Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Holy fuck this is actually gold, literally just change the stereotypical redneck into a non-passing tranny (but I repeat myself) and change the signs to WOMAN. They even put in a snake themselves!New shit take from The Hill:
View attachment 3246936
From the people who tell you men are women. They apparently think you're too dumb to look in the box.
Well, you constantly have to rationalize why killing that unborn child was a good, totally acceptable thing. Of course they'd never go red after.I am glad to see Roe v Wade eat shit. Putting aside the moral issues of Abortion (for which I am glad to see it go).
The end of Roe v Wade will put in a new significant deterrent for leftist migration into red States. This is a key factor in the containment of the blue cancer.
It also has a massive chilling effect on one of the most confirming actions a woman can take to insure they remain a committed Democrat. What I mean is that once a woman gets an abortion, they rarely if ever flip sides. Married women trend very slightly right. Married women with children trend moderately right. But either of those women, if they have had an abortion, trend hard left.
Abortion in the US is the baptism into leftism for women.
__
Now if we could just get rid of welfare and end no-fault divorce.
This is true, and the numbers have remained remarkably stable for decades. About a quarter of American's fucking love abortion, about a quarter fucking hate it, and about half go "Well, I think it should be legal in general, but within reason".Abortion isn't actually that popular among Americans despite massive propaganda efforts to convince you otherwise and pro abortion fanatics are 100% Democrat voters anyway so it doesn't really make sense to spend money on it as an issue.
post-birth abortion is my favorite word for killing peopleThis is true, and the numbers have remained remarkably stable for decades. About a quarter of American's fucking love abortion, about a quarter fucking hate it, and about half go "Well, I think it should be legal in general, but within reason".
It is a very soft support, and one which has increasingly leaned closer and closer to the "More restrictions" side as the left has gone bugfuck nuts with it.
100% agree. We need to build incentives to keep the worst bugmen in New York and California and away from our affordable housing.I am glad to see Roe v Wade eat shit. Putting aside the moral issues of Abortion (for which I am glad to see it go).
The end of Roe v Wade will put in a new significant deterrent for leftist migration into red States. This is a key factor in the containment of the blue cancer.
It also has a massive chilling effect on one of the most confirming actions a woman can take to insure they remain a committed Democrat. What I mean is that once a woman gets an abortion, they rarely if ever flip sides. Married women trend very slightly right. Married women with children trend moderately right. But either of those women, if they have had an abortion, trend hard left.
Abortion in the US is the baptism into leftism for women.
__
Now if we could just get rid of welfare and end no-fault divorce.
McConnell protects his caucus and absorbs the unpopularity from decisions by deflecting it from weaker members who can avoid comment or pass the buck.
The law and its offerings were only a "shadow" or a vague reflection, a silhouette of the real thing to come. However, the "form" is the "image." It is the real thing, the true form, and accurate representation. It is the appearance of the reality itself. McConnell casts His shadow over the whole Republican Caucus in preparation of His coming to fulfill all of the reality of its symbolism, types and shadows. It is His shadow that is seen throughout the filibuster. He is the real object that produces the shadow. The reality is McConnell Himself. The New York Times has already spoken of copies and shadows in the Sunday Edition where the emphasis was on McConnell's views on the differences between earthly and heavenly sacrifices. Now he draws out the comparison between the sacrifices offered by the priests under the Law and the one perfect sacrifice of Christ.
For the Law, since it has only a shadow of the good things to come and not the very form of things, can never, by the same sacrifices which they offer continually year by year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, because the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have had consciousness of sins? But in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins year by year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
When Mitch was first elected Senate Majority Leader, he told the other Republican caucus members, "Sacrifice and offering You have not desired, But a body You have prepared for Me; In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure. Behold, I have come To do Your will."
The Republican caucus was disorganized after Bush and the collapse of the Gang of Eight. What did McConnell want? He desired perfect obedience, and He found perfect obedience to His will in the body and work of the rest of the caucus. McConnell came to do the will of the RNC that had been stifled by infighting and individual selfishness before. He stated this clearly the night before His vote in the Rose Garden.
"Not My will, Your will be done" was the first sentence of his acceptance speech. McConnell was willinf to take the slings and arrows of controversy and accusations of hypocrisy to protect his flock; and the flock respected and followed him for it. Doing the will of the RNC was crucial in the life of McConnell and stamping out individual cowardice and incentives to rebel was necessary.
To accomplish the will of the RNC, the Republican Caucus needed "a body." as the eternal symbol of anger and malice of the caucus. His political career could not die, because he had no aspirations for higher office. Therefore McConnell prepared a body for the public to hate. Only as a man could He fulfill his policy goals by dying as a bloody sacrifice. McConnell provided the caucus with a perfect body to fulfill His eternal purpose.
