Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

[Lightly Buttered Crumpet]

Going by the shit he's been saying on twitter, it all comes back to muh trans rights apparently. He seems to be saying the word 'theocracy' a lot which I don't get because I've not heard that being used up until now.

America has a separation of religion and government, as far as I am aware, but at the same time I know American politicians do talk about god a lot and never come out as atheist. I would struggle to call it an all out theocracy, though. If he ever says it about the UK, then he's got even less ground to stand on because we don't give a toss about religion at all and want it completely left out of politics.
Of course, countries that are actual theocracies, like numerous ones in the Middle East, are classed as darlings of the far left because "Islamophobia bad" so he'll never apply the term to them, even though these countries are also ones that will commit actual genocide on LGBTQ people. I honestly don't understand how these countries get a pass from the far left...

 

[Open Window Maniac]

Tenner says he opens the next video with the Roe v Wade thing. I can almost *hear* him downloading the correct talking points from twitter as I type this.

Short of posting a video colleage of nude photos of himself, I can't imagine anything that would tank his subscriber count harder than him banging on about why abortion is amazing. If I saw a video that had an obese tranny lecturing me about why killing babies in utero is a wonderful thing appear in my sub box, I'd unsubscribe so fast it would make Jim's head spin.

 

[RainwaterDrop]

Troons seem determined to kill off the goth look for good.

It won't work, if deathfath goths didn't kill it, Jim and his ilk won't lol!

In fact, Jim should get a Jack Skellington tattoo. Not because it would suit him or make him any more feminine, but rather because it would seal the deal of the horrorcow fat goth!

I can't believe he's wearing that corset in public forcing people to see the horrible state he's in, you can even hear a kid in the intro. Poor guy.

Oh, fuck me sideways, it can always get worse, trust me. I had the pleasure of taking the wrong bus and getting a Crackhead Safari, Jim looks fucking awful with that look but you don't know how deep rock bottom is until you see crackhead troons walking around and soliciting people. I'm a pretty tolerant guy, but fuck me if that wasn't some of the vilest shit I have ever seen!

Uh oh - making a profit from it, alongside the profit from Patreon and YouTube... sounds almost like the dreaded Capitalism, there, Jim!

No, it's okay when Jim does it, he is oppressed or something, never mind the thousands he makes from very little work, the Taxpayer should fund his every whim. Did you know they didn't immediately kiss his ass in the U.S. wrestling circuit, therefore he is a victim of severe discrimination? Fuck me sideways, this guy comes close to Chu on being a colossal self-centered asshole with an equally big entitlement mentality. I am a pretty open-minded person, but fuck me if this shit doesn't sound like a Cult, guy goes from a gaming content producer to a freak show whose content revolves around taking estrogen pills and talking about himself first. Either that or it's what boosts his confidence, letting his ego out of the cage on full force!

 

[Quixotic Man]

Jim is a man on hormones who has sex with other men on hormones.

No one's butt is getting pregnant, but I will bet a tenner to anyone willing he will act like the Supreme Court is personally attacking him.

 

[Lightly Buttered Crumpet]

Jim is a man on hormones who has sex with other men on hormones.

No one's butt is getting pregnant, but I will bet a tenner to anyone willing he will act like the Supreme Court is personally attacking him.

Stan: I want to be a woman. From now on I want you all to call me Loretta.
Reg: What!?
Stan: It's my right as a man.
Judith: Why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
Stan: I want to have babies.
Reg: You want to have babies?!?!?!
Stan: It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
Reg: But you can't have babies.
Stan: Don't you oppress me.
Reg: I'm not oppressing you, Stan -- you haven't got a womb. Where's the
foetus going to gestate? You going to keep it in a box?

 

[Open Window Maniac]

Jim is a man on hormones who has sex with other men on hormones.

No one's butt is getting pregnant, but I will bet a tenner to anyone willing he will act like the Supreme Court is personally attacking him.

Jim is fat and nobody would have sex with him.

 

[Moja Zemlja]

Oh, fuck me sideways, it can always get worse, trust me. I had the pleasure of taking the wrong bus and getting a Crackhead Safari, Jim looks fucking awful with that look but you don't know how deep rock bottom is until you see crackhead troons walking around and soliciting people. I'm a pretty tolerant guy, but fuck me if that wasn't some of the vilest shit I have ever seen!

You might be a tolerant guy but I doubt the people around where Jim live are, as much of a scumbag he is I'm not looking forward to the day when he tweets about getting harrased or beaten up by either chavs or some Asian blokes.

 

[Lightly Buttered Crumpet]

You might be a tolerant guy but I doubt the people around where Jim live are, as much of a scumbag he is I'm not looking forward to the day when he tweets about getting harrased or beaten up by either chavs or some Asian blokes.

