Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Y
You underestimate just about much democrats love abortions. Expect blue states to run Uber services for poor black communities.

I’m more worried about the mentally unstable childless 30 year old feminist whose personality is Netflix and wine, buried in student loan debt, and has no prospect for a stable relationship. That’s prime recruiting grounds for terrorism. Please avoid crowds and if you see a woman who has unnaturally dyed hair color alone in a crowd wearing out of season bulky clothing: leave the area and alert the authorities.
Yeah people forget that terrorism is very much a concern of mine over this.
 
The salt and endless reeeeeing will be glorious, but I'm not sure this will lead to massive riots like the Summer of Love 2020.

On the one hand, abortion may be the most polarizing and important political issue in the US. On the other hand, there was a component of the George Floyd race riots the issue lacks: white guilt.

Due to fear of being called Rayciss, a lot of centrist and center leaning Republicans had to slow their roll condemning the rioters 2 years ago. They had to sit on their hands and not call for police suppression of the burning and looting and intimidation of normies. This started immediately when both sides quietly suspended COVID restrictions in the height of the pandemic to allow mass gatherings (if it was blacks and their simping white allies).

Can't see this happening with abortion. There will be some big protests, probably a One Million Babykiller March on Washington. But nothing like the race riots we've seen almost yearly since Obama. Also there will be a lack of black thug/Antifa energy. Calling it now, some leftists will try to harness Antifa, and the rest will shut it down fast due to optics.

Also complete LOL at Pelosi and Schumer trying to blame Trump for this, like the Republican party was pro-abortion before 2016...
 
2022 is only 5 months in, and we've had The Honkening, which single handedly gave me some pride in being a Canadian, and led the way to ending mandates and restrictions in Canada and across the world, and now this?
Hey, you gotta credit uncle Vlad, too.

Shit like this is why I'm starting to lean pro-life. I'm generally pro choice out of indifference, but these cunts are literal psychopaths and deserve to be fucked with.
She's right though. This is the only argument for abortion that holds water.

But, since CURRENT YEAR, I've started to look at abortion as a social engineering issue (aka "these cunts deserve to be fucked with"). And it's not just these cunts that deserve to be fucked with - the "radfems" at Ovarit are calling for a sex boycott! Which makes me wonder - why has no amount of quoting Dworkin helped these women to abstain from the sex they don't want with men they don't want to have children by?

The states can make laws regulating marriage (States 10th amendment right) but cannot deny equal protection with those laws (14th and 5th amendments).
The only bits about it that may not hold up are that marriage is a right under the 14th's Life, Liberty, or Property clause (and there's like 3 or 4 other cases that found Marriage is a right that would also have to be overturned).
Ok but why is fag marriage a right? Why is fag adoption a right? A fag or dyke is very much at liberty to marry another unmarried consenting adult of the opposite sex who's not an immediate relative. Plz explain like I'm Russian (I mean, I am).
 
And it's not just these cunts that deserve to be fucked with - the "radfems" at Ovarit are calling for a sex boycott! Which makes me wonder - why has no amount of quoting Dworkin helped these women to abstain from the sex they don't want with men they don't want to have children by?
If these hos could keep their legs closed they wouldn't need abortion in the first place.
 
Ok but why is fag marriage a right? Why is fag adoption a right?
Because five SCOTUS justices got together in the summer of 2015 and decided it should be. That's literally it, with the stuff about how it relates to the Constitution just being the technical side.

A fag or dyke is very much at liberty to marry another unmarried consenting adult of the opposite sex who's not an immediate relative. Plz explain like I'm Russian (I mean, I am).
By that same token, two heterosexual people of the same gender are now just as free to get married for tax purposes or the like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awoo
Hey, you gotta credit uncle Vlad, too.


She's right though. This is the only argument for abortion that holds water.

But, since CURRENT YEAR, I've started to look at abortion as a social engineering issue (aka "these cunts deserve to be fucked with"). And it's not just these cunts that deserve to be fucked with - the "radfems" at Ovarit are calling for a sex boycott! Which makes me wonder - why has no amount of quoting Dworkin helped these women to abstain from the sex they don't want with men they don't want to have children by?


