Community Tard Baby General (includes brain dead kids) - Fundies and their genetic Fuckups; Parents of corpses in denial

Paisley will likely have low IQ no matter what, even if her parents were geniuses. I read somewhere that kids with TD have an IQ of 20 or less, which is pretty much severe mental retardation. Which I think Paisley is already showing signs of.
I agree. I've always seen her as severely mentally retarded but a lot of people in this thread are significantly more optimistic. I think they're comparing it to much to less severe forms of dwarfism that are not incompatible with life.
 
I agree. I've always seen her as severely mentally retarded but a lot of people in this thread are significantly more optimistic. I think they're comparing it to much to less severe forms of dwarfism that are not incompatible with life.
Considering that a majority of the people posted here are actually brain dead she is kind of a genius among the holoprescephaly and Hooligans and Luna.

But as a tard wrangler of very disabled people I'm biased if they have any ability to engage with their environment its a treat to work with them compared to those that you just change their soiled diapers and roll them around.
 
I agree. I've always seen her as severely mentally retarded but a lot of people in this thread are significantly more optimistic. I think they're comparing it to much to less severe forms of dwarfism that are not incompatible with life.
I'm not sure I would call it optimistic to think that Paisley is aware of the waking nightmare that is her life... :(
 
He doesn't even live with her any more. A few months ago she was in the papers very sad that she can't cope with him any more and he was sent to a residential care facility.

Thats why this is so wtf. She's not living with him and dragging him along to her shit, she's taken him from his care home where he's only just had time to be settled in specifically to do this.

It's not just attention. She makes her living from gossip magazines and has to keep the "stories" coming. She's had some fines lately for drink driving etc and keeps having more and more surgery. There's no way she can keep her lifestyle based on any talent she may have had and nobody's paying money to see her saggy implants now so she has to keep doing outrageous shit, having fake relationships and breakups for the magazines.

Re cocaine I put that in as contextual information I don't think you can make any concrete claim from it. She also had a cancerous tumour on her finger removed 11 weeks after Harvey's birth (NOT CLAIMING COCAINE CAUSES CANCER OR CANCER CASUES PWS PLEASE DONT HAVE ANOTHER ARGUMENT) so I dunno. It's fair to say Katie wasn't necessarily in the best state of health at that time.

Ugh. With all her money and game,she can damn well afford private caregivers at her home. Instead,she puts him in a home where he may or may not be happy.
I'm on the fence. She has other kids to consider. I know some parents have to make a heartbreaking decision to place a violent SN teenager in residential care for the safety of the other kids. Without knowing the details of Harvey's challenging behaviour it's hard to say whether it might not be a sad necessity to have him live in a care home.
True but if he's violent that makes her stupid for taking him out to a party with half naked chicks.
 
a lot of adults with PWS or severe autism do much better in residential care than at home. They need environments that are 24/7 regulated and monitored. It’s not necessarily like sticking them in an institution like decades ago.
He is actually supposed to be resident at National Star College in Gloucestershire. They have tards up to 25. It's more of a get the tard to function as much as they can, kind of place. From what I remember they have carers and medical facilities as required and normally go from there to supported accommodation/community tard wranglers in "homes" around the country.
 
I wonder if people with lower IQs but (seemingly) healthy are more likely to have super tards like Paisley? You'd expect the kid to have a mild LD like the parents.
In normal populations, intelligence of an offspring tends to regress to the mean of the parents. Obviously, this isn't a hard rule, because intelligence is polygenic and strongly influenced by environmental factors.

Of course, people like Paisley are exceptions. As others have mentioned, her underlying genetic disorder, thanatophoric dysplasia, affects her cognitive abilities. Briefly, all of our genes provide "instructions" for making a specific protein. Proteins are how our cells do basically everything they need to do. When a gene is missing (deleted) or mutated, the protein that it encodes can't be made correctly or at all. Sometimes, this is no big deal - if any mutation in any gene had serious consequences for an organism, we'd all be dead. In other cases, though, not having a particular protein is catastrophic.

Thanatophoric dysplasia is caused by a mutation in a gene called FGFR3, which encodes a protein called fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. This protein is essential for proper development of the embryonic brain, although its role is poorly understood. What is clear is that a problem with FGFR3 causes major structural malformations of the brain very early in the development of an embryo. The brain abnormalities described in that paper are severe. Even without the other malformations caused by TD, the problems with the brain alone could be considered incompatible with life.

Paisley will likely have low IQ no matter what, even if her parents were geniuses. I read somewhere that kids with TD have an IQ of 20 or less, which is pretty much severe mental retardation.