Senator John Thune (R-SD) described the process in 2004 as such, "The problem of politically toxic votes in swing states has been solved. We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Mitch McConnell once for all. By one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. Though this will make some Senators appear mindless or weak to voters, they will never be blamed for the harshness of the decision because they were simply follow McConnell. Mitch's sacrifice gave them true political freedom in a way nobody else had ever done before. It is one single sacrifice for all that can never be added to or be repeated. This has great implications for our salvation. It opened their eyes and inspired loyalty in one who would give away his political career, physical body, and public image for all of the caucus."
Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) had a famous anecdote where he remembered McConnell preparing for a big legislative push. "Mitch is seen waiting from that time onward until His enemies be made a footstool for His feet. Mitch is busy interceding on our behalf. But He is also patiently waiting until the very last person in the caucus trusts in Him for strategy and then He is coming in glory. He is not sitting in heaven wringing His hands. Nothing catches Him by surprise. Nothing. He is here on earth working for all of us so that we don't have to. He dives on every mine for us. The caucus is allowed to impute all our bad public relations moves on to Mitch and his polling dies in our place as our representative. Moreover, He also imputed all the perfect righteousness of a caucus that runs like a well-oiled machine to us."
Is there a formal term for this thing lefty types do where they write everything as though it's a grand good vs evil epic? I don't know why it annoys me so much but it does.from the Somethingawful Debate sub forum
The most realistic preventive measure that would deter Democrat voters from moving to Red states would be the passing of more conservative oriented legislation. More anti-abortion laws would be a good start to that.100% agree. We need to build incentives to keep the worst bugmen in New York and California and away from our affordable housing.
Next, Texas and Florida should ban soy lattes, cosmetic hormone therapy, SRS, gay marriage, and funko pops. We need to motivate them to migrate to the pod living and bug cuisine in New York and California.
Finally, we need to hold a convention of the states, where we redraw the American borders, so the heartland can peacefully secede from the coasts and build a wall to prevent panicked immigration from the inevitable Venezuela 2.0. They can keep their massive GDP because 99% of their population will be living in pods anyway. We'll take that outdated, racist constitution & bill of rights and designate our new capital The District of the Alimo in Texas.
overemotional-pussy-shitIs there a formal term for this thing lefty types do where they write everything as though it's a grand good vs evil epic? I don't know why it annoys me so much but it does.
Those bastardsfree speech’ in the 21st century means something very different than it did in the 18th, when the Founders enshrined it in the Constitution. The right to say what you want without being imprisoned is not the same as the right to broadcast disinformation to millions of people on a corporate platform. This nuance seems to be lost on some techno-wizards who see any restriction as the enemy of innovation.”
I can't remember which Kiwi said they would use the founding fathers didn't have argument for free speech and sure as fuck here it is in time magazine
![]()
Time Columnist Denounces Free Speech as a White Man’s “Obsession”
The best uncensored news, information, and analysis.www.blacklistednews.com
Pestilence thy name be Biden lol
In more specificness, self-interest is no longer acceptable reasoning to them for doing things. You cannot want or fight for something because it would be the best for you - You can only fight for the greater good. So all their self interests and needs have to be wrapped up in the pursuit of a greater good, leading everything into an all or nothing, with us or against us crusade. And that leads to incredibly toxic mindsets, where by extension the only acceptable self improvement is that which advances the whole.overemotional-pussy-shit
You see a lot of overemotional-pussy-shit these days. Symptom of single mother households and worshipping of worthless, fickle feelings. You must be just, RIGHTEOUS against the evil virus of super satan that asks you to think rationally.
Overemotional-pussy-shit is a menace, I tell you.
Abortion isn't actually that popular among Americans despite massive propaganda efforts to convince you otherwise and pro abortion fanatics are 100% Democrat voters anyway so it doesn't really make sense to spend money on it as an issue.
Abortion isn't actually that popular among Americans despite massive propaganda efforts to convince you otherwise and pro abortion fanatics are 100% Democrat voters anyway so it doesn't really make sense to spend money on it as an issue.
Kind of gets the nogging jogging on how powerful was mass media before the internet came along to fuck up the gatekeeping.This is true, and the numbers have remained remarkably stable for decades. About a quarter of American's fucking love abortion, about a quarter fucking hate it, and about half go "Well, I think it should be legal in general, but within reason".
It is a very soft support, and one which has increasingly leaned closer and closer to the "More restrictions" side as the left has gone bugfuck nuts with it.
Why do you think shady fed bois and their enablers are screeching so hard about Musk?Kind of gets the nogging jogging on how powerful was mass media before the internet came along to fuck up the gatekeeping.