after watching the kino casino stream im gonna give a historical comparison so bear with me in this analyisis because there are some autisitic comparisons to be made. Nick is running the show in an even more self destructive manner. Like the fuhrer that Nick as boldly proclaimed to be the successor to, Nick has centralised his cult of personality so that attention is to be drawn to him. Adolf while in power would routeinely give his underlings poorly defined roles that would conflict and cause competion to deliberately draw away any potenial ire away from himself. Nick does this is a simialr manner as confirmed by Simon and Jaden by suggesting that other key figures and shit talking each other. This causes infighting which further cements Nick's power over the movement. I'll make an appeal to Nicks pychology here and assume that hes an extremely inscure individual to enagage in behaviour like this. Nick, despite wanting to emulate Stalin really is living like Hitler in this bizzare way, both would sleep in late although hitler would wake up at around 12'o clock as opposed to nick waking up at around 6pm every day. Hitler was also quite a social person, all his toadies moved in around the Berkhof and went on holiday at the same time, as Jaden said, Nick is a loner and despite living with him for a year would only see him once a month.
TLDR, Nick claims to be Hitler 2.0 but Hitler was in fact a more functional human being despite taking meth, developing parkinsons and routinely shitting himself.
"Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce."
A quote that his hero Stalin was probably aware of.
However, Stalin was also quite willing to alienate his allies and turn them against each other. Many of his targets were fellow Bolsheviks and people in the higher reaches of society. This meant that he often killed his nation's leaders, as if sabotaging it. This is quite analogous to Nick's propensity to drive any even half-serious person out of his 'Serious Political Movement.'
Stalin's government, with its atmosphere of paranoia, suspicion and bureaucratic bullying, was in some ways similar to AF as well. While Hitler is known for mass, targeted violence, though the extent of this can be debated, the violence of Stalin's years was often found in purges, mismanagement, and general Party in-fighting, which resembles present-day AF in a way.
But in some ways, neither are really analogous, because both were national leaders and not petty tyrants in dead political pseudo-movements. Several lolcows, abusive teachers/bosses, paedophiles, and cult leaders act more akin to Nick, often due to some kind of mental disorder that can draw people in, but then abuse them. Most political figures have some mental quirks, but Nick's resemble a cult leader's more than a national leader's. Or something more petty still.
I assume that Nick would appreciate being compared to Hitler's leadership, but I'm not convinced that this is what the previous interview demonstrated. What Nick primarily resembles is what he is, the leader of a small cult of faggots.
Perhaps one of the closest comparisons to something else would be:
When we grew up and went to school
There were certain teachers who would
Hurt the children any way they could
By pouring their derision
Upon anything we did
And exposing every weakness
However carefully hidden by the kids
But in the town it was well known
When they got home at night, their fat and
Psychopathic capos would thrash them
Within inches of their lives.
