Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
a lot of trannies and would be troons are doing their thing on telegram,
Usually means the russians are kicking the shit in on azov and other baderite hard ice retards like the last 3 months.
 
The situation at Azovstal from Graham Phillips. He also mentioned a Canadian general who, according to unconfirmed information, is already awaiting trial in Moscow.
easily the lowest IQ vatnik propaganda ive seen in a while and thats saying something
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickGer
Azov sisters... There is a traitor among us!

Anton Herashchenko claims that employ of Azovstal, who he calls "a traitor", has given Russian troops information about tunnels that lead underground the plant and Russians have began to storm the tunnels.

Here is head honcho of Azov himself confirming that Russian troops had breached into Azovstal.
Place your bets, could they hold on until 9 of May to deny Putin his Epic Victory Royal for Victory Day or would they perish before that?
 
The situation at Azovstal from Graham Phillips. He also mentioned a Canadian general who, according to unconfirmed information, is already awaiting trial in Moscow.
The capture of a foreign general would be such a propaganda victory he wouldn't be secretly awaiting trial in Moscow, he'd be paraded around the cameras the second he got into Russia.
I wonder if it was that lieutenant-general who conveniently retired from the Canadian military and left for Ukraine while he was being investigated for sexual misconduct?
 
His war, his choice.

No, this is also NATO's war because the U.S. has said that they will never negotiate with Russia and that they want total battlefield victory (whatever that means) and those words have translated into a lack of action on the part of the west to de-escalate the situation since day 1.

Believing that Putin can pull out of the war and restore peace is being delusional since Ukraine is in life support and the only way Ukraine can repay it's debt to the west is in the life of it's citizens and soldiers.

The Ukrainian goverment has declared their intentions to reconquer Crimea and Donbass (maximalist goals) and the west is fully backing them in that decision.

How this war will look like by the end of the year is impossible to theorize since the west is escalating the conflict and hostile rethoric every week.
 
they want total battlefield victory (whatever that means)
probably restoring ukrainian sovereignty within its pre 2014 borders
that would be very based, but i doubt it's possible because it would require successful military conquest of crimea, a real fucking tough nut to crack

Believing that Putin can pull out of the war and restore peace is being delusional
of course he can. retreat troops from ukr territory and the war ends within a week. neither ukraine nor anyone else will invade russian territory.
the difficult part is finding a way to spin it as a victory to placate the vatnik boomers at home.
 
this entire shitshow is nothing but:
 

Attachments

  • e37.jpg
    e37.jpg
    70.5 KB · Views: 100
probably restoring ukrainian sovereignty within its pre 2014 borders
that would be very based, but i doubt it's possible because it would require successful military conquest of crimea, a real fucking tough nut to crack

of course he can. retreat troops from ukr territory and the war ends within a week. neither ukraine nor anyone else will invade russian territory.
the difficult part is finding a way to spin it as a victory to placate the vatnik boomers at home.

I would believe this narrative if Ukraine or NATO were innocent actors in all of this or that conflicts can end by the agressor by pulling away from all of the strategic territories and calling it a day.

But NATO is not a innocent actor, they want an increasingly escalating forever war that will cost the lives of hundreds of thousands (a la oceania vs East asia) and NATO's likely maximalist goals is to weaken Russia to a husk of it's former self or bring about a regime change.
 
I would believe this narrative if Ukraine or NATO were innocent actors in all of this or that conflicts can end by the agressor by pulling away from all of the strategic territories and calling it a day.

But NATO is not a innocent actor, they want an increasingly escalating forever war that will cost the lives of hundreds of thousands (a la oceania vs East asia) and NATO's likely maximalist goals is to weaken Russia to a husk of it's former self or bring about a regime change.
they'll keep sanctions and economic pressure and trade embargos up, sure, that will likely stay until putin croaks and then they'll start negotiations with the next guy.
but the chance of nato forces attacking or even invading russia itself is zero. like, actually impossible.
 
they'll keep sanctions and economic pressure and trade embargos up, sure, that will likely stay until putin croaks and then they'll start negotiations with the next guy.
but the chance of nato forces attacking or even invading russia itself is zero. like, actually impossible.

Well, Russia considers Crimea as more vital than some shithole near the bering sea, so Russia will start to lose it's shit if Crimea is invaded.

And really, you believe NATO won't put bases on Crimea once the Russian's are gone?, c'mon.

This is the part where the endless war with Russia makes sense, they will bring more advanced weapon systems, missiles, artillery, tanks and planes just for the single purpose of achieving a coup in Russia or make Russia lose it's shit and then intervene in the conflict once the innevitable happens : A constant Russian attack on NATO convoys either in Ukraine or in NATO soil.
 
Last edited:
With all three navies flying F-35s now, makes eminent sense. Lots of cross-talk, exchanges, etc.
Soon to be 4 navies as well. Korea getting in on the act by building their own baby flattop. China must be feeling a little crowded since all their neighbours are building up their own carriers, and given how shitty the Chink force is I'd take a baby flattop flying F35Bs over theirs anyday.

has probably guaranteed it will be secured for the rest of the war.
Probably not. Russia is far too large, and has far too many potential targets to make guarding all of them practical. Plus the fact that Ukraine (or worse disaffected Russians acting on their behalf) are able to sabotage shit in country is a bad sign in and of itself.


