- Joined
- Jan 13, 2022
It was not I who proposed "just leave, war ends"; such a childish approach was well deserved.Stop this childish "good guys" stuff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was not I who proposed "just leave, war ends"; such a childish approach was well deserved.Stop this childish "good guys" stuff.
I wasn't the one who started dumping war materiel into a region to start a conflict, and then complained that I had to invade to stop it.It was not I who proposed "just leave, war ends"; such a childish approach was well deserved.
But enough about NATO's activities in Ukraine since, approximately, 1991.I wasn't the one who started dumping war materiel into a region to start a conflict, and then complained that I had to invade to stop it.
Their air defense is (was?) composed of S-300s and MiGs, their infantry rifles are 7.62 AKs and their combat vehicles are upgraded Soviet stuff.But enough about NATO's activities in Ukraine since, approximately, 1991.
I remember when the Counteroffensive was going to happen in April, two more weeks.He also said that he does not expect a Ukrainian counteroffensive until mid-June.
This didn’t start in 2014. It started when the Wall fell and the USA promised that NATO would not expand.next level vatnik delusion lmao
they invaded and straight up annexed part of ukraine in 2014, and have been propping up armed insurgents in another part for 8 years straight
This is the worst refugee crisis in Europe since WW2, and nobody seems to give much of a shit about stopping itas of yesterday 5,707,967 Refugees have fled Ukraine from February 24th and onwards
It's only going to get worse, The refugee crisis and war related deaths are practically going to end the Ukranian Nation by 2050. I would wager by the 20th of May that the Ukranian Diaspora will be doubled, form 6.1M to 12.2M on account of the refugees.This is the worst refugee crisis in Europe since WW2, and nobody seems to give much of a shit about stopping it![]()
there are enough true believer generals in the Russian military.. you can bet nuclear hellfire for all would be the forecast. That being said won't happen,Part of me kind of worried about the May parade because either a false flag or an actual op using NATO equipment will cause things to get extremely worse. Say a US made switchblade strikes the podium where all the top brass are, what will Russia respond with?
At least in the Mykolaiv region for sureBy June the Ukrops won't have an intact rail junction
В Миколаївський області тимчасово відмовилися від планів з відновлення залізничної інфраструктури.
Про це в інтерв'ю "Укрінформ" повідомив голова Миколаївської ОВА Віталій Кім.
Він пояснив рішення тим, що це - безглузде заняття через постійні обстріли.
"Ворог зараз б'є по залізничній інфраструктурі. Тому ми не будемо відновлювати залізничне сполучення, щоб не провокувати", - повідомив голова ОВА.
linkIn the Mykolaiv region, temporarily refused plans for the restoration of railway infrastructure.
This was announced in an interview with Ukrinform by the chairman of the Mykolaiv region, Vitaliy Kim.
He explained the decision by saying that it is a meaningless occupation because of the constant shelling. "The enemy is now hitting the railway infrastructure. Therefore, we will not restore the railway connection, so as not to provoke it, "the chairman of the said.
What I find interesting is that the anti-Russia Ukroswine apologist WWIII simp contingent keeps pushing a variation on the theme of how Russia shouldn't have cared about NATO expansion because of how fast nukes can move; conveniently they ignore the counter-argument to that, simply that if nukes are so fast, why does NATO have to keep expanding up to the point that Russia is entirely surrounded by them?This didn’t start in 2014. It started when the Wall fell and the USA promised that NATO would not expand.
Then, like a crossroads demon, the USA reneged on its promise saying the promise was made to the USSR, not to Russia.
Russia tried to join NATO and the EU and was BTFOd each time, so they finally said fuck it when NATO started its unholy expansion.
This was entirely provoked by NATO, driven by the liberal world order.
BuT NaTo MeMbErShIp Is VoLuNtArY.What I find interesting is that the anti-Russia Ukroswine apologist WWIII simp contingent keeps pushing a variation on the theme of how Russia shouldn't have cared about NATO expansion because of how fast nukes can move; conveniently they ignore the counter-argument to that, simply that if nukes are so fast, why does NATO have to keep expanding up to the point that Russia is entirely surrounded by them?
"Defensive alliance"? No, frens...
During a phone call with the Russian leader, Bennett accepted Putin’s apology and thanked him for “clarifying” Russia’s attitude toward the Jewish people and the Holocaust, the Israeli government said in a statement.
A readout of the meeting from the Kremlin does not mention an apology from Putin, but says Russia recognized the significance of Isreeli Independence Day, which the country celebrated on Wednesday and Thursday, and noted that 40% of the 6 million Jews killed in the Holocaust were citizens of the USSR.
The phone call comes after several Israeli politicians, including Bennett and Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, slammed Lavrov after he told an Italian TV show Sunday that some of the “worst anti-Semites are Jews” in an attempt to justify Russia’s claims it is trying to de-Nazify Ukraine, a country with a Jewish president.
In a response, the Russian Foreign Ministry on Tuesday accused Lapid of supporting the “neo-Nazi regime in Kyiv.”
What I find interesting is that the anti-Russia Ukroswine apologist WWIII simp contingent keeps pushing a variation on the theme of how Russia shouldn't have cared about NATO expansion because of how fast nukes can move; conveniently they ignore the counter-argument to that, simply that if nukes are so fast, why does NATO have to keep expanding up to the point that Russia is entirely surrounded by them?
"Defensive alliance"? No, frens...
But how about "defensive weapons" that were sent to the Ukraine for the sole reason of making defensive corpses, it seems."Defensive alliance"