Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A woman gets offended by a joke about a hardware dongle.
A different woman gets invited for coffee in a lift.
Jimmy Rustle's cousin gets shot.
If I was any of the justices on the majority, I'd be living in my panic room until this is finalized. The temptation to arrange anheroing of one of them, making it 4-4...I don't deal with SCOTUS. But I am inclined to believe the suspected finds are real. It being a very liberal clerk underneath one of the minority justices.
If true, Roberts is actually likely to be pissed, would be amusing if he changes his vote to be on the majority.
If they tried that Roberts would abstain in disgust, making it 4-5 again.If I was any of the justices on the majority, I'd be living in my panic room until this is finalized. The temptation to arrange anheroing of one of them, making it 4-4...
Actually, here's a way they could fuck things over, as pointed out by Rekieta. That one justice is retiring, and they already approved his replacement. What if he doesn't retire? Then you have... 5-5, and in a tie, Roe Vs Wade survives. Her confirmation doesn't go away just because he decides not to resign.
The number... possibly. A clerk there could have done it. But the leaked decision? No way in hell.
I heard supposedly Roberts called into CNN live on air last night over this, which is where the 5-4 number came from?If they tried that Roberts would abstain in disgust, making it 4-5 again.
Roberts judicial philosophy is pure cancer, but that kind of menuever would run right up against it.
There are lots of primaries starting this week and next, yeah. But this WAS coming no matter what, Sotomayor's clerk leaking it just made it earlier than intended.Aren't the Ohio primaries today?
Heard some scuttlebutt on twitter that this leak could be not only grossly inappropriate, but also a violation of federal law.Also, odds on it being an incredibly assmad Sotomayor having her clerk leak it in an attempt to force the weaker conservative justices to flip? She's a verifiable, 100%, grade A retarded dipshit, so I could see it. What are they gonna do, fire her?
Which law? The only suggestion people have had is "stealing federal property" and that won't fly.Heard some scuttlebutt on twitter that this leak could be not only grossly inappropriate, but also a violation of federal law.
It is hilarious how the NPCs immediately forget what they are supposed to support as soon as the next big thing comes in. Previously it was ELON BAD.So I see the latest Current Thing is out?
View attachment 3242094
If (big if) she is the one who leaked the information how fucked is her career? Of course, thats assuming Biden does anything about it except encourage more shitty behavior (or have another dementia episode)Also, odds on it being an incredibly assmad Sotomayor having her clerk leak it in an attempt to force the weaker conservative justices to flip? She's a verifiable, 100%, grade A retarded dipshit, so I could see it. What are they gonna do, fire her?
Rekieta et all seemed to think her career was fucked if it's confirmed, up to and including disbarment. (The clerk, that is. If it was Sotomayor herself nothing will happen except they'll make her fat ass come in to do shit in person from now on.) I think that SJWelfare will kick in and she'll be brought up as a heroine, and given some kushy job at CNN or what have you. ESPECIALLY if they successfully use this to swing the vote.If (big if) she is the one who leaked the information how fucked is her career? Of course, thats assuming Biden does anything about it except encourage more shitty behavior (or have another dementia episode)
no, it's definitely possible that it was some ultra left clerk having gone through Yale or another T14 who's been so fundamentally indoctrinated that they think this decision will lichrully bring about a Handmaids TaleI am going with a smaller chance option but one that makes more sense to me, since SCOTUS Clerks are "Establishment" buddies so I don't think they would drink the kool aid enough to ruin their lives over this.
I think it was an IT person who was working on the servers and happened across the file, or one of the Glowie Agencies who we know skim everything so if this was sent through Email The Glowies would have access to it.
If even an idiot like me can see the op potential here (that is, leak it and use the chaos to force one of the 5 to break), then a lefty clerk absolutely could. And Sotomayor is fucking retarded enough to maybe think it had value in doing it too.no, it's definitely possible that it was some ultra left clerk having gone through Yale or another T14 who's been so fundamentally indoctrinated that they think this decision will lichrully bring about a Handmaids Tale
Perhaps, but that probably isn't a net good thing for them. The more they drain their coffers, the slower they are to fill them back up. If their donors dig too deep and damage their own positions in a panic now, it'll be even worse come 2024.So even if this is unlikely to move the needle for voters in and of itself, I wonder if it will panic donors who would otherwise have sat this one out into opening their wallets again.
And last I checked, the DNC have bank balances of pennies and pocket lint.Perhaps, but that probably isn't a net good thing for them. The more they drain their coffers, the slower they are to fill them back up. If their donors dig too deep and damage their own positions in a panic now, it'll be even worse come 2024.
Takes a lot of money to keep thousands of obese black female vote-counters in anti-Trump merchandise.And last I checked, the DNC have bank balances of pennies and pocket lint.
ANTIFA is mostly criminals looking to loot or attack conservatives. Sitting out in front of the Supreme Court holding signs doesn't benefit them so they won't show up.Now will DC be subject to another mostly peaceful protest like during the Summer of Love or will Antifa be held back because their presence could backfire on the Democrats?
![]()
You weren't kiddingSo I see the latest Current Thing is out?
View attachment 3242094
They'd have to sell that someone and the person they're set to replace can sit at the same time, just to have a hung vote on a court specifically sized to prevent exactly that, on a piece of legislation that there's several other ways to resolve more solidly.If I was any of the justices on the majority, I'd be living in my panic room until this is finalized. The temptation to arrange anheroing of one of them, making it 4-4...
Actually, here's a way they could fuck things over, as pointed out by Rekieta. That one justice is retiring, and they already approved his replacement. What if he doesn't retire? Then you have... 5-5, and in a tie, Roe Vs Wade survives. Her confirmation doesn't go away just because he decides not to resign.