The fact this hasn't happened to him yet is almost as if Britain is not actually trying to commit genocide against all troons...

 

[None Drunk Username]

I don't know much about pro wrestling but I feel like people that do like it wouldn't like watching Jim in the ring. Like not even in the ironic you're supposed to boo and hate this wrestler kind of way.

Idk it's just amazing to me that he's seriously wondering why he's struggling the in the pro wrestling scene.

 

[Oliver Onions]

Also, just as an aside: does anyone know what the guy in the awful song he's always used is screeching? The vocal delivery is so bad that I've honestly never been able to decipher what the lyrics were.

Are you talking about the JQ theme song? Because it's by a band called Drill Queen I think (formerly Mudhoney). The only reason I know this is because over a decade ago Ricky Gervais played it on his radio show during a short-lived feature where they'd sample local bands.

I guarantee this is where Jim originally found it, because that same radio show is where Jim stole his entire comedic personality from.

The lyrics go something like:
Born different,
Born innocent,
Born [???] I'm not like you

View attachment 3242193

'Your rights are not enshrined' says the man who recently moved back to the UK, a country where you have literally no rights, only privileges, all of which can be revoked any time the government or the pigs decide it's inconvenient for you to have them.

God he's such a fucking retard.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I don't know much about pro wrestling but I feel like people that do like it wouldn't like watching Jim in the ring. Like not even in the ironic you're supposed to boo and hate this wrestler kind of way.

Idk it's just amazing to me that he's seriously wondering why he's struggling the in the pro wrestling scene.

While what he's doing is technically a form of professional wrestling, calling it that gives it the impression that it's more than it is and equal footing to something like the empire of the WWE. This is closer to community theater, many of these people are closer to hobbyists than professionals. If he hadn't already built a brand as Jim Sterling, nobody would care about Commander Sterling.

Do people doing the type of things he's doing jump to bigger and bigger stages all the time? Of course. Do people like Jim? No.

 

[Burt Offerings]

'Your rights are not enshrined' says the man who recently moved back to the UK, a country where you have literally no rights, only privileges, all of which can be revoked any time the government or the pigs decide it's inconvenient for you to have them.

It's my understanding that it being overturned simply takes it out of federal hands, and allows the individual states to decide abortion legislature for themselves right? I'm pro-choice, milquetoast "often the lesser of two evils" kind of position, but to be fair this just sounds like more freedom to decide your own laws state-by-state? That sounds like choice to me.
I'm neither American nor legally-minded, but BAM there you go: a guaranteed more nuanced take than Jim will be regurgitating on the subject.

Born different,
Born innocent,
Born [???] I'm not like you

Born [perfect?]
He then goes wahwahwah something after "I'm not like you"

Anyway, bad song. Especially now with what it's become associated with in my mind. When that bell rings I start pre-emptively cringing.

 

[Oliver Onions]

It's my understanding that it being overturned simply takes it out of federal hands, and allows the individual states to decide abortion legislature for themselves right? I'm pro-choice, milquetoast "often the lesser of two evils" kind of position, but to be fair this just sounds like more freedom to decide your own laws state-by-state? That sounds like choice to me.
I'm neither American nor legally-minded, but BAM there you go: a guaranteed more nuanced take than Jim will be regurgitating on the subject.

Also not from the land of the rising cholesterol, but this was my understanding too. It'll become a state issue for them to decide on, which I always thought was the whole point of how America is set up; you have constitutional rights that are inalienable no matter where you go but the states can decide on everything else, until dudes like Obama started forcing through blanket laws everyone had to abide by.

(Could have happened before Obama tbf, the gay marriage thing is just the first one I was aware of)

Born [perfect?]
He then goes wahwahwah something after "I'm not like you"

Anyway, bad song. Especially now with what it's become associated with in my mind. When that bell rings I start pre-emptively cringing.

Yeah I thought it was born perfect, but then there's that weird bit after. Either way, bad song, but definitely suits Jim's obnoxious narcissism to a tee.

 

[Moja Zemlja]

It's my understanding that it being overturned simply takes it out of federal hands, and allows the individual states to decide abortion legislature for themselves right? I'm pro-choice, milquetoast "often the lesser of two evils" kind of position, but to be fair this just sounds like more freedom to decide your own laws state-by-state? That sounds like choice to me.
I'm neither American nor legally-minded, but BAM there you go: a guaranteed more nuanced take than Jim will be regurgitating on the subject.

Haha jokes on you for thinking he's even going to talk about the actual subject.

Tweet - Archive

Tweet - Archive

Also he didn't make this but did retweet it and I think its a good tl;dr of his sizzling hot takes even if its almost absurd enough to be a parody.