I agree. I've always seen her as severely mentally retarded but a lot of people in this thread are significantly more optimistic. I think they're comparing it to much to less severe forms of dwarfism that are not incompatible with life.
Here's a source. An IQ <20 is considered "profound" mental retardation, which basically means a developmental at or below that of a newborn. Because of the structural brain malformations associated with TD, normal cognitive development was not possible for Paisley and t's unlikely that she will attain any developmental milestones.

Most other forms of dwarfism don't cause structural anomalies of the brain, and if they do, they aren't catastrophic. I think that's why people in this thread and elsewhere tend to overestimate the possibility that Paisley has only mild or moderate intellectual disability. She's profoundly mentally retarded because it was impossible for her brain to grow and develop correctly.

(I'm trying not to sound cold or unfeeling here; I recognize that she's a human being.)
 
Most other forms of dwarfism don't cause structural anomalies of the brain, and if they do, they aren't catastrophic. I think that's why people in this thread and elsewhere tend to overestimate the possibility that Paisley has only mild or moderate intellectual disability. She's profoundly mentally retarded because it was impossible for her brain to grow and develop correctly.

(I'm trying not to sound cold or unfeeling here; I recognize that she's a human being.)
REEEEEEEEEEE how dare you ignore my genius spud composing the next works of Beethoven by tongue dictation alone!!!
 
With all of this talk of Roe v. Wade being overturned, I am kind of concerned we will see more potatoes
More down syndrome babies for sure 😵
I wonder if more people will chose to put their potatoes into homes instead of caring for the genetic mistakes/ potatoes they were forced to have?

I actually know a couple that chose to abort their ds fetus (it was actually a planned pregnancy) that had such severe heart problems it likely would have never of survived birth. Most of the father's bio family disowned them when they confided to them. I've written here before but his sister is special needs as well and their insane mother let her have a baby and she's pregnant with a second now.
 
Last edited:
I definitely think this needs to be discussed in the context of the possible supreme court ruling. People need to know this isn't always about a vain desire to 'heckin travel' without kids weighing you down, there are actually medical issues here.
The pro life fundies are some of the most stubborn tards you will ever meet. These are the people that cheer when an actual child is guilted into carrying their rape/ incest baby to tern because "Jesus".

Just look at Mike Huckabee of all creatures
Screenshot_20220503-152917_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20220503-152935_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looking into the news thread on Roe v Wade took me here immediately. It's fascinating to see the true and honest kiwi filth hate sperg over abortions. Meanwhile everytime a cow is expecting we're all praying there won't be a live birth.

Kiwi farms is a fine example of why abortions need to be accessible. From cows to posters alike.
 
The pro life fundies are some of the most stubborn tards you will ever meet. These are the people that cheer when an actual child is guilted into carrying their rape/ incest baby to tern because "Jesus".

Just look at Mike Huckabee of all creatures
View attachment 3243873
forcing a raped, undeveloped child to birth a baby to own the libs
 
Maybe this is a really stupid take, but it seems like people trying to outlaw abortion are just fucking idiots who do not understand how people work. Making abortion illegal will not mean there is no more abortion. It will just mean there is no safe or legal abortion. That will only cause more people to die.
Is the concept of cause and effect just completely foreign to these assholes? Do they think that making drugs, murder, etc illegal erased the problem?
If you want to prevent abortion, first you should prevent unwanted pregnancies. The first step there is better education about sex and pregnancy, so that people actually understand how to prevent a pregnancy. Again, cause and effect. (of course, this is assuming that abortion is a completely non-nuanced issue and that it only ever occurs because of accidental pregnancy instead of being a medical procedure)
 
Maybe this is a really stupid take, but it seems like people trying to outlaw abortion are just fucking idiots who do not understand how people work. Making abortion illegal will not mean there is no more abortion.
What you're missing is that it would, in all probability, *reduce* abortion.
Do they think that making drugs, murder, etc illegal erased the problem?
And I would wager that you still support these things staying illegal, because you know that laws aren't useless just because they aren't perfect.

I agree with the sentiment of what you're expressing but what you actually wrote was, as you say, a pretty stupid take. Sorry.
 
And I would wager that you still support these things staying illegal, because you know that laws aren't useless just because they aren't perfect.

I agree with the sentiment of what you're expressing but what you actually wrote was, as you say, a pretty stupid take. Sorry.
Oh I know, making things illegal does reduce them happening. I do understand that. But too many politicians seem to think that it would completely remove abortions happening. Legislature isn't perfect, and evidence seems to point toward preventative education being more effective than just saying "no, stop, it's illegal now!"
People won't stop doing what they want just because the law says no.
 
Back