm using 'thus' correct here), ruining the closed captioning. But since my disability didn't matter then I see it only matters when you need an easy insult. Wow. Wow Phil. You really need to confront your bias against disabled folk. Just because I'm deaf doesn't mean you can use it against me. I'm taking my money and leaving"

Exceot that didn't happen. Instead the paypig made a sock, wrote an email, and came back. DSP continued to be Massively hypocritical posing as the Martin Luther King of Accessibility. And the retards in chat chortled at the sight of another Troll getting dunked on. Life is suffering.
 
View attachment 3242384
Phil in 2019: "Wings is a liar!"

Phil in 2022: "Hello, sir..."
Seriously can’t be overstated how much of a little bitch DSP is, he will talk however much shit and say whatever about someone, but the second he has to actually deal with said person directly(wants something from them) he shrinks down to a paper tiger and hits them with the “sir”

Like he’s just a genuinely two faced person, he feels for wings, but also wings is a mess if a human for embracing da trolls
 
Back