Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Malcolm Nance is taking time out from his 12 hours of daily retweeting Ukie govt. war propaganda and cleaning Ukrainian Army toilets to

retweet this:
Screenshot 2022-05-03 9.23.05 AM.png
 
Last edited:
I’m pro-life but this is just bad timing tbh, they should at least wait until 2023. The Dems will just now rely on the crutch “The GOP want to turn every state into Alabama, vote Blue!”
sure, if inflation wasnt so high that retail purchases dropped, this would be a game changer.

that doesnt mean the gop wont cuck as always but not being able to buy a steak like you did pre pandemic is what people are thinking about.
 
there's some valid pro-abortion arguments to be made, mostly about its use as a tool to improve public health by preventing deformed and retarded children from being born, and also as a way to stop rape babies from being a thing.
but in practice, a good 99% of the pro-abortion side doesn't give a fuck about such considerations at all, they just want recreational abortion to support their shameless slut lifestyle, and that's just reprehensible.
 
Let's check in on the only opinion that matters:
View attachment 3242702
Link / Archive
Nice. I hope pro-abortion protests of this possible ruling frame the issue as a specifically jewish one, it would make boomercon heads explode.
:thinking: :thinking: :thinking:

:thinking::thinking::thinking:
Malcolm Nance is taking out from his 12 hours of daily retweeting Ukie govt. war propaganda and cleaning Ukrainian Army toilets to

retweet this:
View attachment 3242811
971.gif
d77.jpg
 
The people who want abortions don't need to be polluting the gene pool anyway. Gotta break a few eggs as they say.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Male Idiot
Is the reason this happened. She just couldn't bring herself to retire when Obama was President even though she knew she was dying. She craved the spotlight that much.
As salty as the libs are now, they should be fucking grateful that A) Trump wasn't re-elected, and B) Breyer wasn't as stupidly stubborn as RBG and actually stood down at an opportune time. With its current make-up the SCOTUS probably aren't going to go much further than nuking Roe v. Wade; with a 7-2 conservative majority, pretty much everything that the left have achieved post-1968 or so could potentially have been on the table.
 
As salty as the libs are now, they should be fucking grateful that A) Trump wasn't re-elected, and B) Breyer wasn't as stupidly stubborn as RBG and actually stood down at an opportune time. With its current make-up the SCOTUS probably aren't going to go much further than nuking Roe v. Wade; with a 7-2 conservative majority, pretty much everything that the left have achieved post-1968 or so could potentially have been on the table.
I thought it was gonna be 5-4
 
If I could take the hats I would, but I genuinely fucking despise people who say "we're the [x] of the witches they couldn't burn"
I would love to see the police crack
Their skulls
 

Attachments

  • 8CB26BA3-2861-4188-9559-9F5CC157C9B1.jpeg
    8CB26BA3-2861-4188-9559-9F5CC157C9B1.jpeg
    91.4 KB · Views: 154
  • EABA4B85-43A2-42C4-AB25-0A875546CEE4.jpeg
    EABA4B85-43A2-42C4-AB25-0A875546CEE4.jpeg
    93.6 KB · Views: 146
  • 43C6716E-D5E8-4F32-8C8B-409BA1202FAB.jpeg
    43C6716E-D5E8-4F32-8C8B-409BA1202FAB.jpeg
    93.3 KB · Views: 142
  • FFEDDE40-4A02-46F4-A446-BC8BF0540339.jpeg
    FFEDDE40-4A02-46F4-A446-BC8BF0540339.jpeg
    86.1 KB · Views: 137
  • 237AF8BC-43AF-4967-9DCE-8A011767730E.jpeg
    237AF8BC-43AF-4967-9DCE-8A011767730E.jpeg
    100.2 KB · Views: 152
But also, since I'm fully out of the pol or any other news source loop to keep whatever left of my sanity, I never saw this coming and it really looks like out of the blue happening. Why is suddenly one of the founding premises of Weimerica, free drive-in abortions, being challenged after decades of Roe v Wade? BTW I remember hearing about that law way back on Alex Jones, I used to think he was talking about a person who pushed that law, Rowie Wade hahaha....but anyhow, how is this happening and why? Why would they cancel this?
the ruling of roe v wade was built on shaky ground from the very start, which is why conservatives had wanted it reviewed for so long. more like this has been a long time coming and if democrats want unrestricted abortion they will have to pass a law (which is actually extremely unpopular with voters).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back