Ok but why is fag marriage a right? Why is fag adoption a right? A fag or dyke is very much at liberty to marry another unmarried consenting adult of the opposite sex who's not an immediate relative. Plz explain like I'm Russian (I mean, I am).
About that Tik Tok psycho, it doesn't hold water in the 21st century. Birth control for men and women is readily available, it's inexpensive and many times its free. Birth control pills are almost 100% effective when used properly and if a woman is too retarded to keep her legs closed and remember to take a pill every day then there is long term birth control like a shot every six months, implants and the IUD. You can use contraceptives to induce menstruation after unprotected sex/rape and if you are sapient enough to notice a missed period then there is the abortion pill. They ignore these very salient facts because it doesn't fit their narrative and scream about coat hangers and butchers, as if the only way to prevent pregnancy is via abortion. It is not. A fetus is a human being and has rights. If the idea of pregnancy is that abhorrent then sterilization is also an option.These schizos want to make after birth abortion a reality. They literally want to kill babies after they are born.

The fag rulings are also on shaky grounds, because they focus on the financial benefits of marriage. Why is marriage between a man and a woman so important that society created special laws and policies making it more attractive to be married than not? Because as a society we want stable parents and stable families, for them to stay that way. A geriatric lesbian was mad she didn't get a financial benefir when her fellow lesbo popped her clogs. It wasn't about love but money.

Sure, we accepted gay marriage and equality and what did we get? Trans closets for children in elementary school, "gender affirming" polices that encourage children to chop off their genitals and teachers grooming kids by creating special gay clubs they hide from parents. Spare me the stories about fags and lesbians having children, more often than not they abuse them physically and sexually; there's a story every week about a gay couple killing "their" child. Usually it's women but men kill the kids in their care too. Be a fag all you want, just stay away from children.
 
About that Tik Tok psycho, it doesn't hold water in the 21st century. Birth control for men and women is readily available, it's inexpensive and many times its free. Birth control pills are almost 100% effective when used properly and if a woman is too retarded to keep her legs closed and remember to take a pill every day then there is long term birth control like a shot every six months, implants and the IUD. You can use contraceptives to induce menstruation after unprotected sex/rape and if you are sapient enough to notice a missed period then there is the abortion pill. They ignore these very salient facts because it doesn't fit their narrative and scream about coat hangers and butchers, as if the only way to prevent pregnancy is via abortion. It is not. A fetus is a human being and has rights. If the idea of pregnancy is that abhorrent then sterilization is also an option.These schizos want to make after birth abortion a reality. They literally want to kill babies after they are born.

The fag rulings are also on shaky grounds, because they focus on the financial benefits of marriage. Why is marriage between a man and a woman so important that society created special laws and policies making it more attractive to be married than not? Because as a society we want stable parents and stable families, for them to stay that way. A geriatric lesbian was mad she didn't get a financial benefir when her fellow lesbo popped her clogs. It wasn't about love but money.

Sure, we accepted gay marriage and equality and what did we get? Trans closets for children in elementary school, "gender affirming" polices that encourage children to chop off their genitals and teachers grooming kids by creating special gay clubs they hide from parents. Spare me the stories about fags and lesbians having children, more often than not they abuse them physically and sexually; there's a story every week about a gay couple killing "their" child. Usually it's women but men kill the kids in their care too. Be a fag all you want, just stay away from children.
They're already saying that the Supreme Court will ban birth control next. These aren't smart or serious people.
 
You know, for a political faction that prides itself in organizing, those protest turnouts seem pretty sparse if the footage is anything to go off. Are these people seriously still shit scared of covid that they can't be persuaded to go outside for wahmen's rights?
 
  • Like
Reactions: awoo
For people wondering "why won't they nuke the filibuster to pass abortion law federally", the answer is: they can't. They can't even get a majority due to Manchin.

FRzIEfFXIAI7wjT.jpeg
HR 3755 was made by California Dems to prevent any government restriction on abortion nationwide. Manchin, Murkowski, and Collins all voted no. 3 Democrats and 3 Republicans were absent. For people pointing at Romney, even he won't pass any pro-abortion stance law due to his Mormonism. Even he voted no.

If this follows through, they know they're fucked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back