Is Britain in trouble?
Not even remotely. This is precisely why
a)we have an independent nuclear deterrent (inb4 retards claim that using American missiles means we need their permission to launch, we don't)
b)why our deterrent is sub based, so it can't be neutralized with a strike on the Isles.
Plus I'm pretty sure knowing BoJo, his letters of last resort are almost certainly some variation of "nuke am all, and let god sort em out".

The other argument I've seen is that Britain is vulnerable tiny little island while Russia is big stronk mega country and we don't have enough nukes to destroy it. However that argument is utterly retarded because 99.99% of Russia literally isn't worth nuking. This is a population density map of Russia, notice anything?
1649779568868.png

Those two spikes are Moscow and St Petersburg, and it's pretty clear that simply destroying those two, something well within the capabilites of our subs would functionally destroy Russia, because the fuck else would be left other than a billion miles of nothing?
 
Russian callousness never disappoints. And then the propaganda and terminally online Russians claim that it's NATO's fault that almost everyone bordering Russia hates it.

I'm 100% convinced these people think Russia hasn't changed one bit since the 90s when there was total economic turmoil that left a lot of people scrapping by. The only truth I'd see in this is if these were troops from rural areas of Russia where the local economy is fucked and Army service is their only way out of being stuck in a shithole full of drunks.

Plus the average monthly income of a Ukrainian is half of that of a Russian's in perspective.
Taking a ferry from Helsinki to Saint Petersburg is like a taking a time machine to Prague or East Germany of the early 90s. Driving from the port to Hermitage you have building after building with chipping facades, windows that need to be replaced, damaged bricks, and some buildings even have cracked walls. The few properly maintained buildings are usually owned by government or corporations. Everything looks nice only in the core of the city and the downtown area. Rest of the city is very neglected.
Moscow is similar to Petersburg where it has a few nice parts surrounded by decaying city. The further you get from Moscow and Petersburg, the worse things get. Especially in the eastern and northern regions, where some cities look half abandoned.

I tell you more, a lot of people still keep a belief that USSR is still present, because you know, USSR were all Russians (no), and Russia = USSR today which is wrong on almost every level.
Can you blame them? Good portion of the government are former commies, they pursue the same imperialistic goals Soviets did, and keep blaming the U.S., NATO, and fascists/nazis for everything that goes wrong. Dissenters are jailed and anyone who gains too much power dies of poisoning or falls out of a window. Putin himself is nostalgic for the soviet era and sees it as something to emulate. His siloviki resemble Stalin's inner circle a bit. It's difficult not to see the current Russian government as the same thing as before but with a a new coat of paint; especially if you are an outsider.

Anyone who expect Russian military command to adhere to western media narrative is a fucking mong. Same with those who don't read official governmental statements beyond "when"s and "if"s.
Wholly buying into any side's narrative is a mistake. Both are waging their own info war campaigns. People on the pro-Russia/anti-American side should scrutinize Russian sources. Just look at all the wafting Russian media does after every setback that's too big to sweep under the rug. Moskva's sinking is a very clear example where narrative kept changing until it more or less matched up withe the western one.
 
Last edited:
but the chance of nato forces attacking or even invading russia itself is zero. like, actually impossible.
Well yeah, that's why they engineered this proxy war to weaken Russia by getting Ukrainian fools to die for Nancy's stock portfolio and Hunter's crack money, and this is "supporting the Ukrainian people" or something, except the ones who want to leave but fuck them, because secession is racist, except when the US federal government approves.
 
Probably not. Russia is far too large, and has far too many potential targets to make guarding all of them practical. Plus the fact that Ukraine (or worse disaffected Russians acting on their behalf)
are able to sabotage shit in country is a bad sign in and of itself.
The Russians, despite being retarded, are well aware of their dependency on railways. Guarding every stretch of railway is impossible, but really, it isn't impossible to guard most important railway bridges, and fix whatever needs fixing quickly, when you have 30,000 people dedicated to doing so. Railway sabotage has played a very tiny part in this war up to now and it will continue to do so. They will be minor setbacks and annoyances, at their worst.


I'd be willing to bet that particular stretch of railroad is going to be closely monitored for the rest of the war especially.
 
The Russians, despite being retarded, are well aware of their dependency on railways. Guarding every stretch of railway is impossible, but really, it isn't impossible to guard most important railway bridges, and fix whatever needs fixing quickly, when you have 30,000 people dedicated to doing so. Railway sabotage has played a very tiny part in this war up to now and it will continue to do so. They will be minor setbacks and annoyances, at their worst.


I'd be willing to bet that particular stretch of railroad is going to be closely monitored for the rest of the war especially.

Railways are secretly the unsung heroes of modern warfare, their importance is vital and this is one of the reasons why the French lost in 1871 and the Germans lost the 20th century in the first battle of the Marne.

The Germans were terrified of the possibility that the Russians would have an extended railway network by 1918 and their fears were vindicated in WW2.
 
Well yeah, that's why they engineered this proxy war to weaken Russia by getting Ukrainian fools to die for Nancy's stock portfolio and Hunter's crack money, and this is "supporting the Ukrainian people" or something, except the ones who want to leave but fuck them, because secession is racist, except when the US federal government approves.
"Supporting the Ukrainian people" is a bullshit motive just like "protecting the ethnic Russian people of Donbass" is.
Speaking of secession being racist, has anyone memed on separatists with the Novorossiya flag saving pregnant Anne Frank from Azovstal?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickGer
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back