Tweet - Archive

 

[AirdropShitposts]

 

[Kevin Grumbles]

It's my understanding that it being overturned simply takes it out of federal hands, and allows the individual states to decide abortion legislature for themselves right? I'm pro-choice, milquetoast "often the lesser of two evils" kind of position, but to be fair this just sounds like more freedom to decide your own laws state-by-state? That sounds like choice to me.
I'm neither American nor legally-minded, but BAM there you go: a guaranteed more nuanced take than Jim will be regurgitating on the subject.

The 10th amendment says, in rather basic terms, anything not delegated by the constitution is up to the states to decide for themselves. This decision would merely be granting the states their rights back to decide their own law on the subject, as it should have been all along. People in the US often forget that most states are larger than many countries, and that going from one state to another SHOULD see variance in laws and culture, with the federal government to be seen as a necessary evil there only for combined defense, trade, and other larger infrastructure and logistical organization.

If they want their abortions, they need only move and congregate in states where they can vote that their local governments allow them to, as well as for all of the other things they want forced onto everyone else by the federal government. The Right is completely fine with this as a compromise, and I'd wager Red state populations would even help privately finance bussing their Blue city populations off to their new Utopian states. Just no coming back if Utopia isn't all it was cracked up to be.

 

[AngryTreeRat]

Per my "burn the gays, and actually abolish woman's human rights" peers, they seem to be worried about how they are going after overturning the whole abortion issue, as it hinges in Roe vs Wade. Basically anti abortion laws are illegal, as it violates a constitutional right to enforce them. The method to dispose of that apparently being being done is by abolishing the thing that protects the ruling, which is a constitutional right to privacy. This same bit is what protects interracial marriage, same sex marriage, and preventing the blanket outlawing of homosexuality. It also protects encryption. Without it, all those things can be made illegal without violating constitutional rights, and per some certain quirks of law, depending where you live some currently nullified laws would reactivate as they were never formally stricken.

To quote one person I know:

"I rather have a few ladies murdering nigger babies and gays fucking in the streets than this. It means the feds are allowed to spy on us all without a warrant, it's not worth giving the feds more power just to save a few future niggers."

By my understanding, the 4th, the backup you might point to (I'm not an American and haven't done much digging) only prevents unlawful search and seizure. It doesn't stop passive spying and violation of privacy.

Now, reminder the constitution only applies to the government, that said, this legalizes the government making big brother and doing so openly. Doing something in the open is way cheaper and easier than doing it covertly. So this arguably isn't an abortion rights issue, it's a privacy rights issue with abortion being the instigating factor. Or at least the excuse.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Per my "burn the gays, and actually abolish woman's human rights" peers, they seem to be worried about how they are going after overturning the whole abortion issue, as it hinges in Roe vs Wade. Basically anti abortion laws are illegal, as it violates a constitutional right to enforce them. The method to dispose of that apparently being being done is by abolishing the thing that protects the ruling, which is a constitutional right to privacy. This same bit is what protects interracial marriage, same sex marriage, and preventing the blanket outlawing of homosexuality. It also protects encryption. Without it, all those things can be made illegal without violating constitutional rights, and per some certain quirks of law, depending where you live some currently nullified laws would reactivate as they were never formally stricken.

Roe/Casey hinges a lot on right to privacy but it didn't establish the protection of it. Overruling Roe doesn't overrule the right to privacy precedents which predated Roe by nearly 70 years.

The right to privacy is surmised from the language in the 1st, 4th, 9th and 14th Amendments.

 

[AngryTreeRat]

Roe/Casey hinges a lot on right to privacy but it didn't establish the protection of it. Overruling Roe doesn't overrule the right to privacy precedents which predated Roe by nearly 70 years.

The right to privacy is surmised from the language in the 1st, 4th, 9th and 14th Amendments.

By my understanding, the way they intend to overrule it is to first go after the right to privacy. That's just what I've been told. That said, I'm no expert. I don't have a horse in this race as far as abortion goes. So I only care about any larger effects it could have.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

By my understanding, the way they intend to overrule it is to first go after the right to privacy. That's just what I've been told. That said, I'm no expert. I don't have a horse in this race as far as abortion goes. So I only care about any larger effects it could have.

The leaked draft is available to read. (Which I must state I'm skeptical about being a majority opinion.) It only overrules Roe and Casey. Section C-1 tries to delineate between a right to an abortion and the general right to privacy, arguing only that the latter has limitations and abortion is outside them. It would have to go drastically farther to roll back the right to privacy and I really doubt there'd be five votes to do it unlike setting abortion outside privacy which is plausible enough about gaining five votes.

Eliminating the right to privacy entirely is something even Alito and Thomas have not fully endorsed, it would be strange for there to be five votes for it suddenly when there's much easier majorities to make both for writing Mississippi's law into Casey (six votes) and rolling back Roe/Casey (supposedly five votes).